REQ

[Anonymous No.8806329]

You can feel it, right?
>The coordinated FUD
>The price suppression
>The 3 million bought
>The listing on Bitfinex
>The partnership with PWC
We're so fucking close.

[Anonymous No.8806344]

*blocks your path*

[Anonymous No.8806446]

>>8806344
>implying LINK and REQ ain't brothers

[Anonymous No.8807339]

>>8806329
BUMP

[Anonymous No.8807596]

>>8806329
Even though it had a more than 80% crash and we would need a 500% increase to reach ATH again... There's no doubt it will make it and it is one of the most solid projects out there.

[Anonymous No.8808142]

>>8807596
Who cares about ATH if you bought <10 cents like a smart goy. I'm comfy

[Anonymous No.8808193]

I'm hyped for the ledger partnership to be announced
I expect us to pump bigly on the news alone

[Anonymous No.8808494]

>>8806329
If trips $100 eoy

[Anonymous No.8808553]

>>8806329
>The listing on Bitfinex
This made me hard af, not a bfx but coins there moon, no doubt

[Anonymous No.8808586]

>>8808193
do we really need to put a "not for burn" stickers on our car windshields, after this partnership is announced

[Anonymous No.8808645]

>>8808586
I'm not putting any stickers on my lambo.

[Anonymous No.8808696]

>>8808193
>ledger partnership
elaborate, of you do you mean ledger support?

[Anonymous No.8808808]

>>8808696
Ledger is already supported.
There is a pajeet level fud revolving around the random coin burn meme, the imaginary burnguard and a ledger with said inexistent burnguard included. The photoshop was well done toh.

[Anonymous No.8808855]

>>8808808
So it's a rehash of the unfunny random burn meme, sad

[Anonymous No.8809159]

>>8808142
Yeah I bought at 6 cents but don't tell me dropping from $1 to 14 cents isn't worrying.

>>8808553
Solid listing.

[Anonymous No.8809189]

oh yeah i'm feeling another 100% drop
get ready for 7 cent REQ again

[Anonymous No.8809989]

>>8806344
>>8806446

LINK literally blocked our path on the last news.

Because Sergey locked himself in his bedroom and refuses to do any work, REQ had to postpone their Bitcoin oracle promise.

[Anonymous No.8810012]

I bought just because of the blatant price suppression

[Anonymous No.8810024]

NO I AM NOT DONE ACCUMULATING TO 20K

[Anonymous No.8810040]

Down to 6 cents again

[Anonymous No.8810047]

>>8810040
>>8809189
ETA?

[Anonymous No.8810080]

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

Req does nothing you fucking faggots. Go ahead, someone, anyone, explain to me what Req does and how it's more useful than simply accepting BTC, ETH, LTC, or something like Nano or a platform coin like Tron?

[Anonymous No.8810084]

>>8810047
Next update

[Anonymous No.8810132]

>>8810080
on top of that, coinbase will enter the cryptosphere as a payment operator, it's their next step. This will make req LITERALLY obsolete, as you'll be able to go fiat to crypto and vice versa instantly through coinbase.

Req isn't the next paypal, coin base is.

fuckin fags, your vaporware isnt helping the crypto world. TRX will be the next coin on coinbase.

[Anonymous No.8810154]

i've fallen for every meme (crypto in general desu) and no longer care. I'm down 70% on my initial investment and will still get ass-raped by Uncle Sam on any profits. Given this, I hold 30k REQ and am completely indifferent about any outcome at this point. We will see in a few years what these pajeets come up with..

[Anonymous No.8810162]

>The coordinated FUD

This never actually happens.

Believing that there are rich investors who "coordinate FUD" so they could accumulate some cheap shitcoins is nothing but delusion.

[Anonymous No.8810168]

>>8810154
read my post. Sell your REQ for TRON. Coinbase entering crypto payment literally makes REQ obsolete.

Im not shilling for Tron, just trying to help you. Seriously.

