Linkpool conservative estimate

[Anonymous No.8932222]

Only 0.001% of rapidAPIs monthly calls will provide a monthly passive income of about $20 per node. (assumed that 1node=20k link)

Instead of doing an extremely conservative estimate, let's do one that's still very conservative: 0.1% of rapidAPI.
Already up to $200 per node

Now, with just a bullish estimate, not even the singularity one, let's say it goes to just a 0.5% of rapidAPI. UP TO $1000 PER NODE MONTHLY.

Is linkpool larping or will we really become rich NEET's?

[Anonymous No.8932259]

>>8932222
Seems too good to be true. I can’t believe it.
>https://nordicapis.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-pricing-your-api/
Assume that smart contracts requiring external data become mainstream and the crypto API economy reaches the same size as the regular API economy now.
Let’s take the “hobbyist” from nordicapis.com as equivalent to a NEET running a chainlink node. That’s 688,991 calls per month. Per year it’s 8,267,892 calls. Say you charge $0.01 per call, which nordicapi reports, and is the minimum Oraclize charges. That’s $82,678.92 a year. IBM Watson charges $0.0025 per call which would be $20,669.73 per year.

Docusign says for their API that "You may not exceed 1,000 API requests per account per hour". Lol, ok so 1000 per hour is 24,000 a day, times 1 cent per job is $87,600 per year per node operator. With 19,000 node operators (Sergey's number) serving 1000 API requests per hour that's a total revenue of all nodes of $1,664,400,000 per year. That’s only 0.08% of $2.2 trillion (estimated total value of API economy in 2018).

[Anonymous No.8932269]

>>8932222
Checked. No larp, riches await us linkies

[Anonymous No.8932299]

Wait, so 20k Link only will give $1000 per month? That ain't shit.

[Anonymous No.8932356]

>>8932222
if 0.001% equals to 20$ per node, then 0.1% should equal to 2000$ not 200$ per node each month.

[Anonymous No.8932401]

>>8932356
OP can’t into math

[Anonymous No.8932429]

>>8932356
>>8932401
Yes, my mistake. Good that anon pointed it out. Still, it doesn't change the point I'm making in fact it makes the estimate even more unbelievable

[Anonymous No.8932439]

>>8932401
That is, unfortunately, what our team looks like

[Anonymous No.8932466]

>>8932429
True. Extremely bullish based on the calculations, even though we used rough numbers.

[Anonymous No.8932468]

>>8932299
>Not being able to live on a grand a month.
If you have no understanding of the importance of saving, then a grand is definitely not a lot. You can set up shop in an apartment and be a total fucking NEET with a grand a month. You can even stay up all night if you're scared of the dark because you know you won't have to go to work the next morning.

[Anonymous No.8932511]

>>8932429
now imagine that chainlink gets bigger than a single company rapidAPI is. With the same size, each node should pull 2M per month. I am not saying it will happen any time soon, but even a single percent share of rapidAPI's share would mean 20k per month.

[Anonymous No.8932534]

>>8932468
What happened to $1000 eoy? The singularity? And no, 1k per month isn't shit. I make twice that much wageslaving and that's sill not shit. I've worked hard just to get to 20k Link. 1k per month would be nice, but that low of a return was just not what I've expected.

I plan on staking for a few years before selling any link, if the singularity does happen will the returns be much higher? Say Link hits $1000, what would the profit from a node be then?

[Anonymous No.8932535]

>>8932429

Why do you think link is fussed so unbelievably hard? No bothers to fud stuff like REQ, JNT, etc cos no one cares. If you’re here, right now, with access to fiat or positions in crypto, you have been presented with an incredible opportunity. I tried explaining it to my god the other night, and I’m a brainlet, but the minute you start talking about a the industrial and enterprise applications of a decentralized oracle network fetching off chain data, 99.9999999% people start snoozing. Anyone who’s done their work on LINK knows it’s gonna be a huge payoff. I fud too when I’m trading, and if you aren’t resistant to the FUD, you haven’t no researches LINK we’ll enough.

LINK research is to FUD as your immune response is to pathogens

[Anonymous No.8932557]

>>8932535
*my gf, I do not speak to god. And if I did, it wouldn’t be about LINK lol

[Anonymous No.8932566]

>>8932535 you are a stupid mother fucker you know that

[Dicksausage No.8932583]

>>8932557
You should speak to god only and only about link and never about it to your GF,but since both of them are imaginary you are fine.

