Stop Chainlink Shilling

[Anonymous No.9368597]

Chainlink is a poor investment with no working product, no progress being made, and a circulating supply of 35%. Chainlink does not have the solution to the billion+ dollar oracle problem. It is a coin held up by pure delusion, groupthink and paid astroturfing.

>but what about the testnet?
All the testnet does is allow you to create a eth/btc smart contract that pulls data from one centralized source API. Also, the smart contracts are not even optimal with one data feed. The ETH contract cannot send payments all it can do is upload one data feed into the contract. The BTC contract requires you to send the escrow payments yourself. The contracts ARE NOT self excercising.
This is not a decentralized oracle and there is no utility in it. This is not even hard to program, they don’t have a solution for true decentralized oracles and make almost no progress against top class teams searching for the real solution.
>the token economics
Only 350,000,000 of the total 1,000,000,000 tokens are even in circulation. Your investment is prone to VAST inflation at any time.

Chainlink is a poor investment decision and you are being manipulated.

[Anonymous No.9368655]

No linkers are pathetic at this stage

[Anonymous No.9368694]

Most Link will be locked up in staking. It will come to the point where there is probably less than 50 million Link in circulation.

[Anonymous No.9368699]

I own LINK (a bit ashamed of it, and will likely sell soon, to be honest). That said, I think the LINK shillers on here are doing a great disservice to /biz/. Desperate bagholders literally begging people to buy, spreading rampant disinfo, etc... it's disgraceful.

[Anonymous No.9368728]

>>9368699
Go market sell right now faggot, I'll be glad to buy. A lot of larp is from fudders trying to muddy the waters, but it's obvious that Link is in league with big players.

[Anonymous No.9368731]

>>9368699
anyone selling there links now is fcuking brainlet. This is a long term hold.

but any spastic fuck who wants to sell and even bring the price down I'll appreciate it lol

[Anonymous No.9368748]

oraclize checks data feed
ohshit our 2 vms are down we apologize for the inconvenience
(smart contract now compromised)

chainlink checks data feed
100+ nodes checking api, then consensus forwarded to smart contract
(smart contract still valid)
hmmmm

[Anonymous No.9368761]

Link is a meme

[Anonymous No.9368766]

>>9368655
>>9368728
>>9368731
This is a thread for insightful discussion. If you cannot counter a point or provide anything of value to the discussion get out. Why are all chainlink shills mentally disabled and just scream FUD?

[Anonymous No.9368778]

>>9368748
We are talking about chainlink in the present. You are talking about a version of chainlink that does not exist and may never exist.

[Anonymous No.9368807]

>>9368778
so you are saying the apis are only checked via 1 node at the moment?

[Anonymous No.9368815]

>>9368766
Fuck you, I'm not gonna give a well though out reply to lying pieces of shit. With all the fucking fud and pasta being thrown around 24/7 I don't give a fuck about placating you, faggot. Every piece of fud gets debunked but retards keep on with the same tired old shit anyway.

[Anonymous No.9368886]

>>9368766
there was no argument to counter?

Another fucking brainlet. Go crawl back up your fat cunt of a mother.

[Anonymous No.9368915]

>>9368807
Testnet does not even have nodes. The information is directly taken from a webpages API.

>>9368815
This is all factual information.

>>9368886
t. Didn’t pass the 2nd grade

[Anonymous No.9368961]

>>9368597
Somebody, refute this

[Anonymous No.9368989]

>no progress being made

https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2129823

[Anonymous No.9368993]

>>9368915
hm. it seems disjointed to set up a link payout faucet for node operators without having them perform a task. also it seems pointless to code the direct api scraper when it won't be used in production.

[Anonymous No.9369013]

>>9368694
that doesnt take them out of circulating supply you retarded faggot

[Anonymous No.9369023]

>>9368993
This is what makes me think this team will absolutely not be able to produce. They can’t even make their token structure work on the testnet and instead just pull data directly from website APIs overpassing nearly the entire idea of chainlink.

[Anonymous No.9369052]

>>9368915
however, assuming the consensus mechanism is the most complicated component of the workflow, it makes some to get the faucet running first, get the node querying function second, and the consensus mechanism and running third. Then it's just a matter of sticking them together.

Given the remaining tasks, I'd estimate at least 4 months until mainnet, unless some of this is on the private repo. Feel free to chase moon missions elsewhere, but if a name comes back in the testnet servers, theres a chance you might lose some of your stack

[Anonymous No.9369138]

mfw i realize that the oldfags literally dumped their ico bags with shills, same as colx, holo, amb. this place really is cancer. Link seems like less of a scam but could easily pull an ARK.

