/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9137460]

Tom Gonser (Docusign founder) follows a chainlink shill account on Twitter. Fucking unbelievable

[Anonymous No.9137530]

Yea, people have speculated Assblaster is Tom Gosner. He's well known to be an internet enthusiast from way back in the day.

[Anonymous No.9137566]

>>9137460

Unironically the most bullish sign for LINK i've seen in weeks. This is incredible

[Anonymous No.9137591]

Delet

[Anonymous No.9137606]

Holy shit it's real. Just checked.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CloutChaser12

[Anonymous No.9137608]

Info dump:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/83hq1z/docusign_partnership_speculation/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sxsw-2018-panel-recap-smart-contracts-we-getting-rid-lawyers-gonser/?published=t

[Anonymous No.9137617]

>>9137606
https://mobile.twitter.com/ChainLINKfan/status/989818790086168576

[Anonymous No.9137685]

>>9137460
tig if brue

[Anonymous No.9137687]

what the fuck KEK

[Anonymous No.9137698]

>>9137460
Who fucking cares. LINK will still be $0.50 EOY

[Anonymous No.9137718]

>>9137698
what the fuck KEK

[Anonymous No.9137726]

>>9137608
Gonser is basically shilling chainlink in his post-SXSW write up.

>An Oracle is designed to be more than ‘just an API’. They will include a rating so that its accuracy and usage could be seen, and may in fact collect data from more than just one API so that the data can be more highly trusted. Need a maximum amount of trust? Use multiple oracles. The ‘Chainlink’ technology is being built to deliver this. So, if you want to rely on some data feed to make your payments, you will choose an Oracle over an API every time. Especially for automated contracts.

>Due to all this change, we will see some great innovation with smart contracts technology over the next several years as contracting platforms connect with blockchains, payments, and oracles, and new software categories are defined. This is exciting from an investment perspective as we seek those truly breakout companies who will deliver value on scale and in a way that can be easily deployed and consumed.
Read: buy LINK.

Also:
>As an aside, it seems natural to me that a combination of DocuSign’s platform for creating and managing legal agreements could drive a series of smart contract elements that may execute on a distributed block chain to deliver the automated execution portion.

[Anonymous No.9137747]

>>9137698
Wrong. Faggot

[Anonymous No.9137770]

>>9137747
>yuh wrong cuz muh asslarper sed so
Asslaper said a lot of shit.

[Anonymous No.9137800]

>>9137726
send me the LINK to his write up

[Anonymous No.9137807]

This account, @iso20022 follows the same chainlink shill account, and smart_contract. Weird. Wonder who owns the handle @iso20022? The account is owned by a German it seems and has been active since February 2017.

[Anonymous No.9137837]

>>9137770
Don't give a fuck about what he said. Obviously the market has been shitting itself for months and is just recovering. Go fuck yourself, link 10k eoy 2019

[Anonymous No.9137845]

>>9137800
It’s in the comment above. The LinkedIn URL.

[Anonymous No.9137854]

>>9137845
oh nice, thanks anon :+)

[Anonymous No.9137856]

>>9137807
Wow so fucking weird that some literal WHO account follows tons of other literal WHO accounts, jeez literally WHO wouldve ever fucking thought that could be possible

[Anonymous No.9137874]

>>9137837
>mommy mommy maybe if i keep saying LINK followed by a big number over and over again that will make it happen?!?!

