/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9238587]

Bitcoin Cash WILL WIN

[Anonymous No.9238596]

the race to the bottom

[Anonymous No.9238638]

>>9238587
lol

[Anonymous No.9238652]

Win what? The special olympics?

[Anonymous No.9238673]

so btc runs on asic

and

bch on gpu only

if that's the case fk core

shill me plz

[Anonymous No.9238674]

>*breathes in*
its like pottery

[Anonymous No.9238678]

>>9238587

[Anonymous No.9238689]

>>9238673
>gpu only

[Anonymous No.9238731]

>>9238674
>lets take down the scammers
>gets scammed in the process
Oh my god my sides

[Anonymous No.9238791]

>>9238674
>pottery

[Anonymous No.9238810]

>>9238791
Please don't post here again

[Anonymous No.9238836]

Reminder Bitcoin Cash has
>Bitpay
>Cryptonize
>1000+ merchants adopting
>Memo
And coming soon
>32 MB blocks
>OPcodes
>Anonymous transactions with coinmix
>Smart contracts
>Colored coins

Bitcoin is dead, long live bitcoin cash

[Anonymous No.9238861]

>>9238810
>POTTERY!

[Anonymous No.9239590]

>>9238674
Imagine the hodl crew actually giving up their Bitcoin for a community project. Lol. It is hodl not givedl

[Anonymous No.9239624]

Death to Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9239631]

Why does either have to win or lose? Cant they co exists, each having different roles?

[Anonymous No.9239658]

The flippening will happen this year. Hang in there

[Anonymous No.9239686]

>>9239631
This isn't Apple vs Microsoft, it's vhs vs beta, which makes me worried about bitcoin cash

[Anonymous No.9239712]

>>9239631

They're competing for hash power. Bitcoin cash will probably win

[Anonymous No.9239768]

>>9239631
There's no coexistence when the other side wants you dead.

[Anonymous No.9239814]

>>9239712

[Anonymous No.9239895]

There's been about a hundred altcoins that have directly attacked Bitcoin and none of them were successful, they all faded away into obscurity or are worth shit.

Bcash is no.different from the late adopting retards who fell for this scam or eth or whatever the fuck altcoin.

The bitcoin.com website is cute though, ver might trick a handful of retards, but in the long run your altcoin is going nowhere

[Anonymous No.9240208]

>>9239631

Kikestream has been attacking Bitcoin (BCH) since day 1. There will only be one Bitcoin and it will be Bitcoin Cash, it's only a matter of time.

If you look objectively you'll see that Bcore (BTC) is not growing at all, there are no projects in development and no great mass of people wanting to adopt it - the only reason it's relevant is the non-functional vaporware called Lightning network, which has already proven to be mathematically impossible.

I can only infer that Blockstream is sabotaging Bcore (BTC) on the orders of their kike overlords at AXA/Mastercard in the hope of destroying the idea of cryptocurrency.

Luckily Bitcoin Cash is no longer constrained, the block size is about to be increased to allow 32x more capacity than Bcore. Along with the 32mb block size Bitcoin (BCH) is also introducing smart contracts and colored coins. It has many wealthy backers and numerous startup projects and swiftly expanding userbase, best of all it's only ~9 months old and only $1500 each.

I wonder how much a Bitcoin (BCH) will be worth in another 9 months.

[Anonymous No.9240256]

>>9239814
Why do you think bitcoin will keep going up? I ask corecucks this all the time and the answer is always evasive. They have no idea how blockchain works. They're entirely clueless on the basics of hash power, blocksize, economic incentives, double spending etc etc. Most of them are just praying for a repeat of last year so they can sell, take their gains and fuck off somewhere.

Bitcoin right now is nothing more than dumb money and speculation. Why exactly would it succeed? It does nothing interesting. Even if bitcoin cash didn't exist, bitcoin is superseded by over a dozen cryptocurrencies. It has no market adoption. It can't support transaction load. Miners hate it. The devs are fighting to institute off-chain solutions which are still months away. Bitcoin is fucking dead. Only newfags cling on to the sinking ship

[Anonymous No.9240273]

>>9240208
ahahahahahahaaha

[Anonymous No.9240349]

>>9240273

Another non-argument from a corecuck or a kikestream paid shill

[Anonymous No.9240397]

lets increase blocksizes to 32mb
> blocks are currently 50kb full

[Anonymous No.9240421]

>>9240397

Pajeet you're confusing block size with maximum block size.

