[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 22 KB, 754x455, chrome_2018-05-28_18-17-56.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9648315 No.9648315 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.9648327

it is

>> No.9648329

>>9648315
ur so smrat

>> No.9648353

>>9648315

If the last few months proved anything, it's that we're not in a bubble and that blockchain tech is here to stay. The overall median speaks volumes.

>> No.9648437

>>9648315
Hard to believe during the US civil war there was 300 million people in China.

>> No.9648469

but how does it pop?

>> No.9648497

>>9648469
yellowstone will cause a correction

>> No.9648517

>>9648469
The übermensch

>> No.9648520

>>9648469
disease, pajeet and chinese disease from bad hygiene should kill them off

>> No.9648541
File: 39 KB, 672x753, not today ebolll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9648541

>>9648315

>> No.9648851

>>9648469
white people stop feeding africa

>> No.9648961

>>9648315
It's more complicated than that. The fundamentals (carrying capacity) have been increasing all this time as well. It is currently a bubble and it's unsustainable under prevailing conditions, but dropping birth rates and continued technological development may bring up the floor enough to prevent a collapse. Then again, maybe they won't.

>> No.9648993

>>9648315

It’s exponential growth, not a bubble. It wil form an S curve

>> No.9649179
File: 138 KB, 665x484, 1934ismyfavoriteyear4films.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9649179

>>9648993
>exponential
>>9648993
>S curve

>> No.9649297
File: 86 KB, 960x720, Environmental+Limits+on+Population+Growth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9649297

>>9649179

>t.retard

>> No.9649343

>>9648993
>>9649297
this is why everyone knows stats aren't real math and statisticians are failed mathematicians

>> No.9649407

>>9648469
Its usually disease or a world war. A few nukes flying + a natural disaster or two and we'll be back to a more sustainable level.

>> No.9649430

>>9649343

This is why everyone knows you're a retard.

>> No.9649444

>>9649407

Look at how many people the plague killed. Look at where we are now. It recovers.

>> No.9649458

Please please please Ebola the fuck out of the entire world. I've been researching cytokine storms for about a year, I'm reasonably confident I can weather the storm with some knowledge of how to break out of feedback loops. Fuck Kikes and niggers, my orchard is going to make me rich in the new world where no-one owns any food

>> No.9649469

>>9649444
disease will wipe out billions, africa, china, and india will be swept

>> No.9649513

>>9649469

And then people will start fucking again.

You can't apply financial models to population models.

>> No.9649568

retards not taking in account for the zombie apocalypse

>> No.9649585

>>9648315
I'm ready for a crash and bear market.

>> No.9649697

>>9649585
how do i short humanity

>> No.9649864
File: 38 KB, 1200x1200, 1524306135647.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9649864

>>9648315
It's gonna burst and only LAS CREATURAS DE LAS AMÉRICAS will survive.

>> No.9649916

>>9649697
become a prepper

>> No.9650021

>>9649297
That's only one possible case (usually for slower growth). Population dynamics often work out in a way that there's a mass die-off if the size of the population drastically overshoots the carrying capacity, largely because the resources that make up the carrying capacity are used up at unsustainable rates.

>> No.9650220

>>9650021

Yes. Was just pointing out that S curves have an exponential phase. If any other species had the current curve as humans do, you're right there would be a mass die-off.

>> No.9650236

>>9648315
How do I short the human population?

>> No.9650298

>>9650220

don't want to scare you faggots but you've been set up