/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.8674710]

>another bullrun coming in the next few months
>gonna end up holding this fucking shitcoin while everything else 100X again

I’m not trying to FUD it’s just I have fucked my cost opportunity so immensely holding for so long... what the fuck guys.. you just KNOW shitcoins are gonna blast pass us again while Sergey hones in his anti hype approach to perfection. Anyone else dumping LINK to try and at least make SOME money back??? Fuck me

[Anonymous No.8674731]

>when the linky too stinky
lmao

[Anonymous No.8674735]

Whatever dude. You don't believe in it then fucking sell. No one gives a shit what you think. We've been over this a few times already. If you ain't iron hands then gtfo.

[Anonymous No.8674749]

>>8674735
Look man, I watched thousands of dollars fly past me. If I bought VEN instead of LINK last run up I could have over a million LINK right now because I DO believe in it you fag lord

[Anonymous No.8674755]

Just remember you're gonna be laughed at just because you weren't patient enough. Calm the fuck down and wait you autistic son of a bitch.

[Anonymous No.8674766]

>>8674749
Yeah that was dumb anon. But things aren't going to be so comfy this year. Most biztards will be lucky if their shitcoin even exists in 2019.

[Anonymous No.8674778]

Coulda shoulda woulda. You'll never be happy with your trades cuz it's always in hindsight. Hold and wait and STFU. You can try to trade it and get burnt. Instead of just wait.

[Anonymous No.8674783]

>>8674710
this post doesnt deserve a reply
but somewhere someone should actually give one of these a real reply
then 100% fud

basically

chasing valuation based on speculation requires you to know which fake speculative project will catch the imagination of the average idiot, which you can't know

and

requires you to sell before the dumb bag holders figure out theyve bought nothing, which you wont

or you could just invest in projects with real use cases and fundamentals
it requires a little more patience, but it makes a lot more money

[Anonymous No.8674811]

>>8674766
This is also a worry. Anyone else see the code frequency on the LINK github??? REQ had spikes up to 100K and ours was max 4K. Not fudding go look.
>inb4 private repo

If there was a private repo why is there a transparent pivotal tracker which shows we are at LEAST one full month away??? If BTC breaks the downtrend and we all run up, who the fuck is going to buy LINK with their quiet bullshit for gains?? No one

[Anonymous No.8674832]

Be a real man and grow and grow a fucking heard. It will teach you to be patient. I love kikes who tell me "I wish I can grow a beard like that". Yeah fucker, it's fucking easy, all you gotta do is just leave it the fuck alone. But no. Our 2 second attention span won't allow us to just leave shit be. We gotta fuck with it.

[Anonymous No.8674835]

>>8674783
>just invest in projects with real use cases and fundamentals
Examples? Besides LINK

[Anonymous No.8674851]

>>8674835
eth
xlm
link
req
qsp
xmr

etc etc etc

[Anonymous No.8674864]

>>8674811
It shows you have no fundamental understanding of the potential of LINK. You should give NO FUCK who buys in. The buyers will be institutions. Not fucking normies. SWIFT, SONY AXA, all smart contracts, Zepplin fucking OS. Who gives a shit if normies buy. Ethereum came and zoomed buy all those impatient fucks. LINK will do the same.

[Anonymous No.8674863]

>>8674851
What's your opinion on RLC and ENG? In my opinion, RLC, LINK, ENG is the holy trinity when it comes to investing in smart contract projects.

[Anonymous No.8674873]

>>8674811
No one will ever buy LINK for gains. Their plan is clearly to get a mainnet working and build up the network over a period of months and years.
And the worst part is LINK is one of the few projects with a unique use case -- an existing problem that needs solving.
The overcrowded platform/supplychain/tokenisation space?
Absolute bagholder slaughter coming in 2018.

[Anonymous No.8674880]

Like I said, go ahead and sell, youll just make it cheaper for me to buy every paycheck I receive.

[Anonymous No.8674891]

>>8674864
LINK partnering with Zeppelin_OS is bigger than swift imo.

[Anonymous No.8674934]

>>8674873
Which isn't to say the chainlink team will succeed. There are a million ways they could fail, not least a well-funded competitor appearing.

[Anonymous No.8674973]

>>8674735
>>8674755
>>8674778
>>8674832
>>8674864
>>8674880
You seem upset bro, are you emotionally invested?. Sorry I’m not in a delusional bagholding haze and actually trying to manage my bags now for fucks sales
>le hodl

[Anonymous No.8674986]

>>8674891
Its not. Not even close.

[Anonymous No.8674998]

>>8674934
Most well funded competitors aren't going to believe in decentralized oracles. Fucking hell, barely anyone outside of /biz/ seems to see ANY potential in it. Whether that's your "/g/ talking about bitcoin in 2009" or "this is a guaranteed worthless shitcoin" is up to you.

[Anonymous No.8675014]

>>8674891
Why?

[Anonymous No.8675016]

>>8674986
How so? Zeppelin_OS partnership means LINK will be the defacto choice for a decentralized oracle.

[Anonymous No.8675040]

>>8674934
Chainlink are extremely well connected. They will partner all the tech companies in SaNFrancisco that have blue logos. See >>8673964

[Anonymous No.8675095]

>>8675016
Yeah but only within the immediate community. SWIFT would be an instant $10+ since it represents 11,000 banks.
Zeppelin is great but no one gives a shit unfortunately

[Anonymous No.8675097]

>>8674998
>Most well funded competitors aren't going to believe in decentralized oracles
Yes until the smartcontract craze kicks off and amazon spins a network up in a month.
>>8675016
Zeppelin OS is some literally who tech start up
SWIFT is the backbone of the global financial system, to even compare them is ridiculous