Chainlink breadcrumbs thread

[Anonymous No.9335322]

I'm neither a liar nor an insider. I'm just a random autistic person who has noticed a couple of details that have gone unnoticed by most of the community so far.
>pic related
If you google
>"chainlinked" github
you can actually see that there are hundreds of businesses, whose repositories are public, and they are developing smartcontracts that interact with "Chainlink" before certain off chain data.

[Anonymous No.9335335]

>>9335322
Also there are a lot of "trash results" but diving in the results worth it

[Anonymous No.9335372]

>>9335322
Why do you care so much about LINK? It literally says on the third page of the whitepaper:

"A future market price of the LINK token of more than $1.00 defeats the purpose of this project."

At it's current price, that's like less than doubling your money. Grow a fucking brain already.

[Anonymous No.9335375]

https://www.google.pl/search?ei=ke7yWu20GcXIwALNpLyYDw&q=%22chainlinked%22+site%3Agithub.com&oq=%22chainlinked%22+site%3Agithub.com&gs_l=psy-ab.3...4868.8378.0.8914.9.9.0.0.0.0.250.1035.4j3j1.8.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..3.1.135...0i13k1.0.goa7p6BxSFE

I only see 6 results and two of them are official chainlink repo and two are just gibberish

[Anonymous No.9335457]

>>9335335
Buy LINK and move on to your next investment or focus on trading to get more LINK. You don't need more than 5 reasons to buy LINK. It's stupid and unproductive to obsessively research a project you've already invested in. This is not a step forward.

[Anonymous No.9335512]

within cells interlinked

[Anonymous No.9335562]

OP, I think you're lying. I'm not finding anything.

[Anonymous No.9335570]

Didn't find anyhing wrt to the OP.

But Thomas just started a new "Chainlinked" repository two hours ago. So something new and interesting will be there soon.

https://github.com/thodges-gh/Chainlinked

[Anonymous No.9335604]

>>9335372
Sirs, why does you lying sirs?

[Anonymous No.9335614]

>https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/master/solidity/contracts/examples/DynamicConsumer.sol

was the first result, now it is delete
OP was on to something

[Anonymous No.9335627]

>>9335372
I bring you... the third page of the chainlink white paper.

[Anonymous No.9335632]

Lll..lghghlglhl.. nnnngghgh
Dddo9ooll..aaarrrgghhh
Ooonnn fffthhhhhaaauuuusss.. ddddhhhh tttttoooohohihiohh oooiii

[Anonymous No.9335635]

OP, care to share any of the businesses you saw?

[Anonymous No.9335639]

“Chainlinked” is just a list of 4chan screen caps of bagholders reeing

[Anonymous No.9335640]

>>9335614
>shut it down

[Anonymous No.9335649]

>>9335627
That is interesting, because the guy you replied to said something about the price couldn't go above $1.00.

I wonder if he was lying?

[Anonymous No.9335673]

>>9335372
Does it? The collateralization of Chainlink's share of the API economy can be achieved with less than 1 billion in represented value? People are going to shit themselves with rage at the idea of dealing with whole numbers when oracles + automation allows them to pay whatever decimal value equates to pennies or dollars without ever knowingly touching Link?

Add to your copy-paste.
>A future market price of the LINK token of more than $1.00 defeats the purpose of this project.
"$1.00", "dollar" do not appear in the document. "$" only appears in the context of an Intel securities example.

https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

Are you an asshole or a brainlet parrot.?

[Anonymous No.9335689]

>>9335673
You got baited broham

[Anonymous No.9335701]

>>9335322
>It's another ICO scam thread

Hey that's a cool useless ICO token with no actual possibility to be used for the usecase displayed since ETH can't even handle cats

But here's a real coin (i.e. has a blockchain) with an actual future, a real usecase, and transparent developers: Peepcoin soon to be DAPS

[Anonymous No.9335748]

>>9335701
You make me so angry.

[Anonymous No.9335775]

>>9335640
Holy fuck he's wearing a different shirt!

[Anonymous No.9335784]

>>9335701
LINK is just a fucking token you retard. All of the work is done by nodes outside blockchain.
Literally the only thing ETH blockchain does is send LINK payments, but those can be aggregated from hundreds of payments into one or just take a couple hours, it makes no difference to the node whether they get paid in a minute or 10 hours.

[Anonymous No.9335838]

>>9335701
What about hyperledger?

[Anonymous No.9335862]

>chainlinked
is this a new hot meme?

[Anonymous No.9335935]

>>9335673
He is a fudding idiot. Clearly. I despise these lieing aholes.

[Anonymous No.9335949]

>>9335457
but its fun

[Anonymous No.9336200]

>>9335322
> "chainlinked" github
What in the fuck? Good job OP, I haven't gone deep yet but I've already noticed some juicy stuff. The problem I have with Linky is that I don't think there's anything that can make me want more. If it works as well as I think life's going to be ultra easy mode, so all that remains is preparing in case I'm wrong.

[Anonymous No.9336205]

>>9335673
The LINK network is programmed to shut down when the token price reaches above $1.00

[Anonymous No.9336241]

>Getting mad at $1.00 defeats the purpose of this project.
Come on /biz/ stop being so easy.

[Anonymous No.9336316]

>>9335775
Allready debunked.
He has two shirts, fag.

[Anonymous No.9336348]

>>9335322
This sucks that Link might fail.

[Anonymous No.9336382]

>>9335775
Does anyone think that Sergey going missing for months on end adds a different dimension to this whole project. The anticipation grows as we all await him.

Once he finally does something a new level of memes will arise.

Look at SXSW. We got:

>Sergey's fucking Boring.
>Theoretically Cheese
>and finally the balding autist + Sergey's unhappy face.

All strong memes

[Anonymous No.9336454]

>>9336382
No

[Anonymous No.9336463]

>>9336382
This picture gave us "Steve is chad fucking Vitalik" (Steve is to the left of vitalik in the attached photograph)

[Anonymous No.9336511]

1k eoy check em

[Anonymous No.9336539]

>>9335627
>>9335673
>>9335689
>>9335838
Fuck off back to your facebook group, or shut the fuck up and lurk more faggots.

