/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.8462255]

ITS FUCKING HAPPENING LINKIES
WERE GONNA DO IT
1000 EOY LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.8462290]

>>8462255
Why is DocuSign IPO relevant to Link?

[Anonymous No.8462295]

??

[Anonymous No.8462320]

>>8462255

I love this meme

>loosely related, dubiously potential "partner" has news headline
>link $1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.8462340]

>>8462255
>Implying its not a DGB partnership
DGB 2K EOM.

[Anonymous No.8462343]

>>8462290
Theyre gonna tokenize their shares. To do that, they need chainlink.

[Anonymous No.8462369]

>>8462343
going beyond tokenization

[Anonymous No.8462392]

if the chromosomally deficient don't understand wut this means, don't tell them. They don't deserve it.

[Anonymous No.8462440]

yay

[Anonymous No.8462445]

>>8462392
lol its so obvious yet brainlets dont see it

[Anonymous No.8462455]

>>8462343
Not really. They can tokenize on bitshares for all they care.

[Anonymous No.8462496]

>>8462455

>nazarov, boring, gosner

Get used to seeing these names together, soy boy

[Anonymous No.8462540]

>>8462255
bullish

[Anonymous No.8462580]

>>8462255

Someone please elaborate on whatever delusional rationality is compelling you to infer this is relevant to chainlink.

[Anonymous No.8462626]

It's official, linkies are the most deluded shitcoiners out there

[Anonymous No.8462811]

>>8462496
devil's threesome confirmed

[Anonymous No.8462844]

>>8462580
sergey was on a panel with some of the docusign people
the docusign people mentioned that smart contracts are valuable and something about oracles
thats it

[Anonymous No.8462853]

>>8462580
>t. someone who didn't watch the SXSW talk

[Anonymous No.8462859]

LINK is like reading a good mystery novel. All you get are the clues, but if you're smart enough, you can predict the ending.

[Anonymous No.8462874]

How is this related to chainlinn you absolute donkeys.

[Anonymous No.8462913]

....even if this doesnt apply to link directly, Docusign guy had a massive hard on for Sergey and Link.

Maybe this explains the high volume lately.

Whatever, bought 5k more.

[Anonymous No.8462916]

This has nothing to do with your shitcoin

[Anonymous No.8462932]

>>8462859
>LINK is like reading a good mystery novel

I love that this line became a thing. And it's true, full of clues but never a smoking gun.

[Anonymous No.8462933]

>>8462859
what is the ending

[Anonymous No.8462938]

>>8462916
Dont be delusional

[Anonymous No.8462962]

>>8462933
the butler did it, with the maid, in the shed

[Anonymous No.8462976]

>>8462933

$5 eoy.

[Anonymous No.8462987]

>>8462933
The ending is either good or bad. But it will be the end.

[Anonymous No.8463004]

This the new shill? Let's post shit and say it's super bullish but then call everyone brainlets for not understanding thus implying that's it's obvious

[Anonymous No.8463017]

>>8462255
being less than 1K EOY defeats the point of clhainlink

[Anonymous No.8463025]

>>8462976
Nice subtle fud

[Anonymous No.8463056]

>>8463004
You clearly haven't been DYORing have you?

[Anonymous No.8463076]

>>8463017
>1k EOY

kek nice fud

[Anonymous No.8463089]

>>8462933
Money money money

[Anonymous No.8463119]

>>8463056
Again, great tactic. Projecting the other person is clueless implying they're an idiot for not seeing how obvious this is.

[Anonymous No.8463148]

>>8463119
man get outta here. nobody cares whether you buy the precious lambo ticket LINK. DYOR if you don't believe us.

[Anonymous No.8463213]

My precious linkies will be worth a small fortune in the near future.

[Anonymous No.8463227]

>>8463119
imagine being this retarded

[Anonymous No.8463236]

>>8463119
You are an idiot though

[Anonymous No.8463262]

>>8463119
>filthy no linker lashes out

[Anonymous No.8463314]

>>8462455
what are the chances they use bitbean instead

[Anonymous No.8463330]

Just curious...what is the average age of link shills? Is everyone here just buying 1000 link at a time? The order book is so thin on Binance. How can I put $100k into Link?

[Anonymous No.8463342]

>>8463330
ANSWER MY GOD DAMN BITBEAN QUESTION

[Anonymous No.8463347]

>>8463330
well that's just it. very few are selling these precious tokens. whales need to be very patient to accumulate.

