/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9416080]

partners with
>docusign
>salesforce
>swift
>req
>accord project

who am i missing

A bunch of NEETS on a nazi larping image board are gonna be rich

Best timeline

[Anonymous No.9416095]

>>9416080
>░██████╗░██████╗░░░░░██╗███████╗░░░░░█████╗░░░░░███████╗░█████╗░░██████╗░░██████╗░░██████╗░████████╗
>██╔═══██╗██╔══██╗░░░░██║██╔════╝░░░░██╔══██╗░░░░██╔════╝██╔══██╗██╔════╝░██╔════╝░██╔═══██╗╚══██╔══╝
>██║░░░██║██████╔╝░░░░██║███████╗░░░░███████║░░░░█████╗░░███████║██║░░███╗██║░░███╗██║░░░██║░░░██║░░░
>██║░░░██║██╔═══╝░░░░░██║╚════██║░░░░██╔══██║░░░░██╔══╝░░██╔══██║██║░░░██║██║░░░██║██║░░░██║░░░██║░░░
>╚██████╔╝██║░░░░░░░░░██║███████║░░░░██║░░██║░░░░██║░░░░░██║░░██║╚██████╔╝╚██████╔╝╚██████╔╝░░░██║░░░
>░╚═════╝░╚═╝░░░░░░░░░╚═╝╚══════╝░░░░╚═╝░░╚═╝░░░░╚═╝░░░░░╚═╝░░╚═╝░╚═════╝░░╚═

[Anonymous No.9416104]

As long as they've had these graphics on their website, wouldn't they have gotten a cease and desist if it was bs? Also, who made the classic graphics on SC.com? They were really well done, almost too well done...

[Anonymous No.9416112]

>>9416080

[Anonymous No.9416124]

>>9416080
mfw link accidentally leaked their code in the advert

101101
im shadowforking the shit out of it tonight! strap in

[Anonymous No.9416125]

>>9416104
>wouldn't they have gotten a cease and desist

[Anonymous No.9416127]

>>9416080
>They didn't listen when we told them in 2017 about Link. Then they did the same in 2018. They said they thought $10 was too expensive in 2019. In 2020 they bought at $56.77 average and still made money. Time is money Anon - this is your sign you always look for

[Anonymous No.9416154]

>>9416080
Sage. SAP

[Anonymous No.9416196]

>>9416080
>partners with docusign
proofs? and don't show a fucken tweet. tom gonser provided VC funding for other projects already and there is no confirmation of a partnership with LINK based on that tweet

[Anonymous No.9416208]

>>9416080

microsoft
axa
sony
probably facebook as well if they ever find a way to use smart contracts

[Anonymous No.9416211]

>>9416127
This is FUD dude. $10 by 2019? GTFO

[Anonymous No.9416218]

NEET NAZI MILLIONAIRES

[Anonymous No.9416228]

>>9416095
ok, this is epic

[Anonymous No.9416257]

>>9416196

>there is no confirmation of a partnership with LINK

every single link thread

read between the lines. everything's under NDA so we're not going to get confirmation of anything until it's too late.

[Anonymous No.9416273]

>>9416257
Until it's too late? If one accumulates it doesn't matter.

[Anonymous No.9416393]

>>9416273

i agree

until it's too late as in, if you're waiting to buy in until big partnerships are announced you'll miss out on buying in cheap.

[Anonymous No.9416547]

250k, just waiting for the rest of the world to realise that I'm rich.

I feel so goddamn lucky to be living in this timeline. bless you Sergey, Steve, Ari, and you too Rory.

[Anonymous No.9417028]

BUMPP

[Anonymous No.9417041]

YOU WILL NEVER GET RICH BUYING THIS

[Anonymous No.9417076]

I'm so tired of holding this shite.
Even $5 LINK seems surreal to me.

[Anonymous No.9417091]

None of those are confirmed. Chainlink is just a thought experiment by some dudes who can't run a company. They've gotten in front of a lot of big names sure, but that's just because the talent pool in this space is small. The good ideas have been taken and reimplented as part of Hyperledger's suite and not a single one of those partners will ever actually use Chainlink.

Think about it... why would they want to have to compete with tokens with average joe crypto trader? Why would any of those pick that project over the exact same thing implemented without the tokens by IBM.