>>9335935
>>9335935
>>9335935
>>9335935
>The ABSOLUTE STATE of newfags on /biz/
FUD is valuable you fucking brainlet.
Shill's provide reasons why you should invest
FUD provides reasons why you should re-evaluate your investment. You should be LOOKING for FUD so you can make your investment airtight.
Ignoring FUD is the literal equivalent of covering your ears shouting LALALALA so you can continue to live in a state of delusion.

Newfags need to shut the fuck up and lurk more REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.9336542]

>>9336382
Always lurking, watching, waiting, like an owl.

[Anonymous No.9336545]

>>9336511
chek’d we will be rich

[Anonymous No.9336566]

>>9336463
I thought Steve was the other speccy cunt next to Sergey. You are probably correct and that is another dimension to this picture.

Don't jump ship Steve. In return I give you this nugget from Steve's GitHub.

A lot of work going on in the private repos and well as what we see.

[Anonymous No.9336577]

>>9336511
can confirm

[Anonymous No.9336582]

>>9335372
This. Spbp. It was fun shilling this shitcoin to newfags for a while but it's getting old now. Buy holo

[Anonymous No.9336624]

>>9335784
On chain contract aggregates return data

[Anonymous No.9336626]

>>9336539
It is bullshit of zero value. You have legit news then post it, if you have total crap it is worthless, as is the fool that shares it. Not new to this site, been reading garbage useless fud for a long time.

[Anonymous No.9336632]

>>9336542
Yep, in that full photo Sergey is happy for now that the Skeleton VB is acting centre of attention. 'Look at Me I'm an autistic ideological Unicorn wearing poofter!' Vitalik announces from the centre of the room.

Sergey looks on knowing VB's projects future depends on CL.

Attached is a guy with a profile on Smart Contract.com

[Anonymous No.9336652]

>>9336511
>>9336577

Linky Stinky $1,000 eoy.

[Anonymous No.9336661]

>>9335322
>>9336539
It's too bad nobody developing a blockchain will use ChainLink. Look at Stellar- they've got Mobius as a native decentralised oracles solution.
Look at VEN, they're developing their own decentralised oracle that will be live BEFORE ChainLink lmao.
Look at IoTA, they've announced Qubic- a decentralised oracle that will be live as early June.
ChainLink is valuable because it was a decentralised oracle? Well looks like that's not the case anymore as these 20+ man teams MINIMUM are working night and day to deliver a superior product.
ChainLink is valuable because it's a first mover? Lol it's literally going to be released after 3 (THREE) other MAJOR decentralised oracle projects.

Face it linkies, ChainLink got BTFO by Pajeets (Mobius), Chinks (VEN) and Hippie stoners that have gone ON RECORD for supporting white genocide (IoTA).
This isn't to mention the 15+ other decentralised oracle projects like Aeternity that is designing their decentralised oracle better than ChainLink- more secure, efficient and there's actual incentive to buy, hold and use the token instead of ChainLink where you don't even NEED ChainLink at all lol.
>LINK network lets you run a node with ZERO ChainLink and be paid in ETH if you want

Stellar also has IBM talking to several central banks about launching their own digital currency on Stellar's network. So not only does Stellar have a HUGE team on Mobius working on a decentralised oracle, but they've got the attention of CENTRAL BANKS because of the superiority of their product.

>LINKIES ETERNALLY BTFO

[Anonymous No.9336666]

>>9336582

You know as soon as you say Holo everyone instantly knows you are a Pajeet?

Nobody wants your Cultural Manager SJW shit coin.

[Anonymous No.9336682]

>>9336666
checked. buy link, faggots

[Anonymous No.9336684]

>>9336626
Refer to >>9336661

[Anonymous No.9336701]

>>9336661

How much time did you put into this shit tier fud you homo?

You had enough time to accumulate.

[Anonymous No.9336705]

>>9336661
>anon wtf no central banks are talking to Stellar
https://www.ethnews.com/ibm-blockchain-lead-predicts-central-bank-digital-currency-on-stellar-soon

Central banks using Stellar's network because Mobius provides a superior decentralised oracle.
>People still unironically buying LINK
Lol

[Anonymous No.9336719]

>>9336701
Can you refute ANY of the information in the FUD? obviously not.
LINK is getting BTFO and you faggots are too delusional to realise you're investing on your emotional connection to a fucking cube

[Anonymous No.9336730]

>>9336661
All of those are centralized garbage and trash projects. There's no point in using smart contracts if they're compromised by the weakest LINK in the system.

[Anonymous No.9336751]

>>9335673

The price above $1 doesn't defeat the purpose. There's only 1 billion LINK to back what will go on to be trillions of dollars worth of smart contract execution. LINK below $1 defeats the purpose of LINK. Its price will need to be huge to act as collateral for the services running on it.

[Anonymous No.9336775]

>>9336719

I can, but I'm not wasting my time. Literally all the retards on biz even know your post is a joke so there is no point.

Go all in on Mobius you street shitter.

[Anonymous No.9336791]

>>9336730
>All of those are centralized garbage and trash projects
Stellar's Mobius, VEN and IoTA are all building DECENTRALISED oracles.

IoTA's DECENTRALISED ORACLE will be announced with more information on the 2nd of June. You can check their Qubic announcement yourself.

Don't let yourself be fooled into investing into something and ignoring information just because you wish it wasn't true. I want LINK to succeed because it means we all make it- unfortunately, it's ALREADY outclassed by other MAJOR projects like VEN

>>9336775
I've been partial to Aeternity, but that seems like a bit of a risk.
I'd rather get XLM, VEN and IoTA because the decentralised oracles are being built for these projects.

[Anonymous No.9336818]

>>9336661
Aeternity doesn't have a decentralized oracle. If you understood Mobius you'd understand why their oracle solution is different and should be viewed skeptically as to whether it's a "decentralized" oracle at all. Ven and Iota oracle solutions are still basically gleams in their creators eyes. And none of these have even a fraction of the traction Ethereum does, so it doesn't really matter anyway.