[Anonymous No.8463369]

>>8463330
You don't buy LINK as an investment.
When you buy LINK you're basically buying a hallucinogenic drug that sustains your delusion that you're about to make it.
LINK is basically hope in digital form, it has no intrinsic value whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.8463377]

>>8463347
I've been trying to buy it, but I don't want to drive the price up. The biggest sell order is for less than 5000 link. Why isn't anyone putting real money into this project....?

[Anonymous No.8463385]

>>8463330
Nice subtle shill

[Anonymous No.8463401]

>>8462933
$1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.8463406]

>>8463369
Congratulations on being so witty and funny. Really.

[Anonymous No.8463423]

>>8462255
It is not the same Chainlink. This was confirmed in August. I remember it well because I had just bought a house and signed the paperwork using docusign. I had a big bag of LINK at the time and actually believed this. Turns out there is another company (non-blockchain) called Chainlink. THIS IS NOT LINK!

[Anonymous No.8463427]

>>8462859
Link is dependent on Ether being the “go to crypto”. That’s a bigger mystery

[Anonymous No.8463440]

>>8463385
I'm serious. I don't mean to be a dick, but it seems like everyone interested in Link has the mentality of a 13 year old, but I genuinely would like to buy some. Is there somewhere better to find answers about this? I tried the telegram group: same immature people treating this as a lottery ticket.

[Anonymous No.8463450]

>>8463427
Wrong. If ETH shits the bed, LINK can easily migrate to another blockchain or be its own blockchain. It doesn't matter.

[Anonymous No.8463453]

>>8463406
There's nothing funny about a mental disease, and least of all a mental disease that dishonest shills use to con the victims out of their money.

[Anonymous No.8463461]

>>8463377
they did put real money into it. and they are holding it. they aren't selling it cheaply to you, faggot

[Anonymous No.8463469]

>>8463423
Adding to my post. This is the company associated with DocuSign, Chainlink Research. It has nothing to do with LINK.

[Anonymous No.8463486]

>>8463440

[Anonymous No.8463489]

>>8463440
Stay away from link, shitcoin with toxic community and a 2 members team

[Anonymous No.8463502]

>>8463469
and I forgot the link... http://www.clresearch.com/research/detail.cfm?guid=B2840D24-3048-79ED-9922-46DF8CE8C3D8

[Anonymous No.8463504]

>>8463461
Obviously they did...but no one has been for months. The order book looks like an Indian auction for hookers. Is there somewhere that large quantities can be bought? Or do I have to buy 500 at a time?

[Anonymous No.8463524]

>>8463504
occasionally you'll see a 50k LINK wall you can buy. other than that, you need to be patient.

[Anonymous No.8463537]

>>8462933
The Singularity.
ChainLink will literally link together all living things on Earth, and eventually the Universe.

[Anonymous No.8463542]

>>8463440
if you genuinely would like to buy some you would be able to find out wether or not the mere concept of chainlink is a good idea at last, since this is what most projects in the crypto space are.
now try to add some creative thoughts to the information being provided. think about it while youre buying your exit bag online. if you dont know how to buy an exit bag...just ask :)

[Anonymous No.8463549]

>>8463423
are you retarded? lol

[Anonymous No.8463554]

>>8463489
I'm sorry you have to wait for your wages to accumulate, but I still would like to buy some large quantities. Is ANYONE here helpful and capable of interacting like a real person or am I just going to get a bunch of nonsense?

[Anonymous No.8463572]

>>8463524
Thank you

[Anonymous No.8463597]

anyone think that ETH+LINK will render most other crypto projects obsolete? with chainlink and eth you can create a DApp that will do anything a lot of these shitcoins are trying to do. I'm a brainlet tho so correct me if i'm wrong. There also needs to be a cryptocurrency that can handle tons of microtxns, maybe BTC with LN?
I just can't see very many of the current projects being around for long, many of them are pointless over-decentralization and/or redundant once link is operational

[Anonymous No.8463603]

>>8463549
No, I am distracted right now which is why it took three posts, but I am right. Chainlink Research has nothing to do with the crypto, Chainlink or the LINK token.

[Anonymous No.8463611]

>>8463542
I don't know what an exit bag is. I've done a good amount of research. Have had friends tell me this is a great project, this is why I'd like to put a decent amount of money into this project. My friend and I are both looking to buy in, but we'd ideally not like to sit on Binance all day looking at sell orders of 1000 link to fill all day.

