[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 11 KB, 1920x1080, Request-Network[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8896717 No.8896717 [Reply] [Original]

>partners with amazon
>dumps 20%
>partners with google
>dumps 20%
>partners with apple
>dumps 20%
>get accepted as a worldwide payment option
>dumps 20%

fucking joke of a coin. give me one reason why you hold this piece of shit

>> No.8896738

In hopes of breaking even one day.

>> No.8896747

>>8896717
Because a generous Anon gave some REQ to me for Free, Hey Anon if you're there...Thanks

>> No.8896746

>>8896738
just sell and cut your losses. every single coin is mooning while this shits the bad.

fucking look at omg or poe

>> No.8896765

we moonin

>> No.8896776

>>8896765
why doo

>> No.8896782

>>8896776
op sold

>> No.8896784

>>8896765
>up 3%
>"moon"

the state of reqtards

>> No.8896798

Yeah I made a thread like this some days ago.. at this rate of progression and development and because everyone who holds req lives only by one rule and that is "le sell the news" meme, we will hit price singularity of one satoshi when you get a paymment request for the 2 apples you bought at a farmer's market.

>> No.8896806

>>8896784
15% you retard

>> No.8896808

be patient idiots. request is bigger than you all think, just look up triple entry accounting

>> No.8896823

>>8896717
for some people might sound like plain fud but holy fuck this is true. everytime something is supposed to make the coin value grow, it dumps afterwards not doesnt recover. i dont really fucking get it. im starting to believe devs always dump on the news and make it tank

>> No.8896919

>>8896823
Anon, it does not matter, all that matter is adoption and burning rate, and with all the projects, apps and partnerships they are on the right track.

>> No.8896930

holy shit we really mooned a bit

>> No.8896939

>>8896717
Sell your REQ then cunt, go FOMO into another coin. You realise the way to make gains is to buy undervalued things? If you DYOR and bought because of fundamentals then what has changed? Nothing.

>> No.8897079

>>8896717
If there's one thing REQ does it's fucking dump any time it gets a boost. Watch it bleed back to 19c

>> No.8897309

>>8896823
Because it's a market based entirely on speculation. Would you rather it was based on the real value that and of these blockchain as a service coins would have? None of them would be worth shit.

>> No.8897596

>>8897309
>preferring speculative value over objective value.
Fuck you

>> No.8897626
File: 55 KB, 1000x1000, prprprps.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8897626

>>8896717
>partners with

>> No.8897687
File: 24 KB, 640x584, 1512425507104.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8897687

>>8897596
>objective value

>> No.8897767
File: 20 KB, 255x197, C01B547C-68D2-4237-B301-5B0147601459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8897767

>>8896717
>req it
>hes reqt
>burn his tokens
>he thinks he is looking money
>he is buying LINK
>get y combinator on the line
>make them transfer 250,000,000 LINK
>dump it on binance
>its dumped
>buy binance
>their funds are not safe
>initiate WW3 FUD
>exchange all tokens to BTC
>transfer to BitMEX
>long bitcoin
>pump it

>> No.8897795

>>8896717
look at verge
>getting hacked
>pumps
>getting hacked for 3 days
>pumps
>hardforks accidently
>pumps
>does nothing
>pumps

>> No.8897950
File: 82 KB, 1603x859, req.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8897950

Refute this

>> No.8897960

>>8897950
memelinespointingtheotherway.png

>> No.8898363

>>8896808

Auditor here. Overall I believe there's a few accounting entries that req might have trouble with, but other than that I believe most accounting journal entries can be automated. Don't call it tripple entry accounting because its not. There will be no trebits. It will be double entry bookkeeping over blockchain (hidden 3rd entry), which in itself is revolutionary; for those who aren't in accounting, this is truly a revolutionary project. Anyways, as a question to the req team- Will req comply with IFRS and US GAAP or just IFRS? The accounting side of this project is why im invested in req. If req does comply with US gapp, does the business thats using req have the option to chose cash, accrual, or modified cash as the basis of accounting? I'm extremely curious. If so, this project is going to the moon. Req is partnered up with pwc so I have no doubts they aren't up top of this getting it figured out, but im just curious if its only IFRS and not US GAAP

>> No.8898374

>>8898363
Req isn't partnered with PwC, they are partnered with an office of PwC. I can tell you are not a B4 auditor though, so lmaoing at your life

>> No.8898523

>>8898374

PwC is an LLP you retard, do you even know what that is? If you're partnered with one office, you are in a partnership with PwC. Get owned.