[Anonymous No.9336819]

>>9336539
FUD is valuable? You’re retarded. This entire market is based on ridiculous speculation. You think anyone is actually buying Link because they believe in some revolutionary future and they want to run nodes? No, they’re buying it in the hopes that they can sell it for $10/token within a year. I love that anyone thinks any of this shit has “real value.”

[Anonymous No.9336853]

>>9336818
>98% of crypto “investors” just throw money at shit that sounds good. Do you think anyone cares that XRP or Mobius aren’t “truly decentralized?” Just fucking put money and sell when it is worth more. Essentially no one cares to understand anything regarding this tech. This is about making money.

[Anonymous No.9336864]

>>9336819
Settle down pajeet, you're going to get shit on your sandals.

[Anonymous No.9336865]

>>9336791

Its not out classed at all. Ari Juels helped write the white paper. The Director of Engineering at FB is an advisor and FB is now rolling out a blockchain division. They've been working with some of the biggest financial institutions, and there's good reason to believe that they're what underlies Microsoft's cryptlets. They're baked into the kernel of zeppelin_os which will go on to power most next-gen Ethereum dApps. They'll work with hyperledger and SGX which positions them for basically any corporate or government DLT implementation.

Fuck the idea that a bunch of upstart platform chains outclass the Chainlink team. those turds are low class slobs compared to Sergey and his crew up ultrawealthy elite. they're also not aiming to solve the same problem. it'd be like picking a shitty fragmented internet over an open internet.

[Anonymous No.9336868]

>>9336791
You have no fucking clue what you're trying to say. Ven isn't even releasing oracles, they're just building an oracle platform iirc, and Mobius won't even have a testnet for CENTRALIZED ORACLES until some time in 2019 (they likely won't be around that long).

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and say you're just playing stupid with this fud. Hopefully you aren't really that retarded.

[Anonymous No.9336905]

>>9336853
Sure, and an investment thesis from that perspective is Smartcontract.com is already confirmed to be still working with swift, highly likely to be working with Microsoft, definitely Docusign, possibly Salesforce in some capacity, possibly AXA, and a long list of others. All it will take is for one or some of these to be firmed up in the public's mind and you'll have your moon mission.

LINK is the most fundamentally and speculatively solid token you'll ever find you dumb nigger. Quit making it difficult for yourself and just buy it.

[Anonymous No.9336906]

>>9336791
Good, then go post all your grand thoughts about them in their threads and GTFO of Link with ur FUD. You are too smart for Link so be gone.

[Anonymous No.9336930]

>>9336791
>>9336791
> dude didn't you hear about the announcement of the anouncement on june 2nd. Linkies BTFO.


I'd rather stick with the strong silent type, as Tony Soprano would say.

"barking dogs don't bite"

[Anonymous No.9336945]

>>9336818
>If you understood Mobius you'd understand why their oracle solution is different
Yeah, it's different in that it's more complete? I don't understand how you can reliably compare a near complete project with a concept that has no functional code for the juicy parts.
>muh chainlink github
None of the code relevant to the "decentralised oracle" part has been written yet. It's all code around moving the token between nodes.

> Ven and Iota oracle solutions are still basically gleams in their creators eyes.
How is ChainLink any different? VEN and IoTA actually have deadlines which suggest they've made breakthroughs or at the very least, progress.
ChainLink has literally no roadmap. The cognitive dissonance here is incredible to think that Sergey somehow has the magic answer just because he's been sitting on the issue for a little while longer than anyone else.

If that's the case, why are these new 'shitcoin' projects with no basis already ahead of Sergey and ChainLink?

>>9336865
>zeppelin_os
This is one of the many devkits to make dApps. There's very likely going to be many more.

>Its not out classed at all.
Ari Juels wrote the whitepaper- sure. Conceptually it makes a lot of sense because it was conceptualised early on.
Larger projects realised "oh shit we need an on-off ramp for our blockchain" and developed a secure way to do that.

Do you think something like VEN which has Chinese Govt partnership would be outclassed by Sergey McPhilosophyMajor? kek. I'm being a bit condescending now because you're not being realistic here.

[Anonymous No.9336958]

>>9336865
there's more than one directors of engineering you dumb cuck. Evan Cheng may very well just be advising chainlink in his own time

[Anonymous No.9336969]

>>9336945
>If that's the case, why are these new 'shitcoin' projects with no basis already ahead of Sergey and ChainLink?
According to who, faggot

[Anonymous No.9336971]

>>9336868
Checked, the OP is a fool if he believes that crap. End of the day, longer term investment no better project with upside opportunity for high returns than Link. Anons looking for immediate gains should trade other projects, Link isn't good for that.

[Anonymous No.9336984]

>>9336919

[Anonymous No.9336989]

>>9336945
Iota has a deadline on PRESENTING what q is about. There is absolutely no reason to see Q as a competitor to a decentralized oracle network.

As for Ven, I don't even follow that shitcoin anymore. It's dead in the water. Enjoy staring at BMW images while Linkies drive them.

[Anonymous No.9336993]

>>9336971
Edited to add, FUD sucks and totally shits up this board.

[Anonymous No.9337017]

Facebook's new head of blockchain:
https://mobile.twitter.com/davidmarcus

He's following benioff, szabo, vitalik and some other notables.
Put your autism to work anons

[Anonymous No.9337027]

>>9336868
>You have no fucking clue what you're trying to say. Ven isn't even releasing oracles
I said early on that blockchain projects can develop their own oracles you fucking brainlet.
>The absolute state of /nubiz/
So VEN is building their own DECENTRALISED ORACLE.
Or would you rather believe a project with partnership with the Chinese Govt would choose an unsecure on-ramp for their platform?

Or are you saying Mobius (backbone oracle of Stellar, which will be the platform for CENTRAL BANKS digital currency) is going to be an inferior product?
Security will be the same. But building that security feature isn't fucking difficult.

IoTA which has CONFIRMED industry partnerships with shit like Bosch, which is one of the worlds largest distributors, is a scam?

