[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 453 KB, 1385x967, accounting niggas are in.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9031454 No.9031454 [Reply] [Original]

discuss

https://www.sageintacct.com/blog/new-kids-block-blockchain-reaction

>> No.9031472

>>9031454
this is good and makes me happy

>> No.9031485

0/10 thread
Sage

>> No.9031583

>>9031485
Not really. It means that LINK isn't just using these logos without these companies knowledge

>> No.9031724
File: 79 KB, 1024x720, 937120-asians-bangs-brown-eyes-ogura-yuko-women.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9031724

thanks OP

>> No.9031768

Assuming you guys get your moon due to wild speculation on 'partnerships'; is a legit company that doesn't have access to OTC LINK really going to buy a highly volatile asset from an unregulated exchange, to be held for X amount of time to pay future fees to node operators? How could a business even accurately budget the amount of LINK they require if the price fluctuates like most crypto?
They would need a dedicated, de-centralized, automated, instant, secure and regulated way of exchanging fiat for LINK at the time of fee payment to nodes for any future enterprise adoption after the first round of companies get their link in OTC deals (probably for free).
If fees are based in fiat corporate customers will only want to be exposed to LINK price movements for a split-second when they pay operators, not hoard a stack of it. There is no practical way of doing this, especially without incurring even more overall fees for a simple data request.
There's a reason SirGay nervously said 'for the time being' when asked if node operators would be paid in LINK and not some other currency like ETH. Sorry stinkies, i just don't see it. $0.1 EOY

>> No.9031777

>>9031583
>no mention of anything Link related
doesn't show shit

>> No.9031812

>>9031768
DELETE THIS

>> No.9031953

>>9031454
>highlighting text

jease comon

>> No.9032067

>>9031768
What's up with all this FUD today?

>> No.9032124

Kids are absolutely disgusting. Sold my bags.

>> No.9032165

>>9032067

Poor biz faggots trying to accumulate with their minimum wage jobs. lmao

Get rekt kiddos.