What is up with the inheritance hate here?

[Anonymous No.8429425]

Why do most people in biz hate other people who receive inheritance money from their parents? You would give your kids money too if you had the means to. Are you faggots commies or something?

[Anonymous No.8429488]

I only have money to put into crypto because of my father's life insurance.

[Randal !/V0xcB5jy6 No.8429497]

>>8429425
it's life on easy mode. people are obviously resentful, in the same way some people are born 6'3 chads.

[Anonymous No.8429505]

well actually, there are a lot of communist pigs on this board

[Anonymous No.8429532]

nobody is hating on inheritance. there is some hate on being such a faggot you actually come to biz and tell people about your inheritance, tho

[Anonymous No.8429553]

>>8429488
>>8429497
I mean i get the lack of empathy when people with inheritance money lose their money but im getting the feels that 90% of biz hates people like this purely for receiving money by being born.

Ffs even trump received money, some of which he lost before being successful

[Anonymous No.8429618]

>>8429532
>nobody is hating on inheritance.
Yeah right

> there is some hate on being such a faggot you actually come to biz and tell people about your inheritance, tho
So when we ask for advice and tell our situation, you prefer us to lie about just receiving money to avoid getting your feels hurt right?

[Anonymous No.8429676]

>>8429618
no, we just prefer you neck yourself because you are clearly a faggot.

[Anonymous No.8429696]

>>8429425
People are jealous. Simple as that.

Imagine a wagecuck waiting in the rain for the bus to work when a trust fund kid who's never worked a day in his life drives past in a luxury car.

Some people still think that wealth is distributed based on merit.

[Anonymous No.8429740]

>against inheritance
>commie

Inheritance is something every ideology is against. It is literally indefensible as the argument is based upon nepotism.

Told my parents up frot that I don't need their money - they shouldn't feel encumbered by myself as far as enjoying the fruits of a their life of labor

[Anonymous No.8429777]

please tell us why you made a separate thread instead of just continuing to whine in your first thread here

>>8423797

[Anonymous No.8429813]

You are the sum total of your entire family tree. If your ancestors were builders of society, you'll probably do better with their cumulative assets than someone whose ancestors were alcoholic fuckups.

[Anonymous No.8429929]

>>8429618
Gratz, you have dead parents?
Or are you talking about your poo parents giving y p u moneys

[Anonymous No.8429986]

>>8429425
wow i love this ig

we pass on our assets just like we pass on our genes and values and access to influence. it kinda goes against our modern cult of individualism but it's way the game has always been played

[Anonymous No.8430013]

Heirs destroy rich families because they mismanage the money.

>>8429488
That's not investment. It's gambling.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1085063-the-9-most-financially-irresponsible-players-in-nba-history

[Anonymous No.8430419]

>>8429740
Wrong. Inheritance is the bedrock upon which strong societies are built. The promise of leving your descendants better off is what motivates you build things which will outlast you.

[Anonymous No.8430712]

>>8429425
Just jealous cunts... but their parents coddled them anyways and they had almost everything that trustfundfags have anyways just not the actual trustfund.

That being said.. I know some trust fund babies that are total fucking cunts and act all self entitled because their daddy is rich.

It goes both ways. I'm the humblest person in the world though so these kinds of problems don't affect me. #humbleaf

[Anonymous No.8430754]

>>8429425
It's because you all act like entitled pieces of shit.

[Anonymous No.8431014]

[Anonymous No.8431040]

Great thread, OP.

[Anonymous No.8431207]

Because the vast majority of /biz/ acquired their wealth through effort and/or intelligence.
When some literal spoiled child waltz' in to play with the big boys, they're not obligated in any regard to respect them, because they haven't actually accomplished anything that's worthy of respecting.

[Anonymous No.8431218]

>>8429505
Commie here, you're headed to the gulag in the near future when comrades Corbyn and Sanders get in and show their true power levels

[Anonymous No.8431234]

>>8431207
It's nice to see posts like these among the waves of newfags

[Anonymous No.8431250]

>>8431207
>Because the vast majority of /biz/ acquired their wealth through effort and/or intelligence.
I just peddled shitcoins. does that require effort or intelligence?

[Anonymous No.8431261]

>>8431207
>Because the vast majority of /biz/ acquired their wealth through effort and/or intelligence.

Hahahahahahahhahah what a joke. Ok lets say thats true. Were you educated? Its likely your parents paid fpr your education otherwise you would be suffocating in student loans.

Youre a special little spoiled brat arent you? Why do you deserve to get educated by your parents while poor people dont? See the hypocrisy?

Pls dont say selfmade people exist that paid their tuition too. They are the exception not the norm.

[Anonymous No.8431277]

[Anonymous No.8431304]

>>8429425
the real reason is that most of /biz/ has retarded boomer parents who blew all their money on endless junk which now fills up their house + their cottage, as well as regular expensive holidays to utterly dreary destinations like Disney or Bahamas cruises

that or they are from broken homes with parents too stupid to save anything

[Anonymous No.8431306]

>>8430419
this argument is usually made by waster children when their parents refuse to give money to said shitstain.

If you feel like you have leave money to the child for it to succeed, you failed as a parent. you had time to educate your spawn and imbule them with good habits.

[Anonymous No.8431341]

>>8431304
What? I thought majority of boomers are rich?

[Anonymous No.8431385]

>>8431261
>go to college and then uni while working part time
>come out 4 years later with 10k in debt
>pay it off in 3 months

Retard
but yeah, I'm just jelly that I actually have to work while these fucks could give 2 fucks about working, yet might do so because they have the freedom to choose to. If I had the safety net of millions of dollars, and no absolute need to work, I'd be happy.

[Anonymous No.8431398]

>>8431306
No arguments detected. If you hate inheritance so much give up language and tools and go be a hermit eating berries in the wilderness. Make sure not to study up on survival techniques though. Wouldn't want to inherit any knowledge.

[Anonymous No.8431458]

>>8431234
Same to you, friend.

>>8431250
I seriously doubt whatever shilling you did on a board like /biz/ made any impact on the prices of coins, but I'll throw you a bone say it did; you still spent effort convincing people that it was a good idea to put money into something, which probably also required some level intelligence and understanding of the product.

>>8431261
I was homeschooled by not-very-wealthy-but-not-broke parents that taught me the value and impact of honest labor and strong work ethic.
I'm not saying I deserved to be educated anymore than someone else. But that's exactly my problem with the current economic system; good, hard working, useful people are kept down by nothing more than circumstance. I could of been born in a 3rd world country, or to shitty parents that taught me nothing. But I wasn't, and I'd love to use my headstart to help make a better, fairer reality for as many people as possible.
Just because my current, somewhat blessed, life was produced by the current system doesn't mean I can't, as an individual, have my own opinions and problems with the system that produced it and think it could be handled much, much better.