[Anonymous No.8932595]

>tfw only 7.6k link

[Anonymous No.8932610]

>>8932534
>1k per month would be nice, but that low of a return was just not what I've expected.
Okay Ill say it. Im a deluded linky myself but HOLY FUCK ANON. Time for a reality check. Get real you fucker

[Anonymous No.8932619]

>>8932566
Why so ranjeesh? Flies in your curry again?

>>8932583
Genuinely though, she asked what I was doing on comp as I’m always on it, and don’t have social media so what would I be doing. I said she wouldn’t be interested, she asked for explanation. Tried. Set off the sleep function.

[Anonymous No.8932639]

>>8932610
He's right, are you a college student?

[Anonymous No.8932640]

>>8932557
Having such a retarded god

My god came to me to talk about link, he is the one and only true god!
We chat about link from time to time, cool guy!

Owns 1mil link

[Anonymous No.8932752]

>>8932222
Quads of riches

[Anonymous No.8932758]

>>8932534
The price of API calls will not be affected by the price of the token. The income will be the same whether LINK costs 1 cent or $1000.

You are retarded.

[Anonymous No.8932899]

>>8932758
>>8932758
Sure, but let me reword that. Say the average node is 20k Link when Link is $1. Now if Link were $100, it would only take 200 Link to have the same value node. So a 20k Link holder could have 100 nodes, each yielding what a 20k node would when Link was $1? Right?

[Anonymous No.8932931]

>>8932899
No, the node requirement stays at 20k to have a full node.
The 200 Link holder can pool and gets a share of the node of 20k.
At least this is what I make of it by reading the whitepaper of linkpool

[Anonymous No.8932955]

>>8932899
that right there is the network effect

[Anonymous No.8933008]

>>8932931
Where is this 20k per node number coming from

[Anonymous No.8933030]

>>8933008
Linkpool

[Anonymous No.8933053]

>>8932931
We'll that doesn't sound right, because who in their right mind would keep 2 million dollars tied up in a node for a grand a month? That's .6% return per year.

Im pretty sure that the dollar value on the node is what will matter, not just some arbitrary number of Link

[Anonymous No.8933087]

>>8933053
You're probably right.
I still can't believe these numbers of linkpool.
It would make me one of the richest people of my country (180k link)
And i'm only 21 atm. lol

[Anonymous No.8933110]

>>8932259
The mainnet is only being set up to handle a maximum of 10k nodes. 19k entities offered to run a node but 10k will be the absolute maximum.

[Anonymous No.8933154]

>>8933110
>The mainnet is only being set up to handle a maximum of 10k nodes.
any proofs for that claim?

[Anonymous No.8933219]

>>8933154
Rory stated it in the chainlink telegram in december. Ill see if i can find it.

[Anonymous No.8933228]

>>8933087
That's a lot of Link, I have no doubt you'll be rich beyond your wildest dreams. I'm trying to hit 30k before staking is available

[Anonymous No.8933322]

>>8933228
I went all-in.. I know it is risky but hey that's the only reason I've made money so far in crypto.
I really don't care about the price of link on it's own because I only want to use the passive income. Do you think these numbers of linkpool are correct or will it be more complicated?

[Anonymous No.8933359]

>>8933030
linkpool are just speculating. They have no insider knowledge.

[Anonymous No.8933369]

>>8933154

[Anonymous No.8933419]

>>8933369
so? the current mainnet is still a from of test net really, or initial implementation, he says that the final version will be able to handle 10k nodes but doesn't imply it will be the limit.

[Anonymous No.8933424]

>>8932222
I don't understand where the 20K link per node is coming from? I know linkpool used it as an example, but did they say they won't set up nodes with less than 20K link?

[Anonymous No.8933425]

>>8933369
I didn't consider there being a node limit... so what happens when that happens? There becomes a waiting list to even become a node operator? Getting a node up and running early seems to be imperative- and it could be highly lucrative.

[Anonymous No.8933464]

Can someone explain to me: We need several (20 nodes) for the decentralization, so for each contracts we need 20 api calls and have to pay 20 node operatos.

Why would corps even chose decentralized oracles if it costs 20 times as a centralized one?

[Anonymous No.8933479]

>>8933154
December 26

[Anonymous No.8933531]

>>8933464
It won't be that expensive. Numbers like $0.05 for a single api call from a single node are made-up nonsense.

[Anonymous No.8933536]

>>8933419
>>8933425
I guess i should have worded it better. The mainnet is being set up to handle 10k nodes at least. Anything additional is not currently planned but that cpuld change in the future. Anything amount of nodes above 10k are not guaranteed to be supported.

