/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9261439]

BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE BCORE

[Anonymous No.9261448]

>>9261439
BCORE had it's chance. Now it's time to move on to the next gen.

[Anonymous No.9261453]

>>9261439
why would looking at percentage matter when the total market cap is increasing?

[Anonymous No.9261455]

Bitcoin is like AltaVista. Everyone will forget it within a decade

[Anonymous No.9261463]

Tfw bought bcore like a fucking idiot

[Anonymous No.9261464]

>>9261439
>>9261448

Samefag bcash buyer
You couldn't sway public opinion for Hilary and you won't sway public opinion on Bitcoin Trash. Sucks right? Eat shit

[Anonymous No.9261477]

>>9261464
I don't want that shitcoin to win either. I want NANO, eth, IOTA and eos to fight it out for #1

[Anonymous No.9261484]

>>9261464
Shouldn't you go back your containment board, /pol/tard?

[Anonymous No.9261492]

>>9261455
altawhat?
t.94

[Anonymous No.9261502]

>>9261464
Implying Bitcon Core isn't the Hillary Clinton of the cryptocurrency world
>Incumbent power
>Defended by shills completely devoid of logic so they have to resort to constant autistic screeching.
>Dependent on censorship to push a false narrative
>Eventually going to experience an upset that will lead to cosmic levels of butt-hurt throughout the known galaxy.

[Anonymous No.9261513]

>>9261477

Iota is a shitskin allahu Akbar coin you're donating Bitcoins to muslims dumbass
>>9261484
And yea some fag got me rich last year posting on /pol/ so now I'm
Here to help make crypto great again. You're going to lose yet again faggot. Common sense is my super power.

[Anonymous No.9261532]

>>9261513
I dont care what the people I give money to believe. I care about the tech and eventual adoption.

[Anonymous No.9261558]

>>9261513
Oh, look, a mental midget emotionally attached to an unscalable old shitcoin who is also easy to manipulate into making financial decisions by random strangers on the internet.

[Anonymous No.9261570]

>>9261464
Cope harder corecuck

[Anonymous No.9261573]

>>9261558

You think normies browse this shit and see our autism? Jfc you guys must suck at trading. Undcalable old... listen to yourself god damn I wanna hit you with a fastball to the noggin. How can you defend anything other than Bitcoin absolute idiot just watch dude just watch

[Anonymous No.9261589]

What does this have to do with your shitty fork battle? BCash is where it was last August. The money's going to other alts, not Bitcoin forks.

[Anonymous No.9261597]

>>9261573
>Jfc you guys must suck at trading. Undcalable old... listen to yourself god damn I wanna hit you with a fastball to the noggin. How can you defend anything other than Bitcoin absolute idiot just watch dude just watch

[Anonymous No.9261599]

>>9261464
>>9261484

>cucks thinking BCH isn't the chad donald

[Anonymous No.9261608]

>>9261599
checked

[Anonymous No.9261620]

I've had good bants with you Bitcoin cash cunts in this thread you've been all great company. See ya when Bitcoin smashes through 25K. I'm
Leaving this thread before my ass swells up from this gayness

[₿ !1GS3StGNTw No.9261645]

>>9261599
>bumbling idiot of a president
>consistent scandals
>went so far as to dictate to his doctor what his physical examination paperwork should say because he is grossly out of shape
>has to pay to fuck pornstars

Yeah bitcoin cash is a solution, not the problem. Go back to >>>/pol/ degenerate.

[Anonymous No.9261661]

>>9261453

>Why would losing the market lead matter

[Anonymous No.9261663]

>>9261620

>We haven't solved any of our problems but we're on the way to 25k!

Deluded bcore

[Anonymous No.9261680]

>>9261453
>>9261464
>>9261513
>>9261573
>>9261620
Hard BCope

[Anonymous No.9261719]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB0mG7wMvM8&list=FL3Kiggh35TrTPV6MbyUreJA&t=1s&index=1

>don't call it bcash you bcore loving corecuck kikestream shill!!!!!
>oh whats that you don't like either bitcoin or bcash? FUK U THEN COREKEK!!!!!
kek you cashcunts always make me laugh at least.

[Anonymous No.9261890]

>>9261645
corecuck SEETHING at my digits.