[Anonymous No.8463620]

>>8463554
hello friend

buy mobius sir, it great coin sir and make you very rich like moonman sir,

[Anonymous No.8463648]

>>8463597
you're correct. LINK truly is the last big moon mission. there may be some other one in the distant future, but it's hard to imagine what it would be since EVERY function can be done by ETH / NEO and LINK.

[Anonymous No.8463693]

>>8463554
you could try to buy OTC but with only 100k that's not likely, plus where do you even start if you don't have connections.
this is why LINK will moon so hard; once partnership and mainnet news drop, people will be frantic to get in but linkies have diamond armor after months of relentless FUD.
you're just gonna have to bite the bullet and start doing 10k market buys every couple hours, or put up a big buy wall and hope people sell into it.
There is likely a few weeks or months between now and mainnet and news, so you could always take the risky jew route and only buy for a good price at a rate of a few thousand per day

[Anonymous No.8463718]

>>8463504
Contact Sergey directly through their site. Say you're interested in an OTC trade.
See what he says.

[Anonymous No.8463729]

I think I can guess what this IPO will be about and what Docusign wants to achieve.

https://www.geekwire.com/2017/docusign-founder-tom-gonser-future-digital-identity-potential-ipo-seattle-vs-san-francisco/

In this interview Gonser explains
>Right now, when you go to interact with a transaction, there’s an identity proof that the sender puts you through and we have several tools to do that. But we don’t currently persist any of that to say, ‘Well, you’ve done this 10 times, so now you have this huge trust core.’
>As we look at trying to reduce friction more and more and more, even for transactions of high value, it may make sense for us to do some things that allow people to persist the identities and the authentications that they’ve gone through.
He's talking about having an identity on the blockchain - it's obvious how this would link to an e-signature company. He says the following
>creating a situation where people aren’t re-keying data and they’re not having to prove who they are all the time
Basically it's a way to save time.

He also wants to integrate signing a contract and sending the payment.
>If you think about all the documents out there that talk about a payment, there’s a lot of them. There are so many contracts that contemplate reaching an agreement so that you’ll pay someone to do something. But the [signature] and payment have been two different things. Now you can merge those two together so that by filling out an agreement to have someone come mow your lawn, you are also going to be paid, and have that happen as part of the contract.
>If you think about contracts getting smarter and smarter, some contracts say, “Hey, when we sign this agreement, you’ll owe us 10%. Then when we reach this milestone, you owe us 30%, then when we’re finished, you owe us the balance.”

[Anonymous No.8463731]

>>8462933
It's going to look something like the End of Evangelion but instead of Rei transcending humanity it's going to be Sergey and it's going to look hilarious.

[Anonymous No.8463740]

>>8463502

[Anonymous No.8463741]

Can anyone recommend further resources for this project also? Have gone through the white paper, watched all of Sergey's presentations on youtube, have met talked with developers who are interested in this project (btw, there's another interesting location oracle provider called XYO). But it seems like every discussion community for Link is people who don't really want to discuss the project and would rather try to be funny.

[Anonymous No.8463785]

>>8463693
Thanks. Has anyone heard a rumor that main net has been audited by outside devs and is ahead of schedule. This is not a shill, this is just what my friend has mentioned and I wanted to verify whether anyone else has heard similar news (I know it is a small team so I'm not sure how much insider info could be leaked)

[Anonymous No.8463794]

>>8463741
I can feel your desperation, you already own link let It out

[Anonymous No.8463801]

>>8463785
who is this friend of yours? is he in tech?

[Anonymous No.8463816]

>>8463741
why are you not in the slack?

[Anonymous No.8463819]

>>8463741
go buy OXO OXO then

[Anonymous No.8463840]

>>8463729
And, yes, Docusign WILL be using LINK as its oracle provider.
>You’ll see contracts get smarter and smarter and smarter, and be able to do things more and more autonomously. That’s a humongous opportunity. Some of it is machine learning, and a lot of it is around data. In order for a contract to be smart, it has to get data from the outside world.
We already know he loves and understands decentralized oracles from SXSW. and get this, I think he also wants to take the SaaS approach with Docusign:
> It’s really hard to build it — someone had to custom code that specifically for the bank. If you can imagine a system that will allow you to go into DocuSign and it’s as easy as creating a template, and make that same kind of logic happen for anything in the business, you know it changes everything
I'm betting they'll create "templates" that utilise LINK. They have millions and millions of users. That will be millions and millions of people/companies using LINK as the oracle for their smart contracts via Docusign templates.

