How would it affect the market if the switch actually happened?

[Anonymous No.9353703]

[Anonymous No.9353727]

most coins wouldn't care after a probable dump inbetween, aside from never happening anyway

best thing for the market would be more fiat pairings and liquidity for everything

[Anonymous No.9353826]

big time

[Anonymous No.9354013]

>>9353703
We would be avalanched with boomer cope threads talking about how this never could have been predicted and as a result cryptocurrency as a whole is a failure for sure, and they will receive an avalanche of "you were warned by literal squads of people pointing out the math of the situation with helpful infographics for months on end with not even an attempt at denial letalone plausible refutation, and you chose to stay on the burning bridge. That's not crypto's fault, it's yours".
Everyone else would realise this is correct after suitable enough wailing and gnashing of teeth, and nobody would ever dare attempt to hijack crypto the way blockstream did ever again.
Blockstream and everyone associated with it would be in tatters, all supporting parties reputations effectively ash.
Clueless normies that didn't see it coming and really thought just listening to the loudest propaganda campaign was an effective trading strategy will either completely abandon the space, or more likely hand management of their stake over to the people that actually get it and have proven it over the past nine months by correctly predicting every turn in this road.
So, you know. Pretty much what you'd expect given what's actually happening.

[Anonymous No.9354233]

>>9354013

this guy fucks. looking at all the pajeets crying about losing $100 on BCN and not being able to make their rent this month is really a wakeup call that 95% of these tokenbois and noobs are following the herd and have literally zero idea what they are doing.

Interesting that all the OG bitcoiners, billionaires, and successful business people have flocked to BCH. All BTC has left over is a bunch of cucked "businesses" (Samourai Wallet, Vaultoro) and HODL MOON noobs.

[Anonymous No.9354807]

>>9354233
Bingo.
In fact, a more interesting question is what if it *doesn't* happen.
Well, Blockstream and their mainstream finance sponsors empirically proved that blockchains can be hijacked, centralised, and employed to enslave the very economies that they were created to free, far more effectively than first currencies ever enslaved them.
That would unironically mean this is all just a complete waste of time for anyone involved in this for a reason other than "I think the global population is not yet adequately enslaved to the extent that they need to be by central banks and political authority.". At that point in time anyone who isn't a complete and utter bootlicking sellout to political power should logically completely abandon the space, and in fact probably do their utmost to ensure it never gets any kind of uptake and traction.
The real blackpill truth is that BTC is actually the anti-crypto. If it wins, all legitimate cryptocurrencies must necessarily be proven as failures.

[Anonymous No.9355075]

>>9353703
lmao if BTC crashes there is no way Bcash takes the top spot. No. fucking. way.
Nucoiner boomers are already salty about missing out on BTC gains, you think they'll be happy with whatever shitty % they'd make edging Bcash to the top?
When it has the same "outdated tech"?
Delusional.
If BTC falls Bcash will be dragged down with it, and either ETH or some centralised scam platform will become number 1.

[Anonymous No.9355578]

[Anonymous No.9355824]

>>9355075
It's not a political question, it's a market and technical question. Salty BTC holders have zero impact at all on the equation, they're just pigs to the slaughter. The only thing they get to choose is how loud to squeal.