>>9261599
>>9261608

[Anonymous No.9261903]

the only people geting cucked are those buying a fully chinese owned, fully chinese mined clone of bitcoin, when everyone else got it for free.

if you dont like bitcoin and don't like the direction you think it's being taken in, jump into a modern coin like ethereum or one of its competitors. nobody is switching from bitcoin to litecoin, and nobody is switching from bitcoin to any of it's clones.

[Anonymous No.9261927]

>>9261903

Miners are the same for both coin, dipshit. They have the exact same mining algo

[Anonymous No.9261956]

>>9261903
>fully chinese mined clone of bitcoin
the absolute state of corecucks

[Anonymous No.9261960]

>>9261455
I member

[Anonymous No.9261977]

>>9261463
tfw up 2000% since buying

[Anonymous No.9261997]

>>9261532
If BCH gets more hash rate and a longer chain, it will become BTC by definition.
All normans ALWAYS buy BTC first and this time the transfers will be instant and it will be accepted more as a currency.

[Anonymous No.9262006]

>>9261927
no shit, they used the same algorithm that's enabled centralized mining in china. wonder why they didn't fix that huge weak point in their fork?

>>9261956
nice reading comprehension. remember i own both, and i got this chinese clone for free, probably more than you shills can even afford to buy. but nice try, if you shout loud enough maybe you can drown those bad feelings out.

[Anonymous No.9262010]

>>9261997
the longest chain only works for valid chains, when they broke the proof of work they forever become a different coin, hash power isn't going to change that, just like ethereum classic getting more hash power than ethereum doesn't make it etherem.

[Anonymous No.9262015]

>>9262006
>and i got this chinese clone for free, probably more than you shills can even afford to buy.
If you actually think like you act itt, you would have sold it all like idiots on reddit did

[Anonymous No.9262026]

>>9262006
There is no definite answer to whether mining centralization is "bad". It's like saying that big companies shouldn't be able to develop better tools to dig gold. If you decide to limit it to gpus, it's a very commie move.

[Anonymous No.9262029]

>>9262015
nice cope, but i can assure you whales have not dumped our fork coins, we still own them. why would we sell when everyone else is trying to hype and pump it, including the miners?

trading is a late adopters game, we're here for the long haul.

[Anonymous No.9262035]

>>9261439
b CASH CASH CASH

I actually like B CASH don't know why the name infuriates bitcoin cash cash cash supporters its a catchy name I think they just like getting triggered

[Anonymous No.9262041]

>>9262026
well, for something that is supposed to be a peer to peer decentralized currency, mining centralization undermines the whole decentralized part of it.

most of my money is sitting in coins that aren't based on proof of work, or have a solid plan to move away from proof of work. the writing is on the wall.

[Anonymous No.9262045]

>>9262029
nice larp

[Anonymous No.9262054]

>>9262010
They might not get the BTC ticker, but by white paper definition, they will become Bitcoin.
Also when the flipping happens and people are happy with it, I literally see no future for the segwit horseshit. I wouldn't be surprised if the network would die altogether and the BTC ticker would become available.

[Anonymous No.9262056]

I can't wait for that shitcoin Bcore to have lower tx's than BCH, what will they say then, that it's "digital gold" and not supposed to be sent around?

[Anonymous No.9262061]

>>9262026
t. bitmain shill

Fucking KYS

[Anonymous No.9262064]

>>9262041
And PoS is not centralized? :)

[Anonymous No.9262065]

I'm getting sick of having to explain this to brainlets on /biz/. Did you notice that big grey quadrant that's the primary driving force in BTC's falling market share? That's "other." Do you know what that category represents? Billions of dollars in artificially inflated market caps for coins with zero to no use case and minuscule volume. Go on Coinmarketcap sometime and scroll past the top 20 or so. How many of those coins present a legitimate threat to the dominance of ANY of the major projects (BTC, ETH, XRP, EOS, etc.)? Sure, they have tiny market caps by comparison but there are a shitload of these useless coins and there are new ICOs every day.

[Anonymous No.9262067]

>>9262026
>There is no definite answer to whether mining centralization is "bad"
behold the literal retards buying bcash
"but muh whitepaper" they say, then they say some shit like that.
maybe you faggots should try actually reading the whitepaper for once.

[Anonymous No.9262095]

>>9262041
Also gold used to be pretty much a global currency. It didn't matter that some entities were better at mining it, the only thing that made it work was scarcity. The supply centralization doesn't really affect mass adoption and usability.
In your way of thinking we should have used rocks as a currency because everyone could pick up rocks from the ground.