Their aim is to make shit faster.
>The other thing that’s interesting is businesses that use Docusign are improving something that’s really fundamental to their business, as opposed to sort of a side thing. If I’m in business and I’m competing against somebody that takes three weeks to do a transaction, and I now can do it in one day, I’m going to win. We can fundamentally improve the core transaction speed of a business — that’s so impactful, and we’re just getting started
Tell me what's the fastest oracle? LINK?

[Anonymous No.8463843]

>>8463785
heard that as well. literally have no clue id have to check with the telegram groups, slacks, discords, both reddits and if they all confirm then id be confident

[Anonymous No.8463847]

>>8463741
dunno man you already seem well informed enough, maybe thomas' channel?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClIWFp4FV1QuYmnc8FcFDWw/videos?disable_polymer=1

[Anonymous No.8463859]

>>8463801
It is two friends. One is working on a blockchain project for IBM (I don't know much about the specific details since I'm not sure he's supposed to be giving them) and another is just a wealthy friend who has been very successful with crypto/tech investments and is well connected (the latter is the one from whom I got the rumor)

[Anonymous No.8463873]

>>8463840
LINK is seriously, not even meming, going to change the world.

[Anonymous No.8463883]

>>8463859
it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Sergey and Co. are ahead of schedule. The rumor is probably coming from those tech autists who monitor the Github 24/7.

[P@rick B8man No.8463887]

when does that article come out?

[Anonymous No.8463892]

>>8463847
>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClIWFp4FV1QuYmnc8FcFDWw/videos?disable_polymer=1

Thank you. Will browse through these tonight.

[Anonymous No.8463901]

>>8463883
They probably are, they launched testnet a month before it was scheduled.

[Anonymous No.8463906]

>>8463741
I get your pain. There's a place that's been pretty helpful about how to setup a node and work on external adapters but you have to find it because I don't want to direct people there.

[Anonymous No.8463925]

>>8463440
dude what are you even doing lol you should already be in the slack and have contacted rory etc. about possible OTC trades or how to go about purchasing a large amount/honestly putting up small buys walls on binance will be fine. in here telling everyone they are fucking dumb when you havent done shit on your own kek

[Anonymous No.8463944]

>>8463486
did he die

[Anonymous No.8463960]

>>8463729
DocuSign is not going to use Chainlink/LINK token. Docusign is associated with ChainLink Research, which has absolutely nothing to do with the LINK token. ChainLink Research was founded in 2003. This DocuSign IPO has nothing to do with LINK.

[Anonymous No.8463983]

>>8463944
For sure, his left leg and right arm seem like jelly now.

[Anonymous No.8463984]

>>8463960
do you realize docusign was on the same panel as Sergey a week ago

[Anonymous No.8463999]

>>8463983
Well you can survive without arms. In the immediate sense you mostly need your heart to pump blood, and the central part of your brain that manages stuff like breathing.

[Anonymous No.8464023]

>>8463925
I haven't told anyone they are dumb except for people who are objectively acting dumb. I haven't used Slack, but will look into it. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.8464027]

>>8463960
Brainlet, Chainlink Research is completely irrelevant to the point I just made, which is that Docusign wants to be using smart contracts, which integrate payments and identity, an obvious next step in the evolution of an e-signature company. For their smart contracts, which oracle will they use? They will be using an oracle because he talks about it extensively in this interview. They will be using LINK, it's obvious from SXSW

[Anonymous No.8464035]

>>8463450
>easily
Yeah, if Link's proving ground smart contract platform fails that's not going to cause any problems with adoption, no sireee. Link 100k eom

[Anonymous No.8464050]

>>8464023
just put up small buy orders bots will lower the price even more and accumulate till you buy 100k worth in a week its easy to manipulate binance bots

[Anonymous No.8464063]

>>8463906
Can you email it to me? paulgs9988 at yahoo

[Anonymous No.8464067]

>>8463741
on reddit /r/Chainlink is the official chainlink sub. There is a list of resources there and the ability to get your technical questions answered in more detail by LINK team members.

[Anonymous No.8464134]

>>8463729
>>8463840
>>8463960
>>8463984
>>8464027
Read up about Docusign's smart contract PoC they did in 2015.
>https://www.docusign.co.uk/press-releases/docusign-showcases-smart-contracts-payments-prototype-built-for-visas-connected-car
>The proof-of-concept was developed using the blockchain and brings DocuSign's Digital Transaction Management (DTM) platform, eSignature solution and APIs together with the Visa Token Service for secure payment processing.

Spot the key word? APIs. Chainlink connects APIs to smart contracts.
And the other key word? Insurance. Insurance is one of the most obvious use-cases for LINK.

