[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 14 KB, 252x238, sec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9299594 No.9299594 [Reply] [Original]

I have dug and can't find any official evidence that would point towards an actual meeting/hearing/etc with the SEC discussing the classification of ETH or other currencies as security. All it is, is a few news articles, mostly on bullshit websites with no credibility, and a few tweets about this.

SEC, CFTC have issued nothing to suggest this is actually occuring

>> No.9300052

nope

>> No.9300118

>>9299594
no, theres no hearing today.
orchestrated FUD again.

>> No.9300154

>>9300118
Yes there is
https://www.wsj.com/articles/worlds-second-most-valuable-cryptocurrency-under-regulatory-scrutiny-1525167000

>> No.9300167

>>9299594
>he fell for the China FUD
>he fell for the 'SEC is banning cryptos' fud
Classic /biz/

>> No.9300177

>>9300154
WSJ is fake news anon.

>> No.9300194

>>9300177
And you're just now realizing it

>> No.9300199
File: 223 KB, 496x384, 1524085718740.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9300199

>>9300177
I fucking knew some idiot would say shit like this.

>> No.9300208

>>9300154
>No meeting mentioned

>> No.9300219

>>9300154

That's a meeting, not a hearing. Its significance is 0.

>> No.9300229
File: 2.42 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_2237.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9300229

FUD anon FUD anon you fell for FUD anon FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in FOMO back in

>> No.9300231

>>9300219
MEETING. NOT HEARING. Just really want to hammer that into people.

>> No.9300253
File: 218 KB, 300x366, 1469257051156.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9300253

>>9300199
Its so true though. They also have an sjw agenda. And female empowerment. Basically, WSJ is a mess.

>> No.9300329

>>9300199
from the article
>A working group of regulators including senior SEC and CFTC officials are scheduled to discuss the matter on May 7, one of the people said.
>one of the people said

dunno guys

https://www.wsj.com/articles/worlds-second-most-valuable-cryptocurrency-under-regulatory-scrutiny-1525167000

>> No.9300393

>>9300329
if there really is no SEC meeting whoever wrote that article needs to be held accountable, fucking sick of this hearsay bullshit that has financial repercussions not being prosecuted

>> No.9300398

>>9300154
Nothing in this mentions may 7. Meeting today is fake news

>> No.9300733

>>9300398
that's a buy signal

>> No.9301090

>All the retards claiming to be insiders on a event that was purely fictional
lmao

>> No.9301146

https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/watch?hearingid=D8EC44B1-F141-4778-A042-584E0F3B9D39

>> No.9301164

>>9299594
posted in another thread
>A working group of regulators including senior SEC and CFTC officials are scheduled to discuss the matter on May 7, one of the people said.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/worlds-second-most-valuable-cryptocurrency-under-regulatory-scrutiny-1525167000

no mention of a hearing just a few lines in the article about a meeting that got blown the fuck out of proportion.

>> No.9301166

>>9299594
YES OP, you can get the latet news at lemonparty.org

>> No.9301183

>>9301146
>from feb 6th SEC hearing
nice.
also prove it faggot
https://www.sec.gov/news/upcoming-events

>> No.9301184

>>9300329
>one of the people said

Kek trump really needs to reign in these kikes.

>> No.9301195

>>9300177
100

>> No.9301206

>>9299594
my dad works for the SEC, the meeting is being held but the participants are waiting for the funds to clear before making a ruling

>> No.9301280

>>9299594
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-07/dancing-badgers-draw-more-attention-than-sec-at-ethereum-meeting

>> No.9301338

>>9301280
>meeting
maybe. so what.
>to discuss the possibility of a hearing to talk about the possibility of possibly discussing regulating crypto sometime in the future, possibly

that's practically the sum of it

>> No.9301477

>>9301146
Faggot this was posted in February shit posting Panjeet
https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/virtual-currencies-the-oversight-role-of-the-us-securities-and-exchange-commission-and-the-us-commodity-futures-trading-commission

>> No.9301510
File: 53 KB, 1280x720, carlos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9301510

It's all FUD faggots, you fell a victims to the pump and dump groups.

>> No.9301543

>>9301184
Why would he do that? "People said" is one of his most favorite sources of information.

>> No.9301659

>>9301477
Holy fuck, I just realized that. I pasted the link from a daily crypto email saying this was happening today. My apologies anons.