CHAINLINK

[Anonymous No.8841222]

honesty have no idea why price is so low. Fuck me I'm not that smart I'm actually kind of dumb and I can see ChainLink solves a problem that would make this entire market more valuable. What the hell is going on am I tricking myself? ChainLink has more potential than Ethereum itself what are people not seeing from the outside what could they possibly be missing

[Anonymous No.8841246]

>>8841222
did it really fucking take you 6 months to figure it all out you dumbass?

[Anonymous No.8841300]

>>8841222
unfortunately everyone else is too dumb to understand. the average person doesn't know what SWIFT is. They do know what a "huge partnership" is though. Honestly, the chainlink team needs some serious community outreach. You can't have nodes running if people don't know the product outside of 4chan.

[Anonymous No.8841324]

>>8841222
Jesus. You do know a better company (ripple) is going to crush Swift. Terrible job anon 0/10

[Anonymous No.8841334]

>>8841246
if all this is true, then why is it only 30 cents?

check and mate

[Anonymous No.8841357]

>>8841300
they dont need to do community outreach because they dont cater to the average redditor/fb investor. they are dealing with and report to the big trillion dollar enterprise players who they have NDAs with. they could care less about your lunch money

[Anonymous No.8841362]

>tfw been here memeing CL for 6 months
>tfw biz finally gets it
>tfw biz now thinks its undervalued
i feel like ive been through hell. but finally pple get it.
its underv1lued because people dont see it like us yet. the project is too technical and people dont realize that sergey is the king of autists.
sergey is a diehard believer in his tech.
we WILL make it but for other pple yo relize it its going to take time.

i was in link since before all those recent news...just by reading the whitepaper back in the timz you knew it was groundbreaking tech

[Anonymous No.8841372]

>>8841334
>8841334
look at the sat value you dumb fuck.
>he still measures things in USD.
LMAO

[Anonymous No.8841383]

>>8841362
you dont know how diehard were the fudders and the retard callers back in the day.

[Anonymous No.8841385]

>>8841362

[Anonymous No.8841413]

might happen soon, bros.

[Anonymous No.8841426]

>>8841222
Price is so low because the mainnet is not live yet, when it is you won‘t notice any price increase either because all the „big players“ get their LINK from sergey at a immense discount (check out how many tokens are reserved/locked)
Price will probably increase after a few years tho. I‘d say at some point in 2022 we could see $3 LINK.

[Anonymous No.8841430]

>>8841222
ChainLink is a difficult concept to explain to non-crypto people. It has an Ethereum core developer working on it for instance. On top of that, the team are very anti-hype. They know what their goals are and hyping the coin is not going to get them there.

New money reduced significantly after the crash so it's unsurprising that it has stayed low since then.

ChainLink will increase in value when blockchain tech gains adoption and companies start using its Oracles. It will then become a more well known brand and once a few working examples exist it will be easier to describe.

I sincerely expect ChainLink to become a top 5 coin in its future. We know the real value of crypto is the business benefits of smart contracts and, as IBM concluded this week, decentralised Oracles are the integral enabler.

[Anonymous No.8841432]

>Had 6 months to accumulate
>Started with a stack of 6k
>Diversified into other coins
>now have 3.5k and some shitcoins worth fuck all
Mistakes were made.

[Anonymous No.8841483]

>>8841430
This gonna take many many years, chainlink price will remain low for years to come. And sure as fuck no 1000 dollar end of year which is simply impossible when all the big players like barclays or Fidelity get their LINK at a discount. You really believe big banks are gonna buy your overpriced bags?
damn

[Anonymous No.8841499]

>>8841357
you're an idiot if you think they don't need regular people to succeed.

[Anonymous No.8841505]

>>8841483
>what is supply and demand.
>what is OTC
lol. nice try fag.

[Anonymous No.8841514]

>>8841499
Why would they need your node? What important banking information do you bring to the chainlink network?
How many of your API calls will gonna be needed for multibillion transactions by the biggest banks in the world?
Probably none.

[Anonymous No.8841515]

>>8841499
sorry guy you are the idiot.
run by businesses, for businesses, bought by businesses, speculated on by biz.