[Anonymous No.8464160]

Thank you for your help guys.

[Anonymous No.8464173]

>>8463504
Look at the movement in the top 250 wallets or so.

The whales have hands like hellenistic sculptures

[Anonymous No.8464176]

>>8463119
>projecting
Bearfag is that you?

[Anonymous No.8464210]

>>8464035
Wrong again. LINK is smart contract blockchain agnostic. It works with ETH, NEO, Stratis, XLM, etc.

[Anonymous No.8464215]

>>8463999
Trips of truth confirm

[Anonymous No.8464240]

>>8462320

I love that you are a poor faggot that hasn't accumulated enough Linkies so you think shitting on it on 4chan will keep the price low.

K Y S

[Anonymous No.8464267]

>>8464063
Probably not the smartest idea putting your email address on 4chan

[Anonymous No.8464301]

>>8464173
Are the owners of these wallets known? Looks like lots of round numbers were gifted.

[Anonymous No.8464327]

>>8464267
My spam email

[kingfish !eyZ.srqtOk No.8464339]

>>8462976
>this would still be excellent
2/10 fud

[Anonymous No.8464351]

>>8463883
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2129823
They run out of stuff to do by 8th April

[Anonymous No.8464395]

>>8463925
Why are you giving such shit advice. Team won't be releasing more tokens into circulation for some speculator with $100k.
That's fucking pennies even for current LINK liquidity. He can buy half outright and put a buy wall for the other half and he'll have 250k LINK in a few hours.

[Anonymous No.8464424]

>>8463453
Jesus you sound like exactly the type of person to kill himself when link moons without him

[Anonymous No.8464442]

>>8464210
You're talking about Link a year or two from now. At the moment, it's only been developed to work with Eth, idiot.

[Anonymous No.8464444]

>>8462933
the relief of my seemingly immemorial suffering, $1k EOY

[Anonymous No.8464472]

>>8464444
Checked.

[Anonymous No.8464486]

>>8463873
which makes all the conservative price estimates on LINK stupid. We have literal shitcoins on the market easily surpassing $100... yet somehow LINK.. a critical middleware asset that will enable ETH (and other blockchains), tackle a quadrillion dollar market (among countless others), and create entirely new and booming global markets to name a few...is not worthy of 1000 eoy. Fucking lol at the legit brainlets fudding the LINK price predictions and are actually serious (and also legit noLinkers). Transcendence is nigh. The Singularity cometh.

[Anonymous No.8464551]

>>8464351
Speaking of, what do we know about Ben Woosley and Alex K.? They're doing things with Dimitri and Steve.

[Anonymous No.8464559]

Just found something interesting when googling "docusign" "smart contract" and "oracle"

Tom Gonser was at SXSW with Perianne Boring, who is is Blockchain Professor Georgetown. Look at this - it's the Georgetown law tech review that is published by the institute for technology, law and policy at Georgetown

>https://www.georgetownlawtechreview.org/smart-contracts-a-smart-way-to-automate-performance/GLTR-04-2017/
>Parties will also need to ensure that an oracle does not “go dark” and stop providing information, either due to technical errors or because the oracle simply decides to stop providing services. The oracle should agree to minimum standards of availability and a minimum subscription period. Alternatively, multiple oracles can be used for the same smart contract, using a “majority rules” method to determine when a condition has occurred
That is describing chainlink...
They talk about Docusign being used for contracts as an example of what a smart contract is improving on.
Another coincidence linking Docusign to a decentralized oracle....?

[Anonymous No.8464584]

>>8462392
>deficient
downs has an extra chromosome retard

[Anonymous No.8464598]

/biz/ is never right. Never buy memecoins that are shilled on /biz/.

[Anonymous No.8464610]

>>8464584
Who said anything about downs?

[Anonymous No.8464735]

>>8464559
Georgetown is hella jesuit. Link is a globalist coin.

[Anonymous No.8464751]

>>8464444
WEW

[Anonymous No.8464856]

>>8464444

[Anonymous No.8464907]

>>8462343

I might legitimately drop Link after reading this post

It's a fucking IPO you goddamn fucking moron, not an ICO. Jesus christ, half the marketcap for Link might really be underageb&

[Anonymous No.8464947]

>>8464559

B I G
I
G

[Anonymous No.8464979]

>>8464907
Woah you guys see what this person came up with in his brain then someone found a keyboard idk how in the fuck he managed to hit each letter in the right order to actually deliver a coherent thought but woah you don't see this everyday

[Anonymous No.8464995]

>>8464979
No need to be a dick

[Anonymous No.8465116]

>>8462933
Exit Scamburger

[Anonymous No.8465155]

DocuSign just had their annual 4 day summit in San Fran about 2 weeks ago. I know someone who was there, and asked them to listen for anything blockchain related in the presentations / expos they did. There were no mentions of APIs, Oracles, Smart Contracts, DLTs, blockchain, nothing. There was also no mention of an IPO during the summit, to which a lot of employees were surprised (they're overdue for an IPO, thought maybe there'd be a surprise announcement at the summit).