The maximum block size is being increased to prevent hostile takeovers as is what happened with Bcore (BTC) and to allow for unimpeded future growth.

[Kekovicius !!seZ2sXABmE3 No.9240471]

>delusional pajeet Bcash shills

[Anonymous No.9240492]

>>9240349
funny how all you late adopters can do is all people names. at least pick names that work though, nobody has ever been "cucked" by buying bitcoin. remember, we all got your bcash airdrop for free, and most of us large holders haven't even sold any of it yet.

but thanks for trying to pump this for all of us whales anyway, we hope you'll be there to buy it all up in the future too.

[Anonymous No.9240504]

>>9240492
>>9240471

'bcash bcash bcash'

'late adopter' is the new meme i gather.

Still no arguments.

[Anonymous No.9240546]

>>9240421
you're a literal retard. so you're okay with paying miners the same block reward right now even though they are not filling the blocks anywhere near the 32mb capacity?

[Anonymous No.9240566]

>>9238836
Merchant adoption conference 3 days after fork too. I expect big things from it.

[Anonymous No.9240568]

>>9240256
Because right now if you step down from mining bitcion, someone will step up and replace you.

[Anonymous No.9240571]

Since it's open source, can't BTC just copy every good idea of BCH?

[Anonymous No.9240586]

>>9240546

Should we pay them in rupees until 32mb blocks are full rajeesh just like you? What point are you trying to make? Moron.

[Anonymous No.9240587]

>>9240571
nchain is patenting all the good shit and licensing it to BCH for free. if BTC wants to use the tech they will have to pay

[Anonymous No.9240599]

>>9240571
The whole point of Bitcoin is to profit on offchain transactions.

[Anonymous No.9240603]

>>9240504
if you didn't get a sizable airdrop of bcash then you are a late adopter by definition.

us early adopters just think its funny you trying to pump a coin that we all got for a cost bases of zero.

[Anonymous No.9240607]

>>9240571

Yes, and vs versa. Except that will not happen because BTC has been taken over by a corporation which aims to turn it into a banking layer which they completely control.

If any good ideas ever appear on BTC (however unfuckinglikely) they can be merged into BCH.

[Anonymous No.9240613]

>>9240603
basis *

[Anonymous No.9240640]

>>9240603

'late adopter' meme again. I've been in this far longer than you have, Sanjit. After Bitcoin forked/upgraded to Bitcoin Cash I sold my bcore shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9240668]

>>9240603
>muh early adopter

Coretards have run out of arguments

[Anonymous No.9240706]

>>9239631

No, that's fucking retarded. BCH does everything BTC does, while BTC does virtually nothing. Eventually price dominance will be established and the miners will overwhelmingly mine one or the other (and why tf wouldn't it be the useful one).

There can be only one.

[Anonymous No.9240719]

>>9240640
go on, when did you get your first bitcoin?

[Anonymous No.9240736]

>>9240504
>'late adopter' is the new meme
It seriously is.

>I-Im an oldfag guise!

[Anonymous No.9240739]

>>9240571

You mean like raising the block size? Their inability to implement this simple and obvious solution proves that they are cucked.

[Anonymous No.9240751]

>>9240208
126k June 2018

[Anonymous No.9240752]

>>9240603
>cost bases of zero.
>has to buy btc to get it

[Anonymous No.9240766]

>>9239895
IT'S NOT BCASH
IT'S BITCOIN CASH BITCOIN CASH

FUCK YOU!

[Anonymous No.9240882]

If something is useless and harmless, it doesn't get non stop fud from day one of existing.

[Anonymous No.9240915]

>>9238587

Even if BCH was the superior coin, I wouldn't buy it because the guys behind it are a bunch of frauds and tricksters.

[Anonymous No.9240956]

>>9240752
>shit in a bag
>repeat the process of shitting in a bag for every dollar there is in the world
>distribute my bags of shit 1:1 to all dollar holders, majority of people do not want, or do not care about my bags of shit being distributed.
>MY BAGS OF SHIT DON'T HAVE A ZERO COST BASE BECAUSE YOU HAD TO HAVE DOLLARS TO GET THEM

[Anonymous No.9240980]

>>9240956
not to mention, there are fewer BCH in circulation because all BTC that were lost previously plus a bunch of people who don't know or don't care.