[Anonymous No.8431489]

>>8429425

It's because most people (including myself) don't get that leg up in life. The majority of people come from weak financial backgrounds without family wealth.

If you don't understand why people are jealous of being handed free money, then you don't appreciate the value of money, and you don't understand what it's like to live in a situation without it.

Imagine for a moment that you have to work in order to live a mediocre life. You have to grind and scrap and struggle for that mediocre life. And while you're treading above water, living paycheck to paycheck, there are others just born onto boats. They didn't build the boat, they didn't purchase it, they just got lucky, and now they own a boat while everyone else is struggling not to drown.

Yes it's jealously. We are jealous that we didn't get lucky with our lot in life. I personally was a generation from being lucky, but commies took my family wealth (1st gen gook-american, parent fled from vietnam, large family wealth was nationalized). Not bitter about it, but it would've been really fucking nice to have that kind of financial stability at a young age.

But if I were in your shoes, I'd probably do the same damn thing, squander that inheritance, and wind up with nothing.

You'll have to wait a few years before you burn the rest of your inheritance, and then you'll finally know what it's like to struggle, and you'll understand why people are jealous of the massive advantage you have right now.

[Anonymous No.8431506]

Oh boy I sure do love seeing people flaunt their money they didn't earn.

[Anonymous No.8431515]

>>8431398
>doesn't respond to argumentation
>proceed to spout direct verbal attack thinking it somehow makes a difference.

please name an ideology that is keen on inheritance

[Anonymous No.8431524]

>>8429425
I only dislike and pity the kids who squander them, which is a good 80% of them. I have no reason to hate them

[Anonymous No.8431543]

>>8431458
>I seriously doubt whatever shilling you did on a board like /biz/ made any impact on the prices of coins, but I'll throw you a bone say it did; you still spent effort convincing people that it was a good idea to put money into something, which probably also required some level intelligence and understanding of the product.

Your kind, but it required peace of mind and some money that I could comfortable throw at something incredibly risky. Some skill, mental fortitude as well, but not as much.

One anon once said that getting rich through crypto is one step above the sewer of inheritance. Seems accurate

[Anonymous No.8431561]

>>8431341
they don't leave anything for their kids though, they spend it all on RVs and vacations and junk

[Anonymous No.8431589]

I don't speak for anyone but myself here. I only have a problem with those who inherit money, and brag about it like they earned it through hard work. I believe there SHOULD be some sort of humility in people, but that's never gonna change.
TL;DR OP is a faggot and should totally neck himself.

[Anonymous No.8431591]

>>8431304
>tfw no boomer parents that I can inherit 2 houses and holiday homes from
At least I inherited high iq, so there's less chance of me fucking up killing myself when I do kill myself.

[Anonymous No.8431610]

Doesn't matter how much inheritance you got, by your posts we already know you're a bitchass faggot that cannot deal with any sort of frustration to the point he has to blogpost his feelings on the congolese basket weaving imageboard

You're ignorant about the biggest part of success, which is the struggle and actually achieving goals you fought for tooth and nail, the cornerstone of a truly fulfilled and happy individual

Even if you had all the money in the world you would never make it, you'll never be happy and you life will always feel empty. If anything i feel sorry for you

[Anonymous No.8431620]

>>8431306
>not giving your descendants a competitive advantage in todays hypercompetitive economic climate
Top cuck m8

[Anonymous No.8431663]

>>8429740
>against inheritance
>commie
Pick both.

[Anonymous No.8431674]

>>8431515
>this argument is usually made by waster children when their parents refuse to give money to said shitstain.
Baseless ad hom assumption.

>If you feel like you have leave money to the child for it to succeed, you failed as a parent.
>If you [think thing], you [are wrong]

>you had time to educate your spawn and imbule them with good habits.
This is a form of inheritance.

>doesn't respond to argumentation
>proceed to spout direct verbal attack thinking it somehow makes a difference.
I merely suggested you take eschewing inheritance to it's logical conclusion and give up the civilization your ancestors have left you entirely. It's not my fault that you haven't spent a full 30 seconds thinking through your position.

>please name an ideology that is keen on inheritance
Literally any ideology that is not simultaneously opposed to nature (life is built on the concept of inheritance; everything that lives is a product of the cumulative advances of all its ancestors) and private property (what's mine in mine and I may dispense with it how I wish) supports inheritance. In other words if you oppose inheritance you are a communist. QED

Your ride is waiting.

[Anonymous No.8431684]

>>8431620
This

[Anonymous No.8431701]

>>8431610
this

[Anonymous No.8431708]

>>8431674
All that edge faggot. This isn't /pol

[Anonymous No.8431709]

>>8429425
Tbh it's fully dependent on the amount. I have no issue with someone inheriting a million, two or four, but there's certainly a limit. I don't know where it should be, but I get really uncomfortable with 10M+ figures and I see practically no justification for a 50M+ inheritance ever. So yeah in that regard I'm fully commie.

The problem with inheritance is that it's archaic institute dating from feudalism and there's no other way to possibly look at it. In modern day we more or less agree that we ourselves settle for whatever the price things cost, and if someone's a billionaire there's a reason: he created value for the people WORTH of a billion. Now the fucking issue is that once he dies his children have not created the same value. So it's really similar to him donating his money to a charity after his death.. expect to a very close set of people.

[Anonymous No.8431713]

>>8429425
>in a perfect society with a freely educated populace and solid social structures etc
>low general income tax
>high inheritance tax
>Everyone gets a lump sum or over time payment distributed from said tax
>new generations aren't gimped because prior ones were dumb
>every baby has an equal start
>Sum would be enough to not die and live ok, but if you want to make it you have to be useful somehow to the world
>Also encourages spending over your lifetime rather than hording wealth until death
>prevents generational concentration of wealth due to luck
>if your bloodline is good, your parents were successful or had other positive qualities, that'll be passed to you.
>Maybe some smaller monetary bonus pass down each gen for the prior getting to certain levels of success
>Success each generation based on merit not stacking mods
>something like that

This shit would only fly on a fresh start like Mars or something. The way things are set up currently are already way too fucked up.
>wealth already concentrated
>governments are mostly inept and I wouldn't even trust them to distribute this properly
>Wealthy would just move to somewhere without an inheritance tax

So yeah idk, inheritance is what it is currently. Don't see many actual ways to change things as is so it's kind of pointless to get mad about it. Just work with what you got

[Anonymous No.8431763]

>>8431708
>supporting an instution as old as human history is edgy
>hating edgelords who want to tear everything down because "fuck the system" is edgy
Fuck off, pinko.

[Anonymous No.8431771]

>>8431306
>If you feel like you have leave money to the child for it to succeed, you failed as a parent. you had time to educate your spawn and imbule them with good habits.
Agreed completely.