[Anonymous No.8933574]

>>8933322
No risk no reward. And barring some catastrophe with Link, I'm sure you will end up somewhere in the green. I've gone all in with what I've got as well, I've been dumping my paychecks into Link and will keep doing so. Link is a great project, the fundamentals are solid, now we're just waiting for the network to kick off. This is far from some Tron type piece of shit. Best project out there imo.

I'm not really sure what the final numbers will be. The numbers that Linkpool is putting out are examples of what to expect. It really depends on the price of the token to determine the returns you'll get. The higher the price the more nodes you can operate. Only time will tell.

[Anonymous No.8933631]

>>8933464
They would because you can fully trust the decentralised option as it's the safest. That's solving the oracle problem tight there.

[Anonymous No.8933890]

nice quads op

[Anonymous No.8934014]

>>8933890
Thanks. Check my comment too >>8933322
Seems like Kek is approving

[Anonymous No.8934124]

>>8932222
Did anyone sign up for the linkpool crowdsale? I did but didn’t get any email confirmation or anything...when do we send the ETH we put down on the form?

[Anonymous No.8934236]

Anybody talking about low-risk massive gains through staking is an idiot. If it was that easy then everybody and their dog would buy LINK and stake it, which would instantly make it less profitable.

You will probably be able to make a reasonable amount of money staking. But anybody who thinks shit like 2% per month is plausible probably fell for Bitconnect.

I'm just going to hold, sell it all and then put it into conventional investments like indexes and real estate, but if staking works out to be okay then I might do a bit of that too. But for fuck's sake don't give these people money to make a node when mainnet isn't even out.

[Anonymous No.8934288]

>>8934236
I'm giving them some eth, just for shits & giggles

[Anonymous No.8934301]

>>8932222
fuck, that's it. I'm getting a kek statue for my desk.

[Anonymous No.8934307]

What even is Link?
Like whats the concept, explained to a total idiot?

[Anonymous No.8934329]

>>8932222
Unibright is going to destroy link. Datadash is an advisor and he shilled the fuck out of it in his last vid. It’s ogre linkies, actual professionals are taking over the idea.

[Anonymous No.8934353]

>>8934329
datatrash and his professionals can suck my dick

[Anonymous No.8934371]

>>8934353
Lol, retard, they have a working alpha already. Sergey has McDonald’s ware.

[Anonymous No.8934405]

>>8934371
go and buy it then, no one gives a fuck lmao

[Anonymous No.8934406]

>>8934307
It grabs API data for smart contracts (automated digital agreements), but it's decentralised at every stage so you don't have to trust anybody. That makes it low-risk, low-cost and expandable.

[Anonymous No.8934414]

>>8934307
essentially, it's a meme

[Anonymous No.8934442]

>>8934414
I like memes

Sold my Ontology for it

[Anonymous No.8934443]

>>8932259
>Seems too good to be true. I can’t believe it.
this. im in deep and still will not believe it until it happens. to good to be true im assuming ill lose everything.

[Anonymous No.8934458]

1000 EOY
Check'em

[Anonymous No.8934464]

>>8934443
desu dont even put all your eggs in just crypto, diversify into stocks that give decent dividends.

a good one is glencore

[Anonymous No.8934471]

>>8932299
12k a year passive income is pretty good in all seriousness

[Anonymous No.8934485]

What data will linkpool process?

[Anonymous No.8934513]

>>8934464
tfw I started off with 2.5k of my savings when I was 17y old in bitcoin and atm I have 180k link.
>all my eggs into crypto
>stocks are scary

[Anonymous No.8934521]

>>8932299
an $8k investment that only earns $12k/year passive income what a rip off

[Anonymous No.8934523]

>>8934464
>glencore
look into it. planning on picking up docusign whenever it begins trading

[Anonymous No.8934536]

>>8934307
It's like Req but only for fast food

[Anonymous No.8934572]

>>8934513
desu with 2.5k theres no reason to not put it all in one basket

when you have money you can speculate
when you dont have money you must speculate

also you are lucky to have been aware enough to just take the chance back then, I was busy chasing thots and fighting depression

[Anonymous No.8934614]

>>8932299
>50% yield per year
>"that aint shit"

kys

[Anonymous No.8934618]

>>8934464
>tfw I bought Telstra because I fell for the dividend meme
>tfw down 30% and they've halved their dividend payouts

[Anonymous No.8934672]

>>8934618
>Telecommunications Meme
Thats what u fell for

Buy companies that actually produce something if you want stable dividends, see it as a better bankaccount. BASF is gucci

[Anonymous No.8934697]

>>8932222
500 LINKlet here how do I get in on this or dhould i just hodl?