[Anonymous No.8841527]

>>8841505
>hundred of millions of link tokens already given away at discount to the ones who will actually use the network
somehow you think they need to buy your LINK which they don‘t.

[Anonymous No.8841540]

>>8841515
True, LINK is entirely business focused so it will likely take years before the LINK token is worth a shit.

[Anonymous No.8841550]

>>8841222
>still only 1/3 of the coin supply in circulation
>still most likely years of testing before really being implemented
>still years before mass smart contract adoption
>still no interest for chainlink to disclose anything (as these things are 50 layers on NDA)

Sure it's better than the vast majority of shitcoins but being too early is equal to being wrong.

[Anonymous No.8841563]

>>8841483
the new fud is out kek

[Anonymous No.8841567]

>>8841432
Started with 25k in Oct, now on 75k. Never going to forgive myself if I can't get to 100k.

[Anonymous No.8841588]

>>8841550
>Sure it's better than the vast majority of shitcoins but being too early is equal to being wrong.
I've heard this before. Probably investopedia. It has some truth but it's hard to tell how early you are when I believe this has more potential than eth

[Anonymous No.8841635]

>>8841483
>>8841430
Top 5 is not $1000, it's $17, and moreover I agree top 5 within a year is tremendously unlikely. I do however think by the time link is top 5, that top 5 will be many times larger than $6Bn

[Anonymous No.8841672]

>>8841527
>implying private citizens wont want tokens

[Anonymous No.8841717]

People say
>it's way underground
>nobody outside biz knows
I don't have any social media like Facebook twitter etc but it's not like this hell hole is invisible. It seems the info is out there if you don't have you're not blind.

[Anonymous No.8841723]

>>8841527
they dont buy my tokens off of me you dumb fuck. do u think they are gonna get on some illiquid chink exchange? you dont know anything about the project so i suggest you shut your mouth before you end up looking even more retarded.

[Anonymous No.8841757]

Yeah, if LINK succeeds as the first decentralized oracle solution, crypto as a whole will benefit from the big players and actual good use in the real world.

So far, Smart Contracts are only somewhat useful for creating shitcoins. We need them doint actual stuff, like processing fiat payments and bonds, bets, loans, stuff like that.

[Anonymous No.8841780]

Time to make a new link cube. Lockheed Martin software engineer just starred and forked chainlink.

[Anonymous No.8841802]

>>8841757
My biggest problem is that ETH in its current state is a piece of shit, that it will require a couple of years to be competitive, and some time more to have enterprise stuff running, and Link, until main net release and beyond, is tied to ETH. Link should be focusing on EOS.

[Anonymous No.8841842]

>>8841246
Took me 2 months. First month ignored it. Then I realized there's got to be reason and if I don't look into this I may kms later

[Anonymous No.8841871]

there are """"PEOPLE"""" right now, in this fucking board, that thinks that big companies who will be given LINK tokens for free ARE NOT INCENTIVIZED TO PUMP THE FUCKING PRICE. imagine if sergey gives some company 100m LINK when its current valuation is at a dollar a pop. if they pump the fucking price to, what, 10 dollars each, they just saved themselves $900M because WHEN YOU USE CHAINLINK IT WOULD INEVITABLY BE PRICED IN USD (while using the token). now imagine every single company who were given free LINK adopting this mindset. nevermind the fact that game theory would state that because of this, they'd want to hoard EVEN MORE LINK as soon as possible before they'd get left behind. the absolute state of fudders in this board, and the ones arguing against it not simply saying this simple fact.

[Anonymous No.8841893]

>>8841780
Ummm no. All he did was fix a typo in a README file

[Anonymous No.8841902]

>>8841717
Based on the size of API economy. $10 link seems guaranteed although I know nothing is and could fail.

[Anonymous No.8841907]

>>8841802
>what is blockchain agonostic?
they've already worked on ADA adapters. ethereum is just a piece of the network. they dont depend on it to succeed 100% however.

[Anonymous No.8841937]

>>8841802
Eos emulates Eth natively.

