CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?! $738 A DAY on Ambrosus masternode

[Anonymous No.9356670]

Yes, some math wiz calculated $738 a day of passive income for a single masternode. Yes I know this smells of bitconnect but I actually did the math myself. Assuming 1 million bundled transactions daily and with the current number of masternodes- this is actually achievable

[Anonymous No.9357116]

How do I get a masternode

[Anonymous No.9357210]

>>9357116
minimum 10k amb

[Anonymous No.9357355]

So if j buy 10k amb right now I get $738 tomorrow? And the $738 every day?

[Anonymous No.9357374]

Too good to be true

[Anonymous No.9357378]

Where do you think these 738 USD come from ?

[Anonymous No.9357389]

>>9356670
Kek why would their suppliers pay all of these neets these fees

[Anonymous No.9357412]

>>9356670
When it's something so good you can't believe it, chances are it's not real. Go on AMBlets, I will be here to see you cry and taste your salty tears.

[Anonymous No.9357422]

>>9356670
he fell for the masternode meme

[Anonymous No.9357475]

>>9357378
wasu wasu wasu

The calculations suck though and use current wallets with 10k+ which is going full retard. Using circulating supply something like 5k nodes seems likely, which means 10$/day at even medium adoption. Revenue going up would simply mean more nodes until 15k nodes or so.

[Anonymous No.9357492]

>>9357355
No because the project is worthless and versetti is a crackwhore.

[Anonymous No.9357496]

Oh my god!!! I need to buy $7000 worth of AMB and make it back in less than 10 days!!! Stay poor faggots I'm buying at least 100 masternodes. Can you normies even calculate how much passive income that is during 10 years!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.9357518]

>>9357422
Some of the best shitcoins I have are because I fell for the masternode meme.
That said, don't fall for it when the coin is already being shilled. It's too late to 10x then, usually. Exception is zencash

[Anonymous No.9357586]

>>9357374
>>9357389
>>9357422

OP's thread is a reverse shill thread meant to attack AMB if you idiots haven't been paying attention to these biz AMB spam threads

>>9357475

$738/day is downright fucking lunatic for the 10k node, but conservative calculations (based on an okay adoption rate) have showed that you can make 10% yearly ROI even if AMB is around $10/token, which is still really really good.

[Anonymous No.9357611]

>>9357586
>10% yearly ROI

For a high-risk investment this is a very shitty return not to mention you actually have to run the shitty node.

[Anonymous No.9357614]

oh, it's another "OP thinks market penetration is easy" episode.
Listen up fuckfaces. Market penetration and user adoption is the hardest thing in a business. Building your shitty tech is like 5% of the process. That's why you see so many neckbeards working for mr. Noseberg even though they might be brilliant programmers and could probably make a decent product if they tried. As soon as you have a working product and actually try to get user adoption, that's when you realize how out of your depth and how fucked you are.

99% of these crypto projects don't even have a working product. It's doubtful many of them will. After they have a working product the real shit starts, yet everyone acts as if it's no biggy.
>hurr durr if you build it, they will come

Seeing you morons doing your stupid math and dreaming of millions per year really rustles my jimmies.
>but muh 1% of the market
https://www.inc.com/erik-sherman/the-1-percent-fallacy-that-trips-many-entrepreneurs.html

[Anonymous No.9357618]

>>9357586
>even if AMB is around $10/token, which is still really really good
This is why people fall for masternode scam coins

[Anonymous No.9357653]

>>9356670

And how exactly are they going to generate the dollar revenue to pay these node operators?

[Anonymous No.9357657]

>>9357611

It's not high risk because the return isn't some scam speculative free token like VEN's thor. Read their recent blogpost on their tokenomics. Corporates have to spend real money to buy AMB (pegged in "data bundles" where each costs $10) and use the ecosystem for supply chain management.

A very conservative 10k bundles per day would give you a 10% ROI. If you consider adoption as time goes on, this could easily hit 100k bundles a day - supply chain management software is a HUGE industry worth 10's of billions of $ spread among many industries. 100k bundles/day is equivalent to AMB's ecosystem getting around $365M/yr which is nothing.