It may not be our objective duty as individuals, but it is objectively the duty of a society to care for and enable it's people to be as good for the society as possible.
If that means picking up slack for bad parenting, then so be it. Another kind, helpful member of the community at the end of our efforts will be reward enough.

>>8431543
>it required peace of mind and some money that I could comfortable throw at something incredibly risky. Some skill, mental fortitude as well, but not as much.
My point exactly. You knew how to handle your resources, invested them into smart ideas (even if the idea of scamming money from dumb people is somewhat objectionable, morally speaking), and you were rewarded in turn.

>One anon once said that getting rich through crypto is one step above the sewer of inheritance.
I disagree. We're investing resources into a fledgling technology that has the potential to take society in a very positive direction.
I may disagree with a society that places money as a source of power and coercion, but I don't deny that that is the reality I face, and so I plan to use what power (money) I can personally to help further a positive community for all worthwhile individuals.

[Anonymous No.8431787]

>>8429740
>Told my parents up frot that I don't need their money

I guess there wasnt too much to share then in the first place.

>>8431207
'Spoiled bratz' dont have inheritance money. People get inheritance typically at 50-60 yo

[Anonymous No.8431843]

blah blah blah blah blah i earned my money blah blah blah tl;dr

[Anonymous No.8431896]

>>8431610
oh, shut the fuck up. go ask your daddy why do you have to be so poor. oh, you don't know your daddy? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.8431905]

>>8431218
Actually, you're heading straight to a women's shelter soup kitchen to eat the ants from a discarded napkin when those establishment-succing apes of yours don't get into power, and trump blasts their asses for ANOTHER four incredible years of exposing their absolute insanity, delusion, and evil
communists are the most insanely delusional, dangerous people to have even acquired power in modern times
how it has repeatedly happened and FAILED MISERABLY, AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN, is telling of the efficacy of its kind of coercion

[Anonymous No.8431966]

>>8431620
This.

[Anonymous No.8432046]

>>8431787
>'Spoiled bratz' dont have inheritance money. People get inheritance typically at 50-60 yo
Unwarranted self-entitlement and disdain for honest labor don't magically go away with age. The sentiment is the same regardless of when the inheritance is received.

[Anonymous No.8432129]

>>8431207
>Because the vast majority of /biz/ acquired their wealth through effort and/or intelligence.
we are talking about the same board, right? the crypto board that gambled and partially won. youre not intelligent for being an early BTC adopter. you simply won the dice roll, thats all there is to it. in fact, your decision to spend a lot on crypto proves that youre the exact opposite of an intelligent individual, yet you got rewarded. blind squirrel, nut, etc etc

[Anonymous No.8432286]

>>8432129
>youre not intelligent for being an early BTC adopter. you simply won the dice roll
Wow, is this what it's like inside the mind of an actual brainlet? The only people interested in BTC when it was pennies or dollars were computer nerds that understood what blockchain tech and cryptography was actually useful for. The same thing with ETH, NEO, and possibly LINK or any other oracle service.
My point still stands. If you spend effort keeping up-to-date on new technology, have the intelligence to understand the use cases for it, and especially for crypto, have managed your resources well enough to be able to invest excess into it's development on top of that, you deserve every penny you've earned from that investment.

[Anonymous No.8432327]

>>8432286
>The only people interested in BTC when it was pennies or dollars were computer nerds that understood what blockchain tech and cryptography was actually useful for.
lul

[Anonymous No.8432350]

>>8432286
>that understood what blockchain tech and cryptography was actually useful for
please, dont make me laugh. especially considering the fact that crypto doesnt generate any tangible assets. its not an investment, its a gamble and always has been.
>from that investment
see above. please dont call your diceroll game an investment. you arent and investor. you play monopoly with high-volatility make belief money. technically speaking, youre even worse than someone who bets on sports. at least those are based on statistical probility.

i am not saying that you dont "deserve" the money. that term is worthless anyway, since it changes based on perspective. but please dont pretend that it was your intellect that made you money as an early adopter. if you seriously belive that then youre as far from being an intelligent individual as you could possibly be.

[Anonymous No.8432405]

>>8431709
>The problem with inheritance is that it's archaic institute dating from feudalism and there's no other way to possibly look at it.

Why the fuck would i push myself if there is a cap to how much my kids will inherit? Id rather spend all my cash on hookers and blow than let someone totally unrelated to me inherit my remaining net worth when i die.

[Anonymous No.8432494]

>>8432350
>crypto doesnt generate any tangible assets.
Do you even know what something like a smart contract is or does? Do you have even a basic understanding of how blockchain cryptography works by itself, let alone the potential uses for wealth distribution? I seriously doubt it judging by your posts.

>muh gambling analogy
>muh monopoly money
I didn't get a free pull at a casino and won millions, I invested hard-earned assets into a technology that I saw a huge amount of potential for use in. It's not my fault you weren't able or willing to understand why that was so at the time, and it still isn't my fault that you don't gain anything from my investments for not being smart, resourceful, or forward thinking enough to know when it's time to get some skin in the game.

[Anonymous No.8432529]

>>8429425
Are you stupid? It's jealousy. Nothing more to it than that.

[Anonymous No.8432540]

>>8431561
the dumb ones do
>high IQ 6'4 chad with high IQ boomer parents that invested in gold and I convinced to invest in bitcoin years ago
feelsgudman, still take a yearly cruise and beach vacation with them but got my own place now while Im in school with a decent paying job and loads of disposable money

[Anonymous No.8432573]

>>8432494
>let alone the potential uses for wealth distribution
do you know what an early adopter is? hint: it doesnt mean that you bought in last spring. by the time many people on this board bought into crypto, an actual market didnt exist. and expecting one to popup had no indicators in reality. it was a gamble. spending money on make belief money without any actual backing made by a guy in a basement. i dont get why youre so desperately trying to convince yourself that this was a "smart move".
>I invested
youre doing it again. but it nice that your brought up casinos, since thats basically the equivalent to what early adopters did. you spend money to buy in, and then pray that your bet is successful.
>you weren't able or willing to understand
why are you assuming that someone who calls you out for being retarded couldnt possibly hold BTC/ETH/XMR? i am just different than you are. i accept that this was a gamble and enjoy my rewards. youre too stupid to do that. instead you delude yourself into believing that youre some hotshot investor who saw the signs of time. i have nothing but pity for people like you.

[Anonymous No.8432579]

>>8431620
This.

Intelligent people who earn their wealth know this and teach it to their children. That's how rich families stay rich. People who got lucky don't understand this so their children piss away their wealth in 1-2 generations.

The whole work hard, wage-cuck-me-up by my bootstraps, protestant work ethic shit is a propaganda campaign by by the elite to ensure new young money doesn't become inter-generational and come to challenge their power.