[Anonymous No.8841953]

>>8841893
he contributed...make it

[Anonymous No.8841969]

>>8841871
This, how people don't understand this is beyond comprehension

[Anonymous No.8841979]

>>8841426
5/10 not subtle enough

[Anonymous No.8841991]

>>8841383
The fud made link threads appear invisible to all but the most autistic

[Anonymous No.8841995]

>>8841372
No one measures in Sats. You fucking kike.

[Anonymous No.8842009]

>>8841907
I believe you, can you just show me proof of ADA adapters?

[Anonymous No.8842084]

this shit will never surpass $5 sad but true

[Anonymous No.8842234]

>>8841635
>Top 5 is not $1000, it's $1
This is assuming the marketcap and all coins remain exactly as they are right now and LINK moons by itself. If another bullrun happens LINK could hit $100+ and not even hit top 10.

[Anonymous No.8842274]

>>8841300
you think the average facebook normie or redditor is capable of running a node even if you provided step by step instructions?

[Anonymous No.8842301]

>>8841362
LETS. FUCKING. GO.

[Anonymous No.8842326]

>>8841550
I somewhat agree but you're objectively retarded if you can't wait 2 years to become a millionaire

[Anonymous No.8842388]

>>8842234
damn then i'd only have 8 million dollars fuck this shit i'm out

[Anonymous No.8842492]

>>8842274
No

[Anonymous No.8842533]

>>8841550
hurf durf, it'll take too long FUD

[Anonymous No.8842710]

LOL the fud stopped because those fucks are trying to time the market and fill their bags.

[Anonymous No.8842750]

>>8841483
Anyone who denies this is a shill will a giant link bag or a fucking moron(deluded kinky). You need at least 250k to make it with link. Token supply is too high. Mainnet and partnerships will release into a btc bear market. We are trying to help you faggots.

[Anonymous No.8842762]

>>8842234
>if bull run
>then could
Absolute state

[Anonymous No.8842768]

>>8842326
>>8842533
Say the guys who are spam-posting this coin every single day since more than 6 months now, which one has barely moved, if it's not a sign impatience I don't know what it is.

But my point is very simple: falling in love with an investment with no plan beyond "hold it during X amount of time" is just bad investing in the current market because not only it makes you blind to other opportunities but when one will actually present itself you will be to fearful to sell some LINK and profit from it because "Chainlink could announce something any minute now" (pro-tip: it won't).

[Anonymous No.8842774]

>>8841222
you got well and truly memed my kind of dumb newfriend

[Anonymous No.8842787]

>>8842774
>he fell for the link is a meme meme

[Anonymous No.8842810]

>>8842768
>t. guy with 5k USD in crypto at most

[Anonymous No.8842851]

>>8842810
>t. bagholder who did a x2 in 6 months while everyone with a bit of experience did a x10 minimum

[Anonymous No.8842930]

>>8842768
top kek you are retarded

[Anonymous No.8842959]

>>8842851
grats on making 2k bro

[Anonymous No.8843006]

>>8842750
that's literally the same as saying you needed 5250 BTC to make it

Dude, that means that if everyone who owns chainlink owned 250k, there would only be 4000 people.

You can make it starting with 5k

[Anonymous No.8843016]

>>8843006
btw i got 5250 by taking 21,000,000/4000

[Anonymous No.8843038]

>>8842851
>t. bagholder who did a x2 in 6 months while everyone with a bit of experience did a x10 minimum
so, youre still up x10 from mid october? after one of the worst crashes crypto has ever witnessed? Id say even traders with a lot of experience are at x3 at highest for that period, at average.

[Anonymous No.8843064]

>>8841334
Big money is waiting for you to get in so you can be rich.

[Anonymous No.8843114]

I know it means fuckall on /biz/, and you'll claim LARP, but I'll be receiving roughly $6M from inheritance a few months after summer, when all of my grandfathers assets are sold off.

Will be pumping $2M into LINK, $2M into other alts and $2M into a new house.

Feels fucking good, man.

[Anonymous No.8843198]

>>8843114
Yeah? When?

[Anonymous No.8843239]

>>8843016
You're also a fucking unbelievably retarded linklet for comparing an erc20 to bitcoin itself

[Anonymous No.8843253]

>>8843114
lol to buy 2 million dollars worth of LINK it'll take you like 5 months of accumulation.

