[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 679 KB, 750x750, 1524045713894.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8970340 No.8970340 [Reply] [Original]

*whsipers*

It's happening

>> No.8970397

>>8970340
tonight

>> No.8970434

>>8970340
That chart is looking delicious.

>> No.8970725
File: 7 KB, 220x229, 2134234234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8970725

I just sold.

>> No.8970758

Volume has doubled

>> No.8970784

>>8970340
It's not happening, REQ cannot fucking hold a pump EVER. It just fucking dumps
t. 50% of my portfolio is req

>> No.8970821

>>8970784
Speaks the truth, REQ is a shitcoin going nowhere.

>> No.8970835

love REQ but not even top 100 yet

>> No.8970845

>>8970835
> yet
Shitcoin lost its place today.

>> No.8970892

>>8970340
Has the market just forgotten about us? I mean even fucking LINK has 5 times the volume of this coin.

>> No.8970943

>>8970892
Who fucking knows. I can only reason it as the best buying opportunity of the century, literally.

>> No.8970989

Correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding for req being so low is because its being surpressed by whales. Their plan is to keep it surpressed until it starts getting adopted, which will burn tokens rapidly because of the cheap price. If 30% of the supply gets burned quickly, it will rise very quickly in price when people fomo in.

>> No.8971017

>>8970989
bretty much this. im in a whale discord and this is exactly what we are doing. shhh

>> No.8971252

>>8971017
You probably own less than 50k Req
> Whale
This shits going to $0

>> No.8971339
File: 224 KB, 544x572, 1516300449001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8971339

>>8970784

This.

For every 1 REQ owned by post-ICO buyers, there's 1 MILLION pre-sale REQ tokens purchased by whales and Binance for less than 1 cent.

It will take years for the pre-sale buyers to dump their REQ.

>> No.8971369

>>8971339
Oh, you're that sub-cent retard on reddit that doesn't even know you can look up all the addresses that hold REQ right on etherscan.

This FUD is stupid.

>> No.8971460

>>8971369

Etherscan does not account for the entire circulating supply, shithead.

>> No.8971485

>>8971339
NO ONE bought sub 1 cent. the lowest pre ico price was 4 cents, fudder. and very few held after it hit $1

>> No.8971585

>>8971485
>NO ONE bought sub 1 cent.

You can't prove that.

No way you can account for the hundreds of millions of coins in circulation.

>and very few held after it hit $1

Most of the big wallets on Etherscan have not sold in January.

>> No.8971610
File: 7 KB, 645x773, 1894994894.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8971610

>>8971485
>tfw held after it hit $1

>> No.8971619

>>8971460
why not?

>> No.8971669

>>8971585
You're right, he can't prove it, but he's not the one that made a wild claim. The proof falls on you to show any evidence that anyone bought it for sub-cent prices.

If you don't have anything like that you can fuck off, because I can make that same claim for literally every single other coin, so at the end of the day without evidence, the statement means nothing because it affects every other project as well.

>> No.8971739

>>8971585
>>8971669
i can prove it actually. just look up the pre ico sales prices. theyre all publically available.

>> No.8971772

>>8971739
>I can prove it
>Go and find it yourself lol I'm not actually going to link it here

Fuck off retard

>> No.8971774
File: 579 KB, 497x718, 1509341979342.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8971774

>>8971669
>. The proof falls on you to show any evidence that anyone bought it for sub-cent prices.

That's easy.

After the ICO, there was unrelenting selling pressure below the ICO price, which implies that pre-sale buyers got it for substantially less.

The Binance chink probably got a sweet fucking deal for listing REQ. They probably got their millions for tenths of a cent.

>> No.8971804

>>8971774
No dumbass, the issue was the glitch on Binance that allowed people to double spend REQ. Naturally this made people panic and dump their ICO bags.

3-4 cents was the cheapest REQ ever was.

Also why the fuck am I even responding to you.

>Let me prove this claim by using an implication

Did you pass 5th grade?

>> No.8971914

>>8971804
>No dumbass, the issue was the glitch on Binance that allowed people to double spend REQ. Naturally this made people panic and dump their ICO bags.

That last for a day or two. Don't lie to me cunt, I was around and carefully watching at that time.

The selling pressure lasted all of September and October.

>> No.8971946

>>8971914
So again, where's your proof that this means people bought REQ below a cent?

What makes this different than any other ((((whales are keeping the price low to accumulate))))

>> No.8971976
File: 66 KB, 400x400, 1386789013002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8971976

>>8971946
>So again, where's your proof that this means people bought REQ below a cent?

They only sold because they could afford to.

You think whales are retarded like the average retail /biz/ NEET speculator?

They will NEVER sell at a loss, unless absolutely forced to.

>> No.8972038

>>8971976
Hang out in whale chats where they tell you how they operate often?

You sounded pretty certain in that last statement. Are you implying that whales aren't just people that got lucky on bitcoin and alts like ETH early on and just fuck around on the market now that they can influence it?

>He fell for the "whales are super smart speculators" meme

>> No.8972054

>>8971946
>where's your proof that this means people bought REQ below a cent?
Lmao do you really expect him to give proofs? This is 4chan he is probably legally autistic

>> No.8972075

>>8970340
I want some req but I only have 3k left to throw in so I feel like I'd be better off just throwing that on top of what I already have

>> No.8972097

>>8972054
Which is exactly why I asked it. Most people online can have their argument torn apart the moment anyone asks for any kind of actual evidence to back up a statement. Of course he'll just deflect and tell people to look it up and then resort to ad hominem, because that's the only response anyone can have when someone not retarded asks for proof before continuing a discussion that leads nowhere because it's just two people stating theories and opinions back and forth until one or both come back with actual supporting information.

It's how you win 99% of the time.

If he actually came back with a page that had pre-sale prices, or a screenshot of someone buying REQ below a cent, or anything like that, then we can start something. Otherwise just tell that person to fuck off.

>> No.8972324

>>8971017

But when is the suppressing going to stop?

>> No.8972351

>>8972324
When more people like you lose hope and say fuck it. That's the entire point.

>> No.8972492

>>8972351

Not me, I'm red pilled. I holding for 3-5 years and after. I have a settlement from a car accident coming in and will want to buy more when that comes in, im projecting July or August. Price prediction then?

>> No.8972579

>>8970943

>literally
>non-literal application of term

>> No.8972595

ITT: bag holders who can’t accept that this shitcoin is going nowhere

t. req bag holder

>> No.8972761

>>8972595
>>8970821
>>8970845
>>8971585
>>8971339
samefag spreading fud

>> No.8973266

>>8972761

You wish

>> No.8973277

>>8972761

Not an argument.