There's no way some rinky dink team gets adoption when a clone of their product exists and is backed by big blue. Chainlink was only ever going to be a proof of concept.

[Anonymous No.9417103]

>>9417076
i got shat on for holding ripple for ages at 20 cents while everything else was going up.
i almost missed the moon and bought back in at 35 cents the day before it took off

the patient will be rewarded

[Anonymous No.9417129]

>capegemeni
>corelogic?
>mulesoft
>intellectEU
>hyperledger
>hacera
>CoverUS (Sndrew Hoppin/chainlink crypto fund Connection)

[Anonymous No.9417131]

>>9417103
do you have more faith in link than you did ripple?

[Anonymous No.9417143]

>>9417103

I sat on Ripple for what felt like forever and sold at 50 cents after that first spike for a loss in sat but a gain in fiat. then it just kept going, and going, and going but I refused to FOMO back in because it seemed dumb. turns out I would have had plenty of room to profit still but I just watched it happen.

It was in that moment I vowed I'd never give up my LINK stack. i've jumped off a couple rockets early but I'm clinging to this stack for years.

[Anonymous No.9417183]

>>9417131
You better believe it

[Anonymous No.9417188]

how many LINK to make it guise?

[Anonymous No.9417255]

>>9417103
I been holding since October. RN, LINK is 90% of my poorfolio.
How much more waiting?

[Anonymous No.9417307]

>>9417255

http://www.itespresso.fr/blockchain-salesforce-offre-globale-septembre-186950.html

>Salesforce expects, by the end of September, to offer "all [its] customers" a "blockchain and cryptocurrency solution".

>The competitor SAP has been offering since last year, as part of its "digital innovation system" Leonardo , a "blockchain as a service" offer . In particular, he has teamed up with Capgemini on this front, using statistics from the World Economic Forum: 10% of global GDP will be stored in blockchains by 2027.

>Salesforce is not yet on this track *, but partners have already joined its platform through applications available on the AppExchange.

>* The name of Salesforce is however regularly associated with that of ChainLink . The young company operates a project to simplify the connection of smart contracts to resources external to blockchains.

Mainnet will be out before the end of September. Likely July.

[Anonymous No.9417327]

>>9417255
$5 within 12 months.
$2 within 6 months.

have to wait for main net, but not only main net, several months of no problems before big money will even want to touch it with their billions. but it'll be worth it

[Anonymous No.9417357]

>>9417327

Nah. $5 EOW.

[Anonymous No.9417366]

>>9417327

>several months of no problems before big money will even want to touch it with their billions.

nigga, big money is already balls deep in chainlink. you'll get $5 overnight with partnership announcements

[Anonymous No.9417389]

>>9417366

dubs of doooth

srsly though, the order book is going to shrivel up so fast with increased volume that I don't think it'll stop at a mere 2 or 3x when it pops. I'm hoping we get a new surprise exchange added within the next 2 weeks. that'd be about all it needs to never see 50 cents again.

[Anonymous No.9417396]

>>9417366
>balls deep
balls deep in the vagoo or the anus?

[Anonymous No.9417473]

>>9416257
Does it ever surprise you that not one single cocksucker breaks his NDA though? It's estimated that 400,000 people would have had to conspire to fake the moon landing. Obviously Chainlink is not Apollo 11, but I feel it's safe to assume a large number of insiders are under an NDA, and it's surprising that none of them have broke that. Or, there AREN'T a large number of people under an NDA because the project is complete fucking garbage. Either that, or Chainlink is so goddamn big that insiders would never risk breaking an NDA, no matter how many of them there are. Now don't get me wrong, I'm all in LINK with 20k. I believe this technology will be ground breaking.

[Anonymous No.9417479]

>>9417396

yes. and mouth, and they're even trying for the nostrils and ears. they don't want LINK in the hands of plebs looking for short term gains because they know its the spice and they need control of it. what do you think the volume sausage is. volume spikes most when the price drops below a rolling average which spells accumulation. its easy to keep the price suppressed with low volume, and they'll gladly buy up every LINK that comes up for sale all the way up the singularity too because each one is a step closer to total control of the LINK supply. and he who controls the LINK, controls the universe.

keep in mind a measly half billion could buy the entire supply of LINK at these prices. with only 350million circulation it would really only cost 175 million. big banks and corporations deal with mergers and acquisitions of that value all the time. now imagine every big bank and big corporation fighting over those billion LINK.