[Anonymous No.8934785]

>>8932222
>assumed that 1node=20k link
Won't it be much lower in reality?

[Anonymous No.8934801]

Hello, I'm a poor developer is anyone interested in paying me to write external adapters/ which external API's do you think would be most beneficial to the ethereum network?

[Anonymous No.8934823]

>>8934801
No begging negroid

[Anonymous No.8934888]

>>8934801
Just fork off a new shitcoin from bitcoin and call it "THE ONE COIN"
then make it so theres only one unit, nondivisible, and peg it to several natural ressources and fiat as the ULTIMATE STORE OF VALUE

WHOEVER SHALL HOLD THE ONE COIN SHALL BE KNOWN AS THE HEDGING KING

[Anonymous No.8934896]

AssBlaster, I wrote this the other day and it was Insta buried.

ASSBLASTER... I Don't know if you are still here or not. I'm sorry that these faggots weaponized their autism and doxxed you. You didn't deserve that.

I want to thank you. From the bottom of my heart I want to thank you for what you've done. You've risked your very livelihood to bring us insider information, in a completely selfless act that didn't only not benefit you at all, but put you at risk, and for what? A bunch of thankless neckbeards on a Chinese basket weaving forum.

I am a humble man. I live in the American Midwest and work hard 60+ hours a week. But through your insight and information you have shared with us, know that I have managed to accumulate 20,011 LINK as of now, sitting comfy on my trezor until the time id right, making this stack of seemingly useless internet monopoly money the second largest investment of my life behind my home. And its all thanks to you.

Everything that you have told us has come to pass. And I believe that trend will continue, and that some day, I will be able to break these chains of wage enslavement and experience true freedom, and there is no one else on earth that I can thank for that other than you.

I hope you read this. I hope you know that we're not all the rabid autists who hunted you down and doxxed you. I hope you know that by the time this is all over I believe you will have made a huge difference in a lot of people's lives. And I hope you know that your legacy will never die. The pink wojaks will flow thru the biz board carried along by the tears of the salty no-linkers, the very group you tried to help, while those of us who heeded your advice and wisdom will cheer loudly, "ASSBLASTER! ASSBLASTER! ASSBLASTER!" ... What a glorious day it will be.

Again, know that I'm a nobody. Just a guy with a small stack of LINK and a dream, but some day, I hope to buy you a beer and shake your hand.

Thank you, ASSBLASTER

[Anonymous No.8935100]

>>8932534
>How the poor stay poor
It's minimal effort you retard - passive income you can use for other shit. Buy 1k worth of other shitcoins per month to multiply your gains. It's literally free money.

[Anonymous No.8935132]

>>8934896
>t. Gonna make it

[Anonymous No.8935190]

>>8934442
This is how I got started in link.

[Anonymous No.8935204]

To those that doubt you could make such a massive income off staking link:
Look up NEO -> GAS calculators. Input the amount of link you have. People who hold that many neo - those who bought when it was under a dollar, most likely - are now making hundreds of dollars in GAS a day. And holding NEO to collect GAS does fuck all for the world economy. link will be revolutionary.

[Anonymous No.8935278]

>>8935204
There is about 10 times more LINK in existence than NEO however so take that into account

[Anonymous No.8935284]

>>8932222
Let's do some conventional style NPV valuation of a perpetuity:

at 0.001% utilization that's $240 a year, NPV of a respective perpetuity at 8% IRR: 240/0.08=3000 -> price per link = USD 0.15

at 0.1%: $24,000 a year: the respective perpetuity value: 300K -> price per link: $15

at 0.5%: $120,000 a year: 1.5M -> price per link: $ 75

Observe that this assumes no growth, ever, in the network beyond the initial values used.
>>8932259
Suppose is it as you say, and 0.01 per call. If we assume equal sized nodes, the NPV per node is 1.1M

[Anonymous No.8935294]

Try understand that link is a fee token and no where near as much money ass you think will move through the tokens

[Anonymous No.8935317]

>>8934896
Holy autism.

Imagine worshipping a larping faggot this hard
What has that faggot ever said that came to be? He literally said his "firm" owns ONE THIRD OF THE CIRCULATING SUPPLY
How retarded do you fuckers have to be to fall for this shit...pathetic

[Anonymous No.8935343]

>>8935294
>Fee for data

think about it

[Anonymous No.8935362]

>>8935317
he never said that dumb fuck

[Anonymous No.8935369]

So what are you guys doing? LinkPool or your own node?

[Anonymous No.8935374]

>>8935317
>falling for a pasta thats been in every thread the past week.
why even bother man

[Anonymous No.8935382]

>>8934801
I'm interested. Send an email to [e-mail]
Traveling in Italy currently so it may take me a bit longer than normal to respond.