[Anonymous No.8432613]

>>8432405
Now please re-read your sentence, forget about kids for a moment and honestly answer: shouldn't individual live his life to the fullest and blow the money on hookers or whatever the fuck he wants to anyway?

This is a wider problem related to capitalism, so I have no idea why would you or anyone, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't try and explore other options. If you love your kids that much, why not donate to them during your life? Individual is free to do whatever the fuck he wants with his money, but it seems pretty interesting that you decide to not give them jackshit during your lifetime. Doesn't that seem... pretentious?

[Anonymous No.8432650]

>>8432494
Dude you make yourself look really retarded. Anyone who's been here in 2011 is giggling right now reading
> what something like a smart contract is or does? Do you have even a basic understanding of how blockchain cryptography works by itself, let alone the potential uses for wealth distribution?
> I invested hard-earned assets into a technology that I saw a huge amount of potential for use in. It's not my fault you weren't able or willing to understand why that was so at the time
It wasn't about any of this. It was just fuck the government #YOLO. It changed a little bit with Winklevoss twins and alts like bitshares/protoshares emerging, that's it. Cryptos displacing stocks/bonds wasn't a thing for a long long time and most advocated for a low BTC price in a first place so it's more adoptable.

[Anonymous No.8432679]

>>8432613
>shouldn't individual live his life to the fullest and blow the money on hookers or whatever the fuck he wants to anyway?
Well our parents seem to enjoy spoiling us more than spending it on hookers and blow. Not everyone's parents are degenerates who only love themselves.

Dont you enjoy making your child who you love comfy and happy? Thats why im pro inheritance. Some peoplw really enjoy making their kids successful.

[Anonymous No.8432735]

>>8432573
>let alone the potential uses for wealth distribution
do you know what an early adopter is? hint: it doesnt mean that you bought in last spring. by the time many people on this board bought into Amyris, an actual market didnt exist. and expecting one to popup had no indicators in reality. it was a gamble. spending money on make belief beauty product company without any actual backing made by guys in a basement ab. i dont get why youre so desperately trying to convince yourself that this was a "smart move".
>I invested
Youre doing it again. but it nice that your brought up casinos, since thats basically the equivalent to what early adopters of Amyris stock did. you spend money to buy in, and then pray that your bet is successful.
>you weren't able or willing to understand
why are you assuming that someone who calls you out for being retarded couldnt possibly hold Amyris? i am just different than you are. i accept that this was a gamble and enjoy my rewards. youre too stupid to do that. instead you delude yourself into believing that youre some hotshot investor who saw the signs of time. i have nothing but pity for people like you.

Changed some words so that you could understand how fucking stupid you sound. Educated risk taking is the,same, be it some imaginary internet money or a startup that has no tangible revenue yet. If you as an investor see that as a good invesment because you fucking educated yourself,and understood the potential, then yes, it is an investment. A risky one yes, but it doesn't make it a dumb spin of roulette wheel.

[Anonymous No.8432742]

>>8432573
>woah teehee look at the pretty candles going up and down teehee! what do you mean the magic money machine doesn't run on fairy dust and belief? that's crazytalk xdddddd!

In your own words, "i have nothing but pity for people like you."

>>8432650
>/biz/ existed in 2011
lmao this thread

[Anonymous No.8432751]

>>8432613
Adding to my reply, i know you are having a hard time grasping this so let me use an analogy youll understand.

Sometimes my mom jokes that my dad has a mistress who he spends a lot of money on. I ask "who mom?". She says its me the eldest son. My mom says my dad spends money on me like other people spend on their mistress.

Now think of some hot dream girl you would like to take care JUST because you love her. Thats how our parents view us. Get it? We are not forcing them to do this ffs.

[Anonymous No.8432767]

>>8429425
most people I know who have a comfortable hassle free life are people that have inherited shit. Not one of them has made it themselves in fact the vast majority would be sweeping streets without a windfall and a cushy job that came via inheritance. So dont expect much sympathy from me and others like me when Ive inherited nothing and had to struggle to make it despite connected and inheritance assholes getting all the breaks.

[Anonymous No.8432780]

>>8432742

[Anonymous No.8432788]

>>8432767
>most people I know who have a comfortable hassle free life are people that have inherited shit
Have you tried googling actual facts instead of relying on your self generated anecdotes lol? But go on, live in denial.

[Anonymous No.8432790]

>>8432735
>investing into a startup which usually gives you stock/say in how the company is being ran/some form of influence to make belief money that could disappear in the blink of an eye without you having any ways to sue for damages
educated guess, by the way.

[Anonymous No.8432800]

>>8432788
you are living in a dreamworld

[Anonymous No.8432811]

>>8432800
Im living in dreamworld while youre the one saying that people with no inheritance have a comfier life? DENIAL LMAO

[Anonymous No.8432812]

>>8432780
that's a nice apu friend

[Anonymous No.8432821]

>>8432790
That stock and voting power is fucking useless and worthless like that imsginary internet coin if the company doedb't take off.

[Anonymous No.8432822]

>>8432811
im actually saying the opposite

[Anonymous No.8432847]

>>8432821
wow, what an intelligent comment. the fiat money you hold is worthless too. your government could fall apart any moment now.

[Anonymous No.8432857]

>>8432751
You're not hearing me. I'm not against rising your child, supporting him, buying him property, education or transferring wealth directly to him et cetera. But I am against and I don't understand why you would want for him to inherit something after your death (of old age, not taking accidents into account here). What you're describing is completely cool with me. However if there's an asset they currently own that means they WANT to own that asset. They can transfer that asset today in your name if they so please. But saying "you can have it when I'm dead" is fucked up from moral perspective.

[Anonymous No.8432882]

>>8432857
many people arent able to plan their deaths, anon. do you think everybody dies at the age of 90, being aware that the day of their death is close?

[Anonymous No.8432897]

1st generation starts the farm, 2nd generation builds the farm, and the 3rd generation destroys the farm. Nothing to be jelly about. We’re all that 3rd gen, even when it comes to the country.

[Anonymous No.8432900]

>>8432857
>But I am against and I don't understand why you would want for him to inherit something after your death
>But saying "you can have it when I'm dead" is fucked up from moral perspective.
What is a will? Hahahahahahahah theyre giving consent wtf. They could choose to say fuck it, and donate to charity or spend it all making their tombstone dank but they choose to have their kods inherit it.

If you really hate the concept of inheritance that much you should blame MORTALITY lol.

[Anonymous No.8432935]

Insecure losers are jealous of others' good fortune

More news at 9

[Anonymous No.8432943]

[Anonymous No.8432965]

>>8430419
The only true thing said in this thread.

[Anonymous No.8432967]

>>8432882
>not taking accidents into account here
Are you deliberately not reading?