[Anonymous No.8843389]

>>8843114
As dumb as that sounds it'll probably workout for you.

[Anonymous No.8843422]

>>8843239
>comparing an erc20 to bitcoin itself

I'm talking about supply of a useful asset

didnt even compare to bitcoin directly you utter fucking moron

[Anonymous No.8843452]

>>8843114
damn that sucks you cant put that in now. but congrats

[Anonymous No.8843869]

>>8842274
I think yes.
If they have a computer.

[Anonymous No.8843894]

It's a potentially useful technology. It is not the only possible solution to the problem it purports to solve. The valuation for it is difficult to determine. Should it have a market cap of 120 million, like it does today? Should it have a market cap of 1.2 billion? 12 million? Very difficult to say given that it isn't being used by anyone, right now it's totally speculative.

I would never put any significant percentage of my portfolio in something like this, it's dependent on too many variables for it to pump (crypto taking off as a whole which would necessitate people needing a solution like this to begin with, or people using chainlink instead of some other as-of-yet unknown solution). It's a moonshot, maybe worth putting a little bit into. Anything else is dumb, people buying too much into a meme.

Of course it's all speculative, but I invest in coins proportional to how likely they'll be adopted. For example, I'll hold more VeChain, with it being supported by DNV GL, Kuehne + Nagel, PwC, and so on, than I would hold, say, Devery or Ambrose. VeChain wouldn't go up as much as those two if either EVE or AMB take off, but at the same time, I'm less likely to lose my money because VeChain's at the moment less likely to fail.

I was wise to do that too. EVE is right now about 40% under its ICO price and AMB is currently $0.27 compared to $0.20 back in October. Contrast that with VeChain currently being $2.58 compared to $0.25 in October.

It's all risk assessment. Everything in crypto is risky, but some are riskier than others. Chainlink's way more a of risk than this board would lead a lot of dummies to believe.

[Anonymous No.8843938]

>>8843869
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UClIWFp4FV1QuYmnc8FcFDWw

Have you set one up yourself yet? Go check it out. I do not think the normal Facebook crypto investor will be able to handle.

[Anonymous No.8844000]

>>8841426
>get their LINK from sergey at a immense discount
>>8841483
>get their LINK at a discount
Which pajeet discord thought up this one?

[Anonymous No.8844044]

>>8844000
Institutions are going to need some incentive to be the first adopters to decentralized Oracle systems. Giving discounts to big organizations is actually a valid marketing strategy.

[Anonymous No.8844071]

>>8842768
Tell that to all the retards that sold their LINK for "better opportunities" that ended up losing more money than they would have just holding.

[Anonymous No.8844083]

>>8843894
>>8844044
Kek
Deluded linkies just got btfo
Gonna sit back and watch u idots try to refute this lmao

[Anonymous No.8844101]

>>8844083
Why would we it makes sense

[Anonymous No.8844113]

>>8844000
>>8844044
It would also incentivize them to pump the shit out of it

[Anonymous No.8844122]

>>8844083
UH OH PISSED STINKER INCOMING HAHA

[Anonymous No.8844134]

>>8844083
See>>8844113
faggot

[Anonymous No.8844214]

>>8844113
Obviously there needs to be a balance and I'm sure there are people much smarter than biz working to figure out a good discount for these organizations. These major corporations are not going to buy your bags. I'm sorry but I will never happen.

[Anonymous No.8844251]

>>8844214
man I hope Sergey gives all his linkies to blue chips. This would make the ones in circulation even more precious

[Anonymous No.8844320]

>>8841483
Nice fud dumbshit

1000eoy

[Anonymous No.8844330]

>>8843894
I guess. I'll never forget the memes and all the fun we had, all the laughs, all the crazy photos of Sergey, all the excitement over slightest price movement. Thank you /biz/, it was great, but now I need to move on in life and invest into other assets, market selling my links as we speak. Goodbye.

[Anonymous No.8844365]

>>8843894
Even if the odds are 5:1 going ALL IN makes sense every time in the long run. This is all equity versus odds like you were saying and I agree except for the
>I would never put a significant percentage of my portfolio in something like this,
Depends extremely on total portfolio to percentage ratios again.