>>9336930
>I'd rather stick with the strong silent type, as Tony Soprano would say.
Or you know, stick with the person who has a plan.
"if you don't plan, then you plan to fail"
ChainLink has literally no roadmap lol.

[Anonymous No.9337036]

>>9336791
>Stellar's Mobius, VEN and IoTA are all building DECENTRALISED oracles.
none of those are decentralised

[Anonymous No.9337040]

This thread is retarded. "site:github.com 'chainlinked'" returns very few results and none of them are interesting.

[Anonymous No.9337050]

>>9336971
what the fuck are you checking

[Anonymous No.9337121]

>>9335673
if you ever see "defeats the purpose" in a crypto thread you shoudl know it's an old meme getting rehashed. how new are you?

[Anonymous No.9337132]

>>9336719
Yeah I could refute everything. It seems your knowledge is surface level at best so you'd not even understand my responses. We can agree that möbius is a great buy. All in.

[Anonymous No.9337135]

>>9336719
it's fucking hilarious watching the newfags trying to fit in

[Anonymous No.9337155]

>>9337132
>I could refute everything but I won't

Lol you sound like Bill Gates talking about Bitcoin
>I would short it if I could- and I can but I won't...

[Anonymous No.9337183]

>>9336819
Speak for yourself ye retarded cuck. Don't assume everybody else is as dumb as you. Incentives are baked into chainlink's model and a shit ton of holders do expect to stake link as soon as it's ready

[Anonymous No.9337186]

>>9337155
stupid wastes energy. I'll pass.

[Anonymous No.9337187]

>>9336945
God's work, anon.

[Anonymous No.9337205]

>>9336945
Point to the relevant code wrt decentralized oracles being written by IOTA or ven please. I'll wait.

Hard to believe anyone could be so dumb. I suppose thats why the marketcaps of ven and iota are so high though.

[Anonymous No.9337240]

>>9336819
This is basically what it is
I could give a fuck about the future use case of crypto

I want as much speculation as possible so I can have the next person conned into buying my fake meme coin at the top

I feel the people arguing for the drastic need of block chain and smart contracts are laughable

But we need people like that, makes the ponzi stronger

[Anonymous No.9337268]

>>9336945
>ChainLink has literally no roadmap.
Oh my god not this again... just because they dont have PUBLIC roadmap everyone else if better ? Your fucking VEN doesnt even have a WHITEPAPER you fucking deluded son of a bitch

[Anonymous No.9337271]

>>9336819
You'll sell far too low and kill yourself when we hit 1,000.

[Anonymous No.9337301]

>>9336989
>As for Ven, I don't even follow that shitcoin anymore. It's dead in the water. Enjoy staring at BMW images while Linkies drive them.

[Anonymous No.9337324]

gib breadcrumbs

[Anonymous No.9337340]

>>9337268
That was a reactionary piece of FUD.
Don't act like the 20 points I made other than that are wrong.

>>9337301
Fuck off back to your facebook group

>>9336989
>As for Ven, I don't even follow that shitcoin anymore. It's dead in the water. Enjoy staring at BMW images while Linkies drive them.
Kek ignoring the only crypto with a national level partnership with CHINA and acting like it's a smart move.

They're going to be the backbone of China's new tech province- a place where Huawei, Tencent, China Mobile, China Telecom, Microsoft and Apple are investing BILLIONS of dollars and building MASSIVE datacentres.
VEN will run that fucking city you brainlet. And that city is just the beginning.

[Anonymous No.9337364]

>>9336945

there will be other dev kits sure. but if you know what openzeppelin is you know they're already the standard bearer and will become the default for any dApp developers working on ethereum, defaults matter in this space.

VEN's oracle isn't solving the same problem you goof. an oracle model that relies on different oracles depending on which platform you develop on is clumsy and shit. platform locked oracles will emerge and be used by some small, insignificant projects like what you see on Oraclize now, but chainlink's network will become the open standard that can interoperate with them all without the need for separate oracle infrastructure for supporting different chains.

vendor lock in is one of the biggest risks of jumping into this space right now. Chainlink's core value prop is that they alleviate that risk by providing a common pipeline for all data.

[Anonymous No.9337408]

>>9337271
My future isn’t based on Link going to $1000. $10 gives me plenty of profit. I’m already comfy af.

[Anonymous No.9337411]

How far do you think Chainlink is from decentralized oracle network implementation? Can they do it this year? Or are they not even close as the FUD says?

I just need $25 per stinker to make it.

[Anonymous No.9337419]

companies have nothing to gain buying into a decentralized network of centralized oracles. they'll go for, or be that centralized source.

[Anonymous No.9337427]

>>9335322
youre a fag

[Anonymous No.9337445]

>>9336566
nice dubs and if this is true...they have started on the reputation code

[Anonymous No.9337452]

>>9337364
>they're the standard bearer for an emerging market
That's like saying Searchengine.com is going to be the standard search engine for the internet in 1991.
You can't reliably predict the environment in the future as adoption hasn't even begun.
Fucking Ethereum being flipped as the primary smart contracts platform is still fair game as smart contract adoption is still atleast 2 years away from being mainstream.

>>9337364
>VEN's oracle isn't solving the same problem you goof
So you're saying the ONLY crypto with a NATIONAL level partnership with CHINA is developing a shitty alternative solution lol.
>the absolute state of /nubiz/

ChainLink is a great idea, but its idea (Decentralised oracles) is being implemented by projects independently because their mainnets are launching earlier than ChainLink.

They literally hit the oracle roadblock, and solved it over a summer.

[Anonymous No.9337472]

>>9337419
okay and swift invited Sergey into SIBOS 2 years in a row just for fun, is that correct?

[Anonymous No.9337476]

>>9335614
>>9335640
the only other result for that page is a biz thread from February 18th. So it may have been old. Who knows.

[Anonymous No.9337502]

VEN in 2018 lol, fucking chinks hyping and selling their 0,002c VEN to idiots pumping their price on announcement of announcements.

[Anonymous No.9337503]

Anyone who holds link and FUDs is an idiot. I’m personally starting to hype it everywhere I can where there are idiots willing to buy cryptos.

Anyone wanting to stake: I respect your hobby, but it’s not for me. I can’t wait to sell these things.

