/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9526685]

>/biz/ (largely) believes LINK to be the next guaranteed x1000, and the future of blockchain
>r/cryptocurrency (largely) believes NANO to be the next guaranteed x1000, and the future of blockchain
Who's right, and why?

(Yes faggots we all know biz isn't a LINK hivemind, but go to the archive and check the most popular image reposts. The chainlink logo is only second to fucking bitcoin itself. If it's not the majority opinion of the board it's obviously the largest minority.)

[Anonymous No.9526691]

Well, it’s not NANO that’s for sure

[Anonymous No.9526701]

>>9526685
The future of blockchain is unironically Jibrel Network.

[Anonymous No.9526704]

>>9526691
>not explaining why
your Statement is voided

[Anonymous No.9526715]

>>9526704
You showed him, gentlesir.
*tips fedora*

To the moon, amirite? xD

[Anonymous No.9526722]

>>9526704
cryptos will never succeed as actual "currencies"
#1 thing a currency must have is stability, nothing that can go 30% up and down per month will EVER be used for payments
best case scenario nano becomes a "store of value" meme like BTC, but I doubt that since better coins will come

[Anonymous No.9526723]

>>9526701
Patience Muhammad, the infidels will have their due soon

[Anonymous No.9526724]

>>9526715
Repeat after me: Ironic shitposting is still shitposting

[Anonymous No.9526727]

>>9526701
JNT is a collateral based stablecoin, right?

[Anonymous No.9526730]

Nano needs adoption from normies. LINK needs adoption from businesses. What's the pros of using Nano as payment atm? Nothing, since it's volatile and VISA has the same speed as well. What's the pros of using Chainlink(smartcontracts)? Automates processes which saves money.

There you go.

[Anonymous No.9526748]

>they don't know about Holochain

[Anonymous No.9526751]

>>9526722
cryptos are more than currencies.. LINK has nothing to do with currencies.

[Anonymous No.9526753]

>a very small but very hyped group of people in biz believes LINK has a very small chance of a x 1000 ROI, and the possibility of expanding expanding use cases on the blockchain
>r/cryptocurrency (largely) believes NANO to be the next guaranteed x1000, and the future of blockchain.

Spot the difference

[Anonymous No.9526783]

>>9526748

[Anonymous No.9526798]

>>9526730
Restaurant profit margins are 3-5% (successful ones). CC fees are 3-5% (+ fraud + monthly).
NANO can literally double a restaurant's profit without changing customer price point.

[Anonymous No.9526800]

>>9526751
I said as currencies for payments
I know LINK isn't really a currency per say, more like a fuel for the LINK network, in the same way ETH is fuel for the ethereum network
these network tokens and coins make sense (except in situations where a token is used where it didn't need to be just to cashgrab an ICO), but payment coins don't

[Anonymous No.9526810]

FAT

[Anonymous No.9526811]

>>9526727
JNT is not stablecoin. The token itself literally serves as a collateral.
>>9526727
>shitposting on a dedicated shitposting board
>bad

[Anonymous No.9526835]

Isn't Nano basically a currency? There are plenty of other currencies vying for market share. Crypto currencies don't excite me much personally from an investment perspective. You can still make a lot of money by getting in on a currency early but I feel like smart contracts will have more explosive growth in the coming years. Research group Gartner believes that there will be trillions of dollars flowing through smart contracts by the early 2020s. Any automated payment you can think of will run through smart contracts from simple things, to machine-to-machine payments (think of how many robots and autonomous cars will be around in the early to mid 2020s), to big money real estate or Bank transfers. If smart contracts cut out the middle man and save industries billions of dollars, they'll all start using them any time they want move a lot of money.

Nano could be big too but I feel like most currencies won't be around and only a couple will survive the next few years. But the crypto currency market is already over saturated and that was what everyone was investing in during the blockchain 1.0 days. Now we're looking for other gold mines and using this internet meme money to invest in other uses of decentralized networks and blockchain tech.

So basically If link succeeds it'll be way more profitable because it's solving a problem that hasn't been solved yet and it's a problem that deals with crazy amounts of money

[Anonymous No.9526854]

i trust redddit way more than i trust this shit site

[Anonymous No.9526857]

both are going to make it.

obviously the currency market is super crowded, but nano is what normies assume cryptocurrencies should be like, instant and free, with good enough decentralisation to satisfy people who know their shit, and scalability that comes from inherent design characteristics, so it can ride Moore's Law all the way to tens of thousands of tx/s without blockchain bloat.

many BTC clone shitcoins can offer low fees while nobody uses them, but if they would be adopted they would be guaranteed to run into the same BTC/BCH dilemma, so they are doomed.