[Anonymous No.8844395]

The real question is if there will be a new groundbreaking project after link takes off. I have a good link stack but I am not going to really make it with just link.

[Anonymous No.8844444]

>>8844395
To be honest, if link takes off like we think it will, anyone over 10k will have made it. Unless you want to be have over 10 million dollars.

[Anonymous No.8844471]

>>8844444
We have been blessed

[Anonymous No.8844481]

>>8844444
chekt, FUDers rekt

[Anonymous No.8844487]

>>8844444
NICE

[Anonymous No.8844517]

>>8844444
PRAISE SERGAY

[Anonymous No.8844521]

>>8844444
Fuckin checked

[Anonymous No.8844523]

>>8841222

every single day you faggot shitlink shills spam this board

FUCK OFF

[Anonymous No.8844525]

>>8844444

checked

[Anonymous No.8844543]

>>8844444
Witnessed

[Anonymous No.8844547]

>>8842768
there is no better opportunity than link.

[Anonymous No.8844559]

>>8844444
checked

[Anonymous No.8844571]

>>8844523
the salt.

[Anonymous No.8844578]

>>8844444
Wow

[Anonymous No.8844584]

>>8844444
Damn, Never got digits this nice

[Anonymous No.8844606]

>>8844444
can you feel keks smile?

[Anonymous No.8844612]

>>8844543
The call that saved /biz/

[Anonymous No.8844649]

>>8844444
Sick with it.

[Anonymous No.8844683]

1000$ EOY OR BUST.

[Anonymous No.8844719]

>>8844444
>SWALLOWS REAL FAST

[Anonymous No.8844757]

>>8843894
>Should it have a market cap of 1.2 billion?
Fact: The Universe is as it should be at this very moment [that you are reading in]. If that were not the case, then you imply that you know better the configuration the Universe should be rather than the configuration the Universe is in, that you are arguing against the natural laws themselves.

No, at all times the Universe is as it should be, as its current configuration is inescapable from the ordered sequence of all previous configurations.

[Anonymous No.8844783]

>>8844757
Theoretically we are all made of cheese

[Anonymous No.8844856]

>>8844757
I feel this daily

[Anonymous No.8844891]

>>8844444
Kek has shown Himself again

[Anonymous No.8844937]

>>8844444
Waaagh energy boyz

[Anonymous No.8844948]

>>8844783
Nice

[Anonymous No.8845140]

>>8844444
QUINTS OF TRUTH

[Anonymous No.8845285]

>>8844444
GOD BLESS THE KING OF MEMES
PRAISE KEK

[Anonymous No.8845330]

We’re all gonna make it...r-right frens?

[Anonymous No.8845375]

>>8844444
>>8844444

[Anonymous No.8845472]

>>8842750
>We are trying to help you faggots.
no thank, fuck off

[Anonymous No.8845705]

>>8843894
>AMB
o boy, i stopped reading there. AMB is dead; it was a scam.

if you think i'm taking investment off of an AMB holder you're even more deluded than you think we are.

[Anonymous No.8845729]

>>8844071
LINK has outperformed the market is this bear phase. that in itself is bullish

[Anonymous No.8845746]

>>8843894
high effort FUD

[Anonymous No.8845843]

LINK is built for godspeed

[Anonymous No.8845853]

[Anonymous No.8845857]

>>8845705
This.

[Anonymous No.8845993]

>>8843894
this makes sense if you already have a significantly large portfolio, but we both know you don't

[Anonymous No.8846545]

>>8841222
>>8844444
jesus fucking christ link

[Anonymous No.8846647]

do you need a computer to run a node?

[Anonymous No.8846661]

>>8846647
No

[Anonymous No.8846664]

>>8841995
a lot of people measure in sats. If you think btc is done your an inbred faggot.

[Anonymous No.8846665]

>>8841222
>>8844444
blessed thread

[Anonymous No.8846884]

>>8844000
how fucking new are you
you do know there are sales called private sales, right? private sale contributers get their tokens %10 %20 discounted

[Anonymous No.8846972]

>>8846661
are they gonna set up shops around the world to stake my link? should i buy a separate ledger for my link?

