Tonight...

[Anonymous No.9047088]

It's happening tonight!
Strap in boys!

[Anonymous No.9047110]

i hope so op, hope your right

[Anonymous No.9047136]

>>9047088
god has given me this opertunity to better my life, i cant wait for the the biggest transfer of wealth in history.
thank /biz/ for the chanse

[Anonymous No.9047153]

>>9047088
Checked

[Anonymous No.9047200]

[Anonymous No.9047354]

i've literally seen this posted every single night on /biz/

At what point does shilling Chainlink pass fully into sarcasm?

[Anonymous No.9047374]

Have you not learned anything? I'm gonna say this ONE LAST time and I hope to God you listen to me this time.................It's fucking over. Don't tell yourself otherwise. You are an actual brainlet if you don't understand the implications of VEN's announcement. Even if you ignore the fact that most businesses would just utilize VeChain's smart contract platform with its built-in oracle rendering your shittoken absolutely fucking useless, their announcement also implies the simple fact that literally EVERY SINGLE ONE IN THIS BOARD WHO HAS HIGHER THAN ROOM TEMP IQ. Any smart contract platforms can just have their own oracles. Blockchain agnosticism doesn't fucking matter because everyone would just shit out their own oracle network because IT'S THAT FUCKING EASY. Your "moonshot" isn't anything special, sorry LINKies. Get absolutely fucking fucked lmao. On that note, see how it's currently pumping? That's the whales propping the price up as they finally sell their positions on this gamble of a token. I'm sorry, the dream is over. Go fuck yourselves. It's over!

[Anonymous No.9047486]

>>9047088
>this thread again
i'm finally going to add link to my filter. you guys are getting desperate as fuck now.

[Anonymous No.9047511]

>>9047354

[Anonymous No.9047548]

>>9047374
THIS IS LITERALLY MY FAVORITE NEW LINK FUD LOL. THANK YOU, LOL!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.9047724]

>>9047486
Anon, that's like announcing you're about to punch yourself in the dick;
You probably shouldn't, but we don't care either way.

[Anonymous No.9047845]

>>9047374
Read in his voice

[Anonymous No.9048187]

>>9047374
>their announcement also implies the simple fact that literally EVERY SINGLE ONE IN THIS BOARD WHO HAS HIGHER THAN ROOM TEMP IQ.
this is the part I don't get
>tfw room temp iq

[Anonymous No.9048395]

leds gow muun

[Anonymous No.9048604]

[Anonymous No.9048615]

>>9047088

Strap in boys.

[Anonymous No.9049598]

forced memes never work

[Anonymous No.9049637]

>>9047088
Assuming you guys get your moon due to wild speculation on 'partnerships'; is a legit company that doesn't have access to OTC LINK really going to buy a highly volatile asset from an unregulated exchange, to be held for X amount of time to pay future fees to node operators? How could a business even accurately budget the amount of LINK they require if the price fluctuates like most crypto?
They would need a dedicated, de-centralized, automated, instant, secure and regulated way of exchanging fiat for LINK at the time of fee payment to nodes for any future enterprise adoption after the first round of companies get their link in OTC deals (probably for free).
If fees are based in fiat corporate customers will only want to be exposed to LINK price movements for a split-second when they pay operators, not hoard a stack of it. There is no practical way of doing this, especially without incurring even more overall fees for a simple data request.
There's a reason SirGay nervously said 'for the time being' when asked if node operators would be paid in LINK and not some other currency like ETH. Sorry stinkies, i just don't see it. $0.1 EOY

[Anonymous No.9049686]

>>9049637
Only 350MM of 1B are on "unregulated" exchanges. At least another 350MM of that is intended specifically to be given to and/or sold direct to corporate/banking entities. They don't have to buy it on the exchange, that'd be ridiculous. They'll also likely operate their own nodes. As for price fluctuations, since LINK is divisible by 18 decimal places, it'll be quite easy for the transaction FIAT cost to remain the same while the LINK underlying cost changes during every transaction. LINK would have to be worth something like 1 quadrillion USD per token or more for the tokenomics to fail. You'd have absolutely zero concerns about any of this if you understand really any basic cryptocurrency principle. Of course, you're just a troll with some pasta, but I figured I'd indulge anyone who's even more braindead than you and can't identify that on their own.

[Anonymous No.9049730]

>>9049686
Speaking of pasta.

[Anonymous No.9049886]

>>9049686
Link is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.
In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team.

[Anonymous No.9049898]

>>9049886
>json parser.
dude at least use some new fud. there were tons of copypastas floating around today. be original.