>> No.8898557

>>8898374
Posts like these only make me more confident in my investment.

>> No.8898583

>>8898557

This

>> No.8898680

>>8896717
We need to Keep dumping. There are too many ico whales with millions of req. We need them to slowly sell off so that there are more holders of req instead of concentrated in few hands.

>> No.8898729

>>8898523
Wrong wrong wrong. For example, was PwC Hong Kong does has absolutely no effect on US PwC offices.

Wrong wrong wrong wrong, I work for PwC and we haven't gotten an email from BoMo letting us know we are working with REQ now. My buddy works in Deloitte's blockchain group, and he said specifically they only have worked with ethereum. Try again retard. Office's are relatively autonomous, but use the overall firm's global infrastructure if need be. Partner's own their offices and operate them. What one partner does is not influenced by another office.

>> No.8898730

>>8898680
Except the total # of holders has only been increasing.

https://etherscan.io/token/0x8f8221afbb33998d8584a2b05749ba73c37a938a#balances

There are also far more people with millions of VEN compared to those with millions of REQ, and they have the same total supply.

https://etherscan.io/token/0xd850942ef8811f2a866692a623011bde52a462c1#balances

You're stupid because the only people that are holding long term are the whales that own the most, while the people that dump are the pajeets that have a few thousand.

I've been increasing my stack over the past few weeks and I'm up to 137,800ish. My rank naturally moved up on its own a few times as well.

This has nothing to do with who owns the coin.

>> No.8898741

>>8898729
Wrong, wrong, wrong YOU'RE A LIAR, MY dad works for NINTENDO, and he said the revolution will be VR ENABLED! DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS!?

Lol jimmy you're so stupid!!!

>> No.8898772

>>8898741
I'm going to assume you are also not a public accountant and do not work at a B4 firm. Which is obvious because you have no idea how a partnership with a global firm would work. I'll give you a hint, one office doesn't open the door to the entire global network.

>> No.8898792

>>8898772
But I do, I work at Deloitte and I've heard the janitors mention REQ a few times, so fuck off.

>> No.8898798

>>8898792
Wrong Deloitte is only using ethereum at the moment.

>> No.8898810

>>8898729

PwC France is PwC. PwC China is PwC. PwC (Enter country of your choice here) is PwC. If you go to PwCs website and do some research you'll see that: "PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity."

To say that PwC france isn't worthy of praise is a completely false and inaccurate peice of rhetoric. PwC is PwC, no matter which office you go to. PwC France pulls in A LOT of revenue, and to say that the REQ partnership with PwC France isn't a "true PwC" partnership is just laughable fud.

>> No.8898826

>>8898810
Not FUD because, wait for it, a partnership with PwC hongkong or PwC France would mean no immediate implementation for PwC USA. So like what's the fucking point? The big companies are in the US. Europe's revenues are 3/4 what the US's is. US leads PwC's rev.

>> No.8898833

>>8898798
But you're wrong because I've explicitly talked to the vice president about REQ last week.

>> No.8898855

>>8896717
Req $100 eoy check it mofos !

>> No.8898864

>>8898855
nice digits

>> No.8898876

>>8898826

Youre understating the revenue PwC France pulls in. Once Req proves itself it will branch out. Wait and see.

>> No.8898882

>>8898876
I'm not understating shit, I'm looking at rev figures posted by PwC for FY17. Literally lol.

>> No.8898890

>>8898798
Deloitte has been using but unfortunately we switched to IBM's hyperledger for our most recent prototype as it was faster.

I'm a Deloitte employee.