[Anonymous No.8846980]

Yes the Oracle problem is such a massive issue and every major name in the crypto world is trying to tackle it
Retards

[Anonymous No.8847013]

>>8841499
They don't need us. We are the token regular people so they can call it decentralized. Imo Sergey dropped the link knowledge on us cause they needed some individuals and we are the least credible group on the internet.
Think if CL was as popular with Reddit as it is here? It would be very hard to fly under the radar

[Anonymous No.8847021]

>>8846980
eh, you didn't even try but here's a (you) cause you're alone probably

[Anonymous No.8847083]

>>8847021
Is your little pea brain stumped by such simple logic?

[Anonymous No.8847113]

>>8841426
This is legitimate. If any of you think Sergey can sell 750mil link(to the partners it depends on to succeed) at an exorbidant price is truly retarded

[Anonymous No.8847128]

>>8847083
More (you)'s for the big smart boy

[Anonymous No.8847291]

>>8844683
A voice cried out in the wilderness, but no one heard because of the 4's

[Anonymous No.8847301]

I think this thread is working guys

[Anonymous No.8847416]

>>8847113
ah yes increasing the circulating supply to instantly hamstring it by locking a literal shit ton of it into nodes. nope no price increase there. move along

[Anonymous No.8847444]

>>8847128
Still stumped by simple logic?

[Anonymous No.8847465]

>>8847444
Go away baitfag, this is a hype thread

[Anonymous No.8847498]

>>8847465
>Stop exposing our shilling for the poor pajeet shit that it is
No

[Anonymous No.8847500]

>>8846980
valid logic if you do not have any of the bodies 5 senses

[Anonymous No.8847534]

>>8847113
cringe at not understanding basically anything about this project? idk if you were joking or not thought because this is such dead brain.

[Anonymous No.8847585]

>>8847534
1/3rd for team funding
1/3rd for incentivising the network
What do you think will happen to the tokens, retard? Sergey and Co need money, they dump tokens on binance or sell otc to users of the network. They want to incentivise, they give large amounts of tokens to users of the network. In either scenario it totally removes the need for muh fortune 500s to buy your bags on binance.

Use your brain.

[Anonymous No.8847595]

>>8844444
EVERY TIME

[Anonymous No.8847661]

>>8847585
its all there. you have been told many times. ive probably explained it to you before tbqh. token economics have been discussed in length in slack. idk where the fuck you go all day but it isnt reading anything to do with link

[Anonymous No.8847681]

>>8847585
read:
>>8841871

[Anonymous No.8847733]

>>8846972
Yawn

[Anonymous No.8847751]

>>8847498
(You)

[Anonymous No.8847772]

I'm a different 450k JNT marine.

Just put $6700 fiat into 18k LINK.

Just liquidated 80k BBN and 10k CPC for another 18 ETH.

Do I throw this into LINK or into REQ? What do you think, my new, stinky brothers?

[Anonymous No.8847774]

>>8847661
The fact is 2/3rds of the supply remain waiting to enter the market one way or another
You can delude yourself all you want but the fact of the matter is link is a fee token and not a settlement layer, and no big player is going to buy your ico funding bags from binance

>>8847681
What an idiotic post

[Anonymous No.8847785]

>>8844444
/thread

[Anonymous No.8847798]

>>8847774
Explain to me why it is idiotic. No, really. I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.8847826]

>>8847798
>huur if users of network buy tokens for less than market price otc they are going to pump the price so they can dump all their cheap tokens
Is basically it... retarded

[Anonymous No.8847842]

>>8847774
>fee token

precisely why it will have value

im eating stake very soon

[Anonymous No.8847866]

>>8847826
If large institutions acquire a large amount of tokens OTC from the 650 million non circulating supply, they will want to be able to use them (to pay for data requests) at a discount.
In order to use them at a discount, they must make the value of their tokens higher. This is because, and I'm going to spoon feed you because you need it, the cost of a data request will be priced in USD. Therefore, if the value of one LINK token is higher, they can do more data requests per token. Are you following? They don't have to buy our tokens off of binance, dude. No one expects large institutions to do this. That is why the 650m exists. Normies (and you!) will buy our bags at 10x the current price off of binance.