[Anonymous No.9337522]

>>9337472
look into the connection anon. EVERY instance of SWIFT mentioning Sergey is them saying
>Sergey is helping us build OUR OWN blockchain

Sergey has worked with many people, but ChainLink is his own baby. SWIFT is going to use their own blockchain and their own product that Sergey is helping build.
Why do you think ChainLink had no announcements or github updates for so long?

Seriously, simple google searches will reveal this to you.

[Anonymous No.9337536]

>>9337452

that comparison to search engines tells me all I need to know. you're evidently not a developer because that comparison is trash. openzeppelin isn't like a search engine/app at all, they're more like the IEEE you brainlet. we're talking development standards, not some consumer facing app you NEET

[Anonymous No.9337542]

>>9337452
Some shitty coin launching a mainnet doesn't mean they will suddenly have a functioning oracle system sooner than link, brainlet. You don't understand anything

[Anonymous No.9337568]

>>9337522
"their own blockchain" is hyperledger retard
and
>Sergey is helping us build OUR OWN blockchain
wrong, he's helping them build a "smart oracle"
"smart oracle" is what they always use to refer to link nodes

seriously, kill yourself. This is not funny anymore in the slightest. I am so done with these kind of shitposts.

[Anonymous No.9337621]

>>9337542

Yarly. Even if it were live, Oraclize has been out for 2 years and nobody gives a shit because its trash. Augur could be used, but its also trash. Every developer has been waiting for Chainlink to emerge. There will be one main chain agnostic data network and to date the competition doesn't stack up. Chainlink is the first project I've seen that can actually function in production as the core oracle service. It can service any use case and is architected in a way that will keep it current for years.

Anyone who's so anti-LINK that they're legit nolinkers are true brainlets.

[Anonymous No.9337633]

>>9337536
holy fuck im not saying zepplin is a search engine. The point of what I was saying is any prediction on the future of the internet ecosystem as early as 1991 or even 1994 was fucking nearsighted.

Everyone was talking about the internet and how to connect, but if you did you were a freak and uncommon.
That's where we are with crypto. Thinking you can predict the future is laughable.
Nobody know what's zepplin_os is outside of linkies

>>9337542
>shitty coin
>national level partnership with CHINA where they will be the backbone to a smartcity with billions of dollars ALREADY invested by Huawei, China Telecom, Tencent, Microsoft and Apple
Fucking newfags trigger me so hard

>>9337568
There is nothing anywhere that says Sergey is building something SWIFT will use. Literally EVERY documentation of Sergey working for SWIFT says that Sergey is "helping SWIFT build their own x"
Whatever Sergey builds in relation to SWIFT is for SWIFT. ChainLink is not SWIFT's product.

[Anonymous No.9337637]

>>9337542
Yeah lol, Chainlink is in work since 2014, even before ethereum was developed and some chink coin that came out of nowhere last year is supposed to release better product than chainlink in couple of months.... lol...

[Anonymous No.9337649]

>>9337568

this. brainlets gonna brainlet. each chainlink is an oracle. so them helping swift make their own oracle just means they helped them setup the chainlink in their system. do you really think a bunch of dinosaur bankers are going to just hack together their own oracle service? kek

[Anonymous No.9337658]

>>9337408
You don't realize how hard it is for a coin to go from 50 cents to 10 dollars do you....

Keep in mind we just had one of the biggest events happen to Link since it is anti shill coin

That FB group had loads of people
And apparently very rich people

Link barely got a pump before coming right back down

But yea , mainnet
It's going to magically explode in price like all the other coins that had mainnet right? I hold Link , but I already know this coin has a 3 percent chance of ever passing 3 dollars.

[Anonymous No.9337694]

>>9337637
Correction, Sergey has been working on it since 2014. Now some Chink coin with
>NATIONAL LEVEL PARTNERSHIP WITH CHINA
is developing a superior product in a fraction of the time.

The delusion of linkies hanging onto LINK only exists because they're happy to ignore the entire environment around them.
If LINK pulls off what it wanted, sure it'd be easily valuable. But the other projects outclassing LINK already is a clear sign it won't happen

[Anonymous No.9337700]

>>9337658
Nobody cares what coin you have 200 bucks in, pajeet

[Anonymous No.9337706]

>>9337694

the delusion of the non technical is astounding

[Anonymous No.9337708]

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/smart-contracts-and-the-future-of-banking-cm849118

"There is, however, one important roadblock to the widespread adoption of smart contracts for tangible goods, as well as non-blockchain-based intangible goods: smart contracts are confined within their native blockchain network, and unable to operate in the rest of the world."

We're gonna make it goys

[Anonymous No.9337723]

>>9337708
>"There is, however, one important roadblock to the widespread adoption of smart contracts for tangible goods, as well as non-blockchain-based intangible goods: smart contracts are confined within their native blockchain network, and unable to operate in the rest of the world."

literally the issue that chainlink is solving

[Anonymous No.9337725]

>>9337706
>this. brainlets gonna brainlet. each chainlink is an oracle. so them helping swift make their own oracle just means they helped them setup the chainlink in their system
This is fucking gibberish. What are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.9337737]

>>9337694
ok retard anon show us how VEN is developing that superior product that is already outclassing LINK
LINK has a testnet on ropsten up right now and a working product, missing only the aggregation and reputation contracts.

VEN has....?

[Anonymous No.9337740]

>>9337708
>>9337723

A 2016 Forbes story titled " Smart Contracts May Create Significant Innovative Disruption " noted that smart contracts could soon extend far beyond the movement of digital cash and be used "to effectuate business activities involving purchases and exchanges of virtually any tangible or intangible goods, services and rights (e.g., sales of securities, commodities, personal property, real estate, digital rights, etc.)."

[Anonymous No.9337774]

>>9336945
>projects designed for central banks

Absolutely disgusting

[Anonymous No.9337788]

>>9337708
>>9337723
The issue with smart contracts is usability- but smart contract platforms like Stellar and VEN are already developing their own, faster than ChainLink lol.