[Anonymous No.9137886]

>>9137837
Ha ha ha ha ha !!!!
Cought you fucking pasta posting pajeets redhanded !!
Read this fucking thread
>>9134876
and cry poo-tears !!
CL (shit on it!) is fucking worthless !
Can't bring decentralized and trustless data into the blockchain lol because the smartcontract creator has to choose APIs, thus making the whole CL (shit on it!) project worse than fucking Mobius, not to speak about Oraclize.
>IT IS NOT TRUSTLESS NOR DECENTRALISED, FAGGOTS !
You fucked up skizos got literally fucked in the asses by a faggot who calls himself Assblaster and there is nothing you can do about it but circleshit in eachothers mouths !
Motherfuckers !
I'm dieing of laughter right fucking now

[Anonymous No.9137906]

>>9137460
IT'S REAL AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.9137938]

>>9137460
oh no really? the guy who literally sat next to Sergey in the most recent smartcontracts.com presentation in SXSW follows chainlink? no fucking way dude. GREAT FIND my duder

[Anonymous No.9137952]

List of companies riding Chainlink's dick:

- Microsoft
- IBM
- Facebook (not announced yet, wait for fall)
- Docusign
- SWIFT
- Founder of the World Economic Forum
- OpenZeppelin

SmartContract is a few more big names away from becoming the standard oracle before they even launch. Fuck mobius. Nobody will touch that shitcoin with the names behind Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.9137988]

>>9137856
ISO20022 is the SWIFT messaging standard which chainlink is compliant with.
If we could figure out who owns the @iso20022 account it might be pretty exciting. Yes, it could be owned by some fintech/banking literal who, OR it could be owned by some legit baking fucks, and therefore be extremely bullish for LINK.

The fact that it’s been around since well before chainlink was a thing makes me think this is interesting.

I just followed them and they seem to automatically follow back any account which follows them, by the way. That’s why they follow the chainlink shill account. But they seem to have followed @smart_contract totally independently

[Anonymous No.9138000]

>>9137952
doesnt matter because link doesnt hype anything. normies will never fomo and send us to the moon

[Anonymous No.9138017]

>>9137988
>If we could figure out who owns the @iso20022 account it might be pretty exciting
Why? Have you not seen all of the other retarded bullshit meme accounts it fucking follows?

[Anonymous No.9138050]

>>9137938
Lol "some guy".

[Anonymous No.9138054]

>>9138000

You should buy substance and sell hype. Chainlink is the best investment specifically because they don't hype anything. But their project is literally paradigm shifting for the entire blockchain industry so who gives af about hype. That's like saying the internet will fail because the nerds who developed TCP/IP and HTTP are bad at marketing.

With chainlink you're investing in a protocol, not an app, and protocols don't need hype, they need adoption by developers and key companies. That's exactly what SmartContract has been focused on making happen. Ethereum didn't focus on drumming up hype, but you'd be dumb to not buy 50 cent ETH.

[Anonymous No.9138071]

OP uses safari and 3G lmaoooooo

[Anonymous No.9138080]

>>913801
You don’t think that someone who works in an official capacity on ISO20022 following smart_contract would be interesting?

Read my post again brainlet. They automatically follow back any meme account. But they followed smart_contract independently.

[Anonymous No.9138099]

>>9138017
You don’t think that someone who works in an official capacity on ISO20022 following smart_contract would be interesting?

Read my post again brainlet. They automatically follow back any meme account. But they followed smart_contract independently.

[Anonymous No.9138102]

>>9138000

Checked

[Anonymous No.9138132]

>>9137988
lmao it's probably just some biztard who holds like 100 LINK.

[Anonymous No.9138136]

>>9137530

AssBlaster said he was born in 1992.

[Anonymous No.9138146]

holy shit we are gonna make it
what a fuckin timeline boyos

[Anonymous No.9138150]

>>9138132
Since February 2017?

[Anonymous No.9138159]

>>9138050
>"some guy"
>"some"
are you mentally disabled my friendo?

[Anonymous No.9138170]

>>9138054
making money is whats most important. im holding 70k links for seven months already. too late to dump now, im in too deep. i'll loose every cent or make a fortune.

[Anonymous No.9138197]

>>9138150
You're right, its some fintech fag instead.