[Anonymous No.8810194]

>>8810132
>you'll be able to go fiat to crypto and vice versa instantly through coinbase.

do (((they))) control coinbase? cannot wait for the next normie pump, this time they will get burnt by the taxes. Then crypto will die. Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.8810197]

>>8810168

That's possibly the worst advice I've ever seen on /biz/, and that says a lot.

What exactly is it that Tron does?

[Anonymous No.8810210]

>>8810168
>Sell your REQ for TRON
>TRON

[Anonymous No.8810233]

Delusional faggots itt, almost as bad as linkies

[Anonymous No.8810262]

>>8810132
>TRX will be the next coin on coinbase.
I agree and is exactly why I'm putting 50% of my paycheck every month into TRON
>>8810168
this

[Anonymous No.8810268]

>>8810262
stop samefagging with a different IP pajeet, Tron is a shitcoin, now shoo shoo

[Anonymous No.8810274]

>>8810080
this this this
why use request when myetherwallet free?
I'm selling my req ledger

[Anonymous No.8810641]

>>8806329
I think that once the ERC20 token smart contract is audited and deployed on the network we will see more usage and tokens burnt.

[Anonymous No.8810681]

>>8810162
Uh..yes it does.

[Anonymous No.8810716]

>>8810168
>>sell your REQ for tron

[Anonymous No.8810821]

>>8810168
REQ is going to be the most integrated payment systems in the crypto space but we should sell it for some Chinese company promising magic beans.

[Anonymous No.8810866]

Where do i buy this cryptocurry frens?

[Anonymous No.8810950]

>>8810866

Binance

[Anonymous No.8811519]

>>8808586
kek

[Anonymous No.8811546]

>>8810132
>trx
id rather end my life before i invest in this chinkcoin

[Anonymous No.8811667]

>>8811546
TRON $2,480,551,331
Request Network $110,857,090

[Anonymous No.8811697]

>>8811546
REQ would need to 22.376118X just to be on the same level as TRON
so please show some respect

[Anonymous No.8811731]

>>8811667
>>8811697
Nice id Anon

[Anonymous No.8811768]

>>8811546
Tron is a platform and a cross media currency as well. Req is a shit experiment that is useless because it’s already done better by established tech behemoths.

I understand that many lost money buying req and psychologically you’re hoping to recover (this is called “digging in”), but don’t, you will get hurt.

Tron is going to a dollar, watch.

[Anonymous No.8811817]

>>8811768
this

TRON is going to $1 weather you like it or not cuckboys

[Anonymous No.8811912]

>>8810162
Haven't you seen literally every REQ thread? They're instantly shitted on by pajeets and retards that like that random burn meme. JUST look at this one.
>unironically shilling TRON

[Anonymous No.8811997]

>>8811912
At least your TRX doesn't get randomly burned.

[Anonymous No.8812021]

>>8811997
(You)

[Anonymous No.8812026]

>>8812021
Cheers m8

[Anonymous No.8812048]

>>8811997

[Anonymous No.8812375]

>>8811817
It's "whether", but yes, absolutely.

Justin Sun has said the target price EOY is $1.

That's a fucking 33x. Put in 1k and you'll have 33k by the end of the year, which is more than a year's salary working at mcdonalds, which is where most of you 4chinners will end up working if you don't make it soon.

[Anonymous No.8812485]

>>8806329
You're right OP just wish I could buy more...

[Anonymous No.8812579]

>>8812375
justin sun is a shillboy who will say anything to pump the price

[Anonymous No.8812635]

>>8811768
>>8811817
>>8812375
Cryptocurrencies that have to market to people based on what price it will get to are all bullshit hype coins. Request is really going to change the blockchain game, and we don't have to say "$1 EOY" because we all know Request is going to be huge. Justin Sun is marketing "$1 EOY" because that's the only real reason to buy Tron, if it even gets that far. It has nothing over any other crypto and yes you will make more money investing in REQ. I hope TRON does well, and I may even throw some money in if it starts mooning to mars, but it doesn't have shit on Request

[Anonymous No.8812675]

>>8812635
>expecting rational behavior from /biz/

[Anonymous No.8812740]

>>8812485
please stop. horrible, fake shilling. You're going to fuck people over if you convince them to buy REQ.