[Anonymous No.9241614]

>>9240736
Anyone else getting flashbacks to the election with the drumpf shit? It's like they're terrified of even mentioning BCH by name.

[Anonymous No.9241671]

>>9240980
Yeah, one of the few things people are forgetting.

BCH, mid May until end of 2018, will be something very interesting and rare. Lots and lots of people don't understand the magnitude of every detail if you put it all together looking back the past decade.

You can't illustrate what is going to happen without being laughed at and ridiculed.

What's coming for BCH is something that only comes every hundred years, or so.

All this crypto stuff has been exhausting the past 10 years, depending how long you have been in crypto. Finally, things will be set straight soon.

[Anonymous No.9241675]

>>9238587
Isn't BCash the same as the shitty version Bitcoin Core? kek

anon just buy the future cryptocurrency on the better ethereum blockchain, u noob...

https://www.bitsonline.com/erc20s-better-cryptocurrencies-ether/

https://www.coinoid.com/first-mineable-token/

[Anonymous No.9241685]

BTC and BCH will go the way of Netscape. Antiquated protocol, served it's purpose and will be replaced.

Monero is honestly much more important than either. It's a niche crypto, but the purpose it serves is at the very heart of why crypto was created. If it's ever used to bypass capital controls or by the wealthy yo hide assets then it'll be worth 6 figured.

[Anonymous No.9241702]

>>9239631
The thing is that once BCH gets the longest chain, it will become BTC.
After that I don't really see a future for bitcoin core.

[Anonymous No.9241713]

>>9241671
>>9241702
morons

[Anonymous No.9241722]

>>9241685
There are like 10 better privacy options than XMR. It will become irrelevant by the time privacy coins become relevant.

[Anonymous No.9241730]

>>9241713
I said nothing wrong. Once it gets a longer chain, it will become Bitcoin by definition.

[Anonymous No.9241754]

Operstion dragonslayer is here R-right guys?

[Anonymous No.9241768]

>>9239895
Corecuck cope

[Anonymous No.9241777]

>>9241614

Yeah sometimes I lose my train of though and think 'shareblue' instead of 'blockstream'

[Anonymous No.9241779]

I salivate every time I think about how many whales will be buying BTC before realizing they bought a shitcoin and now they have to switch over BCH.

[Anonymous No.9241811]

>>9240719
2013

[Anonymous No.9241826]

I totally understand people supporting the original BTC, but people have to wake up that it has been turned into a piece of shit with segwit and LN. It's not the same bitcoin anymore. BCH is.

[Anonymous No.9241859]

>>9241722

Which privacy coins should I be looking into? First mover advantage is pretty significant. The monero community feels like how the bitcoin community felt 6 years ago. I have a fairly substantial amount of XMR accumulated. What privacy coins would you diversify into if you were me

[Anonymous No.9241945]

>>9241859
I would keep 50% XMR, 30% Zcoin and 20% Zencash.
Here's a good article summarizing the cons/pros of each privacy solution:
https://zcoin.io/zcoins-privacy-technology-compares-competition/

[Anonymous No.9241985]

>>9241713
Classic response.

[Anonymous No.9242115]

>>9241945

Appreciate the advice and info good sir

[Anonymous No.9242284]

>>9240568
Is this your mental model of mining? it's all guys in a room with a pad and a pencil and accounting visors, and if one goes away another one comes and and takes his seat?
Actual truth is it's all automatic, and if people step down from mining BTC it's because the price of BCH rose or the price of BTC fell, and nobody is stepping in to take their place, because they're following the same metrics that caused the original person to leave BTC and start mining BCH. When the price shift is big enough, not enough people will be mining BTC to even keep it alive, period, at which point it will be frozen forever, with the tiny amount of ideological miners unable to actually provide sufficient POW to mine the necessary blocks to get to the next difficulty adjustment.