I'm a firm believer that LINK is THE perfect use case for what DocuSign does, but there have been 0 whisperings of using LINK let alone DLT from them.. but then again, maybe the employees will found out when everyone else does.

[Anonymous No.8465181]

>>8465155
Send them an email.

[Anonymous No.8465206]

>>8465181

[Anonymous No.8465246]

>>8465155
this is larp but if you listened to Tom Gosner fluffing sergey at sxsw and don't believe there is something meaningful going on between the two companies at some level then you have brain damage.

[Anonymous No.8465303]

>>8465155
>There were no mentions of APIs, Oracles, Smart Contracts, DLTs, blockchain, nothing.
Yeah except for SXSW which just happened

[Anonymous No.8465526]

>>8464442
Is this bait? How new is you? Sit this one out nigga, it's not for you

[Anonymous No.8465550]

>>8465526
This is the dunning kruger effect in action, friends.

>Pic related, it's you

[kingfish !eyZ.srqtOk No.8465571]

>>8463944
i feel like if the initial blast didnt do him in he couldve easily survived that fall. likely a double amputee but id say 53% chance he survived.

[Anonymous No.8465591]

>>8464947
Perhaps. Under the condition that it is also true

[Anonymous No.8465691]

>>8465303
>Yeah except for SXSW which just happened
I was referring to the summit. t. (you)
>>8465246
>Tom Gosner was professionally courteous to Sergey, HOLY FUCK PARTNERSHIP t. also (you)
I want to believe too, but the logic here is why they call us stinkies delusional.

[Anonymous No.8465696]

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-spotify-ipo/spotify-plans-to-list-shares-fend-off-apple-and-amazon-idUSKCN1GC2YF

[Anonymous No.8465710]

>>8464907
>half the marketcap for Link might really be underageb&
Yeah you should drop all your LINK you fucking moron, you have no clue what market cap even is

[Anonymous No.8466020]

>>8464486

[Anonymous No.8466054]

>>8465710
He's saying half the coins are held by underage b& faggot

[Anonymous No.8466071]

>>8465696
Nigga wtf i just spent 5 minutes reading that article and theres no correlation with the thread whatsoever

[Anonymous No.8466092]

>>8466071
they don't deserve it

[Anonymous No.8466212]

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.

[Anonymous No.8466387]

>>8465155
Why not send them an email. Start a new thread and we can even throw in our two cents.

[Anonymous No.8466428]

>>8466387
>hey why don't you email a company about a partnership they either have no idea about or have an NDA with, maybe they'll tell you they're heavily invested in LINK and it's 1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.8466927]

>>8465246
>>8465691

I’d say fluffing would be an accurate description of the behaviour at SXSW. you can tell he is totally sold on chainlink, just listen to his intonation as he lobs those softballs at Sergey.

[Anonymous No.8467036]

>>8462255
A fucking "business" based on something that Adobe Acrobat could do for decades.

[Anonymous No.8467297]

>>8463440
its just a meme

[Anonymous No.8467920]

>>8463597
WRAPPED BTC ON ETHEREUM CHAIN VERIFIED BY A LINK ORACLE SIGNED BY A MULTI-SIG WALLET. THINK OF WHAT BEING ABLE TO PUT BTC ON A SCALED ETHEREUM WILL DO FOR ADOPTION. oh shit just noticed caps

[Anonymous No.8467991]

Linkies are so fucking delusional

[Anonymous No.8468013]

>>8463440
Lel just buy btc (Prob gonna have to make use of many bitcoin atms Or just use coinbase or some other major exchange website if you like giving away your ID assuming you're american), transfer to binance, buy link in small increments until you accumulate 100k worth.
Bonus points if you fud link to accumulate at a lower price.

[Anonymous No.8468097]

>>8462540

[Anonymous No.8468726]

>>8465696
continue.

