/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.8963866]

Will it ever moon :( my bags are so heavy

[Anonymous No.8963882]

Rekt, normie

[Anonymous No.8963881]

>>8963866
Daily reqminder

[Anonymous No.8963886]

>>8963866
going sub 100 any minute now

[Anonymous No.8963911]

>>8963886
already 101 senpai

[Anonymous No.8963962]

>>8963866
I swear nobody has any patience anymore. You have a coin that has a solid team, solid partnerships, and a great plan for dapps and roadmap. To top it all off, the market is keeping it at 20 fucking cents so you can keep gobbling up more. Be grateful it hasn’t mooned yet and keep accumulating. Iron hands, golden gains friend.

[Anonymous No.8963987]

>>8963866

I honestly no longer know what it would take to get broad interest in this project.

At the very least, they will need crypto-fiat integration before anyone else, otherwise they are doomed to shitcoin hell otherwise known as Yobit.

If I don't get an update on the roadmap for fiat integration, I'm going to be looking to bail out.

What's keeping me in so far is there really are no other crypto investments with better fundamentals for growth.

I don't want to Tether up and then see all this shit fly to $2.50 like that Swiss fund manager guy predicts.

[Anonymous No.8964013]

I still believe.

[Anonymous No.8964110]

>>8963987
>reddit spacing
>doesn't know about the accounting use case
>displays severe lack of intellect
checks out

[Anonymous No.8964130]

>>8964110

None of those form any coherent arguments.

What you retards call Rebbit spacing is in reality correct use of paragraphs and sentence layout.

[Anonymous No.8964134]

>>8964110
>/r/bikinibottomtwitter memes

NOT THAT I WOULD KNOW H-HEH

[Anonymous No.8964289]

>>8963987
I'll put it like this:
I'm holding until 2020. 10k REQ over the course of a few years could turn out to be very profitable. I'm taking to account the fact that REQ has a Mainnet, partnerships, and solid plans that will revolutionize certain industries. It's going to stick around and there will be more profit. The question is, "how much?"

Idk what's going to happen or when, but I do know that it will go up. I'm not going to day trade, risk more tax liability, and try to time the crypto market. I've learned my lesson early 2018 along with everyone else. I don't lose anything. I holding REQ for two years, so I say, "Why the hell not."

You have to remember, no matter how much FUD you see about crypto in general and about how we're "late" that we're still ARPAnet tier of the internet craze. Crypto and block chain technologies will explode in the next few years, and REQ seems like one of 17 solid projects to latch onto while on the ground floor.

Do what you want, though. Just have fun, be cautious, and be safe, faggot.

[Anonymous No.8964407]

>>8964130
>this

>is

>correct

>use

>of

>paragraphs
according to you? Please an hero, newnigger.

[Anonymous No.8964824]

I'm just at a loss as to why there is not more enthusiasm about this project. The partnerships they announce, the team and roadmap is all so fantastic it's just incredible that the price is so stagnant and that the volume as well is so low.

[Anonymous No.8964922]

>>8964289

Well I'm currently sitting on 325% profit in REQ since I bought in at 4 cents.

I've already made a respectable gain.

Would you recommend I bail out and seek out higher volume shitcoins?

[Anonymous No.8964924]

>>8964289
17 solid projects? Enlighten us anon. I have another £1k to put in, should i add to my 5.5k REQ or put into something else

[Anonymous No.8964972]

All I'm saying is that super computers tend to be right pretty often.

[Anonymous No.8965101]

>>8964922
>holding through $1.20
>selling at $0.21
>>8964972
>5y
>+1032%
Nice, just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.8965128]

>>8965101
>holding through $1.20

That's not guaranteed to happen again, and the market was stupid for those 20 days. Hindsight is always crystal clear too.

[Anonymous No.8965140]

>>8964972

That's pathetic desu. What is that even based on and how could you possibly model something as irrational as crypto valuations.