[Anonymous No.9242318]

>>9240915
> evaluating trustless systems based on who I trust
This meme is getting stale coretards, I think it's actually designed to force opposition to even get into the game of playing personalities who is more of a scammer, which is really just old style useless politics, the exact realm from which all this trustless ecosystem is supposed to free us. It's extremely easy to point out all the ways in which the cunts behind core are objectively more evil and scammy than anyone behind cash, but even having that argument just validates what is essentially a political argument in a sphere designed to free us from the chains of political arguments.
So you know, in conclusion neck yourself and whatnot.

[Anonymous No.9242366]

Question BCH supporters need to answer for themselves as well as in public, think long and hard:

1. If Roger Ver declared BCH a failed project, what would be the effect on it? Is there any person who could declare the same for BTC and have the same effect?

2. What do you make of this wallet 19hZx234vNtLazfx5J2bxHsiWEmeYE8a7k?

3. Block rewards subsidise network security. Block rewards tend to zero. Transaction fees will take over as incentive for network security in BTC. How will BCH guarantee mining power without keeping the block reward while keeping transaction fees low?

4. How come all cypherpunks (Szabo, Finney, Back) who pioneered the discovery of Bitcoin agree on the trade-off between security/decentralization and scalability?

5. Why have 21 new developers in the last 50 days alone had their first commits been merged to Bitcoin if Bilderberg funded Borgstream keeps an iron fist on the protocol? Are there 21 developers working on BCH in total - not even speaking of new developers?

6. Is Satoshis innovation Paypal 2.0 and cheaply buying coffee or is it breaking the nations state monopoly on money? Hint: Message in genesis block

7. How often does the Whitepaper claim Bitcoin to be designed for large scale micro transactions? How often is censorship resistance and reducing trust between parties mentioned?

8. Even if all assumptions underlying Bitcoin are wrong; why would BCH be the successor rather than any of the multitude of arguably more established altcoins with more transaction volume such as litecoin or dogecoin?

[Anonymous No.9242396]

>>9242222

[Anonymous No.9242485]

>>9242366
1) Nothing. Yes, many people could declare BTC a failed project and have the same effect, Mike Hearn for example did exactly that and had exactly that effect, market dipped quite a bit and eventually recovered, Ver declaring BCH failed would do the same thing.
2) Someone who stopped accumulating at 2% of the total supply.
3) You can make money either by having a small amount of high paying customers, or a high amount of small paying customers. BTC is going for the former model, BCH is going for the latter model, because there's no actual reason to value the instrument in the former model, it's just a curiosity limited to impacting a very small fraction of the globe. The original vision was always the latter model, also the block reward doesn't stop for over a hundred years.
4) Adam Back is CEO of blockstream, and is just parroting the party line. Finney died long before BCH ever came to fruition, Szabo is just plain wrong.
5) Because commits that don't compromise the core mission are not a threat to the core mission, and not prevented from merging. Anything that compromises the business interests of blockstream, or the vision of Greg Maxwell, will not get merged into the present BTC codebase, period.
6) It's breaking the nation state's monopoly on money, which can only be done by providing usable money, not limited edition digital collectibles with a transaction throughput adequate only to service a few thousand users, and a paypal 2.0 plastered over the top of it where blockstream charges tolls on all fees and their partners implement the agenda of the central banks on the newly created infrastructure that matches bretton woods from the old world.
7) Peer to peer electronic cash implies both large scale transactions and censorship resistance and reducing trust between parties. False dichotomy is false, and does not become true no matter how many times you thrust it forward insisting it is true.
8) Pic related.

[Anonymous No.9242536]

>>9241702
10 year old coin vs a few months old coin.

It will be fun to see cashies cry.

[Anonymous No.9242548]

>>9242536
> hurrr durrr what's a chain

[Say with me: No.9243197]

BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

[Anonymous No.9243368]

Just sold my last BCH stack to acquire IOTA.

Salty?

[Say with me: No.9243449]

>>9243368
>IOTA
KEK

[Anonymous No.9243511]

>>9243368

>>9239613

I see your future

[Anonymous No.9244292]

>>9238587
It's already winning.
Core shills cannot into basic math.
youtube.com/watch?v=oTF5EPDzHFs

[Anonymous No.9244305]

There's one simple rule why Bitcoin Cash will never beat Bitcoin and the vast majority of people are too blind to see it.