>> No.8898894
File: 71 KB, 500x500, 2vg9Wcl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8898894

>>8898876
>Youre understating the revenue PwC France pulls in. Once Req proves itself it will branch out. Wait and see.

>> No.8898916

>>8898890
Glad to see some of us B4 people representing. These NEET's are screaming and crying, they can't understand that it is unlikely to be a partnership with an entire global network, like a small bespoke group within an office in a big city. Furthermore, as someone proposed, will this even be kosher for GAAP and IFRS.

>> No.8898920

>>8898730
how do i check the rankings of token holders?

>> No.8898939
File: 259 KB, 1440x2880, Screenshot_20180414-102225.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8898939

>>8898882

16 billion vs 12 billion. Let me guess, you didn't even look it up did you? Fucking lol'd.

>> No.8898944

>>8896746
Sell low and buy high.
Have fun staying poor stupid,
Smelly dumb nigger.

>> No.8898956

>>8898939
I'll walk you through this slowly. here is my post
>>8898826
>Europe's revenues are 3/4
now we can refer to your post
>>8898939
>16 billion vs. 12 billion
now with some hard math of 16 times 3, then divided by 4. You are brought to 12 billion dollars. There for, PwC WESTERN EUROPE (more countries than just france) has 3/4 the revenue of PwC Americas.

>> No.8898979

>>8898826
Req partnered with PwC in France because req is in france. Plus pwc has their blockchain research center in France. Any tech they want to implement will be across the entire global company.

>> No.8898980

>>8898920
on...the same page that I linked? Click on token holders and just go down the list.

>> No.8898985

>>8898979
Wrong, unless they get some serious work done in respect to GAAP and IFRS. REQ is years from actual accounting implementation

>> No.8898998

>>8898956
you are wasting your time arguing with idiots that cannot into basic math or logic. welcome to /biz/
>that being said, req IS a shitcoin and you should not invest in it. but what do I know

>> No.8899006

>>8898998
All my arguments being said, I would love for REQ to get accounting implementation. Would make my life better

>> No.8899037

>>8898985
Of course they are years away as is nearly every crypto and every new development. Doesn't mean pwc in France isn t s great deal for them.

>> No.8899053

>>8898956

I get it you retard. You said 3/4's as if it was only like 500 million. Its fucking 12 billion! Who cares at that point. You were downplaying and not being transparent about the total revenue figures.

>> No.8899057

>>8898855
I'll be happy with $10. $100 and I'll buy a house and a tall leggy wife who will have to hide her disgust with a fake smile as she fucks my short fat ass

>> No.8899075

>>8899037
nah dude, they are years away from GAAP and IFRS. do you know how fucking annoying compliance shit is? GAAP and IFRS makes changes on a yearly basis and its not stagnant like laws or something where they set it and thats it.

Look up the shitshow that is the changes in Rev Rec and Leases, its costing companies low millions to come back into compliance.

>> No.8899090

>>8899053
You gotta go back

>> No.8899094
File: 98 KB, 1603x859, meme lines lul.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8899094

>>8897950
there you go

>> No.8899132

>>8899094
Fucking hope this is true. Might finally reach 1 million REQ if this happens.

>> No.8899170

>>8899075

This post scares me because I already know the shitshow these new revenue recognition standards are causing. Well damn. You've basically answered my original question. Im starting to realize we might be a decade away from automated accounting.

>> No.8899187

>>8899170
Im not even fudding, just lets be super realistic. Apple didnt blow the phone marketwide open day 1, it took a few years. Shit will take time and then till be great.

>> No.8899220

>>8899170
>>8899187
>>8899075
to give non-public accounting fags an idea:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-13/ge-s-2017-loss-widens-as-results-restated-after-accounting-shift

>> No.8899357

>>8899220
You dont have to tell me, im in public accounting, fag. Im glad im not the only one on here that is.

>> No.8899459

>>8898729
>Wrong wrong wrong
Repeating a statement doesn't make it any more true.

>> No.8899514

>>8899057
kek

>> No.8899852

>>8899459
Trump disagrees