>>8432900
That's the whole point to rethink the will. If you're willing to leave money after your death, why can't you do so TODAY? You can transfer your house, car, stocks, whatever to your child. But the cornerstone point being is that you lose control and put your trust into him.

[Anonymous No.8432989]

because people live in their houses until they die, drive their cars until they die,
go camping in their caravan until they die, watch their tv until they die,
hoard investments until they die.

the only time people will blow all their money on thai hookers is when they see their death coming like cancer or something

[Anonymous No.8433011]

>>8432967
>Are you deliberately not reading?
are you too retarded to understand that some people think that they can MAKE MORE with what they have than their children can? if i hold stocks, and i am smart enough to properly invest, then why would i hand my money to my children today if i can make them even more money over the course of the upcoming 10 years? giving to your children doesnt mean that you believe that they can do better.

also: where the fuck are you gonna live if you hand real estate to your children before you die? does the will to live equal to live a miserable live in some shitty retirement home?

[Anonymous No.8433042]

>>8432967
>That's the whole point to rethink the will. If you're willing to leave money after your death, why can't you do so TODAY?
Because you need money to live? You need the house to live on while you are alive? What is so hard to understand about this. Thats why its often the case they give the inheritance after death.

But in some cases like mine, they give some once you become and adult by their standards and you receive the rest when they die.

My parents did it to me in my early 20s while my grandparents gave their inheritance in their 50s. ALL OF US ARE STILL ALIVE BTW.

[Anonymous No.8433045]

>>8431218
Sanders is part of the 1% you moron

[Anonymous No.8433068]

>>8432965
how about giving the children a great education and upbringing, instead of raw cash.

If you supply the former, inheritance isn't necessary.

[Anonymous No.8433075]

>>8432935
So you agree inheritance is luck based?

[Anonymous No.8433081]

>>8433075
your entire life is luck based you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.8433085]

>>8430419
Inheritance is a system that lost its check and balance system over a century ago. In a pre-industrial society bad families are cut off from land and title by the crown. There is no such system to check the shell game of post-industrial webs of intangible assets. You can't strip it like you can land.

[Anonymous No.8433094]

>>8433068
>how about giving the children a great education and upbringing, instead of raw cash.
Why not both? They are spending money for your education too you know. Thats the hypocrisy with people that hate inheritance money but had their parents pay for their tuition.

Meanwhile some kid in a third world country cant afford your education. Youre a spoiled brat like us too just of a lower magnitude.

[Anonymous No.8433113]

>>8433045
You cant be a senator and not be part of the 1% because the salary is so high.

[Anonymous No.8433114]

>>8433081
with inheritance, you don't take risks for luck to manifest it's benefits. With life, it isn't the case You have to pay for a lottery ticket, which makes it much better than inheritance.

[Anonymous No.8433126]

>>8433011
>if i hold stocks, and i am smart enough to properly invest,
>>8433081
>your entire life is luck based

Do you have split personality disorder or something?

[Anonymous No.8433132]

>>8429740
>ideology
Brainlet detected, all posts from this ID ignored

[Anonymous No.8433139]

>>8433114
are you white and live in a first world country? congratulations, youve wont the lottery of life. could be a black guy living in a mudhut or a chinese rice farmer instead. how about your family? did you grow up with loving parents? could have been born to a bunch of crackheads in a trailer part instead. everything is life is luck based.
>>8433126
see above. its retarded to bitch about "being fortunate enough to have parents who hand you money", but at the same time ignore the fact that your upbringing as well as the nation your were born in werent left to chance.

[Anonymous No.8433150]

>>8429425
Because some of us weren't lucky enough to be born into such a cushy life.

[Anonymous No.8433164]

>>8429497
I'm a 6'4 chad and I don't have it any easier than you do. In fact I'd rather be shorter since my height is seriously hampering my /fit/ gains. I also hit myself in the head a lot when getting out of trams. Not to mention I cannot find decent sized clothes.

[Anonymous No.8433172]

>>8433011
>>8433042
Once again, those are not arguments and you're missing the point. It's about putting trust. You can transfer the house to him, it doesn't mean he has to kick you out, but he should have the power to do so, because it's about trust. He can own all the stocks and you can manage it for him. It puts risk on you but a much needed risk in my opinion, and as long as your family is functional it should not be an issue.
I'm also curious why are you so proactively feel insecure about it? I highly doubt that you're entitled to 10M+ inheritance (thing I'm against).

[Anonymous No.8433182]

>>8429740
Fuck off commie, you will hang first, people don't produce wealth for "society" (ie: the shitskin next door) or an "ideology", they produce wealth for their children and so the success of their genes and memes.

People hating on inheritance are niggers who resent others for not having subhuman as progenitors or commie faggot with 0 understanding of human nature.

[Anonymous No.8433200]

>>8433139
Yes, luck based benefits aren't good for anyone. One has to cut the ones that are obviously damaging to society, blatantly unfair and implementable in a non-horrific manner. Inheritance needs to go.

[Anonymous No.8433218]

>>8433172
>You can transfer the house to him, it doesn't mean he has to kick you out, but he should have the power to do so, because it's about trust.
Then whats the point of transferring it to your kids that early if they cant kick you out, hence they can't sell the property or rent it out?

The amount of cope just to be against inheriting money lmao.

[Anonymous No.8433225]

>>8433182
>hurr commie
inheritance is antithesis to efficient free markets allocating resources based on merit.

People produce wealth to create a nest for the children to grow into productive and happy members of society so that they can get the fuck out and spread the goodness.

[Anonymous No.8433238]

>>8433114
Let's take a successful businessman as an example. He might have worked hard and earned his money but he probably inherited a high IQ and good business sense. It's all just a lottery.

[Anonymous No.8433243]

>>8433225
>free market
>don't do what you want with your money
Pick one

[Anonymous No.8433254]

>>8433218
They can kick you out if they want to. They would be the full owners.

[Anonymous No.8433256]

>>8433225
>inheritance is antithesis to efficient free markets allocating resources based on merit.
>based on merit

Ahhh, the favorite phrase of commies. We all know how attempts of being based on merit turns out lol... look, on average people will NOT work their ass off if they or their offsprings wont benefit from their hard work.

There are a few exceptions of course but they are exceptions and not the norm. You can bet your ass I'd rather slack off and meet the minimum hard work quota than exert more effort only for my neighbor's kids to benefit from it. We have taxes for that anyway.

[Anonymous No.8433268]

>>8433254
>They can kick you out if they want to. They would be the full owners.
Whats your point? lol

[Anonymous No.8433288]

>>8433225
>>8433243
The moment we lose control of who gets the money we worked for during our lifetime is the moment we truly lose our freedom. Fuck of commies.