They could have better tech and it wouldn't matter. Do you know why? Could you even guess why?

[Anonymous No.9244313]

Who would win
>dozens of developers from different places lead by experts and pioneers in cryptography and cryptocurrency
>1 French developer allied with 1 Chinese magnate and a couple of conmen

Obviously the second thing am I rite op?

[Anonymous No.9244521]

[Anonymous No.9244809]

>>9244521
https://medium.com/@octskyward/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830
Stupid or dishonest?
Yes, [my position remains the same]. If we’ve learned anything from the 2008 subprime bubble crisis it should be that nothing ever keeps growing exponentially, and assuming so can be hazardous …. Changing the rules in a decentralized consensus system is a very difficult problem and I don’t think we’ll resolve it any time soon.
Remember, this is the man who effectively runs Bitcoin, due to Core’s monopoly status amongst miners. He believes that technological progress isn’t going to keep going because in 2008 a lot of banks made bad loans to American homeowners.

There is illogical in the extreme: computer speeds have nothing to do with subprime lending practices. The financial crisis wasn’t caused by exponential growth.

[Anonymous No.9244823]

>>9244305
> muh pairs.
> muh whales.
> muh jews.
How'd I do?
What do you think those parties will do when they figure out they're on a burning bridge?

[Anonymous No.9244864]

>>9244313
yeah, it's amazing to see cashies hate on adam back who literally invented PoW. But I guess they can worship their "chads" so it's ok

[Anonymous No.9244898]

>>9244864
According to his royal beardness one meg greg, adam has had no influence on the project at all.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/8g7h5z/which_core_developers_have_been_employed_by/dyak0a6/

[Anonymous No.9244904]

>>9244864
He also called him a well meaning fuckwit.

[Anonymous No.9244952]

>>9244864
>wow much cypherpunk

[Anonymous No.9244967]

>>9244952
>many development

[Anonymous No.9244982]

>>9244967
>incredible

[Anonymous No.9244999]

>>9244823
You missed the point completely, actually.

Need me to break it down? It's pretty simple.

Ready?

We know who Roger Ver is. People don't like Roger after the controversial interview. But even if he was a perfect spokesperson Bitcoin Cash still would never usurp Bitcoin.

Nobody knows who Satoshi Nakamoto really is. If "he" is ever discovered Bitcoin will dump into oblivion because the magic will be gone.

It only becomes a religion once the founder is gone/dead. If the founder is still present it's a cult.

[Anonymous No.9245004]

>>9244952
>>9244967
>>9244982
>github is the only place where you can track how much a developer contributes to a project
>github is the be-all end-all of developer productivity
brainlet

[Anonymous No.9245014]

>>9244952
also you look pure onions with those glasses and that beard

[Anonymous No.9245036]

>>9238587
It’s literally slower than every coin in transaction speed. Okie dokie

[Anonymous No.9245037]

>>9245004
By contribute do you mean control?

[Anonymous No.9245069]

>>9244999
Hahahaha... Christ what a ridiculous fucking reason. Some investor made a decision he is very effectively promoting therefore bitcoin cash cannot possibly win.
And speaking of satoshi, if he is csw, *or* more plausibly csw has access to keys with his hoard and plans to use them to attack btc and boost bch, btc is even more utterly fucked than it is due to the incompetent stewardship of core.
You should've stuck with whales, pairs and jews. You can at least venture an argument those parties are stupid and slow to react, but the market as a whole won't react because Ver is alive? Fuck me what drugs do they have you coretards on these days.

[Anonymous No.9245118]

>>9245014
What did u just say to me? I'm a black belt kiddo

[Anonymous No.9245125]

>>9245069
I suppose we'll find out in the end, won't we?

I'm not mad at you, you've placed your bets. Although perhaps you are a little narrow minded.

I encourage you to play with the idea.

[Anonymous No.9245147]

>>9238596
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.9245203]

>>9238673
>every pleb can mine it
>high price
pick one

[Anonymous No.9245222]

>>9238861
it's a meme, you rando! you should learn more about the memes we use here on 4chan before posting here, or "lurk more" (another one of our lingo!)

sincerely, an anon.