[Anonymous No.8847870]

>>8847772
LINK, also get the fuck out of JNT and all in LINK. Screencap this post.

[Anonymous No.8847895]

>>8847826
Also you should learn how to argue because it seems like you only know how to ad hom. I get this is 4chan but your arguments are next level retarded

[Anonymous No.8847911]

>>8847866
So I said muh fortune 500 aren't buying your bags on binance and you agree with me
Now fuck off bagholder

[Anonymous No.8847943]

>>8847866

>>8847911
jesus christ imagine being this fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.8847948]

>>8847895
Stinky Linkies believe a 1t market cap for this shitcoin is possible by end of this year when most likely we will still be in a bear market
I can call you retards all I like, because you are

> $5 eoy 17 was such a sure thing
>Lol no
> now $1000 eoy 18 is on the table
So fucking delusional I don't even know where to start

[Anonymous No.8847949]

>>8847911
>you agree with me so I win
the best argument of all times

[Anonymous No.8847995]

>>8844444
checked, also OC

[Anonymous No.8848177]

>>8847774
It seems you do not understand what the link token is even used for.

Start here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xpYRD5b50pc
Then read the following:
https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

[Anonymous No.8848213]

>>8847948
>implying market cap means anything
>implying it's not just price * supply
>implying this is a bear market when btc is up 42% on a 6M

stay poor nigger

[Anonymous No.8848246]

The unironic and 100% serious answer is that nobody wants to be associated with the chainlink "community". You are a bunch of insufferable retards and you have destroyed the reputation of your project with your relentless and aggressive stupidity.

[Anonymous No.8848285]

Shoo pajeet shoo!
No one here is unironically falling for your poo scam.

[Anonymous No.8848287]

>>8848246
mission acomplished boy
when it finally works all the worlds' businesscucks will have to buy shit from neckbeard khv anime-loving NEETs

[Anonymous No.8848291]

>>8844444
Checked - noLinkers Rekt
Praise Kek
Honour Sergey &
Heil Hitler

[Anonymous No.8848295]

>>8847943
when I get rich off of link im going to do so much coke and hookers I get on this guys level

[Anonymous No.8848300]

>>8848287
Nope, they will buy from the 2/3rds of supply sergey has locked up

[Anonymous No.8848322]

>>8848300
you haven't read/comprehended my posts. Does your mom know you're on here? Don't you have homework to do, sonny

[Anonymous No.8848323]

>>8848300
wtf i just sold my 195k links

[Anonymous No.8848336]

>>8848322
>huur they will get cheap tokens so they will pump the price and dump their tokens and make money and forget about chainlink forever
So swift and all the other rumored partners are going to dump this shit into the ground?

[Anonymous No.8848385]

>>8848336
so... no, lol. You didnt read my post. Pumping the price to be able to get more utility out of each token != PnD. And even if they did PnD (which isn't what my post implied but is what you wanted it to imply, key difference) there is a part there I like - a pump by institutional money. Is this supposed to be FUD? Even if they pumped it to like 1$ I still make out like a bandit.

shoo shoo brainlet

[Anonymous No.8848410]

been wagecuckin all day, why is this shit pumping?

[Anonymous No.8848412]

>>8848385
Youre entire argument is based on nothing other than what you think they will do... pure conjecture bro
Keep trying

[Anonymous No.8848434]

>>8848412
what coins do you hold

[Anonymous No.8848460]

>>8848434
Btc, eth, xmr, omg

[Anonymous No.8848474]

>>8848460
actually not bad for a brainlet. I was expecting something like 100% BTCP or DBC

[Anonymous No.8848484]

new FUD tl;dr
>o-ok guys it'll moon but, like, it'll take a really, REALLY long time, ok g-guys?? j-just trust me

[Anonymous No.8848497]

>>8848474
I just like to shit talk link
Dw about it dude

[Anonymous No.8848516]

>>8848497
you do a terrible job

[Anonymous No.8848609]

>>8848516
I try but thanks

[Anonymous No.8848626]

>>8844444

[Anonymous No.8848702]

>>8841324
>ripple
>no fixed amount and can literally print an endless amount of ripple into existence
>literal jew scam coin

You're going to neck yourself when you realize you got scammed by a bunch of kikes, while us stinky linkies moon to Lamboland.