[Anonymous No.8433306]

>>8433268
My point is you take the risk of your child being a retard, drunk, junkie, or simply money hungry during your lifetime. If he decides to gamble away the house you wanted him to inherit, or the business, so be it, but you get to see it happen. If he decides to fuck you over and commit you to miserable poor life so be it. If he's a decent human being, like most of us are, you get to live your life exactly like today.

[Anonymous No.8433320]

>>8433288
>communism
>money

[Anonymous No.8433327]

>>8433256
>strawmaning
the favorite pastime of retards who can't make a coherent response to save their live

[Anonymous No.8433329]

>>8433306
>My point is you take the risk of your child being a retard, drunk, junkie, or simply money hungry during your lifetime. If he decides to gamble away the house you wanted him to inherit, or the business, so be it, but you get to see it happen
Why? Whats the purpose of this?

>If he decides to fuck you over and commit you to miserable poor life so be it. If he's a decent human being, like most of us are, you get to live your life exactly like today.
Again why the fuck should they do this? Is it just to satisfy you people with no inheritance money lol? You watch too much #justiceporn on plebbit.

[Anonymous No.8433332]

>>8433075
real life has no ekwality. Stay mad poorfag

[Anonymous No.8433353]

>>8433288
that's only true if you define freedom as not being able to provide inheritance to your children, which makes the statement self-referential. grandiose for the sake of grandiosity without content

[Anonymous No.8433368]

>I should do whatever I want with my money!
you can't hire a hitman to kill another person for a good reason. you shouldn't be able to do something only a little less socially damaging, like inheritance to squanderers.

[Anonymous No.8433370]

>>8433353
You can do as you please with your money. You seem to be ok with people with giving their money to charity but not their kids.

You reek of salt especially with this post >>8433306 what you ask has no purpose and only suggests that you want people who are better off in life to suffer.

[Anonymous No.8433373]

>>8433332
Yep.
People who need inheritance are inferior by the admission of their parents.

[Anonymous No.8433381]

>>8433368
>you can't hire a hitman to kill another person for a good reason. comparing giving money to their own kids to hiring a hitman lol. You sound delusional and bitter.

[Anonymous No.8433389]

>>8433368
>hiring a hitman is equivalent to letting your life savings being inherited by your children

We're hitting levels of false equivalence that shouldnt be even possible

[Anonymous No.8433392]

>>8433329
I have inheritance, stop projecting and learn to argue. One more comment like that, a personal attack or whatever and you automatically accept defeat.
What's not the purpose of it? What's the purpose of giving your children inheritance? Does this purpose somehow get diluted or changed if you give them money today instead of after your death?

[Anonymous No.8433394]

>>8433373
>People who need inheritance are inferior by the admission of their parents.

People dont NEED inheritance, but everyone wants it if given the option to receive it. People who say no to free money are lying. Inheritance money is the easiest free money you can get.

[Anonymous No.8433395]

>>8433368
>you can't hire a hitman to kill another person for a good reason
if i couldnt then the profession of hitman wouldnt exist.

[Anonymous No.8433404]

>>8433389
>no content in post
Your parents will have to work extra hard so you can sustain yourself after their death I see

[Anonymous No.8433406]

>>8433392
>I have inheritance, stop projecting and learn to argue.
I thought you hated inheritance money? quit larping just look at all your replies and see the contradiction.

There is a difference between projecting and being able to see that you are a salty faggot with no inheritance.

See this >>8433389

[Anonymous No.8433414]

>>8433394
>Inheritance money is the easiest free money you can get.
That's the problem.

[Anonymous No.8433417]

>>8433404
>Your parents will have to work extra hard so you can sustain yourself after their death I see
Good thing we have inheritance money then poorfag.

[Anonymous No.8433432]

>>8433395
Society does what it can to stamp shit like this out. Not like it's a choice at a job fair.

[Anonymous No.8433433]

>>8433164
>>8429497
>>8429425

The point is that people love blaming their lack of success on something that is out of their control, so they don't have to take responsibility

[Anonymous No.8433434]

>>8433414
>Inheritance money is the easiest free money hence its a problem

So you're a sadist then? You want to work hard just for the sake of working hard. Someone who has inheritance money will likely never say that.

Stop living in denial, anyone will take free easy money given the chance.

[Anonymous No.8433439]

>>8433414
>>8433434
i meant a masochist to yourself and a sadist to people who are well-off

[Anonymous No.8433453]

where would peoples property go? who decides this?

[Anonymous No.8433470]

>>8433434
That undermines the goal of a meritocratic society. where a persons worth reflects what the person is.

People like free things, doesn't mean that stealing stuff off the shelves of stores should't be discouraged. If given a stolen TV, everyone would be happy, but squashing that on society-scale is still desirable.

Prisoners dilemma of Game theory fame.

[Anonymous No.8433478]

>>8433453
Where do you think these no-inheritance fags want the money to go? Its either share it with them or no one enjoys the money. Any scenario where the kids of the one who actually had the money wont receive it would do it for them.

[Anonymous No.8433479]

>>8433225
>inheritance is antithesis to efficient free markets allocating resources based on merit.
There is no such thing as "merit", it's a stupid meme invented by the bourgeoisie after the fall of the trifunctional model of society (warrior-religious-merchants) during the XVIIth and XVIIIth century to justify their rise to power and the elimination of the church and the aristocracy ("WE are the ones producing and importing goods so WE deserve political power).
It relies on another unnatural meme of the time that became the motto of the left: "equality".
In reality both don't exist, they are comfortable lies dissimulating the terrible gap of intelligence, growth environnement, character and attractiveness separating individual humans and which defines success and that were common knowledge through most of history.
What brainlet perceive as "merit" is just the natural expression of these traits.

>People produce wealth to create a nest for the children to grow into productive and happy members of society so that they can get the fuck out and spread the goodness.

"Happiness" top kek, where did you read this dogshit? Adam Smith?
The free-market is darwinian as fuck, it's not about being a "happy member", it's about ascending or keeping your place in the social hierarchy through material wealth, in short it's about dominance, a soft dominance but still a form of dominance.
This board became bluepilled as fuck since redditors invaded.

[Anonymous No.8433503]

>>8431489
/Thread, right here

[Anonymous No.8433505]

>>8433470
>That undermines the goal of a meritocratic society. where a persons worth reflects what the person is.

You're free to work hard like my ancestors dummy. Inheritance money doesnt come from nothing, someone down in the family tree had to earn it. Its cumulative and is the perfect representation of a family's hard work throughout decades or centuries.

If you start now instead of bitching maybe just maybe your future offsprings can actually inherit something and not be in your position.