>>8812579
It's called being the CEO of a real company, which TRX is. He's put his face, his name, his reputation on the line. He's a successful person in Asia and was featured in Forbes 30 under 30... Who created REQ again? A bunch of no names who never show their faces or talk about their coin? It's vaporware, that's why, and coinbase will literally stop REQ dead in it's tracks.

REQ was simply an idea that got hyped along with many other useless currencies last year, simple as that.

This year we're going to see actual adoption, and TRX is on the front line as it's already being integrated into Chinese social media platforms, as well as real world utility services like O-Bike.

REQ is useless, it's not a currency, you don't even need it to use request network. You guys have a huge cult following because you thought it was going to make you rich, every other reason you tell yourselves is a lie, hate the break it to you.

>>8812635
Look, I hope you faggots make money too, but REQ is vapor ware. I'm not saying you have to buy Tron, but it's one of the top contenders for 2018's next bullrun.

REQ has no use case, seriously, do some research. The era of blind buying is over, people want real coins backed by real companies, aka TRX.

[Anonymous No.8812753]

>>8812740
>REQ is vapor ware
Dude...

[Anonymous No.8812833]

>>8812753
Ok, in your own words try to explain to me why request network is useful, and why you need to own REQ tokens?

[Anonymous No.8812844]

>>8812740
Now who's the one fake shilling here. I really do wish I could buy more. I'm all in REQ

[Anonymous No.8812895]

>>8812833
This is what Request will do that Tron never will. You're a confirmed noob

[Anonymous No.8812938]

>>8811697
So REQ has more room to grow?

[Anonymous No.8813035]

>>8810162
Stfu subhuman furfag there is definite price suspension going on and only shills don't see it

[Anonymous No.8813037]

>>8812895
Absolute vaporware. Here are some questions that a more intelligent person might wonder.

-How will Request network determine what exchange rates between cryptos are?
-How would "muh amazon adoption" handle erroneous transactions? refunds?
-how does REQ deal with scalability issues, in the event that it actually launches and is used?

Face it, REQ is over.

[Anonymous No.8813038]

>>8812895
>>8812833

This is the smallest part of all the use cases. The most interesting use case is Accounting. Say it with me: “Triple entry accounting”

[Anonymous No.8813075]

>>8812895
Ironically, this isn't REQ strongest point. Not even close.

Partnership with PwC France and Francophone Africa... Dude. This is retard-proof investment.

[Anonymous No.8813092]

>>8813075
There is no partnerships with PWC lmao. Why are you lying?

[Anonymous No.8813139]

>>8813092
Ok I'll give you a (You). Fuck off

[Anonymous No.8813188]

>>8813092
Are you retarded? Like actually

[Anonymous No.8813204]

>>8813037
how does paypal determine exchange rate when I buy my weeb toys from Japan? How does paypal deal with erroneous transactions?

These are easy issues to solve..

Scalability is an industry wide issue. I would not worry too much about that at the moment.

[Anonymous No.8813214]

>>8813037
You fool, refunds are already active on req’s mainnet.
Fool, req uses kyber on the backend for exchanges.
You fool, read their latest update, req will be portable on any platform such as EOS.
You need to read and dyor instead of spouting nonsense that you can’t backup, you fool.

[Anonymous No.8813282]

>>8812740
trx plagiarized whitepaper, called out by Vitalik himself. trx has its day. real tech will win out long term. at least req wrote its own whitepaper. trx still in testnet with 1+ billion mc? lmfao

[Anonymous No.8813329]

>>8813204
US petro dollar, which has one price.

>>8813214
Oh really? So how does one get a refund? Where does the money come from?

Again, stop lying.