[Anonymous No.9245240]

>>9238587
...the special olympics

[Anonymous No.9245243]

>>9245222
or should i say
t, an anon ;)

[Anonymous No.9245260]

>>9245125
We are already finding out. Almost a year into fork time and cash has outperformed core by over 200 percent.
I'm hugely sympathetic to a particular perspective I think is massively influencing the unconditional support core is getting from people who really ought to know better, and that pespective is actually two closely related ideas. Firstly, tech people are trustworthy and not machiavellian, and do not engage in the same kinds of manipulations as business people are notorious for, therefore in most showdowns between tech and business, you should be on the tech side. And secondly tech people are smarter than anyone else, so even if their ideas don't make sense or seem bad, it's best to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Both of these points are actually very frequently true. But they are only heuristics, and on close examination of all former cases where these were true, the tech people did genuinely have good reasons for their stances, and they were genuinely disinterested in political wrangling and promoting their own interests at the expense of everyone else's.
That is simply indisputably not the case here. No matter how deep you look, you will never find a legitimate technical reason for the core doctrine. It is easy to spot maxwell changing the historical narrative based on whatever he wants at the time, and it's in blockstream's actual business plan admitted by the CEO to charge tolls on the bitcoin blockchain.
In this case this previously very useful heuristic is simply wrong. And those sticking to it just haven't dug deep enough to see the proof.

[Anonymous No.9245262]

>>9238587
All bitcoin has to do is get rid of blockstream and jew network and I'm all in on bitcoin.

BCH is just a payment system for asiic miners.

[Anonymous No.9245298]

>>9245262
BCH is bitcoin without blockstream or the jew network plastered on top. It's pretty funny that what you claim to want is exactly what you're poisoned against.

[Anonymous No.9245347]

>>9245260
>Almost a year into fork time and cash has outperformed core by over 200 percent.
Any shitcoin will outperform Bitcoin if you buy low and sell high.

[Anonymous No.9245502]

>>9245347
That's simply switching all your bch for btc, or vice versa. No day trading. Coretards love to point at the price and think it proves they're winning. They don't simply analyze the results of what you should've done at the fork time objectively given the full history of the situation. The market is trending towards the correct result, and core is going to die because of it. The sooner people accept this the sooner they can appropriately position themselves, if you're really so caught up in the propaganda campaign that your emotions won't allow you to make the obvious rational choice on core vs cash, at the very least you should be completely out of both.

[Anonymous No.9245536]

>>9245298
except the BCH team doesn't have the brains to make a complete monetary ecosystem. Bitcoin has the backing and experience that BCH could never achieve short of the actually devs moving over to that project.

[Anonymous No.9245556]

>>9245536
*actual

[Anonymous No.9245585]

>>9240492
>bla bla bla late adopter
mfw every early adopter I know irl, who has been engaged in the crypto communities for several years, some of them working on big crypto business projects, sided with bitcoin cash

[Anonymous No.9245623]

>>9238587
BCC is doomed fail, especially if BTC can't stay over 10k

[Anonymous No.9245634]

>>9245536
> have faith in the core devs!
Good luck. You're going to need it.

[Anonymous No.9245662]

>>9245536

>except the BCH team doesn't have the brains to make a complete monetary ecosystem.

That's a pretty hard hitting comment. I think I'm going to need to see some sort of evidence to back that up.

You're implying some autistic faggot who lost his teeth because he didn't brush, believes the sun rotates around the earth and believes in some resurrected kike has the brainpower to compete with a whole host of upcoming projects build on top of Bitcoin Cash?

[Anonymous No.9245934]

>>9245623
Bitconnect already failed, keep up.

[Anonymous No.9246153]

Corecucks getting wrecked in every thread.

It’s just a shame that most of this discourse is taking place in English and the third world tards who prop the price of corecoin up will not get the nessesary info in time and will be left holding kike bags.

If you’re bilingual it is your duty to inform your fellow countrymen that corecuck coin is compromised.

[Anonymous No.9246275]

https://txhighway.com/

if bch is so adopted... then why no traffic?

[Anonymous No.9246388]

>>9246153
There's enough of them hired directly by blockstream to shill here that they've been rekt so hard and so many times they probably know better than the average new york late adopting boomer how underhanded their employer is.