[Anonymous No.8433512]

>>8433406
Alright I'm out. Congrats on screaming the loudest, you're a treat at the parties and with girls. I stated that I dislike inheritance over $10M USD and I hate inheritance over $50M USD. Personally I have a little less than $1M in inheritance waiting for me, out of which 70% in property and 30% in other assets. You demonstrated no coherent thought whatsoever during the conversation. Being entitled to something does not mean that you have to agree with something, you fucking moron. Abolition of slavery, establishment of woman rights all happened because of white men. You're a disgrace for right-wing who is not able to participate in discussion.
In short, go fuck yourself and your mother, whitetrash.

[Anonymous No.8433521]

>>8433479
>"Happiness" top kek, where did you read this dogshit? Adam Smith?
hahahahaahahahahahahahaah

[Anonymous No.8433528]

>>8429425
Yes, that wealth should be redistributed.

[Anonymous No.8433529]

>>8433470
>People like free things
not sure why youd think that inheritence is free. youve subconciously worked for it as a son, and maybe put up with more than you would have, if there was nothing to inehrit.

[Anonymous No.8433541]

>>8433512
>Being entitled to something does not mean that you have to agree with something, you fucking moron.
Then donate it to charity you fucking hypocrite, if you are not larping that is. Its very unlikely someone with inheritance money hates inheritance. This is an anonymous board and I'm only playing with probabilities.

Its more likely that you are a salty anon with no inheritance than someone who has inheritance money that somehow legitimately hates the concept of inheritance. You have to admit this is true.

[Anonymous No.8433556]

>>8433434
>You want to work hard just for the sake of working hard.
>Stop living in denial, anyone will take free easy money given the chance.
Believe it or not, some people have morals. And the inheritance isn't "free". It comes at the cost of keeping useful resources out of the society that you live in.

[Anonymous No.8433571]

>>8433556
>Believe it or not, some people have morals. And the inheritance isn't "free". It comes at the cost of keeping useful resources out of the society that you live in.

So when are you planning on donating your "inheritance" faggot?

[Anonymous No.8433573]

>>8433556
>It comes at the cost of keeping useful resources out of the society that you live in.
consumerism in its purest form. just BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY

[Anonymous No.8433581]

>>8433512
>being this salty on an anonymous imageboard

stay mad faggot

[Anonymous No.8433599]

>>8433581
only someone with no inheritance money would be that salty in an inheritance general thread lol

[webshops that accept crypto No.8433607]

>>8433556
"You're such a good boy"

Grow up and stop rationalizing communism

[Anonymous No.8433654]

>>8433478
I have no idea how a realistic system would work but yes I assume in their minds it goes directly to them and they can immediately go out and spend it all on a lambo to attract women

[Anonymous No.8433672]

>>8433571
>donating your "inheritance"
I don't have one, nor would I "donate" it. I do donate my time and efforts towards positive community efforts, as I don't yet have enough money to make an impact financially yet.

>>8433573
You do realize there's a myriad of ways to spend money and resources beside simply acquiring consumable luxuries, right?

>>8433607
I'm not rationalizing communism? Have you even read Marx? I don't agree with the guy either, but shit son, you could at least educate yourself.

[Anonymous No.8433680]

>>8433654
>I have no idea how a realistic system would work but yes I assume in their minds it goes directly to them and they can immediately go out and spend it all on a lambo to attract women

They seem to think kids receiving money from their parents leads to the worst kind of entitlement. You know whats worst? Someone who received "free" money from someone who they are not related to.

Can you imagine if some brat you are not related to receives your net worth upon your death? That kid would spend it much faster than your spoiled kin would.

[Anonymous No.8433689]

>>8433672
>I don't have one, nor would I "donate" it. I do donate my time and efforts towards positive community efforts, as I don't yet have enough money to make an impact financially yet.

No wonder you're asking people who have inheritance money to donate theirs. Its easy to ask of people with inheritance money if you dont have one.

[Anonymous No.8433696]

>>8433689
>you're asking people who have inheritance money to donate theirs.
Where in any of my posts have I asked anyone to give money away.

[Anonymous No.8433697]

>>8433680
>*whats worse lol
sorry im out of this thread, my moms asking me to drive to my little brother

[webshops that accept crypto No.8433720]

>>8433672
You literally said that inheriting things is keeping useful resources from society.
Where do you draw the line? Being filthy rich is also keeping resources away from society.

[Anonymous No.8433722]

>>8433680
No one would be receiving mine, I would merely live beyond my means my entire life and constantly buy retarded faggot ass shit like matching father and son lambos, brat unrelated would be welcome to the mountain of debt I accumulated

[Anonymous No.8433724]

>>8429425
Yes, they are commies, and what they don't understand is that money was earned by their parents, who then chose to pass it on to heirs. It's the living will of the person who actually created that value; it doesn't belong to "society".

[Anonymous No.8433747]

>>8432286
fair point, being an avant-gardist has its upsides

[Anonymous No.8433751]

>>8433528
You don't get to redistribute what I earned, filth.

[Anonymous No.8433780]

>>8433697
Oh, you're a momma's boy lol. No wonder you're defending your freeride to the death, because you realize you'd die without it.

>>8433720
Except most people that are "filthy rich" are so because they have a large amount of responsibility in the form of either managing their business, resources, or investments. Meaning they're actively using that wealth for the development of further capital, i.e. not outside of society and locked in an inheritance fund somewhere.

[Anonymous No.8433932]

>>8429740

Wait so what exactly are you saying? Say your parents die and have 1 million in assets they left behind. Wouldn't you rather they left a will saying that you'd inherit it? Cuz otherwise that shit just gets donated to good will (In Canada atleast).

[Anonymous No.8433997]

>>8432350
>at least those are based on statistical probility.

Fuck, even for /biz/ you're a retard.

[Anonymous No.8434035]

>>8432650

Newfag detected. Of COURSE it was about that other shit too. Have you even fucking read Satoshis whitepaper?

And /biz/ wasn't even around then faggot.

[Anonymous No.8434045]

>>8433997
Read some of the other posts he's made in this thread too lol.
Dude's a certified brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8434054]

MY DADDY SAID I CAN INHERIT ANYTHING I WANT AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT I'LL HAVE HIM TEAR DOWN THIS PATHETIC LITTLE MONGOLIAN BASKET WEAVING FORUM SO SUCK ON THAT

[Anonymous No.8434068]

>>8429425
>Are you faggots commies or something?

Nope. But let's put it this way - given a choice between me eating and you breathing, I'm not going hungry. IDGAF how your family got the money (probably some fucking scam anyway) - it's the same bullshit argument used to justify feudalism.

Chop, chop, chop!