[Anonymous No.8848755]

>>8841540
Right .. those folks running those nodes are going to get paid something of no value. They are eager to work for free. Get a clue. LOL

[Anonymous No.8848801]

>12k Link, sell 2k and put it into REQ cause "LINK and REQ are bros" meme
>Link taking off, REQ tanked harder than anyone and hasn't made moves since

I regret not being all in.

[Anonymous No.8848873]

>>8846884
Nice digits .. full house with an extra pair to boot .. It is in the cards for Link ..

[Anonymous No.8848989]

my linkies stay stinky $1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.8849039]

STOP SHILLING YOU FAGGOTS
>PUMPS
>DROPS 5 SATS
>PUMPS AGAIN
>NO DUMPS IN SITE

you faggots are ruining my trading strategy, now i can't buy in

[Anonymous No.8849061]

>>8848801
Sold my REQ a while back, LINK is a very comfy hold for those who believe

[Anonymous No.8849122]

link up .06 cents over night. is that normal?

[Anonymous No.8849141]

>>8849039
only strategy is hodl

[Anonymous No.8849196]

>>8849141
Not for most coins
But now i realize that for LINK
SELL YOUR BAGS
LAST CHANCE BEFORE IT DUMPS
BUY IN CHEAPER
SELL SELL SEELL

[Anonymous No.8849391]

why the fuck are you guys investing in pic related
its a website for finding websites. who is going to want to find your stupid pokemon homepage. How is this going to make any money? the yellow pages are probably going to get in the game and crush these guys, not to mention yahoo is too far ahead already
>muh new tech
stay poor, I sold off my google IPO shares already

[Anonymous No.8849422]

>>8849061
>>8848801
REQ is a good hold nigger.
So i s LINK. Buy both instead of FOMOing around like a weak hands.

[Anonymous No.8849482]

>>8849422
>good hold
>down to 15 cents

[Anonymous No.8849495]

>>8849482
To clarify, I didn't buy it at ICO prices

[Anonymous No.8849571]

>>8844444
CHECKED

[Anonymous No.8849739]

>>8849391
guys are you retarded?
The moment IBM doesn’t need this nerd anymore he will be kicked out and his microshit gobbled up by the firm.
And all your investments will be gone
DELUDED

[Anonymous No.8849751]

>>8841324
Chainlink will allow swift to compete with link. Banks will just use swift and ripple will fail wth adoption because ripple is expensive for banks to use (ripping out and replacing their systems etc.) Chainlink will put swift out of business indirectly

[Anonymous No.8849935]

>>8841362
>biz finally gets it
No dipshit! It's the same fucking pajeets that have spammed this board

[Anonymous No.8849957]

>>8849739
IBM! ok fine, they slightly fucked up on PCs, and the internet, and actually they're just a consulting company at this point, but they are going to dominate blockchain

[Anonymous No.8850215]

>>8847772
TRAITOR

just kidding, I'm thinking about shifting some of my jnt into link too

[Anonymous No.8850615]

>>8848246
yeah, so if the project fails, we'll take the blame
but when it succeeds, we'll take our ball bags and drag em all over your mother.

and since we're at your mother's house, might as well go down to the basement and laugh at you, anon.

[Anonymous No.8850653]

>>8847772
Yeah man I got the fuck out of JNT as soon as it pumped a few days ago. I will likely be all-inning LINK

[Anonymous No.8850679]

>>8848177
Checked

[Anonymous No.8850730]

>>8849751
This is the dumbest post of the day. Congrats on this, seriously.

[Anonymous No.8850953]

>>8849751
What in the ever living fuck are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.8851277]

>>8843894
Based on all of the news we keep seeing it is evident that that link is being developed with corporate uses in mind

[Anonymous No.8851424]

>>8848246
Sergey is that you?