Devery (EVE)

[Anonymous No.9005858]

Wait the partnership with the UN is real? I thought it was a team of pajeets. Is it really mooning like WTC did? Wow

[Anonymous No.9005942]

>>9005858
Of course you retard biz fudding this coin was the number one buy signal

[Anonymous No.9005946]

You're too late.

[Anonymous No.9005977]

>>9005858

you are too late faggot
>tfw 1 mil EVE

[Anonymous No.9005979]

>>9005946
That's what people said about trx and xvg and WTC and neo and many other project who started out with legitimate partnerships like devery

[Anonymous No.9005980]

>>9005858
Still a team of pajeets
The (((UN))) changes nothing to these fundamentals.

[Anonymous No.9005996]

This is gonna dump hard. It pumped because its on one exchange with low volume so gl getting out with no liquidity. Not sure why anyone would buy a coin where none of the team members have any background in blockchain development.

[Anonymous No.9006043]

>>9005980
I bought Trac and it literally does nothing. The telegram is full of dude bro betafags and the team has nothing to show besides an award from Walmart for being a good idea. So now I look at eve and I just can't see why it wouldn't take the seat next to Vechain as the top supplychain coins. I mean JD.com (Amazon of China) is partnered with them wtf?!

[Anonymous No.9006117]

>>9006043

Buy on a pullback and just wait.

[Anonymous No.9006129]

>>9005980
>>9005996
LMAO TRACFAGS AND ARYFAGS BTFO

COPE HARDER FAGGOTS

[Anonymous No.9006180]

Jesus fucking christ no one in here has even mentioned the BTTS...

You guys are all fucking pajeets who don't deserve this money.

[Anonymous No.9006212]

>>9006180
BTTS literally is as big for etherium as lightning network is for BTC and LTC. It will change the game and it's coming to eve first and only works on tokens who have it built into their smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.9006298]

>>9006212

Explain to me how the token gains value when theres no reason to hold it (no burn mechanism/masternodes/etc)

[Anonymous No.9006299]

>>9005977
300k here
whats ur average cost my guy

[Anonymous No.9006342]

>>9006298
Companies must HOLD eve to use verification services and also pay a small fee to whoever developed the app they use for supplychain analysis and validation/verification. Pretty sound growth model for investors.

[Anonymous No.9006411]

>>9006342

They dont have to hold it though. They will buy it, use it, and its resold in seconds to avoid volatility. Look up token velocity problem. I used to hold Eve and asked this question many times with no response from the team. My guess is they are getting paid in fiat and eve holders will ultimately get the shaft.

[Anonymous No.9006541]

>>9006411
The price of validation is pegged to a fiat value so the companies are not exposed to volatility. And yes they must HOLD EVE verification would happen at every stage in the supplychain (requiring eve) and without infinite liquidity (which is not a thing) they would not purchase and resell as the fees would kill them more then just holding.

[Anonymous No.9006564]

>>9006541
But again verification is pegged to a fiat value, thus not subjected to volatility

[Anonymous No.9007159]

>>9006541

So you’re telling me the price is locked in for companies who want to use eve, but you expect the value for eve to rise? That makes no sense

[Anonymous No.9007463]

>>9007159
Do you not understand supply and demand? Are you a literal fucking retard? The more companies that use it for verification services the less ever there will be to go around. (Raising the price) and as the price raises the amount of eve will go down. It's a linear relationship that has a positive slope you brainlet

[Anonymous No.9007653]

>>9007463

So then price of eve isnt pegged for companies and therefore they have no reason to hold a volatile asset.