[Anonymous No.9138214]

>9137886 anon if what you said is true then why are these huge companies trying to work this oracle problem out with chainlink? Hell, if youre so smart about this shit, why are you even here? Its so great knowing that there is legit no more true fud left with link...i mean the fudsters are trying to bring up mobius now LMAO its like the only fud left for them to use. And remeber whenever someone is fudding on 4chan that meas buy it so thanks anon literally just bought another 100k

[Anonymous No.9138224]

>>9138099
You don't think that someone who works in an official capacity on ISO20022 following fucking @valid_baba and @@ChknBiscuits would be interesting?

You're full of shit about them automatically following anyone back. I just followed them and they didn't follow me back. Fuck you Asslarp.

[Anonymous No.9138270]

>>9138000
Idk if we will need normies bruh.
I think the network will be secured by greed, necessatating a huge token price.
Like you could alter that data, but it'll cost you a fortune.
I bet the price has already been agreed upon, and there will be nothing organic about it. It'll be like a stable coin

[Anonymous No.9138299]

>>9138197
Hmm
>>9138224
I followed them (with my chainlink shill account) and they followed me back instantly (hence why they now follow 2 chainlink shill accounts). If you’re not lying and they didn’t follow you back, then that’s interesting.... they must’ve followed back because they’re interested in chainlink.
I don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about them following bullshit accounts. They follow and are followed by numerous Swiss banks and fintech. There’s only around 250 following and 90% are banks and fintech?

Some of their “likes” go back to late 2016...

[Anonymous No.9138314]

im fucking sick of it. these over confident threads, the smug anons thinking they've made it already. I've been holding these ICO bags for fucking 8 months. It's not happening. It hasn't happened. It won't happen. The overconfidence is actually starting to become my biggest personal FUD. You faggots are so sure of the moon, that the inverse is going to happen. Thats how this market seems to work. I'm fucking scared boys. I can't hold these bags any longer. If I had bought literally any of my other picks instead of LINK I'd have 5x+ more money. It fucking hurts. Part of me is starting to despise Sergey. I'm starting to fuckign hate the guy. Why won't he just throw us a fucking bone? We've missed the biggest bull-run of all time holding his shitty bags and he is 100% completely unapologetic.

[Anonymous No.9138335]

>>9138314
Im scared of the possibly potential ChainLink has.

[Anonymous No.9138362]

>>9138314

glad to see this is already pasta

[Anonymous No.9138371]

>>9138299
I'm not lying. I followed them and waited 5 mins. They didn't follow me back. I'm not even sure it's possible/legal to automatically follow back. And it would make zero sense for them to do so since they'd end up following back thousands of spam/porn accounts.

Here are some bullshit/meme/totally unrelated accounts they follow:
@valid_baba
@@Crypto_Dennis
@ChknBiscuits
@VincentAdolph8
@GreenSockMonkey
@PepeRolli
@SwissChocoWorld

[Anonymous No.9138385]

>>9138314
kek this pasta is older than my dried up cum in my ex

[Anonymous No.9138392]

>>9138335
>>9138362
>>9138385
cope

[Anonymous No.9138403]

>>9138385
I hope he gets his colonic irrigation before he develops piles

[Anonymous No.9138408]

>>9138371
What? There are multiple bots that do automatic follows/follow backs, or you can purchase followers etc.

So 7 out of 302 accounts they follow are spam/meme accounts, while the other 295 are Swiss banks and fintechs. Hmm.

[Anonymous No.9138446]

>>9138371
Ok I just checked and @PepeRolli seems to be something to do with probably where they live (somewhere in switzerland) and @swisschocoworld is obviously Swiss chocolate. It’s a Swiss banker who owns the @iso20022 account most likely.

@greensockmonkey, @crypto_dennis are crypto/investing related accounts (whoever owns @iso20022 has interest in crypto)

Etc etc
They aren’t spam meme accounts
They probably tweeted something like #iso20022 once and got followed

[Anonymous No.9138468]

>>9138270
> It'll be like a stable coin
This can't happen.
One of the key innovations of Bitcoin was the idea that you have to *incentivise* people to run network nodes. It's a fundamental linchpin of crypto.
You MUST appeal to greed to incentivise node holders.