I was ChainLink to succeed for you guys because I like the memes, but pay attention to the fucking environment. The walls are closing in and you're all staring at the sky

>>9337737
>wants me to DYOR for him
literally a few google searches away.
VEN has an investment from Jim Breyer (Forbes listed him as the best tech investor) and
>NATIONAL LEVEL PARTNERSHIP WITH CHINA
For a minute, just pretend i'm not shitting on your hopes and dreams and trying to help you make money. Just HUMOUR that idea for a fucking minute. That that newfound open mindedness and look into it.

Seriously, the amount of newfags on this board thinking all crypto FUD is a personal attack at them is ridiculous.

>>9337774
https://www.ethnews.com/ibm-blockchain-lead-predicts-central-bank-digital-currency-on-stellar-soon
Sourced my claim fuckwit. Can you source your
>n-n-nuh!

[Anonymous No.9337799]

>>9337700
Good guess
I do have 200 bucks in Link
Because anyone who went all in this anti hype coin is a complete Moron

This is an absolute high risk coin. With out the masses loving Link like biz loves Link from an investment stand point this coin won't gain much

If it does? Good I have some

[Anonymous No.9337808]

(sigh)
I legitimately can't muster surprise or anger at this shit anymore. Sergey hasn't done a single god damn thing right (or any for that matter), yet you linkies talk of him like some omnipotent being that is about to change the world.
I can't even find the words to describe how much I loathe this sad excuse for a project right now. Holy shit. I have never hated any group of idiots more in my lifetime. Fuck all of you assholes that shill this fucking disgrace of a project.
God, what is happening to our board? The mental state of linkies is making me more and more depressed about our current situation and future. Each week I tell myself that nothing will surprise me anymore, and each week I find myself proven wrong.

On the plus side, textbooks in twenty years will be really interesting. I mean if schools still exist after all, because if you linkies are any sample of where humanity is going, there won't be any schools. We would just throw shit at each other and lick batteries.

Something something oracles something something decentralized.

Fuck. You.

[Anonymous No.9337816]

>>9337788
17 posts in this thread lol. Stay poor and make sure to live stream your suicide when it hits 1k

[Anonymous No.9337819]

>>9337788
Ok so you have nothing. To no surprise for anyone.
unironically kys

[Anonymous No.9337820]

>>9337658
Uhh...every coin 20x’d last year. Link could 20x in less than 6 months

[Anonymous No.9337829]

>>9337799
You have so few link it won't matter if it goes to 1k EOY or zero. Good strategy lmfao

[Anonymous No.9337840]

>>9337819
>LINK has nothing and no announcements
>VEN which has a NATIONAL LEVEL PARTNERSHIP WITH CHINA announces they're developing their own DECENTRALISED ORACLE for the mainnet launch by August

>hurhurr you have nothing my linkiee stay super stinkiii!

[Anonymous No.9337859]

>>9337840
how's that BMW partnership?

[Anonymous No.9337889]

>>9337411
what is pivotal tracker

[Anonymous No.9337890]

>>9337840
Stop. You're anonymous. You can just stop posting and nobody will remember your retardation tomorrow. There's no need to further embarrass yourself.

[Anonymous No.9337892]

>>9337725

if you think that was gibberish you clearly understand 0 about how chainlink functions

[Anonymous No.9337914]

>>9337829
I have 3k split up in 6 coins

I trade all of them to increase my sats
Because I am not a delusional hodl brainlet grasping to 1000 per link

But ... prove me wrong. I hope Link does make it, It'll be a lesson for me to trust others more. For now, I'll trade every Link top and buy the dips

[Anonymous No.9337919]

>>9337799

This isn't a high risk coin at all. I've been up on my buys since I bought them. and being anti-hype is a good thing. it means you know for sure these prices are undervalued and once a marketing director is onboarded and hype kicks up you're guaranteed a rocket from that.

[Anonymous No.9337958]

I love how people get heated as though they have clairvoyance and can see exactly how the fintech space is going to look in 5 years.

Here’s an idea faggots: treat it as a gamble. If you win great, if you lose, oh well, hopefully you weren’t a retard that invested his life savings into speculation. If you have alternative sources of income, none of this shit is important.

[Anonymous No.9337973]

>>9337919
Compared to pretty much any real investment, it doesn’t get much more high risk than cryptocurrency.

[Anonymous No.9337984]

>>9337859
Why do you anons get personally offended over your fucking crypto

I don't care about the BMW partnership and the shitshow that it was because VEN is already being built as the backbone to a smartcity with billions of dollars being invested into it from Huawei, Tencent, China Telecom, Microsoft and Apple lmfao

>>9337890
/biz/ is about making money. The newfags on this site that choose to see it as their crypto safespace is literally shitting up the board.

Being able to take a step back and re-evaluating decisions is paramount to 'making it'. Even if not making it, you need to be able to do that to succeed in life.

For fucks sake, try to poke holes into your decisions and your decisions will become airtight.
If you deflate your idea, it just means you nipped a bad decision early on

>>9337892
>each chainlink is an oracle
Wrong. Each node functions as an oracle and each chainlink can be used as something to improve your reputation (with diminishing returns) or as a mode of payment for performing as a node/oracle.
The thing is, the minimum required LINK to run a ChainLink node is fucking ZERO.

>they've helped them set up the chainlink in their system
lmao, an oracle is built to connect one system to another. You don't 'set it up in their system'.

Read VEN or Mobius or any other oracle platforms whitepaper, fuck, read LINK's whitepaper and you'll see.

[Anonymous No.9337998]

>>9337919
If, they get a marketing director.
I dunno , I'm a brainlet when it comes to in depth tech talk about Link or other coins.

But certain CEO are in communication with their investors. Basically being like , I got your back. Sergey doesn't give me that feel, seems like a bunch of NEETS are funding his own little personal project


K I'm done

[Anonymous No.9338020]

>>9337973

Nah. Traditional markets are heading for the next great depression. Meanwhile banks are planning on adopting DLT either way to reduce costs and help fix the shit that will have broken the economy. There's never been a better investment than crypto. Come 2020 the prices are never coming back down.