OTOH, there are the somewhat plausible connections drawn between link, docusign, iota(?) Swift, iso2022 &psd2, accord(waruso yesterday for that one) etc. idk man, im going to hold it for a year just to see what happens. I'm not 100% in and you shouldn't be either, imo.

[Anonymous No.9369148]

this shit is about to tank so hard right now. can't break 6100. heading back to 4500 now.

[Anonymous No.9369227]

>>9368766
Because we're tired of explaining this product over and over and over again. Your entire "insightful discussion" is retarded because pretty much any question you'll have can be answered by actually DYOR. The day you do this will be the day you understand why it is shilled so much here - but I suspect you'll just keep being a daft little brainlet forever.

[Anonymous No.9369268]

>>9369227
I did my own reasearch and laid it out for all here. I used the testnet, I read the whitepaper, i’v checked the chainlink contract.
I don’t have any questions about what I posted in the OP it is factual, what about it do you think is not?
The chainlink testnet directly sources data from only one API of a webpage and skips over the tokens and nodes to produce unoptimal smart contracts that are not self executing. This is not the vision or plan they laid out in their whitepaper and it seems clear they cannot execute.

[Anonymous No.9369269]

>>9369138
>Link seems like less of a scam but could easily pull an ARK.

no it cant with a 1b supply

[Anonymous No.9369318]

>>9368778
>only invest in something after it's fully functional and priced in
nigger WHAT

[Anonymous No.9369425]

>>9369268
perhaps they're testing something you're unaware of? something you can't see?

[Anonymous No.9369436]

>>9369318
>investing in something that has only shown evidence it will never be delivered as specified, if at all.
Read the rest of my posts.

[Anonymous No.9369465]

>>9369425
Maybe they are, but you never should invest off of blind faith or rumor. You must analyze the reality of the project in its current form and analyze the risks.

[Anonymous No.9369487]

>>9369465
valid point, I have nothing to say besides looking into the social networks of the people involved makes me optimistic and comfy enough in my investment to sell the top to buy lower and build my stack in this way.

[Anonymous No.9369531]

>>9369487
Thats your prerogative and I respect that. If you are optimistic on the project its your call. I’m just highlighting some big risks associated with chainlink for the people here who might be too caught up in the sensationalism.

[Anonymous No.9369552]

>>9369531
well what do you think it says about link that despite days where eth:btc/usd are in the red it stays green and it trades within a consistent range for the past week? Also that overall it's depth charts are overwhelmingly full of buys?

to me it says accumulation

[Anonymous No.9369612]

>>9369552
Current price action is of no importance to fundamental analysis. Bitconnect would outperform BTC/ETH/USD but eventually collapsed due to fundamental issues. Also orderbooks are easily manipulated and you could be seeing trends that don’t exist.

[Anonymous No.9369617]

>>9369552
I gotta sleep but I'll read your response in the morning, thanks for being considerate enough to provide a "fud". Fud strengthens confidence in good investments

[Anonymous No.9369639]

>>9369612
oh nice, just in time. Yes, that is correct, it COULD be manipulation. Atleast tomorrow I have something to do, joyous existence anon. Rest well.

[Anonymous No.9369671]

>>9369013
that dosent taek them oot of circulatenng supply yoo retardead fagoot

[Anonymous No.9369677]

>>9369617
nigga it's not even real fud. the real fud is that literally no one in this thread knows enough about link to call him a faggot.

[Anonymous No.9369713]

>>9369677
hence tomorrow why I'll be sitting through the entire white paper and consulting with the best programmers I know??? Also don't call me nigga white boy.


GET YOUR SHIT KICKED IN LIKE WHITE KIDS DROPPING NBOMBS
JOKING BOUT BLACK CRIME
LIKE WHAT THE FUCK IS ENRON
YOUR GIRL WORSHIPS MY BALLS
SHE CALL ME SHENRON

[Anonymous No.9369860]

>>9368597
good points OP, thank you for giving your take and actually posting something of substance

[Anonymous No.9369945]

>>9369713
why are you the way that you are

[Anonymous No.9370002]

>>9369268
>The chainlink testnet directly sources data from only one API of a webpage and skips over the tokens and nodes to produce unoptimal smart contracts that are not self executing.
It's almost like it is an isolated environment which shows a very barebones outline of how it could work even though it doesn't have many external sources to interface with, therefore limiting the capabilities of a smartcontract supplement which relies on the provisioning and delivery of external datafeeds. Maybe this is why it is called a testnet? Ever thought of that?