[Anonymous No.9417488]

>>9417473

what about Ass Blaster. definitely a LARP... but also possibly not a LARP.

[Anonymous No.9417503]

>>9417488
I do find it very peculiar that AssBlaster disappeared right after the @Creatine incident.

[Anonymous No.9417504]

>>9417473
I think a lot of people are being paid in LINK for their secrecy.

if any of the larps are real, then those people are doing just that anyhow.

[Anonymous No.9417518]

>>9417473

>believes it's highly unlikely that nobody would break their NDA on LINK

>simultaneously disregards every single person claiming to be an insider spilling the beans about LINK on /biz/

[Anonymous No.9417520]

>>9417504
This doesn't make any sense at all though. The only people breaking NDA online are on /biz/? Obviously they could be by word-of-mouth, but we have no way to prove that. The only way this could be true is if a lot of higher ups and insiders involved with crypto lurk this board.

[Anonymous No.9417543]

>>9417503

ya the whole thing is hard to discount. but I'm sure its one of these anons in this thread just laughing is ass off at our dumb asses.

[Anonymous No.9417550]

>>9417518
Please see
>>9417518

I just find it very hard to believe that the ONLY PLACE ONLINE that these people theoretically break their NDAs is on /biz/ of all places.
>but muh anonymous goat milking imageboard faggot
I get it, but not reddit? Once these faggots get LINK in their wallet, can't they just fuck off and tweet about it? They may lose their job, but surely someone has to have a 'fuck it' mentality.

[Anonymous No.9417554]

>>9417520
It wouldn't surprise me if some big money picked up on the singularity meme and wash traded it low to accumulate and will suddenly take it all off the exchange at once for the fomo memes. It's not likely but if it happened it wouldn't surprise me.

[Anonymous No.9417573]

>>9417550

why would they break NDA? what's the incentive? these people worked their whole lives to get to their position, and have an opportunity in chainlink present itself. that's not going to make them just say "fuck it" and break NDA. there's no gain. its all downside risk.

[Anonymous No.9417596]

>>9417573
I completely understand. I wouldn't expect someone to. But there is always an exception, you know? People sometimes make rash decisions, and if these gigantic companies with millions of employees are truly interested in Chainlink, don't you think at least one of those "need to know" employees would have spilled some beans? I'm just working the odds.

[Anonymous No.9417620]

>>9417596
or they are just quietly using their paychecks to accumulate...

[Anonymous No.9417658]

>>9417620

this. if you know something was going to be $1000 EOY and was currently 50 cents would you run out and tell the world, or take out a loan to buy up every single LINK that hits the order books up to $100.

[Anonymous No.9417690]

>>9417658
if LINK is $1K EOY what is ETH EOY?

[Anonymous No.9417733]

>>9417520
big eyes have been on 4chan since gamergate, trump, etc. this is not new.
>besides, everyone keeps forgetting a big part of this... another reason why any of these or other companies would want to utilize chainlink... you get to monetize data operating a node

[Anonymous No.9417762]

>>9416095
>>9416228
fucking new fags

[Anonymous No.9417897]

>>9416095
(you)

[Anonymous No.9417946]

>>9417733
i came here from reddit because of trump. lurked /b/ a bit in 09 or so. you fags have your fingers on the pulse so i figured this is the place for everything to happen out of the internet.

was close to buying btc and eth but pussed out, hopefully link is our chance to make it.

been enjoying myself here, thanks for the laughs everyone.

[Anonymous No.9418141]

>>9417596
But maybe they just tell it to their family or whoever. But they don't go to fucking twitter with their face and lose their jobs.

[Anonymous No.9418179]

>>9417946
>came from leddit because of epic le maga daddy god emperor

1. You're a faggot
2. If you're one of the niggers that posts about politics on every board unironically kys. Every board got exponentially shittier since the US election

[Anonymous No.9418495]

>>9417188
10-20k Link bro.
More Link will make you sell early.