[Anonymous No.9338027]

>>9337914
trust people lol when you can easily just go read the wp and use common sense.

[Anonymous No.9338045]

>>9337984

> The thing is, the minimum required LINK to run a ChainLink node is fucking ZERO.

Right, just like plenty of services exist that are at your own risk, charge you nothing, but come with no SLA. What's your point? Just because you CAN stake zero doesn't mean a thing. You'll simply be skipped over for any contracts that require collateral.

[Anonymous No.9338069]

>>9337840
Ven isn't creating an oracle network like ChainLink they're just implemented an adapter that will allow IoT to write to the VeChain. I know you knew this and also know I'm wasting my time talking to stupid but in hopes others are not dumb and can comprehend this post.

[Anonymous No.9338085]

>>9338027
Wrong friend
Read my post
I'm a brainlet in alot of this stuff

Most white papers look the same to me. I only understand the basics. So knowing which project would be better than the next can be difficult to pin point through a meme paper.

All crypto projects look good on paper.
I'm about my gains tho anon

[Anonymous No.9338091]

>>9337889
You tell me.

[Anonymous No.9338121]

>>9338045
No? Do you know what decentralised oracles do? It means there's multiple points of confirmation. You gain reputation based on reliability of your node. Staking 0 LINK just means you start off with a lower rep, but a 0 LINK node running for a month can have higher rep than a 10k LINK node just starting out lmfao.

If your 0 LINK node provides bad information, you lose repuation and traffic to your node. Have you read the whitepaper?

>>9338069
>an adapter that will allow IoT to write to the VeChain
Gee, that almost sounds like exactly what LINK is doing for hyperledger.
Probably because it IS exactly what LINK is doing. They're building a fucking crypto Json Parser. Allowing for information to be written from one medium to another.

The fact that VEN can knock this shit out in a summer, and the fact that these projects will be open source before LINK launches their mainnet is a HUGE red flag for holding or buying LINK.

[Anonymous No.9338159]

>>9338121

> Staking 0 LINK just means you start off with a lower rep, but a 0 LINK node running for a month can have higher rep than a 10k LINK node just starting out lmfao

high rep isn't the only factor in oracle selection. contracts that require collateral will require collateral full stop. nothing you've said makes a single bit of difference, it just demonstrates the many different ways the network will be leveraged. that flexibility is a good thing, not a bug.

[Anonymous No.9338172]

what the fuck is this thread about. op says he got some juicy things through google search and you all are discussing fucking old pastas, bad fud and shitposts.
i want my fucking breadcrumbs

[Anonymous No.9338174]

>>9338091
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2129823

[Anonymous No.9338212]

>>9338121
>Staking 0 LINK just means you start off with a lower rep, but a 0 LINK node running for a month can have higher rep than a 10k LINK node just starting out lmfao.
>unironically fudding intentional design decisions

[Anonymous No.9338240]

>>9338174
Thank you fren, but for someone with no coding expertise you might have as well posted a bunch of moonrunes.

[Anonymous No.9338250]

>>9338159
MOST contracts won't require collateral. Why? Because it'll increase the price of pushing that contract through. Decentralised oracles means you'll get the same fucking security running a zero collateral contract because you'll be going through multiple nodes. Only difference is speed

Are you really this fucking new to blockchain?
You're arguing against one of the basic reasons blockchain is valuable LOL gtfo

>>9338172
He's a 'researcher' from that fucking facebook group. He found literally nothing and thought it was juicy.

>>9338212
contrasted with
>>9338159
>>9338045
>the absolute state of /nubiz/

[Anonymous No.9338253]

>>9337998
We are not investors, we are just speculators, we dont own a single part of his company, so there is no point of "getting our back". This is high industry project so expect it to behave like one

[Anonymous No.9338276]

>>9338253
>we don't own a single part of this company
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHH

[Anonymous No.9338279]

>>9338172
I'm an atheist, but I've been finding myself wishfully thinking of how nice it would be for Hell to exist, just so I can take some solace in knowing all you disgusting linkies might one day suffer for the damage and pain you've caused to /biz/ since the ICO.
Just a little bit of hope for justice.

[Anonymous No.9338301]

>>9338253
We most certainly ARE investors. Just not in the company, but in the decentralized network.

[Anonymous No.9338317]

>>9338276
You are trying too much...pack it up... you wont change anything here, save your time for christ sake, do something more productive please and enjoy your VEN gains....

[Anonymous No.9338376]

>>9338121
With VEN you can't customise the data you want you have to use what is provided and that's it. With ChainLink you can be specifically choose any URL/adapter and the node will fetch said data you requested. This is what makes Link unique and the network valuable because you're not fetching data from one source or IoT device. VENs oracle is limited to the VeChain.

[Anonymous No.9338419]

>>9338250

It doesn't matter that most contracts won't require collateral. What matters is the average value of the collateral that is required by those that do. At least try to keep up.

[Anonymous No.9338504]

>>9337998
The minimum amount is 1

[Anonymous No.9338522]

>>9338504
Minimum required LINK for a node is 0

>>9338419
>>9338504
>haven't read the whitepaper
t. these faggots

[Anonymous No.9338550]

>>9338522
No it’s not faggot, it is one. I just talked to Rory about this a week ago.

[Anonymous No.9338578]

>>9338253
We're neither investors or speculators, cause that would mean chainlink is a security (which it isn't).

We're future node operators and we didn't buy the token to make speculative gains, we honestly want to run nodes to Make the Internet Great Again. Every single one of us :)

[Anonymous No.9338611]

TRY HARDER FUDDERS
IRON HANDS TILL EOY, 2020 IF NECESSARY

[Anonymous No.9338621]

I feel really bad for anyone genuinely questioning link. I honestly have a hard time seeing how people here can be so stupid.

[Anonymous No.9338631]

>>9338550
>the community manager said it's 1 LINK minimum!
Meanwhile, Thomas Hodges, the fucking developer of the node, and the WHITEPAPER says it's 0.
>the ABSOLUTE STATE of /nubiz/

Source Rory said it's 1 and you can literally take his job.