[Anonymous No.9262108]

>>9262067
So BCoreans care about the whitepaper all of a sudden? BCore pulled out the old BTC ledger and is doing a transplant in a new creepto called BTC+SW+LN_vA0.1

[Anonymous No.9262118]

>>9261439

>thinking this is a negative for Bitcoin in any way, shape or form

kek

[Anonymous No.9262120]

>>9262045
great contribution to yet another thread, as is typical for you desperate late adopters

>>9262054
you're misunderstanding the whitepaper then, they broke consensus with what is overwhelmingly regarded as bitcoin, so they're no longer in the running for being bitcoin. the longest chain is relevant for 51% attacks only, to choose the best/highest chain to build on, that's all.

the whitepaper says nothing about these philosophical questions everyone wants to keep asking about the "real bitcoin".

>>9262064
could be, in fact, it's guaranteed to be centralized to the same degree that proof of work is, because you could mine a proof of work coin like bitcoin, and sell it for ethereum to stake with.

the important difference is if someone tries to attack the network, they lose the very thing they were using to attack the network. if some chink tries to attack bitcoin, what happens? we can try to change the proof of work, but then they develop new asics, or buy up a bunch of GPUs with all of their money, then it's impossible to prevent another attack, because they now have a majority or close to of general purpose mining hardware that survives any other fork attempt.

proof of stake in theory prevents attackers from getting another shot, which is why so many projects are starting to prefer it.

[Anonymous No.9262134]

>>9262120
tl,dr

[Anonymous No.9262142]

>>9262095
not even close to being the same, by most people incorrectly arguing here that more hash power on a forked coin makes it the real coin, what mining centralization means is full control over the entire coin itself.

an entity being able to mine more gold doesn't mean they have the power to change the properties of gold.

>>9262108
everyone in cash arguing about the whitepaper seems to have a very twisted view of what's actually said in the whitepaper. the stance on minority forks has been clear from the start, regardless of the direction you think is the right way to go, satoshi himself made it perfectly clear that forking to a minority chain is something that should be entirely avoided.

[Anonymous No.9262143]

>>9262067
Whatever algoritm you use, somebody will find a way to scale it better than others.
Even with Gpus it's getting centralized. The Nvidia mining cards have much better hashrate/power consumption ratios and you can only buy them by 500 min, so normal people can forget about it.

[Anonymous No.9262146]

>>9262095
>It didn't matter that some entities were better at mining it
You could fork away from the miners, but the miners putting work is the whole F*CKING POINT and if Core doesn't want PoW anymore it should fork away and call itself an altcoin (not Bitcoin). What gives Core the right to change the model so drastically and still keep the brand name?

The miners are securing the blockchain both until they get their reward and as long as they have to keep profiting from their farms and that's why Core villifying the miners proves it's AGAINST bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9262147]

>>9262134
and that's why you'll stay poor forever.

[Anonymous No.9262155]

>>9262146
by your argument cash also doesn't have the right, because they changed the proof of work algorithm. so what exactly are you trying to argue?

[Anonymous No.9262166]

>>9262143
>Whatever algoritm you use, somebody will find a way to scale it better than others.
Doesn't even matter if there is no mathematical way to improve processing time.

Economies of scale will ALWAYS exist, no matter what algorithm you pick.

[Anonymous No.9262167]

The more triggered corecucks get the more sire I am about their eventual demise. This is like trump and brexit all over again. The writings on the wall for corecucks.

[Anonymous No.9262174]

>>9262142
>the stance on minority forks has been clear from the start, regardless of the direction you think is the right way to go, satoshi himself made it perfectly clear that forking to a minority chain is something that should be entirely avoided.
Did you even READ what I wrote?
BCore is the fork, therefore it doesn't matter if it has more PoW, because it's NOT BITCOIN you imbecile.

[Anonymous No.9262177]

>>9262155
>by your argument cash also doesn't have the right, because they changed the proof of work algorithm
pretty sure that they didn't
they changed the difficulty adjustment algorithm, to one that is undeniably better

[Anonymous No.9262185]

>>9262174
but it simply isn't the fork, that's just your (incorrect) opinion. cash has made more changes to the core chain that bitcoin has, that's exactly the difference between a hard and soft fork.

[Anonymous No.9262197]

>>9262177
that's exactly the same thing, the difficulty adjustment is more important than the actual proof of work algorithm itself. trying to argue any differently is just severe cognitive dissonance.

