[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 47 KB, 1000x1000, 7C3AB574-AA5D-4D25-B7DD-C80959654D8D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8631986 No.8631986 [Reply] [Original]

LINK is literally the only option crypto has to recover and mantain a bull trend. People don't realize this. There's no more new money. Only holders. We need to breach into the consumer market, governments and the big companies. The best choice is having Smart Contracts interact with the real world. We need ChainLink to be a success or we're all dead.

>> No.8632005

>>8631986
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.8632046

Hey bag holder.

>> No.8632049

>>8631986
the nodes dont even sync properly as per the whitepaper critique, thats a noob-tier mistake. this thing is dead.

>> No.8632092
File: 80 KB, 500x501, 1436892889076.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8632092

>>8632005
>>8632046
>>8632049
guys, I don't think you enough time to buy BTC is bouncing back

>> No.8632118
File: 222 KB, 970x980, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8632118

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be paid in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.....

>> No.8632148
File: 76 KB, 900x900, pepe_baller.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8632148

>>8631986
I agree, OP. It may sound self-aggrandizing, but we LINKers aren't just in it for us. We're in it to save the whole cryptosphere. If you understood the technology and the implications of LINK, you'd understand what we mean.