[Anonymous No.9338650]

>>9338631
Who cares if it's 0. A 0 link node is not going to get any lucrative contracts. Kys

[Anonymous No.9338686]

>>9338650
>hasn't read the whitepaper
>doesn't understand decentralisation
I've literally explained this in my earlier posts IN THIS FUCKING THREAD

[Anonymous No.9338709]

>>9338686
I guarantee I understand the white paper better than you

[Anonymous No.9338783]

>>9338611
Delphi Fud, stay strong Marines.

[Anonymous No.9338786]

>>9338709
>vouching for his character on an anonymous board
kek. newfags gonna newfag

>unable to refute any fud
>denying the reality of the whitepaper and words from the DEVELOPER

[Anonymous No.9338813]

>>9338786
Go buy some more VEN, faggot

[Anonymous No.9338838]

>>9338813
>He thinks VEN is a bad buy
oh boy... You realise it's possible to own MULTIPLE cryptos right?

[Anonymous No.9339212]

>>9336566
Steve has since blocked us from seeing this since this was posted. I think he might be browsing /nubiz/

[Anonymous No.9339876]

>>9338631
>>the community manager said it's 1 LINK minimum!
>Meanwhile, Thomas Hodges, the fucking developer of the node, and the WHITEPAPER says it's 0.
>>the ABSOLUTE STATE of /nubiz/

>Source Rory said it's 1 and you can literally take his job.


Doesn>>9338631
>>the community manager said it's 1 LINK minimum!
>Meanwhile, Thomas Hodges, the fucking developer of the node, and the WHITEPAPER says it's 0.
>>the ABSOLUTE STATE of /nubiz/

>Source Rory said it's 1 and you can literally take his job.


It doesnt matter. Everyone who wanys to use link network will HAVE TO pay it in link. If link becomes the standard, everybody will use. Add that to pos nature of link, great demand , not enough link on the market, sky is the limit. Nobody says this is certain, but it is worth the risk>>9338631
>>the community manager said it's 1 LINK minimum!
>Meanwhile, Thomas Hodges, the fucking developer of the node, and the WHITEPAPER says it's 0.
>>the ABSOLUTE STATE of /nubiz/

>Source Rory said it's 1 and you can literally take his job.

It doesnt matter. Everyone who wants to use link network will HAVE TO pay it in link. If link becomes the standard, everybody will use it. Add that to pos nature of link, great demand , not enough link on the market, sky is the limit. Nobody says this is certain, but it is worth the risk

[Anonymous No.9340144]

>>9335935
>newfag
>dumbass

Pick both in your case.

[Anonymous No.9340650]

>>9339212
lol he really did hide that some time after this was posted.

i'm so sorry steve.

[Anonymous No.9340680]

>>9335627
Wow after reading the 3rd page I can indeed see that what he said was false! It's almost like it's fucking obvious he's just trying to spend fake FUD as a joke!

[Anonymous No.9341015]

>>9338279
I'm an atheist too but I find your idea of infinite punishment for a finite thought crime to be illogical.

[Anonymous No.9341045]

>>9339876
did you have a stroke

[Anonymous No.9341065]

>girlfriend walks in
>"What you doin hun?"
>Look up from reading this thread
>"Oh..nothing"
>Tfw reality disconnect

[Anonymous No.9341106]

>>9341045
no, just a lot of vodka

[Anonymous No.9341108]

IN THIS THREAD WE ALL APOLOGIZE TO STEVE.

[Anonymous No.9341133]

>>9341015
there's no such thing as finite; all things have cause and effect. any action you take, every decision you make, echoes throughtout eternity.

[Anonymous No.9341161]

>>9338783
Its always Delphi, they are the scum of BIZ.

[Anonymous No.9341176]

>>9341108
W E

[Anonymous No.9341503]

>>9335673
>the virgin "articulate and well-sourced rebuttal"

>>9336205
>the Chad "superfluous FUD"

[Anonymous No.9341528]

>>9341108
Sorry Steve

[Anonymous No.9341551]

>>9341108
Sry Steve, LINK $1K EOY

[Anonymous No.9341716]

>>9338172
This. I hate this thread and I hate all stupid link shillers and fudders. Whenever an actually interesting thing about LINK is to be discussed the thread just turns into fucking retarded arguments that have been repeated a million times already instead of talking about the new / interesting thing going on

[Anonymous No.9342267]

>>9340144
Smd in your case ahole.

[Anonymous No.9342897]

>>9335372
You can really tell who the newfags are when they legitimately respond to FUD that has existed since before chainlink.

[Im The Real Astro !L8dQx4TGuw No.9343039]

LINK GOING DOWN AGAIN THANKS TO DELPHI
I FUCKING TOLD YOU NOT TO TRUST THEM

[Anonymous No.9343074]

>>9343039
Ok

[Anonymous No.9343444]

>>9343039
>GAY in ID

[Anonymous No.9343493]

>>9343444
Trips. We made it

[Im The Real Astro !L8dQx4TGuw No.9343554]

>>9343444
No it actually says R U GAY because you are the faggot.

[Anonymous No.9343586]

>>9335512
your id, haha

[Im The Real Astro !L8dQx4TGuw No.9343611]

>>9343586
OK I ADMIT IT
DELPHI IS A FAGGOT GROUP AND WE ACCEPT ALL GAYS

[Anonymous No.9343935]

>>9343554
>Hello Sirs
>I am from a group called the Pajeets of New Delhi
>I bet you haven't noticed how 4 Link threads show up all saying "SELL SELL SELL"
>Well this is the New Delhi Pajeets at work
>They are masters of deception AND ARE MISLEADING YOU!!
>DO NOT TRUST THE NEW DELHI!

[Anonymous No.9345000]

>>9341716
>thread about literally nothing
>oh man I hate it when you guys ruin interesting threads like this!!!
fucking newfag

[Anonymous No.9345044]

>>9341716
>>9338172
They allowed him to share this with you

https://github.com/thodges-gh/Chainlinked

[Anonymous No.9345080]

>>9343444
Trips verified. Check em

[BnB a No.9345119]

why the fuck is LINK dumping?????????????????????????????????