[Anonymous No.9357671]

>>9356670
I was so close buying the dip but bearwhale saved me and I stayed in ZRX. Thank god. Will by this when its 2000 sats again.

[Anonymous No.9357687]

>>9357657
>return is uncertain
>adoption is uncertain
>number of competing nodes is uncertain and unstable
>price of asset is uncertain and unstable
>running costs of node are unknown

Sure, this is as safe as as fucking government bond from Switzerland.

[Anonymous No.9357701]

>>9357614
Damn that reality pill is bitter.
AMB and MOD and WTC and all these centralized teams with a coin attached are startups. If you want to know what good investments are, you have to understand what makes a startup successful. Decentralized coins follow different rules.
Good luck anons.

[Anonymous No.9357760]

>>9357657
Ok I'll play.

>A very conservative 10k bundles per day
Where do you get that this is conservative?

>would give you a 10% ROI
You don't know this. Even using your 10k bundles. 100000$ over 150MM supply or say 10k nodes is 10$/day or 3.5k a year. ROI depends on price of very unstable tokens and costs of running the node.

>this could easily hit 100k
Easily, trust me.

>$365M/yr which is nothing.
Nothing at all, you've convinced me everyone is going to be glad to pay this 'nothing' and make us rich with 'nothing'.

[Anonymous No.9357818]

>>9357586

[Anonymous No.9357851]

>>9356670

remember when people were saying coss would give you 50k a month

[Anonymous No.9357954]

>>9357687
>>9357760

>Where do you get that this is conservative?

The rumors of their partnerships.

>You don't know this. Even using your 10k bundles. 100000$ over 150MM supply or say 10k nodes is 10$/day or 3.5k a year. ROI depends on price of very unstable tokens and costs of running the node.

3.5k/yr IF they allocate that many nodes. Chances are it'll be half of that.

Also, 5% of AMB for every transaction are burned, so the currency is deflationary increasing value of token over time.

>Easily, trust me.

If the partnerships are true, yes it is. If the partnerships aren't true, why would they create a model whose entire value structure is based on corporate partnerships? The team has a significant amount of tokens locked up right now which they would like to see grow in value.

>Nothing at all, you've convinced me everyone is going to be glad to pay this 'nothing' and make us rich with 'nothing'.

Try speaking english pajeet. It's nothing in comparison to the billions and billions companies use to manage their supply chains already, with inferior software.

[Anonymous No.9357999]

>>9357954
>rumors tell me this is get big sir
>365MM/year is nothing sir, great buy sir

Looks like you are the pajeet faggit.

I notice you are not even trying to defend that this is not a high-risk investment.

[Anonymous No.9358043]

>>9357999

Lol butthurt ching chong pajeet doesn't have an argument

>MUH HIGH RISK INVESTMENT

Guess what, all of crypto is a high risk investment retard. Some more so than others, and comparatively this is one of the comfiest holds in the entire market with the strength of the team behind it.

[Anonymous No.9358076]

Guess what. I can’t believe you, pajeet!

[Anonymous No.9358513]

>>9358043
>guess what, all of crypto is a high risk investment retard
>>9357657
>It's not high risk

Lol looks like you're just a faggit who can't handle losing an argument on a Kurdic candle maker forum.

[Anonymous No.9358547]

>>9358513

Not high risk in comparison to all the shitcoins being shilled by pajeets on biz. Looks like you've got brain damage or bad reading comprehension... or both. Kek

[Anonymous No.9358609]

>>9358547
>nothing in comparison
>not high risk in comparison

Way to shift your goalposts pajeet.

>muh rumors
>muh partnerships
>muh figures pulled out of my ass

hahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.9358629]

>>9358609

>When you're this assmad that you resort to making up bullshit about shifting goalposts rather than actually putting up an argument

[Anonymous No.9358667]

>>9357657
>AMB's ecosystem getting around $365M/yr which is nothing
Actually true, there's plenty of software companies that make billions annually