[Anonymous No.9262221]

Another shit thread, brought to you by BCH. Yay.

[Anonymous No.9262224]

>>9261439

Looking forward to the day where NIM is #1 and I can go buy a coffee for 0.01 NIM

[Anonymous No.9262237]

>>9262155
>because they changed the proof of work algorithm

[Anonymous No.9262247]

>>9262185
>that's exactly the difference between a hard and soft fork.
That's so ignorant I'm convinced more than ever BTC is doomed. If you put real money in it at least try to learn it.

[Anonymous No.9262252]

>>9262155
>because they changed the proof of work algorithm

[Anonymous No.9262262]

Bcucks falling for the ver pump and dump

[Anonymous No.9262271]

bcash
the fake bitcoin

[Anonymous No.9262272]

>>9262237
nice argument. i'd love to see you even try to argue that changing the difficulty algorithm is not changing the proof of work.

>>9262247
ok, let me spell it out, since you clearly don't understand the difference:

a hard fork, makes the chain going forward invalid for current clients, meaning when cash hard forked, existing clients did not recognize the chain, and because the overwhelming majority did not move, cash is not bitcoin, and is a fork.

a soft fork makes the chain going forward valid to all existing clients, meaning they can validate blocks and stay on the longest chain without issue. a bitcoin client from a few years ago can and does sync up to bitcoin's chain today. of course they can't necessarily interact with the full content of the chain, and you could argue old clients aren't able to validate the full chain thanks to segwit, which is true, but as far as proof of work is concerned, and as far as the blockchain itself, it is the same valid chain.

that clear it up for you?

[Anonymous No.9262273]

>>9261502

Corecucks literally believe that BTC has a holy mandate and that its number one position is eternally guaranteed. See Giacomo Zucco's recent tweetstorm.

This is the kind of hubris that precipitates an epic downfall. Just like Hillary thought her victory was assured, Bitcoin Core's laurel-resting will be its own downfall.

[Anonymous No.9262297]

>>9262067

The word "decentralization" appears precisely 0 times in the whitepaper.

[Anonymous No.9262298]

>>9261477
Fucking lmao
eos, nano and iota are absolute trashcoins, eth is the clear winner

[Anonymous No.9262314]

>>9262252
you late adopters are so clueless, it really is embarrassing.

satoshi's proof of WORK requires WORK. where do you think the work comes from? sha256? you'd be wrong. the WORK in proof of WORK comes from the difficulty, which must be carefully and constantly updated in consensus to keep the blocks arriving at a constant rate, to prevent certain attacks on the network from mining power arriving and leaving.

by changing the difficulty algorithm, they changed the proof of work. but they only changed it enough so they could keep mining with their asics, because doing any different would go against their goals for the coin, which was mining profitability.

[Anonymous No.9262331]

>>9262273
i dont think they do, i do think they have no interest in using a chinkcoin though, when clear "successors" are already soaking up huge amounts of the market cap.

nobody is going to switch from bitcoin to a bitcoin clone, the value proposition isn't there.

[Anonymous No.9262348]

>>9262298
AND iota is where you're wrong.

IOTA will take over within the next 2 years.
Realize this. Buy now.

[Anonymous No.9262355]

>>9262348
>>9262298
Aside from BTC.
BTC XLM IOTA
No reason to buy anything else aside from XMR if you want drugs

[Anonymous No.9262359]

>>9262197
Are you seriously defending the BTC DAA despite the fact it's now well understood that it is a way BCH can outright destroy the BTC chain?

[Anonymous No.9262361]

>>9262348
>>9262355
stellar and iota don't really pass the inertia test, unless they see some huge growth and actual adoption like ethereum in the next year, they're going to be left behind by newer hotter things.

[Anonymous No.9262362]

>>9262272
>that clear it up for you?
Don't bother.

>>9262273
People will stop buying it when they'll see it doesn't go up in price like other options. That's the harsh truth.

>>9262297
Because Bitcoin isn't meant to be decentralized, it's meant to be a distributed ledger.

[Anonymous No.9262365]

>>9261439
Thanks just bought 100k Others

[Anonymous No.9262373]

>>9262314
>which must be carefully and constantly updated in consensus to keep the blocks arriving at a constant rate, to prevent certain attacks on the network from mining power arriving and leaving.
Which is what the BCH DAA is doing and the corekek DAA cannot. WHICH is the reason why if BCH reaches parity with BTC, BTC will just cease to exist.