[Anonymous No.9526864]

>>9526854
Saved this for banner season

[Anonymous No.9526872]

>>9526701
>Literally and unironically fundind islamic terrorism
kys

[Anonymous No.9526880]

>>9526835
Investing into currency coins is literally retarded. There is so much competition that picking the "winner" (if there is one) is literally a lottery. Ride the hype, but don't marry the shitcoin like the retarded plebbitors.

Smart contracts and digital tokenization is the future. LINK is the best bet on smart contracts you can make right now, as there is no viable competition. Of course LINK might take a while and it might even fail altogether. And even if it succeeds, it's hard to speculate on its future value. Might be worth $1b or $100b. It's a longshot.

[Anonymous No.9526883]

>>9526810
I'd go with FAT32 if you're formatting an SD card, although FAT16 has its benefits as well.

[Anonymous No.9526887]

>>9526880
>digital tokenization
asset tokenization

[Anonymous No.9526913]

>>9526854
You shouldn't trust either. Fucking pleb.

At least here we aren't pretending to be nice for upvotes or to shill.

[Anonymous No.9526972]

>>9526685
Link - possibly enabling mainstream smart contracts on the blockchain
Nano - a fucking 'bitcoin but faster' shitcoin.

Currency coins fags are the most deluded in the entire cryptomarket.

[Anonymous No.9527013]

>>9526872
That's the best kind of terrorism. Having domestic terrorists would make anyone uncomfortable, but as long as the boogeymen are towelheads, it's comfy.

[Anonymous No.9527019]

>>9526835

smart contracts are not ready yet, and they won't be for 1-2 more bullruns. Literally invest in tokens or currencies until then.

And Bitcoin is a currency, ETH is essentially a currency, even all the other platforms with literally nothing try to sell themselves on currency as well. It's a big deal and NANO will moon soon.

[Anonymous No.9527051]

>>9527019
>smart contracts are not ready yet, and they won't be for 1-2 more bullruns.
and you took it outta your ass I assume?

>>9526880
>Ride the hype, but don't marry the shitcoin like the retarded plebbitors.
Absolutely this. When I see deluded retards getting married to their shitcoins, their stupid little communities, their fucking groups gurus etc, Can't wait to see all those retards be left with nothing. They think crypto market is a beauty contest or a football league

[Anonymous No.9527053]

>>9527019
Link mainnet will be out this year.

[Anonymous No.9527073]

>>9526685
Have vastly more belief in NANO, problem is that it does nothing free and instant, what's its use case..

[Anonymous No.9527092]

>>9527073
Use without understanding is the killer feature for NANO and a necessary marker for adoption.
Try explaining proof of work and blocks to a normal person and watch their eyes gloss over.

[Anonymous No.9527102]

Nano already had a parabolic run.

LINK in relation to crypto growth is still in stealth phase.

I look forward to seeing all the retarded Click bait YouTube videos talking about link and how it will moon again! 50x! After it already goes stratospheric.

[Anonymous No.9527182]

>>9526685
>The chainlink logo is only second to fucking bitcoin itself. If it's not the majority opinion of the board it's obviously the largest minority.

A result of endless shilling and forced memes. This is not representative in any way.

[Anonymous No.9527812]

>>9527053
But could that already be priced in?

[Anonymous No.9527919]

>>9526685
Nano is pathetic

[Anonymous No.9527971]

>>9526798

>everyone in a restaurant will be taking out their phones and scanning QR codes to transact NANO

KEK The sheer delusion of redditors amazes me. As insane as LINKIES are, I can at least imagine a world where firms are using smart contracts and oracles and shit, like it would be no difference in their culture. But the idea of a bunch of normies in a restaurant whipping out phones and sending NANO just makes me laugh.

[Anonymous No.9527992]

>>9527971
This. Even Request has better shot at being adopted as a payment solution.

[Anonymous No.9528167]

>>9527812

Nothing is priced in yet because:

A. Nobody knows about Chainlink
B. The price is artificially suppressed so that those in the know can accumulate cheaply

[Anonymous No.9528992]

>>9527919
Why?

[Anonymous No.9529085]

nano is non ironcally worthless, all premined shitcoin.
Reddit loving it, even after it's been found out they had a paid shill campaign, makes me confident that it's worthless

[Anonymous No.9529190]

What about RLC? Ahead of schedule, has the right connections, solid to phenomenal team, its main focus is a reality.

[Anonymous No.9529332]

>>9526722
>but I doubt that since better coins will come

Better coins are already here. It's all just a meme war at this point.

[Anonymous No.9529511]

EOS unironically will win the war for normie adoption
>hacked account recovery
>usernames instead of hashes
>no fees and just as fast if not faster than Nano

[Anonymous No.9529556]

>>9528992
I don't feel like explaining it right now but it is true.