Ok, you think, maybe industry companies will have nodes and they dgaf about price, right?
Wrong!
That would end with a tragedy of the commons where everyone wants to use the network, but no one wants to commit the resources to run it.
Why would you spend a lot of resources maintaining a node, if your competitor can use the exact same network for a cheaper price?

For the network to be a success it must be economically worthwhile to run a node. This creates unavoidable buying pressure on LINK.

[Anonymous No.9138508]

>>9138408
You can purchase followers, but why would a reputable company automatically follow back anyone who follows them regardless if it's a spam/porn account? They wouldn't, and they don't. You're full of shit.

Like you just said, smart contract is one of a couple hundred fintech accounts they follow. They follow lots of random nobodies and pajeets. Why would the smart contract follow be of any more significance than @ChknBiscuits or any of the other shitty accounts? They follow various blockchain related pages, the world doesnt revolve around your fucking shit token.

[Anonymous No.9138528]

>>9138446
>@greensockmonkey, @crypto_dennis are crypto/investing related accounts
Oh ok then well since this literal WHO account follows them now, I guess that makes them totally legit! Maybe soon they'll follow based Mcaffee too!

[Anonymous No.9138635]

>>9138508
>They wouldn't, and they don't. You're full of shit.
I’m not full of shit because I just said that they probably didn’t automatically follow back based on what anon said. They appeared tonautomatically follow me back but I was mistaken. Which I already said? Keep up ffs.

>>9138528
This is literally a pointless argument.

Some Swiss fintech/banking person own the @iso20022 account and follows smart contract and you think it’s literally irrelevant? Don’t you think it’s much more fucking likely that it has to do with the fact that chainlink is iso20022 compliant? Hence they also liked that chainlink iso20022 tweet last year? It doesn’t matter if they follow 0.001% Swiss chocolate accounts you fucking autistic fucks. Stop hyper focusing on irrelevant details and remember
Chainlink is iso20022 compliant
Bankfags are jizzing over iso20022 right now
*someone* in Swiss banking/fintech circles owns the iso20022 twitter account since at least early 2017 and has an interest in chainlink and smartcontract.com.
End of discussion

[Anonymous No.9138654]

>>9138136
when did he say that?

[Anonymous No.9138766]

>>9138654

In one of his threads he mentioned he'd been on 4chan since 2006 when he was 14.

[Anonymous No.9138767]

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sxsw-2018-panel-recap-smart-contracts-we-getting-rid-lawyers-gonser

[Anonymous No.9138786]

>>9138635
>Some Swiss fintech/banking person own the @iso20022 account
"some guy"
>and follows smart contract and you think it’s literally irrelevant
It's barely relevant considering it follows all these other blockchain related projects, random pajeets, meme accounts, bike shops and fintech pages. Wait, hang on, I just realised they're following the one and only Divesh Singh!!! Holy fuck it's fucking real! LINK $1000 EOY confirmed!!!!
Proofs @diveshbhartiya

[Anonymous No.9138828]

>>9138766
yep, thanks, found it >>/biz/thread/4801212#p4803686
I was pretty sure he's in his 30s or so

[Anonymous No.9138845]

>>9138828

ya, makes sense. he'd definitely have an incentive to obscure his identity with some false personal info here and there

[Anonymous No.9138861]

>>9138786
>It's barely relevant considering it follows all these other blockchain related projects, random pajeets, meme accounts, bike shops and fintech pages.
The fintech pages are a HIGHLY relevant.
As for the rest. It’s less than 1% and not even that unusual. You are retarded.

[Anonymous No.9138923]

>>9138861
>only muh fintech pages are relevant, all the others don't mean nuffin cuz they nuffin to do with muh smart contract
Damn bro that's harsh, Divesh Singh and Hari Krishan are gonna be on suicide watch.