[Anonymous No.9262377]

>>9262359
cash can't destroy anything, the difficulty adjustment has been that way forever, and there have been many sha-256 coins in the past, and none of them have "destroyed" bitcoin. it's just wishful thinking.

and im not defending anything, just correcting ignorance from people that think you can change everything but sha-256 and still argue that you haven't changed proof of work.

[Anonymous No.9262383]

>>9262362
>Because Bitcoin isn't meant to be decentralized
you know how i can tell you're a late adopter?

[Anonymous No.9262389]

>>9262331
> nobody is going to switch from bitcoin to a bitcoin clone
But you and all the coretards that think like you already did.

[Anonymous No.9262390]

>>9262108
I'm saying you dipshits don't actually understand the whitepaper, and more than likely have never even read it.
>>9262174
which one has replay protection you brainlet. that alone tells you which one is the alt coin.
>>9262297
>this word isn't there that means it doesn't meat the definition hurrrr
way to prove my point.

[Anonymous No.9262398]

>>9262373
updating with a sliding window and updating with a sliding window of zero is the same thing. sure cash has a more "live" update than bitcoin does.

>if BCH reaches parity with BTC
no reason to even think it will

[Anonymous No.9262409]

>>9262389
no sure what you mean. like i said, the majority of my money is in non proof of work coins as future proofing. but i'm still using bitcoin, and i have no interest in litecoin, or dash, or gold, or cash, or diamond, as does the rest of the non-speculative market.

[Anonymous No.9262412]

>>9262377
Christ you're clueless. No other sha256 coin has ever been executing on the original proven vision for bitcoin, while what used to be bitcoin has been turned into an ICO for a centralised hub and spoke network that is obviously a subversion attempt from the incumbent central banking system.
It is beyond a foregone conclusion where this equilibrium leads. And that will result in the DAA killing the BTC chain.

[Anonymous No.9262443]

>>9262412
>original vision
more weasel words. these political arguments are tiresome, and you won't convince anyone not already eating all that shit up.

[Anonymous No.9262445]

>>9262409
What you think is bitcoin is actually just a subverted clone, artificially limited in throughput and a centralised hub and spoke network for the banks to reimplement their architecture on top of it forced in. So as I said, you already fell for a much shittier bitcoin clone than cash.

[Anonymous No.9262456]

>>9262445
see
>>9262443

[Anonymous No.9262460]

>>9262445
You're wasting your time arguing him....

[Anonymous No.9262463]

>>9262443
> I know everyone else is aware but my religion requires me to feign incomprehension.
Ok Luke, you have fun with that whole kike zombie geocentric cult thing you've got going on while you're ignoring this facet of material reality also I guess. Enjoy.

[Anonymous No.9262469]

>"oh no, I think I bought something else when trying to buy bitcoin!"
if you bought bitcoin from bitcoin.com you may have been the victim of this scam. the bcash scheme run by roger has seen much controversy, including twitter bans and being denounced by ethereum creator. thankfully even if you have bought bcash, the problem is easily rectified. although bcash is not as valuable as bitcoin, it can still be traded on most major exchanges. in future, buy from a reliable exchange and avoid bitcoin.com.

[Anonymous No.9262479]

>>9262460
Yeah I get that now, poor fucker. He's going to have to lose everything to understand.
Oh well. There's no saving some folk.

[Anonymous No.9262485]

>>9262460
if only there were arguments. all everyone sees in these threads are political posturing, and warping of words and definitions to fit into a narrative.

you cash circlejerkers are doing more harm than good


>>9262463
>he actually thinks i'm some religious nut
you guys are just purely predictable.

again, these pathetic childish arguments will get you nowhere. you think the greater public, and institutional investors are looking at you all and thinking, yeah, that's a community i want to be a part of, one that's turned into a giant meme about "satoshi's vision" and "corecucks"?

[Anonymous No.9262492]

>>9262479
>lose everything
please tell me how this is possible when i own equal amounts of bitcoin and all of it's airdrops?

not everyone is a late adopter, remember, i can't lose.

[Anonymous No.9262510]

>>9261439
126k June 2018.

[Anonymous No.9262518]

>>9262460
>"They vote with their CPU power, expressing their acceptance of
valid blocks by working on extending them and rejecting invalid blocks by refusing to work on them.
Any needed rules and incentives can be enforced with this consensus mechanism."
>conveniently leaves out the part about consensus.
the network is designed to be changed by consensus.
the network decides what bitcoin is by consensus, not by what you perceive as someone else's vision.