> This is not the vision or plan they laid out in their whitepaper and it seems clear they cannot execute.
Wow, you mean this testnet isn't the full plan laid out in their whitepaper and that they can't fully demonstrate the capabilities of the project in this state?

The main problem here is that you are clearly too stupid to understand the limitations of a testnet. The fact that there are people like you fucking around with your money in crypto is just mind boggling to me. I might as well be having this conversation with a bag of dog shit.

[Anonymous No.9370016]

>>9368597
Should've brought the shadow fork

[Anonymous No.9370037]

>>9368766
>>9368815
>>9369227

Fucking hostile stinky linkies! I was able to get a level headed one in this thread
>>9360687
Project sounds more like a cult than anything. DGB 2.0 if you ask me

[Anonymous No.9370072]

>>9370002
A testnet should test the basics of the platform as stated in the whitepaper. The chainlink testnet operates completely different from the product in the whitepaper. The most critical parts of chainlink, the tokens and nodes are not even a functionality in the testnet. All the testnet does is literally scrape information off of a website API and uploads it into a smart contract thats not self-exercising. Its literally useless and does nothing of value for the project or the space. You should maybe test it out.

[Anonymous No.9370097]

>>9370002
Test-nets have much less limitation than live products by the way, thats the point.

[Anonymous No.9370120]

>>9370072
Oh that's all it does? You should try it while running your own node separately on the same instance and getting them to talk to one another - which they do, and quite well. I'm not even sure if you're trolling or if you're actually stupid enough to believe you can run bullshit past me when I have been playing with this since release.

[Anonymous No.9370132]

[Anonymous No.9370143]

You guys are total cunts for fudding newfags out of riches. The world is a big enough place for everyone on this board to make it off Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.9370153]

>>9370120
Or run several nodes on it even, which you can do. Not you in particular, because you have no idea what you're talking about. But someone like me or other users who intend on staking without needing to use crap like linkpool.

But we both know you'll never follow this up and my words are wasted on you. Refer to my previous comment about conversing with a bag of shit.

[Anonymous No.9370175]

>>9370143
>/thread

[Anonymous No.9370282]

Thanks, just sold all of my holdings.

[Anonymous No.9370308]

>>9370153
I’m not sure why you are so inflammatory. Don’t take investing so personally. I have tried the test-net and all the features I have described are accurate. Care to explain what you think I am missing?

[Anonymous No.9370408]

Is there any competition for this token? Is anyone else trying to solve the orcle problem?

[Anonymous No.9370410]

>>9370143
>stop countering our organized shilling
>let's all pretend there aren't tens of other projects who blow LINK out of the water

[Anonymous No.9370458]

>>9370408
The oracle problem is a billion, even trillion dollar question. Yes, there are many projects and people trying to figure out a solution.

[Anonymous No.9370462]

>>9370410
>>let's all pretend there aren't tens of other projects who blow LINK out of the water
Which project tackles what LINK is trying to tackle better than LINK does?
>inb4 Mobius

[Anonymous No.9370482]

>>9370410
>tens of other projects who blow LINK out of the water
See this is the exact sort of dishonest bullshit I'm talking about

[Anonymous No.9370493]

>>9370462
Augur, gnosis

[Anonymous No.9370523]

>>9370493
Both of these projects are years behind link and far more centralized. Unibright also. I look forward to others buying into these trainwrecks though - that's what you get when infants and morons try to mimic a legitimate product like link.

[Anonymous No.9370535]

>>9370493
guess we have the winner right here

[Anonymous No.9370560]

>>9370462
>>9370482
I was referring to ROI, should have specified that.
LINK does nothing yet, except aggregating the money of the herd in exchange for a piece of Sergey Nazarov's bags.

[Anonymous No.9370572]

>>9370523
Augur has been around much longer than link. I’m not shilling any of them I don’t hold any of these coins. I don’t think any of the current products will find the oracle solution.
>>9370535
I think thats a binance listing for augur

[Anonymous No.9370583]

>>9370560
>I was referring to ROI
Then buy Verge, lmao.