[Anonymous No.8935427]

>>8935343
Are you implying that people aren't willing to pay fees for data? That definitely isn't true. Data processing is a trillion dollar industry lol.

[Anonymous No.8935510]

>>8935362
Yes he did
He also claimed his firm worked with a nonexistent firm mentioned in a fake medium article
When it was pointed out its fake, he went into full damage control mode
Just see what you wanna see bro, believe in a larping faggot because it furthers your delusions... crazy

[Anonymous No.8935574]

>>8935427
That’s what I’m saying, he’s thinking it’s just a fee token

[Anonymous No.8935596]

>>8935574
Ah, sorry, I misunderstood you.

[Anonymous No.8935607]

>>8935510
stop. you fell for a meme pasta. you're just a raging faggot

[Anonymous No.8935628]

>>8935369
Linkpool until I figure out how to set up my own node

[Anonymous No.8935635]

>>8932639
1K a month per node. Compound this over time to running multiple nodes and getting more requests/month as the economy grows. 1K a month to start is mind boggling, especially considering the effort and social skills you have to put in to make it happen (jack and dick, respectively).

[Anonymous No.8935718]

Who the fuck is Assblaster y’all keep taking about ?!? Been out for the last few weeks.

[Anonymous No.8935730]

>>8934521
yeah, absolute horrid return. Are people this deluded?

[Anonymous No.8935894]

>>8935510
>When it was pointed out its fake, he went into full damage control mode
Link or screenshot please. I've been looking for evidence to back up the claims that he was larping.

[Anonymous No.8935927]

>>8934521
It is shit if you haven't already made it

The only way to make it from this is to have 100 grand laying around to drop in it. Or if it hits $1000

But for someone who can only afford 1 node, yeah it's not shit

[Anonymous No.8935959]

>>8935927
>t. 12 year old

[Anonymous No.8936048]

>>8935718
Go away

[Anonymous No.8936071]

>>8935959
I can only afford one node. Tell me how $1000 a month is gonna buy me a Lambo? Oh yeah, I just gotta wait 35 years. Not bad.

But really, the roi is massive, but without enough capital to drop in it's not gonna make anyone rich. The only way I can see myself making it from this is if tons of people fomo in because of the insane returns, thus driving Link to 1000 which will drive node returns down. That's great and all and I do think Link will hit that, but 1 grand a month STILL ISNT SHIT.

[Anonymous No.8936083]

>>8935718
fucking new fag leave this board

[Anonymous No.8936093]

>>8935510
You are full of crap .. that isnt what he said .. and his explanation about what was said was spot on. Dude was legit, but dumbasses like you eliminated a great source of info.

[Anonymous No.8936110]

>>8935718
>he really in it for the memes.

[Anonymous No.8936133]

>>8935278
Id kill people for NEO

[Anonymous No.8936135]

>>8934236
most sound advice I've heard in this thread desu.

I think for the first 3-6 months I think crazy good profit is possible especially considering this is very new and it is very difficult for normies to set up a Chainlink node. If you disagree that that setting up a node is difficult just remind yourself that the whole Linkpool initiative is about making staking LINK easy so anyone can stake (at a humungous cost of 30% profit).

[Anonymous No.8936146]

>>8936133
not kidding hit me up

[Anonymous No.8936155]

>>8936093
>but dumbasses like you eliminated a great source of info.
he is biz now. expect nothing less.

[Anonymous No.8936163]

>>8935718
LEAVE NOW

[Anonymous No.8936209]

>>8935278
Amount of link doesn't matter. It's how much you stake. Not every staker gets paid. Just because you have 20k LINK in your node doesn't mean you automatically get paid like with NEO/GAS. With LINK you need to accept a contract offered and fulfil the contract for payment and for this to even happen your reputation must be good, not just that you have a lot of LINK bags

[Anonymous No.8936225]

>>8932299
>>8932534

I like how your ID starts with 'RET' because you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.8936228]

>>8936093
It is entirely what he said
he also said $3 this month... doesn't look like a single chance of thay happening
He disappeared because he kept getting called out and ran out of bullshit
Now he will never come back because everything he said was flat out wrong and there's too much damage control to do

I can't believe people actually fall for larpers... delusional bag holder

>

[Anonymous No.8936287]

>>8936225
I guess I am, You're right, $1k a month is a fuck ton of money. Lambos, mansions all that shit... my fucking ass.

[Anonymous No.8936289]

>>8934896
Honestly this made me tear up.