[Anonymous No.9262531]

>>9262510
i do think we'll be seeing six figures in the next 36 months, but obviously not june.

[Anonymous No.9262532]

>>9262492
> no no no anon I'm just talking bullshit I don't actually trade on my own nonsense.
Phew, that's a relief, better to be a slimy hypocrite than a consistent honorable abject loser eh Moshe?

[Anonymous No.9262551]

>>9262532
>trade
trading is a late adopter's game.

i just know not to take cash or any other clone of bitcoin particularly seriously, like litecoin, gold, diamond, dash, etc. that doesn't mean i'm going to dump my cash airdrop though, literally dont need the money, and it would be a waste seeing as how easily manipulatable cash is due to the position miners have the coin in.

nothing i have said has been wrong, opinionated maybe, but i'm not trying to twist words and make political arguments for something this unimportant.

[Anonymous No.9262554]

>>9262460

>LN is not peer to peer
>It will be controlled by financial institutions

what the fuck is this garbage

[Anonymous No.9262565]

>>9262554
someone who doesn't understand the bitcoin whitepaper, the current bitcoin network, and the lightning network.

funny how it's nothing but the same misunderstood things that keep getting reposted over and over again.

[Anonymous No.9262570]

>>9262554
Yeah whoever could get that impression

[Anonymous No.9262577]

>>9262570
you're trying to argue centralization on a network that isn't even being used yet?

[Anonymous No.9262581]

>>9262551
Don't take them seriously, but don't trade them for the millions worth of "the real btc" a genius early adopter like you could surely pull if you were so inclined to actually put your money where your slimy weasel lying mouth is.
Right.
I think we're done.

[Anonymous No.9262587]

>>9261439
The sick boomer coin can't even get above 10k, that's so sad, meanwhile Bitcoin CASH is breaking out.

[Anonymous No.9262591]

>>9261464

>Blockstream hires the same shilling team used in the presidential election and are going to lose again because Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9262600]

>>9262591
>Bitmain hires the same shilling team used in the presidential election and are going to lose again because Bitcoin is the real Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9262613]

>>9262570

There will be large nodes which will come from organisations and businesses who will facilitate a lot of payments for their products, but there's no way to tell that financial institutions will run large network controlling nodes outside of pure speculation. Even if they did and tried to drive the fees up, people can just re-route through other nodes to get their payment where it needs to go, and most people will likely use the regular blockchain for larger payments.

[Anonymous No.9262618]

bch $33,333,333 end of march 2019

[Anonymous No.9262625]

>>9262581
because it's 10 to 20% extra on top of my bitcoin holdings, which are already a long term bet, and have been for years, but that only make up a small % of my entire portfolio.

it literally isn't worth it to sell and convert what amounts to 4-7% of cash into bitcoin, especially when it's a political fork like this, and miners have a lot of reason to manipulate the price up to prove a point.

this desperation to trade and presumably get rich is juvenile. you can't get so emotional about this stuff, you have to be objective.

[Anonymous No.9262627]

>>9262600

Say it with me Hillary, RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR

Just once, say it with me

>she won't say it

[Anonymous No.9262641]

>>9262613
> doesn't understand why lightning routing is P!=NP hard.
K.
I guess you're going to tell me about onion routing now right? Like you think it has anything to do with it?

[Anonymous No.9262645]

>>9262361
do you just only get your news off 4chan?
Both of them have/will see more adoption than any other "crypto"
ANY

[Anonymous No.9262656]

>>9262627

[Anonymous No.9262669]

>>9262625
> be objective.
Ok. You're objectively wrong and it's objectively a waste of time talking to you as you've indicated you're unwilling to recognise that objective reality. Wasting time is objectively a bad idea so I'm done with you. You will objectively fail in this market and you objectively deserve it. Enjoy.

[Anonymous No.9262673]

>>9262641

I'm not going to sit here and pretend like I know the technical side of things because I don't, but thanks for trying.

If BTC is going to be replaced, it won't be by a BTC fork

[Anonymous No.9262677]

>>9262641
ye5

[Anonymous No.9262701]

>>9262645
no, but i also don't buy into every hyped coin there is. i see no reason why either will see greater mass adoption than any of their "competitors" in the token/asset space, or dag space.