[Anonymous No.9138998]

>>9138923
You’re right. I guess chainlink is no longer iso20022 compliant, $0 eoy

[Anonymous No.9139057]

>>9138998
Won’t all fintech companies have to be if they want to do business in the EU?

[Anonymous No.9139101]

>>9139057
I was being sarcastic

>>9138923
Instead of continuing this pointless argument I’ve actually messaged the account and asked who runs it. If they respond I’ll let you know mate.

[Anonymous No.9139114]

>>9138000
Do you not understand that this has nothing to do with "normies"? FFS

[Anonymous No.9139160]

>>9139101
I know. But I’m saying the fact that it’s ISO20022 compliant isn’t a big deal.

[Anonymous No.9139172]

>>9139160
LMAO. you are more stupid than i thought

[Anonymous No.9139178]

>>9138786
By the way, the @valid_baba account he follows is a shill account for a blockchain project called Sovrin ID.

So yeah if you look through the 7 you listed one by one, actually looks like he follows actually ZERO meme/irrelevant accounts. You’re full of shit.

[Anonymous No.9139191]

>>9139160
How many iso20022 cryptos are there?

[Anonymous No.9139220]

>>9137952
This is highly likely. That's all I can say unfortunately. P.s Sergey finds those new Ropsten memes pretty funny lol

[Anonymous No.9139227]

>>9139172
Are you his boyfriend or something? What’s the big deal that smart contract is ISO20022 compliant if all fintech companies have to be ISO20022 compliant? Why do Linkies always have to grossly exaggerate the significance of anything Chainlink ever does?

[Anonymous No.9139251]

>>9139220
R-r-rory?
Please tell sergey and the team that despite our chronic autism we hope nothing but the best for chainlink

[Anonymous No.9139277]

>>9139227

[Anonymous No.9139278]

>>9139251
Oh they know anon, they know. Still, thank you for your kind words

[Anonymous No.9139287]

>>9139191
It’s just a messaging standard which any crypto can comply to should they want/need to. UCASH is also ISO20022 complicant. It’s not some major achievement.

[Anonymous No.9139291]

>>9139278
what are your ties to the team

[Anonymous No.9139304]

>>9139287
*compliant

[Anonymous No.9139305]

>>9139287
Ok
How many cryptos are ISO20022 compliant and have a partnership with SWIFT

[Anonymous No.9139309]

>>9139291
Personal and loving most of all

[Anonymous No.9139341]

>>9139251
>LARPing as Rory

Absolute state of /biz/

[Anonymous No.9139343]

>>9139305
K I’m gonna need to see the part where SWIFT announced the partnership with Chainlink please

[Anonymous No.9139365]

>>9137726
comfy

[Anonymous No.9139374]

>>9139343
its on their website you fucking insect. how do you dress yourself in the morning. you are retarded.

[Anonymous No.9139406]

>>9139220
Does he like mine?

[Anonymous No.9139413]

>>9139341
Lol just sent a screen cap of these posts to our guys at San Francisco and they had seen them already. "Even if Rory tried to post as himself no one would believe lol" -S. I'll try to make him post

[Anonymous No.9139416]

>>9139374
Um no sweetie, that’s not how it works. Any nigger can create a website and announce partnerships with massive companies. I need the part where the actual company that carries any weight, i.e. SWIFT, announced the partnership with Chainlink. Don’t let me down now sweetie.

[Anonymous No.9139443]

>>9139406
Yeah I think they found the whole Ropsten, Stockholm idea hilarious!

[Anonymous No.9139464]

>>9139416

>sweetie posting in the year of our lord 2018

[Anonymous No.9139475]

>>9139464
t. sweetie

[Anonymous No.9139504]

>>9139443
When you say you think you mean in your imagination right?