[Anonymous No.8936325]

>>8936228
Wrong .. and I can not wait to the day Link pops for good and we can all celebrate and laugh at the morons like you that missed the boat.

[Anonymous No.8936360]

>>8936228
Wrong. You read some crap from some other Larpers and buy in without providing any info to back it up. Prove me wrong like I just did you. Just another lame FUDER that will miss the boat, and deservedly so.

[Anonymous No.8936369]

>>8932534
Lol get fucking real dude. 1k passive income a month on initial investment that you can still cash out. Most people that invest lose money. If you aren't happy with those gains then kys you will never see anything better. Most boomers dream of 5% a year.

[Anonymous No.8936384]

what the node do? what data it provides?
nobody ever explains this
like if I run a node do I also have to do something else besides running a computer 24/7?

[Anonymous No.8936398]

>>8936325
The signal capital mentioned in thay article doesn't exist. It's 100% fake. He started with "my firm works with signal capital" to add some legitimacy to his bullshit and use the medium article to his advantage.
Now post the rest of the screencaps itt after it was found out the article was bullshit.

Also,
>my firm owns 1/3rd the circulating supply
LMAO

So fucking delusional
Keep holding those bags you dumb fuck. Appeal to authority for a fucking larping anonymous poster. Could you be any more pathetic? Seriously...

[Anonymous No.8936484]

>>8936398
Show us the post he stated his firm owned 1/3 or the circulating supply. As far as the other, he explained exactly how and why he responded as he did. You got nothing but some lame fake FUD.

[Anonymous No.8936539]

>>8936398
I have read the whitepaper asshole .. and I am fully committed to the project. You on the other hand, know jack shit other than FUD. The attached was enough to get my buy in - AB's info was just a nice to have along the way. You are clearly too dumb to own Link - buy Mobius sir.

[Anonymous No.8936540]

>>8936484
>fake medium article involving signal capital
>"yeah my firm works with signal capital" to add legitimacy to his larping bullshit
>article proven as fake, signal capital have nothing to do with crypto in the slightest
>No more to be said about it from ass blaster except straight up damage control

As for his firm owning 1/3rd the circulating supply, he's said it plenty of times

Can you prove anything he said is true? No you can't
Keeper believing bullshit if you helps you deal with not selling at 10k+ sats but don't try convince others of it

[Anonymous No.8936571]

>>8932222
They already hit 500 ETH in the whitelist KYC process, just 500 ETH more to go

[Anonymous No.8936575]

>>8936540
You got nothing .. I said post it or stfu ..

[Anonymous No.8936582]

>>8932222
>2222
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[Anonymous No.8936598]

>>8932222
how do I get a node?

[Anonymous No.8936608]

>>8936575
You and AB have got nothing either... remember the Dennis system? What's the last step bro. Lmao you got fucking played and dumped on hardcore.

[Anonymous No.8936623]

>>8936575
And the only "convincing" of anything I am doing is showing anybody that reads this thread you are lieing fudder. As far as LINK goes, anybody investing should DYOR. You might try doing some of that junior instead of just spreading bullshit.

[Anonymous No.8936673]

>>8936623

[Anonymous No.8936709]

I won't be able to run a node probably. Are holders going to benefit somehow? Besides any price increase the token might have.

I'd love to stake mine but I'm quite brainlet regarding this project.

[Anonymous No.8936765]

>>8934307

[Anonymous No.8936822]

>>8936369
I don't care what booomers think. I was told there would be a singularity and that link would be 1000. Now you're all ragging about how 1k a month is so fucking amazing. Is the singularity happening or not?

[Anonymous No.8936837]

>>8936822
Market sell all your LINK, you don't deserve it

[Anonymous No.8936908]

>>8936822
Don't believe 1000 is legit .. 50 to 60 initially... a drop then back to 150 to 200 eventually ... but nobody really knows. Then again you could ask that jamoke I was debating with earlier, I am sure he would tell you it will be worth nothing.

[Anonymous No.8936938]

At 8% IRR, a single node operator (assuming 20K links) would need to gain USD 1.6M in profits per year for a single link token to be valued 1K.
I'm ignorning growth prospects, network effects and speculative valution thereof.
1K per month is very very good for the initial investment.

[Anonymous No.8937029]

>>8936822
Either a troll or you're this mentality retarded.

[Anonymous No.8937100]

>>8936071
god you're such a faggot

[Anonymous No.8937135]

>>8936071
You'll never make it not because of all those reason you think are the true reasons.

You're never going to make it because you don't know how to invest.

Get rich quick are always going to be your downfall.

Wealth is built brick by brick.