[Anonymous No.9246408]

BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

[Anonymous No.9246424]

>>9246275
Wow, what a cool site.

[Anonymous No.9246475]

>>9240603
Why do you keep repeating false talking points we all know Cash was free to all bitcoin holders at time of fork, we also know it is still true to original bitcoin so no need to push your fake segwit scam on us like your dumb enough to think it’s bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9247122]

>>9238674
>accuse ver of scamming
>try to sue him
>get accused of scamming
the fucking ironing

>>9238791
kys

[Anonymous No.9247299]

>>9244999
good thing we don't need 4chan bots for us to make it in fact we welcome all the attention we can get but we will win the old fashioned way by being the best not forced on the masses like some dictator would do.

[Anonymous No.9247326]

>>9246475
> bcash has ~10% hashrate of Bitcoin.
> bcash proposes to solve scaling through increasing blocksize infinitely.
> bcash's majority hashrate is from a group of friends that have a criminal history.
> bcash bag holders will commit suicide when Bitcoin increases it's blocksize by 1mb.
> Bitcoin is the one with the longest chain (whilst considering difficulty).
> bcash claims to be Bitcoin.
> bcash is a shitcoin, altcoin, a scam.

[Anonymous No.9247347]

>>9247299
he looks better in this picture

> Ver got sent to prison.
> Ver got raped.
> Ver renounced USA citizenship.
> Ver becomes con-artist.

[Anonymous No.9247390]

>>9247326

pic of hash rate at 24%you should do more research before posting, cash is king always will be

[Anonymous No.9247425]

I would renounce my citizenship too if I come into billions in taxes plus when laws are unjust then the just are criminals, you talking point bots are useless

[Anonymous No.9247443]

>>9247326
> bcash has ~10% hashrate of Bitcoin.
true, but this will change if the price continues to rise
> bcash proposes to solve scaling through increasing blocksize infinitely.
yes, and this is proven to be totally doable. the only argument against this is an incoherent 'muh decentralization'
> bcash's majority hashrate is from a group of friends
so?
> that have a criminal history.
this is so blown out of proportion you should stop because you're making yourself look retarded
> bcash bag holders will commit suicide when Bitcoin increases it's blocksize by 1mb.
this would be bad for bch, but good for crypto. do it faggots.
> Bitcoin is the one with the longest chain (whilst considering difficulty).
true
> bcash claims to be Bitcoin.
true
> bcash is a shitcoin
its like 98% the same code as btc how is it shitty?
> altcoin
you could argue this
> a scam
jesus christ you people are idiots

[Anonymous No.9247496]

>>9247390
hey dipshit. are you that deluded and thick?

7 day average is ~12%.
3 day average is ~12%
1 day average is ~13%

kys faggot.

[Anonymous No.9247524]

>>9247326
> bcash has ~10% hashrate of Bitcoin.
see >>9247390
> bcash proposes to solve scaling through increasing blocksize infinitely.
Maybe infinitely, but gradually with the development of data storage and bandwidth technology - it just makes sense. With max 32mb block (no hardware upgrade required) it will be ready for PayPal level of transactions, BTC is congested after about 7tx/s.
> bcash bag holders will commit suicide when Bitcoin increases it's blocksize by 1mb.
from 7 to 14 tx/s, holy shit
> Bitcoin is the one with the longest chain (whilst considering difficulty).
It is currently, but BCH will surpass that and will become "the Bitcoin" by definition
> bcash claims to be Bitcoin.
yes it's a bit too soon to say that, but it is definitely competing to become the real Bitcoin

[Anonymous No.9247705]

>>9247496
My point remains we are getting more hash power and reward too

[Anonymous No.9248460]

>>9240719
another cashie here, bought my first coins in 2013, but i also mined briefly in 2011. Was a dysfunctional mindblown wreck back then, cared more about hedonism and "self-exploration" than all the money in the world, so i used my electricity and thermal capacity to grow weed and play video games and take psychedelic voyages instead of becoming an billionaire. on track now though, I think i'll break 1 mil by my next birthday.

[Anonymous No.9248504]

>>9239658
EOS ETH ADA will flip btc

[Anonymous No.9249303]

>>9247390
>This data should be interpreted as an estimate.
>The real number can differ by several percent.
kek