[Anonymous No.8468782]

>>8463741
Ask for an invite to the slack. Or browse during the early European hours (9 am - 1 pm) for quality LINK threads. Only NEET murricans and yuros browse at that time, so the threads are usually tech related. American hours are the fucking worst, and the threads rarely touch on the tech at all.

[Anonymous No.8468901]

>>8468782
tell me more about the spotify relationship.

[Anonymous No.8469182]

>>8468782
the spotify relationship

[Anonymous No.8469236]

>>8468782
i-i'm never on during those hours..

[Anonymous No.8469355]

>>8468726
>>8468901
>>8469182
Its not relared at all anon is retarded

[Anonymous No.8469504]

>>8463603
>>8463502

Everyone ignored this guy even though he appears to be right

[Anonymous No.8470321]

>>8464907
one can speculate that docusign execs have liked what they see. See >>8464947

[Anonymous No.8470365]

>>8470321
Pajeet brand street diarrhea.

[Anonymous No.8470377]

>>8464444

can't wait

[Anonymous No.8470392]

>>8470365

[Anonymous No.8470429]

>>8463840
I will be rich because of Anons like you. I'm not smart, but I believed people who were smart and helped others for no gain. I'll never meet you, but thanks man

[None !suMerlcrZs No.8470468]

owning chainlink just keeps getting better and better

[Anonymous No.8470474]

>>8469504
He literally brought up a point no one was discussing. Everyone is talking about the docusign execs having a panel with sergey at SXSW you chimpanzee please don't buy link if you're this retarded.

[Anonymous No.8470493]

>>8469504
refer to
>>>8463549

[Anonymous No.8470501]

>>8464444
This post needs more checking, look at the No. before it.. Kek is whispering

[Anonymous No.8470511]

>>8464442
Yeah, I'm sure they rewrote the entire thing in golang for no reason.

[Anonymous No.8471123]

>>8466212
i saw you yesterday on another thread. plz die

[Anonymous No.8471840]

>>8464339
>tripfagging

Something about them makes me irrationally angry

[Anonymous No.8471890]

>>8462255
FUCK I hate the $1000 EOY meme it's the worst

>t. holding 250k LINK$

[Anonymous No.8471940]

>>8464444

[Anonymous No.8471975]

>>8463840
Link isn't a real oracle though. That was proven last week.

[Anonymous No.8472401]

>>8470377
neither can I

[Anonymous No.8472524]

HOW
NEW
https://youtu.be/MfH1B85YyFU?t=1300

[Anonymous No.8473126]

Where did that $1000 meme come from? I always see this exact number which blows my mind how big crypto market would need to be for this to be possible

[Anonymous No.8473139]

>>8473126
the $1000 meme came from because linktards spammed the board to get a series of repeating digits on a Indonesian foot massage board.

[Anonymous No.8473160]

>>8473126
LINK will be 1000$ EOY when goes to 2.5$ when people realize its true potential, and then 3T total market cap hits

it's really not so crazy

[Anonymous No.8473180]

>>8473160
>people realize its true potential
so never?

[Anonymous No.8473191]

>>8473180
thought you were asking a genuine question
nvm then filthy nocoiner

if you don't get at least 2k linkies with your spare profits you are an idiot (but good luck with your 5x gains in btc instead of gambling shitcoins though!)

[Anonymous No.8473225]

What if SXSW really meant to invite the other ChainLink people, but messed up and then this fat piece of shit shows up instead?

[Bearfag No.8473350]

>>8464176
No... i'm right here
Lurking
Link $3 EOY
Screen cap this
Never be too optimistic

[Anonymous No.8473473]

https://youtu.be/D95jXGCXkqc?t=16m5s

moyle:"(on smart contracts)..it's got to happen, whether it takes 100 years or 18 months is anybody's guess.
I can make my own educated guess about how long it will take..."
(he glances sideways at the rest of the panel)

look at that body language from everyone.

$100000000000000000000 dollars end of year.

[Anonymous No.8473548]

>>8464444
>tfw I finally thought I had enough links for the 5th time, but then the need for more emerges again and again

[Anonymous No.8473667]

>>8466927
Yea I don't see how this isn't super obvious. Tom Gosner wanted sergey to talk specifically about the chainlink network. He kept asking leading questions to get to that, not smart contracts, not the company smartcontract.com, but the actual network that uses the tokens. I definitely was not expecting that but it's very good news.

[Anonymous No.8473713]

>>8473126
$1000 is obviously unrealistic but if chainlink is being used mostly for contracts that trigger fiat payments (like swift) then the market cap of crypto will be irrelevant. The price of the tokens will be based on the ROI of running a node and if contract value is valued in USD the price of the tokens will be some fraction of that and have nothing to do with ethereum or any other crypto.