Those $1000/month could be used to buy more LINK, real estate, loan out the money.. etc... There are many way to reinvest those $1000/month and make more money off of it.

Majority of poor people that became rich is because they know how to manage and save money. Not because they hit it off in some jack pot.

[Anonymous No.8937248]

>>8935204
my god... apu? Is that you?

[Anonymous No.8937257]

>>8937135
Obviously I'm going to reinvest, I'm just trying to figure out what the deal is. All the sudden people are abandoning Link hitting 1000, and the new line is that 1000 a month is so great. Obviously I won't be mad to get 1000 a month. I just wanna know if 1000 per link hype is abandoned.

[Anonymous No.8937277]

So committing 16ETH to linkpool will get you 0.1% of every dollar that Linkpool makes, potentially across hundreds of nodes, all potentially pulling in thousands of dollars a day.

This seems like a very good deal, if you think ChainLink is going to be absolutely massive.

[Anonymous No.8937294]

>>8937257
$1000 per link is a fucking joke, dude, how do you not understand that? $100 per link would be fucking incredible.

[Anonymous No.8937304]

>>8937257
Why the everloving fuck would you believe the $1000 EOY meme? It’s an outrageous price. That’s why it’s a funny meme. Holy fuck you’re so unbelievably retarded to be even asking this question

[Anonymous No.8937324]

>>8936608

You are a fucking idiot. Stacks of what AB said was true and could be verified. There was zero benefit to running him off the board, just edgelords like you thinking you’re alpha.

Go read his threads (and make sure it’s the proper trip code) and spend 5 mins researching some of his info.

[Anonymous No.8937346]

>>8936822
Go buy thebillioncoin. You do realize money has to come from somewhere right? There are countless LINK holders. Big companys aren't going to be giving every neet who put his neetbux in a fucking lambo each month.

[Anonymous No.8937449]

>>8937294
newfag. Bet you Havent even read Satoshis writings before

[Anonymous No.8937477]

>>8937324
+1 totally agree. These asstards that read bogus info posted from other morons acting like AB ruined a good thing for many. Pisses me off every time I read something one of these morons posts about it, dude was great and helped many. Wish he would return, my guess is he is too at risk job wise to do so or he would.

[Anonymous No.8937487]

>>8937324
What has he said that is true?Name me a single thing.

[Anonymous No.8937507]

>>8937294
>>8937304
>>8937346
Nice, have fun selling your stacks at $60. I'm holding until 1000, and selling half the future staking returns after that. It's not just a meme.

And thanks just bought 1000 Kringles

[Anonymous No.8937563]

So a contribution to the Linkpool crowdsale buys you a stake in all future Linkpool profits, and this relationship is contained in an Ethereum contract but not tokenised, is that right?
With this being the case, do crowdsale contributors actually have the ability to onsell their stake in Linkpool profits? Is there a "Linkpool token"? The Medium article seems unclear on this.

[Anonymous No.8937600]

>>8937563
Go to the Linktrader Reddit .. there is a bunch of info there and you can ask questions directly to the Linkpool team. That is your best option for info.

[Anonymous No.8937621]

>people acting like 1k/month is good
If LINK is worth $25 and it takes 20k LINK to get that income then you would be better off market selling your whole stack and buying US treasuries.

[Anonymous No.8937701]

>>8932534
Sorry for being a brainlet, but what is staking? And how do you do it? And what are nodes and how do you make one

Ive tried googling but i always get noninformation

[Anonymous No.8937722]

>>8937621
1K per month, at 8% IRR link would be $7.50. That's still 19x from current price.
What kind of growth people are expecting, really?

[Anonymous No.8937730]

well shit, now i need to buy another 100k so i can run 10 more nodes.

[Anonymous No.8937735]

>>8932640
you chat with Sergey regularly?

[Anonymous No.8937756]

>>8936709
if you don't run a node you can still profit by shoving the tokens up your asshole

[Anonymous No.8937801]

>>8937730
You should probably learn simple division first, anon

[Anonymous No.8937811]

>>8937621
only $25 oh no what ever will I do with only 2.5M dollars. only retarded poorfags believed the $1000 meme you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.8937843]

I swear to fucking god, all these order of magnitude errors in everyone's fucking math makes me think I invested in the wrong coin. Even if the technology is amazing.

[Anonymous No.8937854]

didn't linkpool say a node would be high 2 or low 3 figures? so around 100,000 per node?

[Anonymous No.8937856]

>>8937722
I don't know about expecting, but people are definitely hoping for better than that. OP's math effectively places a maximum price of ~$25 a token, since after that you're really making no money by buying them to stake. I don't think anyone would be upset by 50x, but if you're a poorfag, you ain't gonna retire on that.