[Anonymous No.9370781]

>>9370572
I'm talking more in terms of development and (implied) partnership building. Unless they're somehow more low-key than LINK is, they just won't have the clout or product required to take first mover advantage with many of the major companies looking into blockchain tech. I have read your other comments in this thread and you would do well to study solidity and golang a bit more and review the whitepaper once you are more confident with these. I wish the testnet had more in it, but only a fool would actually believe that the state of the testnet is anything but an afterthought for smaller companies to have a play with. That's the impression I get from it anyway.
>>9370153
This guy knows a bit about what he's talking about, but I think he's too invested in this for what we've been given in regards to the aforementioned testnet. I think it will pay off, but link isn't my whole portfolio like many of the fanatics on here.
If (and this is a big IF, but there are too many coincidences for me to ignore personally) companies like SWIFT / Hyperledger are engaged with link, you can bet your ass that they're running their own environments for testing purposes which we are never going to see until the big day. I'd recommend putting a small amount aside for this one (maybe 500ish) regardless of doubts, simply because of the events which this team seems to consistently attend and the names which constantly pop up alongside them. The link cult is obnoxious, but the enthusiasm certainly isn't baseless and I don't think the testnet we have been given is really a good judge of what the end product will / will not be capable of at this stage.

[Anonymous No.9370903]

>>9370781
Chainlink seemed like a very promising project but with the testnet release and lack of clarity regarding updates and developments it has been dissapointing. The github is basically dead and there is no concise roadmap. Cannot justify any significant investment into chainlink because of these factors laid out. I don’t think having a small % of your portfolio in chainlink is at all irrational though. You just see so many people all in chainlink around here being extremely sensational when the product or delivery has not been able to justify it.

[Anonymous No.9370916]

>>9368597
>All the testnet does is allow you to create a eth/btc smart contract that pulls data from one centralized source API. Also, the smart contracts are not even optimal with one data feed. The ETH contract cannot send payments all it can do is upload one data feed into the contract. The BTC contract requires you to send the escrow payments yourself. The contracts ARE NOT self excercising.
>This is not a decentralized oracle and there is no utility in it. This is not even hard to program, they don’t have a solution for true decentralized oracles and make almost no progress against top class teams searching for the real solution.

It's almost like the "testnet" is there for "testing", huh anon?

[Anonymous No.9370941]

>>9370916
The testnet does not test any crutial functions of the chainlink platform as described in the whitepaper.

[Anonymous No.9370950]

>>9370941
Of course it does.

[Anonymous No.9370973]

>>9370950
I’v already explained why it doesn’t in my posts, so you explain how it does.

[Anonymous No.9370978]

>>9370973
Did you posts say the testnet does nothing at all?

[Anonymous No.9370981]

>>9370903
They have gone a bit fanatical because the rumors have gotten to their heads, which is dangerous because even promising products can fall over in this space while things of little substance seem to rise. The github / lack of communication is a red flag, but I also find it very intriguing because it could go either way. A) If the team has been putting on a front and claiming to be working hard but are actually incompetent and lazy, the github and lack of communication is your proof
B) However, if this is not the case and this is a product they truly believe in, they could actually be tied up in a plethora of NDA's as some of the speculators here have claimed, which would explain how little information we get.
My mind about this one will be made up when I see the names attached to this in the mainnet release when it does arrive, so just make sure you keep your eye on it too just in case it does happen to be option B.

[Anonymous No.9371005]

>>9370978
>The chainlink testnet directly sources data from only one API of a webpage and skips over the tokens and nodes functionality to produce unoptimal smart contracts that are not self executing. This is not the vision or plan they laid out in their whitepaper.
Heres one, read my posts.

[Anonymous No.9371010]

>>9371005
Well that's something, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.9371015]

>>9370981
Eyes are on it, just awaiting additional information. It could be option B, just working with the verifiable information at hand

[Anonymous No.9371030]

>>9370903
>Thinking they have any reason to give a shit about you

There's a good reason why they aren't giving you updates. It's because you don't matter.

[Anonymous No.9371031]

>underage faggot with a thesaurus.
linkies should be embarrassed.

[Anonymous No.9371048]

>>9370981
The rumors surrounding chainlink and sergey's confirmed bank and industry connections are the biggest cocktease ever to be quite honest. It seems likely chainlinks rumors will turn out to be true

[Anonymous No.9371063]

>>9371030
I’m not an investor. Investors should matter to them and be given progress developments stop trying to be edgy.