>>9262669
see, you're getting all emotional again. like i've said before, i own both, so i objectively can't lose. sorry if that annoys you so much but it's just the truth. just calm down and try to think objectively about the tech and the users, not the politics, or the twisted interests.

[Anonymous No.9262708]

>>9262673
> I don't understand any of this technical shit, but this thing that will happen because of the technical shit is totally impossible. THAT MUCH I AM SURE OF!
K

[Anonymous No.9262717]

>>9262613
Big blocks aren't a problem with the right changes, like commitments. You could literally verify your own tx's on a mobile.

[Anonymous No.9262729]

>>9262701
>29 posts by this ID
>the same resident cuckstream shill screeching about late adopters

*yawns*

[Anonymous No.9262743]

>>9262729
>shill
btc and bch make up such a small amount of my portfolio, i'd do better shilling for ethereum. but nice argument.

[Anonymous No.9262752]

>>9262656

Not an argument.

Bitcoin Cash is unironically the real Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9262765]

>>9262717
true. ethereum already solved this problem with their lite protocol, you can verify the entire chain just from the hashes, and request just the leaf nodes that are relevant to your accounts, and verify them against the block hashes without needing to download anything else.

the main argument against bigger blocks is just that it creates the same problem mining centralization has, which is it becomes increasingly harder to get any changes made when a smaller and smaller community controls the security and with nodes the interaction with the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.9262788]

>>9262752
>maybe if i repeat it 76000 more times it will come true

[Anonymous No.9262809]

>>9262788

Although it is already the reality, the market hasn't realised it yet. But as you can see the market is starting to wake up.

[Anonymous No.9262838]

>>9262809
>just 75999 more to go!
im sure this time its different than the last bcash pump and dump

[Anonymous No.9262843]

>>9262838

But I didn't say it ranjeet

[Anonymous No.9262851]

[Anonymous No.9262853]

>>9261448
correct. ADA, EOS, ETH

[Anonymous No.9262862]

>>9262843
>but sir pls i did not say such a thing sir!

[Anonymous No.9262875]

>>9262752
bcash is unironically a scam whose paid shills pretend that it is bitcoin in hopes of fooling normies. eg. bitcoin.com, r/btc, your post

[Anonymous No.9262911]

>>9262875

Yeah OK Raj, that reverse psychology shit doesn't work here.

Bitcoin (BCH) is about to flip back into 3rd place after shitting on Ripple's fiat coin

[Anonymous No.9262922]

>>9262911
wat? nice reddit post pajeet.

[Anonymous No.9262946]

>>9262922

why is this a reddit post? Le 'reddit spacing' meme?

Because I used the enter key right?

[Anonymous No.9262962]

>>9262911

That's my sister. WTF? How is she so horny?

[Anonymous No.9262988]

>>9262962

post moar of her

[Anonymous No.9263117]

Corecuck rage.

Sorry corecucks your coin is shit and you’ll all die poor.

[Anonymous No.9263128]

>>9263117
i used to think cope was a stupid meme, but the amount of posts like this make me believe it's actually a real issue.

[Anonymous No.9263137]

>>9263128
Yeah, your posts.

[Anonymous No.9263153]

>>9263137
yeah, it's hard to cope with all these millions. nice try though.

[Anonymous No.9263173]

>>9263153
>hoping that anyone would fall for his pajeet LARP

[Anonymous No.9263180]

>>9263173
because biz is only for poor late adopters right? it sure seems like it, but ive been posting here for years, and whenever im reading whitepapers or prerelease docs im usually shitposting on here or fit.

seeing how much everyone covers their ears whenever they see someone that's actually rich from these fucking coins is half the fun.

[Anonymous No.9263200]

>>9263180
I can smell curry coming from your posts.

[Anonymous No.9263231]

>>9263200
:^)

[Anonymous No.9263233]

>>9262348
https://shitcoin.com/iota-cannot-be-used-for-iot-loss-of-funds-may-occur-e45b1ed9dd6b?ho1

oh no no no NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.9263252]

>>9263233
yeah, iota is fundamentally broken tech, but that goes for all DAG chains, there are problems that have no clear solution. nothing good long term for those coins.

[Anonymous No.9263432]

>>9262946
you don't even know - and the pic is pure pajeet. wtf are you doing on biz

[Anonymous No.9263443]

>>9263200
yep, pure curry

[Anonymous No.9263732]

>>9263432

What picture? The asian slut with her arse in the air?