[Anonymous No.8937897]

>>8937843
LINK is the dunning kruger token.
The best is when they say
>[industry sector] is worth [big number], if LINK can capture just [random number]% of that we'll all be rich!

[Anonymous No.8937903]

>>8937856

there's 1 BILLION link tokens. $25 maximum even seems like a lot.

[Anonymous No.8937959]

>>8937487

I won’t be spoonfeeding a true fuckwit like you

[Anonymous No.8937966]

>>8937903
$25 billion market cap sounds like a lot? At that price loads of billionaires could just buy up every single token. Many big companies has market caps well over one hundred billion. If LINK is truly revolutionary why would it not be able to reach those numbers?

[Anonymous No.8937974]

>>8937903
Crypto marketcap will probably hit 20 trillion eventually, link will be top 10, maybe top 3. 350 billion marketcap with so much link locked away in nodes will be easy. Link will hit 1000

[Anonymous No.8938023]

>>8937903
>>8937966

Brainlets. There will never be 1 billion tokens in circulation. The vast majority (estimated of 80-90%) will be locked in to nodes.

[Anonymous No.8938054]

>>8938023
Only if running a node is profitable, which, by OP's estimate, it won't be after about $25/LINK.

[Anonymous No.8938125]

>>8932535
What does link do that other coins don't?
Many other coins are decentralized oracles

[Anonymous No.8938160]

>>8936071
>60% annual passive income profit
>only 1k/month

what if you had more than 20k LINK? 100k LINK would be 4k/month. 500k would be 20k/month. Not to mention capital appreciation of LINK.

[Anonymous No.8938164]

>>8938125
Nice bait

[Anonymous No.8938202]

>>8938160
I only have 20k, I'll be lucky to get to 30k before staking is availiable. I think Link will eventually hit 1000+, so I'm not worried. I'm just calling out all the faggots who said making $1000 a month was so great.

[Anonymous No.8938251]

>>8932222
Nice try into getting us to buy more Link. 20k a node... what happened to the 10k? Well jokes on you I'm already broke.

[Anonymous No.8938300]

>>8935635
It's not that easy to set up a node unless you know Linux. The set up is not Windows or Mac friendly. Go watch Thodges YouTube tutorials and tell me I'm wrong.

With mining you need to pay for GPUs but with Chainlink the barrier to entry to how much LINK you stake and your node reputation.

[Anonymous No.8938341]

>>8934405
Kek

[Anonymous No.8939013]

>>8938164
Explain why I'm wrong
Brainlet here

[Anonymous No.8939587]

>>8934329
I was having a look at unibright the other day. Looks okay and the team is good, but has a long way to go before it establishes the kind of foothold that link has. It's just too late. And a datadash endorsement is a joke compared to things like sibos and sxsw speaker, so unless you're retarded I don't know why you'd even bother mentioning it. The chainlink mainnet release will be a deathblow for this project. Rip.

[Anonymous No.8939899]

>>8939587
I have been thinking to get into unibright ico, sounds legit. That being said, I don't understand how'd it ever solve the oracle problem. Is there anything else but an ecosystem of smartcontract templates to it? At least by skimming through the whitepaper I couldn't find anything very close to what link is supposed to do.

[Anonymous No.8940134]

>>8939899
I think it's a competitor to link in a loose sense, but the approach is pretty sloppy when it comes to the complexity and scalability that large companies will require. It's designed as a mom and pop smartcontract plugin platform, which is good for usability, but the design is too simplistic to meet the requirements for the things which form the backbone of major fintech processes. It won't be used for anything serious imo. It could change its tune, but considering its basically in ico stage at the moment with a rushed "alpha" I won't hold my breath.

[Anonymous No.8940145]

>>8940134
Actually - I'll add something to this. It could have some nice synergy with chainlink possibly.

[Anonymous No.8940171]

>>8940134
Tbh, I don't understand why they necessarily need to introduce a token and respective economics with it. Couldn't they just offer these solutions as a regular company?

[Anonymous No.8940379]

>>8940171
>Tbh, I don't understand why they necessarily need to introduce a token and respective economics with it. Couldn't they just offer these solutions as a regular company?
no, they need some way to decouple and decentralize the operation, which is where tokenization comes in. bringing independent node operators in acheives this.

[Anonymous No.8941344]

>>8932535
yes, dont worry, we are here, and we are listening. i really like smart people shilling link. at least you guys have the patience to deal with the fudders

[Anonymous No.8941607]

>>8937854
99$ or 999$