[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 14 KB, 1195x153, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9655477 No.9655477 [Reply] [Original]

It's too obvious. Buy or be poor

>> No.9655698

Think I’ll pass.

>> No.9655719

After they lost their partnership because of laziness and lack of communication? LMAO. Not buying your bags Raj.

>> No.9655732

>>9655719
Kek.

>> No.9655738

>>9655477
Shitcoin took a huge dump on fake news coordinated fud about wiki france partnership and even though it has been proven fake still doesn't bounce back lol... REQlets eternally BTFO. What a garbage investment. REQ is literally the one token in all of crypto that tomorrow could be making trillions of dollars of exchanges in the real world and still somehow manage to go down in value. Hilarious.

>> No.9655745

>>9655719
that is clearly FUD, especially with their recent reports of security issues. you're missing out on free gainz

>> No.9655757

>>9655719
Boring. Boring bonehead FUD.

No more bonehead FUD.

It was proven to be false and, in addition to that nonsense, REQ isn't going to be on coinbase untile 0x and Bat are (end of June)

>> No.9655840
File: 600 KB, 1744x716, 90F7B93F-3B51-4A60-A314-71C4665B829A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9655840

>>9655757
Well Ive seen people post good FUD like pic related and it gets no response

>> No.9655919

lol REQ is such a sad shitcoin, the people defending/shilling it should be embarrassed.

>> No.9655960

What will happen when the Wikimedia France officially refutes the FUD?
At the best case scenario, REQ will gain 2-3%
Most likely nothing.

>> No.9656630
File: 573 KB, 694x413, REQ-illuminati.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9656630

I heard Monsier Pierre sucked a creamy log for 2 million REQ

>> No.9656644

>>9655960
It's huge buy signal unless you are brainlet

>> No.9656659

>>9655745
>that is clearly FUD,
you're making the classic /biz/ mistake of implying that all FUD is false

>> No.9657637

>>9656659

Are you ready for that creamy log?

>> No.9657840

>>9656659

Our Log Theory