[Anonymous No.9418885]

I bought another 1500 stinkies with my btc yesterday

[Anonymous No.9418914]

The Prophecy

[Anonymous No.9419020]

>>9416095
▲
▲ ▲

did I do it right?

[Anonymous No.9419226]

>>9418914
There seems to be a large behavioral overlap between the link cult and the q anon shit. Where absence of evidence is treated as evidence.

>nobody else is talking about link. Therefore there must be massive partnerships in the works and silence paid for in link itself. Real soon now!

>nobody has seen Obama's ankles in public in a few weeks. Therefore he must be on house arrest and facing imminent execution. Real soon now!

[Anonymous No.9419244]

>>9416095
trolling linkies epic style!

[Anonymous No.9419312]

>>9419226
When can we dump our bags on boomer grandmas?

[Anonymous No.9419368]

>>9417307
https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/8j6cb5/another_1218_months_for_mainnet_tell_me_this_is/

[Anonymous No.9419425]

>>9419226
good observation
I wonder what's the next autistic coin is going to be after link fizzles out.

[Anonymous No.9420322]

>>9416080
Why crickets? Don't give me this NDA shit. Salesforce could have easily just said "you know we are aware of solutions such as ChainLink that we are keeping an eye on" gtfo with your dots they all mean fuck all.

[Anonymous No.9420446]

>>9418914
Mfw i put that together in photoshop.

And posted it to pol.
Got 0 replies that night

[Anonymous No.9420524]

>>9419425
smart money is in mobius already

[Anonymous No.9420799]

>>9419226
Lmao it's true though

[Anonymous No.9420919]

>>9416080
They could partner with facebook and the federal reserve and it still wouldn't change the fact that there are 1 billion tokens and nothing with over 100mil supply has ever even approached the valuations you faggots are hoping for link. Some of you need to accept that you are getting JUST'd by a meme that exists for rich neets to have fun in lieu of having a life.

[assblaster believer No.9421063]

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-hsbc-says-performs-first-trade-finance-transaction-using-blockchain-2018-5?IR=T

I have a good feeling fellows... HSBC is on the smartcontract site right? Once again, no name is leaked about the "first trade finance transaction using blockchain"... 20$ EOY and i'm multi millionnaire, i'm already cumming

[Anonymous No.9421080]

>>9416196
Docusign is pretty much confirmed. It has a clear use in the Smartcontract.com system. Tom Gosner retweeted he was a link marine and follows the chainlink shill account. Tom literally kept urging Sergey to keep talking about specifically chainlink at SXSW, not just smart contracts in general or smartcontract.com. Rory even literally described how docusign would be used in the chainlink network.

There's a lot of dumb dots, but anyone with half a brain can see Docusign will be integrated into chainlink.

[Anonymous No.9421094]

>>9420919
yep

[Anonymous No.9421138]

>>9416196

>there is no confirmation of a partnership with LINK

this is how boomers think. grow a fucking brain and start using bayesian inference

[Anonymous No.9421776]

Everyone who follows q anon also owns ChainLink. They believe that lack of evidence is a sign that something big is in the works. In reality it's fucking nothing kek

[Anonymous No.9421793]

>>9421776
Hey man, keep posting it. Might get a couple of (You)s, bit of attention, fill the gaping void for a while. Who knows?

[Anonymous No.9421796]

>>9421138
>bayesian inference
The fuck is this boomer term you just used?

[Anonymous No.9421914]

>>9417946
gb2reddit

[Anonymous No.9421999]

>>9421796
> absolute state of brainlets

[Anonymous No.9422186]

can everyone stop arguing and get along for a change?

[Anonymous No.9422416]

>>9421080
I agree on the docusign connection but I don't see mainnet coming out in only 4 months. Looking at pivotal tracker there seems to be a ton more work needed to be finished in such a short time period.

[Anonymous No.9422798]

>>9422416
They are starting to configure faucet for testings. That means they just started with test net. Q4 is my estimated time of arrival

[Anonymous No.9423384]

>>9417479
Exactly. Half billion dollars or even 150MM is pocket change to massive banks and hedge funds so if Link was really that great and technologically groundbreaking we'd see the supply mostly bought up already. You basically just proved Link is shit thanks a lot.