[Anonymous No.9371109]

>>9371048
Well see that's the thing which actually makes me a bit excited for it despite what I think is still my measured skepticism. It's not the only horse I'm betting on per se, but if the investigations in other threads or even a single one of the LARPers prove to be true, the connections + the tokens being staked in nodes for reputation could lead to a substantial price increase which I can't even begin to work out on paper if it does what it claims it will do. I still think it's wise to take a look at a few other worthy projects and make sure there's at least a little diversification. Trust me - the regret of watching a project fail can really crush you in a way which "missing out" doesn't. It happened to me when I was in stocks, so I learned this lesson the hard way.

[Anonymous No.9371138]

>>9371063
>Investors should matter to them
And what if they don't matter to them?
Are you going to call the police?

[Anonymous No.9371808]

>>9370903
utter bullshit. the github is really active right now.

[Anonymous No.9371818]

>>9370981
wtf are you on about.. lots of commits happening every day

[Anonymous No.9371996]

>>9371109
Anon, which other projects are you in and why? You seem like a sensible and interesting person.

[Anonymous No.9372135]

>>9371808
>>9371818
He's stuck in February '18 fudmode.

[Anonymous No.9372143]

>>9371996
I hold a quite respectable number of links. I dont even feel angry when people fud links nowadays, cause i know its gonna take off anyway without the brainlets. Like, go ahead dump the price to your hearts content, i'll gladly hold your bags. IDGAF

[Anonymous No.9372193]

>>9372143
I am 100k+ bagholder myself. My biggest fear is it’s not enough to make it. I am a Linklet REEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.9372554]

>>9368597
Have you considered being a putz somewhere else?

[Anonymous No.9372571]

>>9372193

I own over a million links and I'm a linklet.

[Anonymous No.9372716]

>>9372193
I’m only in for 70k. I’d love to have 100k lol.

[Anonymous No.9372739]

Chainlink is the AMD of crypto.

[Anonymous No.9372837]

like it or not, no matter how you look at it, LINK is not a poor investment by any means. it has literally no reason to crash and is one of the least risky projects in crypto. if you havent thrown in at least $500 into it just in case something actually happens youre an actual brainlet

[Anonymous No.9373446]

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/solidity-cborutils/tree/2e24df4a4a8b4ba35ad4b0a441591df3280bb90e

nick Johnson working on our stuff again

[Anonymous No.9373486]

>>9373446
Is that the ETH developer?

[Anonymous No.9373505]

>>9373486
Yes

[Anonymous No.9373536]

>>9368597
>ASTROturfing.

i see what you did there

[Anonymous No.9373539]

>>9373505
Thank you, now that is very assuring, which makes the Fudder that started this thread look even more like the stupid mofo he is.

[Anonymous No.9373892]

>>9370458
>>9370462
>>9370482
What other projects are there trying to solve the oracle problem? mobius, augur, gnosis, any others?

I'm planning on buying everything that's trying to solve the oracle problem so no matter what happens I make it

[Anonymous No.9373935]

>>9370941
>publicly exposed testnet doesn’t include the differentiating factor described in white paper/talks
>known existence of private repos

Hmm

[Anonymous No.9373955]

>>9369138
what is the connection with docusign? a tweet from Tom Gonser? you realize he's balls deep with his cash as a VC investor for another project right? you should consider putting your money where he does.

[Anonymous No.9374005]

>>9368597
Now that REQ launched BTC support on theire mainnet while NOT using Link and having a unknown third party create the smart contract for them Link is pretty much proven to be a useless shitcoin just like so many others.

I was a firm Link believer, but i just sold my stack and put most of it back into REQ. When theres solid proof like this that Oracles can be created on the spot by projects like REQ. Link will have no real world usecases exept for maybe a few (if) they are successfull in the end.

Man, i really wish this weren't true, but it is. fucking hell what a shitty day.

[Anonymous No.9374068]

>>9373446
>our
kys faggot

[Anonymous No.9374130]

>>9374005

Unknown Oracle provider.... what a brainlet.

They're using a centralised oracle provider called oraclize.it, they're switching straight to chainlink when it's on mainnet because it's superior in every way.

They wanted to get their MVP out to get traction first...

I can't tell if people are larping or if they're really this stupid

[Anonymous No.9374219]

>>9369013
>Sell me your linkies
>No, i need them for staking so i can have more stinkies
>SELL THEM TO ME REEEEE
>Nope

See how dumb you sound? of course staking takes them out of circulation.

[Anonymous No.9374257]

>>9374130
desu this thread revealed that the average link holder on /biz/ doesn't understand what they've bought.