[Anonymous No.8813346]

>implying you know more then VB

[Anonymous No.8813361]

>>8813075
Are you reqtards still trying to fool people with the pwc partnership lies? If it actually happened req would've mooned instead of dumped another 25% lmao
In a year you're going to face palm looking back at this thread while asking yourself why you went with req instead of tron

Tron has ACTUAL partnerships that's why it's always mooning

[Anonymous No.8813424]

>>8813038
Hello thanks for helping me out yesterday, read the white paper for req. the only thing I have against it that it seemed a bit to uh, “happy go lucky”? Like in chainlink / ETH / btc white papers they constantly address problems and solutions and mishaps and how they already have potential solutions in mind. I hope the yellow paper will address it too. Since there is not a lot of math / formulas involved atm. Still I bought some.

What companies besides Pwc France does req work with? Also how is there team? I read the bios. Just asking if you know something I don’t. Thanks again m8

[Anonymous No.8813450]

>>8813329
correct

[Anonymous No.8813626]

>>8813346
a lot of code written these days is just copy paste to be fair

[Anonymous No.8813696]

>>8813346
lmao, VB talking shit about Tron, classic.

[Anonymous No.8813818]

>>8813282
>plagiarized whitepaper
DYOR, friendo

[Anonymous No.8813867]

Has anyone noticed REQ and LINK follow similar patterns the last few days? They sit around the same place in marketcap and went up and down together.

[Anonymous No.8813929]

>>8813867
They're bros. You can't be holding one without the other.

[Anonymous No.8813978]

>>8813626
He's talking about the whitepaper moron.

[Anonymous No.8813998]

>>8813626
He's talking about the whitepaper not the code

[Anonymous No.8814198]

>>8813978
>>8813998
what the frick?

[Anonymous No.8814576]

>>8813978
>>8813998
yeah because there is no code :D

[Anonymous No.8815271]

>>8813626
The problem is we wouldn't be able to tell if the code was copy pasta. But the white paper for trx is literal copypasta

[Anonymous No.8815306]

>>8813978
>>8813998
>>8814198
>>8814576
>>8815271
>d-don't inspect REQ's merits a-anon, j-just buy it!!! h-here is some Tron f-fud

[Anonymous No.8815485]

>>8810168

[Anonymous No.8815501]

Any money you put in REQ is better off in LINK

[Anonymous No.8815553]

>>8811912
It's not coordinated fud.

It's just random memeing.

[Anonymous No.8815555]

>>8810080
>>8810132
>>8810168
>>8812375
>>8812740
>>8812833
>>8813037
>>8813092
>>8813329
>>8813696
>>8815306
fucking wew lad

[Anonymous No.8815589]

>>8813361
Are you fucking retarded? PWC literally tweeted it themselves

[Anonymous No.8815620]

>>8815555
lol a pajeet calling others a pajeet. classic pajeetery.

>>8815589
LOL. no, PWC definitely did not.

[Anonymous No.8815637]

>>8806329
REQ bagholder here, I'm hoping we make it. Hell, I might get some LINK too so I can be stinky. I've got ~ 30 million TRTL I should probably sell.

[Anonymous No.8815654]

>>8815620
You are fucking brain dead

[Anonymous No.8815658]

Monkeys read “Req” or “Request” and they proceed to post their FUD to earn Rupees.

This fucking pajeets crawl out of their slums to earn Rupees Fuding Request and Shilling Tron.

[Anonymous No.8815684]

>>8815658
If the post is from an Indian IP, I want the flag next to the post ID.

[Anonymous No.8815699]

>>8815654
hahahahahah

ad hominem, the sign of desperation when facts are no longer on your side...

Go ahead, see if you can trick more people into throwing away their money with your "muh PWC" meme.

[Anonymous No.8815723]

>>8813929
Real biz bros hold the real two moon bros

Unironcially 50/50 split

[Anonymous No.8815752]

>>8815620
Go shit in the street

https://twitter.com/pwc_france/status/978248098022658048?s=12

[Anonymous No.8815789]

>>8815620
https://twitter.com/PwC_France/status/978248098022658048
Are you literally retarded?

