LAST BOARDING CALL

[Anonymous No.9174489]

After PwC FR partnership announcement, this is really your last chance to buy REQ low or get left behind with trx and xvg bags forever

[Anonymous No.9174896]

keep it quiet mate

[Anonymous No.9174920]

>>9174489
>drops 40%

[Anonymous No.9174933]

130k REQ here. I'm gonna hold this sucker until I'm a millionaire.

[Anonymous No.9174965]

>>9174933
Could you hold until you hit about 5 million? Thanks.

[Anonymous No.9174990]

>>9174933
649,724 here bro. Holding till at least $3

[Anonymous No.9174994]

>>9174489
So now you let everyone in on our little secret. Fantastic. What will you do now ? Tell them the true EOY price of $*5.75

[Anonymous No.9175040]

>>9174994
idc already have enough

[Anonymous No.9175042]

>>9174489
That is a DAMN good find Jesus.
How do you put fiat on the blockchain? A bank backed stablecoin.
This is huge

[Anonymous No.9175178]

>>9175042
If ING officially partners whit Request and start offering Fiat and privacy features, will be a game changer.

[Anonymous No.9175269]

REQ vs. XVG.

OP, you need kneepads

[Anonymous No.9175328]

>Inb4 whales
I hope ING will break your spine, asshole whales !

[Anonymous No.9175340]

>>9175269
Nothing vs REQ

[Anonymous No.9175369]

>>9175340
when REQ gets a RIP

[Anonymous No.9175436]

>>9174990
> 649,724 here bro. Holding till at least $3
How much did you invest? That's a fuckton of REQ

[Anonymous No.9175453]

>>9175369
you are so fucking dumb and deluded that you actually think that some fucking shitty community coin with kind-of-privacy feature and nothing else is going to do anything else but die in a year.

[Anonymous No.9175476]

>>9175369
Why the fuck are you shilling your shitcoin in this thread, pajeet?

[Anonymous No.9175475]

>>9175369
why do you even have to spam your shit in other coins thread?

[Anonymous No.9175522]

>>9175476
>this is really your last chance to buy REQ low or get left behind with trx and xvg bags forever
Op gave me the license

>this is really your last chance to buy REQ low or get left behind with trx and xvg bags forever

>>9175453
>>9175475
REQ is so lost that you rage so hard because the bags are so heavy ?

>F

[Anonymous No.9175570]

>>9175522
ive had enough stupidity for one day see you again tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.9175599]

>>9175570
Have a nice day. BTW, im in REQ and have no prb with you guys ;)

[Anonymous No.9175797]

im confused
how did it go from

>Our team has been working on payment networks and blockchain since 2014, and we are backed by ING bank and the YCombinator which provide valuable advice.

to

>We will remove the ING Ventures logo from our website. After a discussion with their legal department, they asked us to communicate that they solely backed Moneytis but were not involved with Request since they can’t be associated with a project that did an ICO.

it clearly says that they cannot be associated with Request

[Anonymous No.9175873]

>>9174489
>>9175269
Why vs? Req is a platform for financial flows, if the xgv team builds an oracle and a liquidity provider they can easily integrate into the req network and instantly gain all req partnerships.
If req adds a solid privacy layer you could pay from xvg (or anything else implemented) to any req supported currency without losing privacy in the echange.
It's a fucking win for everybody faggots.

[Anonymous No.9175900]

>>9175436

[Anonymous No.9175915]

>>9175873
>Why vs? Req
Just because Op is a silly FUD kid.

[Anonymous No.9175921]

>>9175797

[Anonymous No.9175924]

>>9175797

>they can’t be associated with a project that did an ICO.

Legal reasons.

The team still has meetings whit ING.

[Anonymous No.9176063]

>>9175797
Legal framework for crytpo and icos is still developing, but it's getting better expecially in europe.
Ing could not openly back a project without a clear legal framework, but it probably will soon be able to.

[Anonymous No.9176092]

Ive seen 10 million req threads and not one single mention or picture of a dev. Ever.
That is really weird.

[Anonymous No.9176117]

>>9176092
Probably because they're not faggots that sit on twitter all day and plaster themselves all over the internet like the hucksters in this market

[Anonymous No.9176165]

>>9176117
Yeah but never one mention of a name in literally months of these shill threads. Its weird and creepy.

[Anonymous No.9176178]

>>9176092

[Anonymous No.9176201]

>>9176092
>>9176165

In a field dominated by personality cults and twitter warriors I find it refreshing, they are not autist geniuses, just hard working devs and entepreneurs with a solid business background.

[Anonymous No.9176244]

>>9176178
>faces without signs of autism and degeneration
thx, goona skip it

[Anonymous No.9176360]

>>9174489
Some inside info here: They have other partnerships lined up already which they haven't announced. Probably smart to spread them out across the updates to keep things exciting, but REQ is only going to continue rapid growth over the next 1-2 months as they announce. By then they'll likely have newer partnerships lined up to announce as well. REQ is moving fast at this point.

[Anonymous No.9176424]

>tfw only 5k reqqies
I don't think i'm gonna make it lads

[Anonymous No.9176468]

>>9176424
8k here lad. its ok we're gonna acquire some wealth

[Anonymous No.9176509]

>>9176424
$50B mcap in 2-3 years is very feasible. That gets you $50/REQ at full circulation not including burn, so a minimum of $250,000. Including burn you can expect to walk away with $300-400k in 3 years. Just hold and chill.

[Anonymous No.9176549]

>>9176509
This ma dude

[Anonymous No.9176592]

>>9176509
It needs to happen while Trump is still in office. The first thing the liberals will do when they take over is ban all crypto in the US.