[Anonymous No.8965143]

>>8963881
>no reqs unironically believe this

[Anonymous No.8965171]

>>8964972
God that would be depressing

[Anonymous No.8965178]

>>8963866
only chainlink can save us now

[Anonymous No.8965184]

theyre going to moon in the days, weeks, and months after consensus when normie money comes in and when they get more exposure.


i think the next 1-3ish months are the last time to buy req at this low of a price level

[Anonymous No.8965208]

>>8965178
Word on the street is req is making their own oracle solution now because sergay spends too much time at Mc Donald’s doing nothing

[Anonymous No.8965355]

>>8965184
I hope so but not sure that Consensus will have that much of an effect on normies

[Anonymous No.8965398]

it's a scamcoin focused on marketing. I'm an accountant and I've read the white paper. I've talked to multiple people at the office and no one can explain what the dev team means when they talk about smart auditing or replacing human audits. I've questioned people shilling and they ignore it. I asked on the req subreddit and the thread got deleted.

a week later someone pops up on biz claiming to work for big 4 and linking a bunch of shitty links with new articles talking about req

they don't have a working product, they have videos of a "working product". it's all marketing to get their reddit drones to create "whats possible with req" as the dev team just makes another venmo copy cat that has higher fees.

Normies aren't using this trash. Just lol at the burn rate right now and they already released a mainnet

[Anonymous No.8965431]

>>8965398
>their entire accounting system violates the independent auditor requirement
>claims all taxes are handled by REQ when all other payment systems require 1099s to be sent out
>claims the government will approach them with questions about taxes (as if the IRS is not going to audit you instead)
>violates GAAP and FASB and SOX

[Anonymous No.8965447]

Req and link only coins not doing shit today lmao

[Anonymous No.8965631]

>>8965398

Dude, they have a working payment network running ETH transactions, you can send or receive money today if you wanted to. Everyone is holding however for the promised fiat integration with crypto via Oracle. But Srgey is a fat fucked and locked himself in his mother's apartment.

What do you make of the PwC merger? Apparently PwC has a dedicate crypto staff who will be coordinating work with REQ devs.

[Anonymous No.8965712]

>>8965398
>>8965431
The US is not the world u retarded fk.

Also this lvl of stupid fud. go now and post this concerns on reddit u cuck, so i can see that you are not a paid rupee pajeet.

[Anonymous No.8965770]

>>8965431
To be fair I always questioned the Audit part of their Whitepaper but I assumed they meant Tax Returns instead and that it was an error with the wording.

[Anonymous No.8965825]

>>8963866
Told you deluded fucks for months to drop your bags. There's something satisfying in seeing your posts being called FUD for months, watching desperate bagholders ride it all the way to the bottom and now your hands are getting weak. Funny enough, this is probably where you should accumulate more if you believe in it.

[Anonymous No.8965910]

>>8965398
Maybe what you said is true, I have no idea. But for a scam coin focused on marketing it doesn't fucking do a lot of marketing. They tweet like twice a week.

[Anonymous No.8965988]

>>8963866
I've been saying this for ages: Dump your SHIT REQ bags for something with potential.

REQ only used to pump cause of speculation on testnet/ mainnet/ updates. Now all that is OVER. main net came out and everyone smart sold before it happened. I sold my ICO bags probably to you during the January bull.

Look for coins with upcoming huge hype: OMG, ICX, EOS, XLM, NEO, ELA or some moon shots that havnt pumped yet like ELEC.

dump that shitcoin asap you're losing money anon

[Anonymous No.8966083]

>>8965988
dunno breh It's going up in sats.

[Anonymous No.8966236]

>>8965825
Wow guys, I think this one's actually serious. I look forward to you FOMO-ing in at a few bucks

[Anonymous No.8966317]

>>8965988

>OMG
>1.2 billion valuation, White Paper only

Your post just fell apart right there. You can make an alarmist post and pretend to be an expert and than drop a turd like that. Your credibility is just right in the toilet now.