[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-06-09: Search is working again.
2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled. 2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 1.44 MB, 800x1200, 1517980442693.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9564579 No.9564579 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

Oh ho ho boys and girls. This is not a drill.
It's indeed a good day to be stinky


>> No.9564626

this doesn’t have anything to do with link haha

>> No.9564643


>> No.9564663


>> No.9564723

something to do with integrating with api of exchanges to determine prices and execute trades.

>> No.9564729

Learn to read between the lines, fagalagadingdong. Chainlink Visa partnership confirmed.

>> No.9564751

crypto-fiat payment system.

>> No.9564779

they'll use a smart oracle to determine the best prices across exchanges.

>> No.9564818
File: 74 KB, 503x418, Screen Shot 2018-05-22 at 3.19.33 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


but its already confirmed... on their website. i thought everyone knew they had a partnership.

>> No.9564932
File: 866 KB, 3000x3000, 1518837858072.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


lmao cope brainlet

>> No.9564988
File: 319 KB, 500x300, linkface.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.9565035

It's REQ, which is why we're testing the burn. Have at least 10k for this ride to the top, but more is advisible.

>> No.9565076
File: 201 KB, 1300x1500, 1525227844794.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


People still aren't convinced they're partnerships because they don't understand copyright law.


>One fundamental principle to understand is that trademarks are not designed to protect companies. Trademarks are designed to protect customers from confusion.
>If you use the logos in a way that won’t confuse customers or the public, then you probably are not infringing the trademark. But you have to remember to think from the perspective of what would confuse *the public* and not what would confuse you, a sophisticated marketer/businessperson.
>If the logos’ placement, size or usage imply that you are affiliated with that media company, or that you are being endorsed by them, then you may be violating their trademark rights. It might also be false advertising. So you need to be very careful in how you use the logos.

SmartContract would be breaking the law by using these logos if they were not actually affiliated with these companies and had their explicit consent. All of these partnerships are implicitly confirmed and it goes completely over most people's heads.

>> No.9565144


exactly. the logos being there mean they've been in contact, and at the very least have been given permission to use their logos. given that we know they ran a PoC with SWIFT, its likely that rather than just getting permission they've had more in depth discussions about their tech with VISA, PayPal, HSBC, etc. PayPal is super interesting because REQ and OMG want to squeeze in on their space so they may be more ambitiously working with Chainlink than people have caught onto yet to stay ahead of these upstarts.

>> No.9565163

I was always under the impression that REQ and chainlink were working together. Is that not the case?

>> No.9565310


Chainlink works with anyone who wants help with integration, so probably. But that will just make PayPal all the more eager to get any blockchain solutions finished and released.

>> No.9565329



>> No.9565411

Working together means request needs chainlink as oracle
Chainlink doesn't need req though

>> No.9565413

it was my understanding the logo was not part of the application. in fact it plainly states the word smartcontract has been registered worldwide to a mexican company for tech services one week before link applied. Conversely this leaves open the opposite of what you state in that others may be infringing the mexicans by using smartcontract phrase with tech.

>> No.9565452

REQ dropped LINK as soon as they realized Sergey and co. are years behind a working oracle service.

>> No.9565460

It's over lad just accept it and move on to the next meme

>> No.9565496

Holly shit!
Why is the price bleeding so much??

>> No.9565529

You can’t trademark a common phrase. Internet, can’t be trademarked. Credit card can’t be trademarked. Podcast can’t be trademarked. Trying is free but smart contracts are a ubiquitous thing nowadays. If he did this in 2009 maybe he would have gotten away with it since nobody had a clue a smart contract was a thing except a few futurists.

>> No.9565558


I really hope you actually believe this.

>> No.9565618

just like how airswap needs chainlink oracles for price determinations.

>> No.9565635


>> No.9565648
File: 917 KB, 1105x1786, 07D8F71C-CD59-4729-BBC3-127146776D58.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


Apart from trying to take our 4 leaf clover, look at that fucking hint with a rocket ship

>> No.9565650

i dont have to believe if you go and look you can find it registered yourself

>> No.9565724


Here's a hint: I don't doubt some Mexican company registered it.

>> No.9565953

Maybe we could give it a shit test and report smartcontract.com to the respective companies in order for them to reveal if they are partnered or not.

>> No.9565986


You should absolutely do this and report back.

Delete posts
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.