[Anonymous No.9139512]

Tom Gosner is a billionaire now. What other coin had a billionaire investor? Any what is its market cap now? And chainlink isn't a chink scam unlike this other one

[Anonymous No.9139539]

>>9139504
Philosophically speaking yes, sweetie

[Anonymous No.9139545]

Amen

[Anonymous No.9139548]

>>9139413
would love to hear a biz post from anyone on the team. lol

[Anonymous No.9139579]

>>9139548
>>9139539
thomas called someone "anon" on reddit. Sounds like an implicit but plausibly deniable way of saying he browses. at the very least they'd be dumb not to have someone keeping an eye on /biz/ to have a heads up in case some anon decides to go rogue and trys to fuck with them/theproject.

[Anonymous No.9139580]

>>9139539
K well philosophically in my imagination you’re unironically a larping faggot.

[Anonymous No.9139708]

>>9139512
Literally EOS

[Anonymous No.9140719]

>>9137460
to be fair, you have to have an extremely high IQ to understand ChainLink. Without a technical background in computing, economics, philosophy, you simply will not have knowledge necessary to fully wrap your mind around the potential behind the project. If you take a look Szabos economic theory you will see why Sergey majored in philosophy to begin will as most of his talks and speeches sergey has given on the topic really stem from adam smiths invisible hand free market forces.

[Anonymous No.9141373]

>>9137608
>Chainlink is a requirement for smart contracts to be, well.. smart!
-Tom Gosner, founder of Docusign
Literally all fud eternally BTFO.

[Anonymous No.9141454]

So imagine you have a smart contract of any kind, big money involved. The contract can only accept info from some addresses. The blockchain cannot be altered, so if the data is corrupted, the owner of those addresses would pay compensations.

Why are Oracles needed again?

[Anonymous No.9141679]

>>9141454
If the data source is a simple API from a single source, it may be at risk of being compromised or being inaccurate. If the result is payments automatically being paid in error, this could be very bad. This is where the notion of an ‘oracle’ comes into play.

[Anonymous No.9141767]

>>9138314
What a whining bitch, sell it.

[Anonymous No.9141811]

>>9138314
why did you go all in
you could have had a main link hold and some picks to keep you occupied

[Anonymous No.9141916]

>>9139277
Fyi. The poster on Reddit that wrote the attached attended that Swift conference last week. He provided his thoughts on what went on at the conference. After that he was asked if he was still as bullish on Link as he was when he wrote the post you attached. His response was extremely favorable, says he feels even stronger about it than he previously did... Which is pretty encouraging to me.

[Anonymous No.9142053]

>>9137952
Yes, go back to your make-believe bubble where everything is set for you to have the life you always wanted and the only thing you need to do is trust someone else to solve it all. There is nothing for you to do, just wait. It will all get better once you make it. Your parents will be proud of you and look up to you. Your friends will respect you and want to be on your life more often. You'll find love, be sure of it. Once you've uncovered who you really are after acquiring your wealth people will agree with you: You're the best! You’re so smart! You’re so lucky! I am so lucky to have met you, I'm always going to be by your side, and I love you. I love you. Maybe she does and maybe she won't leave. Maybe your new and old friends like you all the same and do care for you. Maybe your parents do think they did a great job raising you. Or maybe you don't have anyone at all. Even better then, because once you make it none of this will matter.

That's because everything you've dreamed of being depends on only one decision. Would you'd made it if it wasn't for this? Would you'd made it if you didn't risk being a fool for a year or two before whatever scam you're attached to succeeded? I don't think so and you don't think so either.

That's why you're still here, looking for yet another clue to lay back and be calm while you wait for the day when the rest of your life can truly begin. Keep waiting.

[Anonymous No.9142766]

>>9141916
Attached is the question and response referred to above.

[Anonymous No.9142940]

>>9137770
Right, because everyone always gets price predictions correct. He is right about $3, just got the time scale wrong.