If oraclize so convincingly solves the oracle problem. People would no longer be talking about the oracle problem.

[Anonymous No.9374301]

>>9370941
are you retarded.
Do you think they just put out a flash game.

ITS A (T E S T) NET
ITS FOR T E S T ING
YOU LOW T E S T FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.9374431]

>>>9373971

LINK will be a faucet of constantly streaming profits because oracles will be streaming, not dripping data.

It will be a constant flow of data vs a single time thing.

Users of the network will be practically paying rent for the data streams, not single one-offs

Cap this shit for posterity, /biz/ does it again

[Anonymous No.9374481]

>>9374301
obviously this guy is an idiot or being purposefully thick, but the "testnet" that exists now on their webiste has nothing to do with the ropsten test net.

As far as I can tell, the test net on the site is a very basic system for demoing how you can point an oracle at an API and feed that into a smart conract. He's right that it doesn't actually trigger any event, but it's pretty obvious Smartcontract.com worked on that in custom integrations, a la the SWIFT poc. Remember, Smartcontract.com wasn't dealing with crypto play money. These smart contracts trigger fiat payments (in SWIFT message and ISO 20022 format) so you won't find them on the blockchain.

Obviously the chainlink network is nowhere to be found on the test net. That's what they are building now. There's zero reason to think the team won't be able to build exactly what is described in the white paper, but it is obvious they are being extremely meticulous as evidenced by their abnormally high code coverage, which is probably part of why it's taking longer than people here thought.

These are retarded "arguments" and anyone who found themselves concerned should feel bad and really try to understand what Smartcontract.com was doing before switching to working on chainlink, as well as chainlink itself, so people don't treat this guy (and he posts a lot) as if he's saying anything that actually makes sense.

[Anonymous No.9374538]

>>9369945
idk, you think about it, cause it's not causing me any problems

[Anonymous No.9374777]

>>9372739
What is the intel of crypto then ?

[Anonymous No.9374894]

>>9372193
Linklet Dysmorphia

[Anonymous No.9375040]

>>9373446
literally all this is changing the style with solium. kys faggots

[Anonymous No.9375179]

Fuck you OP. I'm balls deep you can fuck off im sinking with this ship.

[Anonymous No.9375557]

se3000 commented 26 minutes ago
We are planning on allowing payment for other types of initiators soon, so I think it makes sense to leave it there for now.

[Anonymous No.9376266]

Nice just bought the rest of the circulating supply. We're all gonna make it faggots

[Anonymous No.9376429]

ITT RETARDS FALLING FOR FUD.
we had this same thread last night Delphi in full faggot mode.

[Anonymous No.9376581]

>>9374894
Ah for fucksake lads. It should be “dysphoria” you fucking idiots. Like a contrast to “euphoria”.

Dysmorphia is to do with morphology/ a physical parameter. Biz is actually retarded sometimes.

[Anonymous No.9376593]

>>9368597

Op speaks truth. Link is an erc20 shitcion.

U idiots just got burger scammed.

[Anonymous No.9376668]

I'm amazed at the amount of time and effort that goes into this FUD. What's the end game?

[Anonymous No.9376677]

Anyone have a crypto discord

[Anonymous No.9376895]

>>9376668
Endgame is to get brainlets who don‘t understand the tech to sell

[Anonymous No.9377266]

>>9376677
Yeah

[Anonymous No.9378032]

Fuck this. I am not going to hold these piece of shit on my wallet any more.

[Anonymous No.9378144]

>>9378032
I’d swap out that LINK for REQ. Even if the price isn’t doing great right now, they make progress every 2 weeks.

[Anonymous No.9378770]

>>9378144
But link is making progress daily in github and project tracker. Its only that they dont announce and hype. This is causing the opportunity cost for other moon shots due to the sunk cost.

[Anonymous No.9378811]

>>9368597

Facebook is using ChainLink holy shit! $1,000 EOY

[Anonymous No.9378951]

>>9376668
To shake weak hands. It shouldn't be easy to become rich.

[Anonymous No.9379097]

>>9378951
Why?

[Anonymous No.9379128]

>>9379097
oh my sweet monsoon season ranjeet, look up the word, "consolidate". think about what it means while you empty your bowels upon the streets of mumbai today and tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.9379144]

op, they don't deserve to make it. let them be

[Anonymous No.9379165]

>>9379128
What...?

[Anonymous No.9379341]

>>9378032
Shit man. Get to 100k link wtf you doing? No Monero? Holy shit. Solid port though.