[Anonymous No.8815793]

>>8815699
https://twitter.com/pwc_france/status/978248098022658048?s=12

[Anonymous No.8815817]

>>8815752
>>8815789
thanx, now I can just ignore this clown

[Anonymous No.8815818]

>>8815553
>It's just random memeing.
It's truly retarded memeing. Reddit tier memeing

[Anonymous No.8815933]

>>8815793
>>8815789
>>8815752
Kek pajeet btfo
>>8815699
>>8815620
>>8813361
>>8813092

[Anonymous No.8815987]

>>8815818
>>8815933

The funny thing is that it's probably some req whale that's paying these pajeets.
Anyone with a decent req position has an interest in the price staying low, so that when req start rolling and the burning ramps up, their slice of the pie will get bigger faster (lower price=more req burnt for every transaction).
If you play the long game you want req as cheap as possible for as long as possible.
Then when the contract bot will start buying tons of reqs the buying pressure will get unstoppable and req price will explode up.
Nice thing is that at that point you do not need anyone to dump your req to, you just keep selling to the contract, it's a pump that never dump.
Ahh, this token economics get me hard.

[Anonymous No.8816026]

>>8815987
>Ahh, this token economics get me hard.
A familiar feeling.

[Anonymous No.8816835]

150K REQ my brothers... comfy as fuck.

[Anonymous No.8816846]

>>8815987
This makes want to FUD the fuck out of my precious Req

[Anonymous No.8816850]

>>8815987
My friend who had like 300k req sold off yesterday

[Anonymous No.8816981]

>>8816850
Hopefully he bought tron. Going to moon any second now

[Anonymous No.8817005]

>>8816981
Haha well he’s not retarded.

[Anonymous No.8817999]

I honestly believe req is one of the last remaining garunteed moonshots, but will take years to get where it needs to be in order to truley make it. I knew about btc when it was under a dollar, just didn't have the money to put into anything risky. Same with eth. Was ready to drop 3k on it when it was under 70 cents. My asshole stockholdr buddy FUD'd me so hard i just didn't pull the plug. Each 6 months id check in to see the price of eth. It remember it was slow at first. Then i remember checking it a it was stable at $1.13 I kept checking it every 6 months and it kept going up and up slowly. Until it mooned to $8-10, so on and so on. Im not missing it this time. Req is the crypto end game. I don't think we will see anything over $100 by 2022 with this supply and marketcap though but maybe by 2030 if there is a good amount of token burn it can be up to $200-$300, pure speculation though.

25k stack of req. Trying to get to 50k. Let's go

[Anonymous No.8818029]

>>8817999
It won't take that long dude, project will be done in a year and advertising by then. Crypto will see mainstream adoption (true normie shit like online shopping with REQ) in 3 years.

[Anonymous No.8818060]

>Chad, I...

[Anonymous No.8818080]

>>8815752
>>8815789
>>8815793
>>8815817
>>8815933

LMAO. PWC france is a client acquisition department of PWC, it's not the actual accounting firm.

Why do you think it's PWC "france" and not PWC? Because they are a silly offshoot customer relations branch, who are allowed to do silly things like tweet about crypto. PWC has NEVER released any statement even hinting at mentioning REQ, let alone discuss partnerships with it.

Think with you're fucking heads, if REQ actually partnered with PWC we'd know it.

[Anonymous No.8818099]

>>8818029

So in 3 years what's your price prediction?

[Anonymous No.8818209]

>>8810162
dude—EVERY fucking time i see you, you're being a total dumbass
i bet you'd do fursuiting too, if you weren't a fucking deathly impoverished bombay bastard
ugh

[Anonymous No.8818349]

>>8818099
$100 is more grounded but this market is never sane, the fomo will be unreal if it actually sees adoption.
About $1000

[Anonymous No.8818397]

>>8808808
>There is a pajeet level fud revolving around the random coin burn meme
I literally started the joke, because thats what we do, jokes, some months ago and to my surprise the meme catched up after some weeks.

Im not a pajeet, I dont receive money for fuding, hell, it wasnt even a fud. Just some funny shit I started to put in every thread.

Btw I hold 30k req

[Anonymous No.8819176]

>>8816850
y?