Sergey talks about this a lot, how crypto and tokenized fiat will be a bigger deal in the future but for now dealing with fiat is what the focus is.

[Anonymous No.8473790]

>>8473713
and to add, this is the purpose of working with SWIFT messages, which Sergey confirmed they are working on in his december blog post and Rory reconfirmed two times, both after data dash said it was over and some random time on slack. The smart contracts will trigger swift messages that make the offchain payments.

[Anonymous No.8473871]

>>8462255
You are so stupid
Inb4 they partner with factom

[Anonymous No.8473913]

>>8473191
I bought 3150 links with rest of what I had after market rape, it's game over for me so I will just leave it on my Ledger (ordered it before I lost almost everything). In next 4 years link maybe will be $3-4 which would at least cover my loses

[Anonymous No.8473942]

>>8473913
>4 years
You will be pleasantly surprised. Just forget about those linkies for now though

[Anonymous No.8474071]

>>8464486
fuck up about the $1000 EOY its just desperate delusional poor fags, your going to perpetuate your poverty with this delusional thinking you know

if link is $1000 EOY ill give away my ENTIRE
250k link stack

[Anonymous No.8474082]

>Year 2030
>LINK has reached $10,000 and has completely changed the world
>Most people have still never heard of it
>"Anon, how did you get so rich?"
>"Oh, some fence company"

[Anonymous No.8474167]

It’s so fucking annoying that all discussion of LINK just turns into price prediction. Why can’t we talk about the tech and partnerships

[Anonymous No.8474185]

>>8474167
Talk about it then faggot, nobody is stopping you

[Anonymous No.8474357]

>>8473871
Partner with factom you say?

https://www.factom.com/blog/smartcontract-factom-announce-collaboration

[Anonymous No.8474381]

>>8474167
Because we've already talked about that shit endlessly. We know it's going to make us rich, we just want something that can keep us sharing it with each other even when there's no news.

So we make memes and shitpost about prices. And just for the record, $1000 is conservative.

[Anonymous No.8474412]

>>8474185
I already made several posts about it here (I guess my ID changed now because I’m on different WiFi)
>>8463729
>>8463840
>>8464027
>>8464134

These got hardly any attention, despite being on fucking topic. I wish someone would come and help me research, or try to disprove my findings and speculation. But the majority of this thread is people discussing price and Totally irrelevant shit. Nothing to do with docusign. Makes me really annoyed.

Gosner talked about doing an IPO in the interview linked above, he said it’s a way to get funding. But for what? Something to do with smart contracts?

[Anonymous No.8474454]

>>8464751
woah woah woah
is this legit? what did he mean by this

[Anonymous No.8474619]

>>8474412
>Gosner talked about doing an IPO in the interview linked above, he said it’s a way to get funding. But for what? Something to do with smart contracts?
read this again and if you don't see why it's retarded nigger you are a brainlet. this is why no one is talking to you.

[Anonymous No.8474683]

>>8474381
Okay okay look I get that Link is pretty revolutionary but this is going to take 2-3 years. $10 I would be unbelievable to me. Hell $5 would be pretty good too. But $1000 EOY is just crazy you billionaires and multi mult millionaires would be made overvnight?

[Anonymous No.8474809]

>>8474412
1) Docusign stands to benefit from provable signatures
2) Docusign needs oracles
3) Docusign has associated with only ChainLink and no other oracle networks
Conclusion: Hoard Link

[Anonymous No.8474826]

>>8474683
The price singularity is a meme, truth is many devout LINKies will sell their stack at $10. Just like how there are so few Bitcoin millionaires from the old days.

[Anonymous No.8474892]

>>8464444
I'm going to finally move out of my parents house. I'm going to McDonald's and getting a big Mac to honor these digits

[Anonymous No.8474980]

>>8470377
Checked. Congrats. We made it already. These moments should be just to enjoy the memes before singularity.

[Anonymous No.8474986]

>>8474167

Because it is just a json parser and not a single big rumor partnership has been confirmed hahahahhahahahahahahahahahhHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.8474998]

I have some stinkies so I would love for link to hit $1000, but I don't think it's ever going to happen.

[Anonymous No.8475052]

>>8474082
>anon your so rich how did u do it
> "hahaha a little stinky thing called chainlink"
> why dont u get gf and stop fucking sexbots?
>"hehe what...? Stfu faget"