[Anonymous No.8434074]

>>8429425
because they are poor and will receive nothing of inheritance go be communists cucks somewhere else biztards

[Anonymous No.8434095]

>>8434054
there is literally nothing wrong with this
the people who shit on rich kids buying supreme are the someone spending their money on useless iphones and 399 dollar chairs

[Anonymous No.8434153]

>>8433997
sport betting was the safer choice back then. is had an established market, rates were based on recent performance of the respective athletes/teams, payout was guarateed and your earnings didnt suddenly vanish etc. early crypto adopters had no legal backing. there was no market or way to sue for damages once the currency suddenly turned into fairy dust. it was, at that point, nothing but gambling. from strictly speaking financial and geopolitical standpoint, bitcoin holds no actual value. its technology behind it that does, hence why anyone with a functional brain would have predicted btc to actually be worth anything by now. the market should have shifted towards a more technologically advanced currency ages ago.

[Anonymous No.8434202]

>>8429813
my dad was both a millionaire and an alchoholic fuckup. he died last year because of liver problems.

[Anonymous No.8434213]

>>8429497
this
also
>>8429425
>tfw waiting for grandparents to die so I can cash in and buy more shitcoins

[Anonymous No.8434254]

>>8434153
>it was, at that point, nothing but gambling
>anyone with a functional brain would have predicted btc to actually be worth anything by now. the market should have shifted towards a more technologically advanced currency ages ago
How is it that you're able to put these two statements into the same paragraph yet not realize the hypocrisy of your claims?
Face the truth: you just weren't smart, savvy, or involved enough in technology to understand why it was an almost risk free investment.

[Anonymous No.8434332]

>>8434254
hey, if you want to think of yourself as an intelligent trader/investor then be my guest. just dont be surprised about the fact that youll be flipping burgers as soon as most of the market stops being as volatile as it currently is.

[Anonymous No.8434371]

1) People are free to do whatever they want with their money, this includes giving it to the kids or burning it with a gas lighter.
2) Life itself is pure misery so if someone can be given easy mode they deserve it. Anyone preaching how a human is supposed to go through pain and hard work can go fuck themselves.

[Anonymous No.8434380]

>>8434371
people can't pay for a hitman with money. they definitely can't do whatever they want with it

[Anonymous No.8434408]

>>8431261
i feel like as long as you go to public universities you should be able to get enough financial aid that youll be fine if your poor. hell i got enough to cover all my tuition plus cover a lot of my living expenses seeing as how i lived cheaply.

[Anonymous No.8434411]

>>8434380
I cannot have a binding (written or spoken) contract with someone for assassination service but if someone expresses their hatred and murderous intent for a person I can still "donate" him.

[Anonymous No.8434423]

>>8434380
>people can't pay for a hitman with money
what the hell are you on about?

[Anonymous No.8434473]

>>8431306
there is a difference between spoiled and privileged. whether or not your child becomes spoiled isnt even entirely up to the parents, sometimes people just end up shitheads. most parents want their children to have an enjoyable life which includes being successful without necessarily having to struggle, most wealthy families achieve this to some degree their kids take the reigns of the family empire learning how to run or manage the families assets whether those be business, property, or other investments, etc. even the more upper middle class tend to do the same, notice how many dentists and medical doctors children end up following in their footsteps. someone who inherited 5 million and turns it into 50 million is by all means a successful person but of course we are all more in awe of someone who starts with 0 and makes 1 million, rightfully so its much harder.

[Anonymous No.8434483]

>>8434332
>just dont be surprised about the fact that youll be flipping burgers as soon as most of the market stops being as volatile as it currently is.

>an educated land-owning individual wealthy off of smart longterm investments
>"you'll be the one flipping burgers faggot because you dared to be a meanie pants and tell me the hard truth over the internet! someday you'll regret this :^)"

This is next-level delusion.
Don't worry though, maybe your kids can go to a good public school I've helped fund and learn to not make the same mistakes you did.

[Anonymous No.8434489]

>>8434411
True. Made a shorthand from what you said.
I can't make a legally binding assignment to a person that would kill another person as a civilian.

You can't do everything you want with your money.

[Anonymous No.8434493]

>>8429425
as long as the inheritance doesn't come from war profiteering, slavery and bad practices (like the rothschild's money pile), i has no problem with it. if possible, i think there should be no inheritance or all humans should receive a certain amount at birth, as part of a human inheritance. if we are going to have a meritocracy, then it needs to be a real one. no privilege from past exploitation of other people's labor or war profiteering from manufactured wars (those kinds of ill gotten riches should go back to the money pile of humanity and redistributed for the greater justice of all). fuck the elites and their pawns.

[Anonymous No.8434504]

>>8431610
honestly i dont believe you have to be successful to be happy many who are successful are bitter, sad, or angry people even. i honestly feel happiness is like an innate quality, money can help but look how many rich people are still suicidal. unfortunately i think some of us are just doomed to hate life

[Anonymous No.8434526]

>>8434489
Right, you can't use your money for criminal activities but other than that you can do anything.

What's your point? Are you for more heavy regulation with regards what people can do with their money?

[Anonymous No.8434571]

>>8434526
The guy was making an argument from that axiom. It follows that inheritance can also be under scrutiny. I think it should, but I've written about it above.

[Anonymous No.8434635]

>>8434571
>I think it should
No, it shouldn't. A few jealous people on Instagram doesn't count as serious negative consequences for society at large.

[Anonymous No.8434716]

>>8434635
>A few jealous people on Instagram doesn't count as serious negative consequences for society at large.
How about a few elite families that engage in nepotism, keeping only their friends and family in positions of power for thousands of years, creating legal measures to keep sucking more and more resources from the middle class and the poor, eventually achieving the status of godhood among men. Families that made their riches through war profiteering and slavery should not be allowed to pass those riches to their bloodlines. This would discourage people from engaging in economic practices which go against universal law. It is the only way to prevent the formation of a godlike elite class in society. Within every society, family inheritance always allows the most evil people to become an unstoppable elite class. This is the root of humanity's problems. We should, instead, give every human an inheritance of fixed value (enough to kickstart their early lives). There are trillionaire families out there, which through deceit, manipulation and infiltration of governments and banking systems, will keep collecting "their cut" of everything we produce. Who gives them this right? The fact that they were born with a certain surname and within a certain bloodline? Fuck that. No man should have that much power given to him simply by the circumstances of his birth. This outdated system of inheritance is a threat to human society and the planet itself. Elitism and nepotism must be stopped.

[Anonymous No.8434974]

>>8434716
You just described why commies hate capitalism dummy. I knew you fags were commie scums.

[Anonymous No.8435005]

>>8434716
Make a compelling case to upend monarchy.

[Anonymous No.8435201]

>>8429425
4chan users are poor and hate anyone with money, and /biz/ is the only board where people don't lash out at rich anon posters assuming they actually made their money themselves. people getting big inheritances are next level normies, generally.

[Anonymous No.8436367]

>>8434716
https://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2014/10/03/there-are-more-self-made-billionaires-in-the-forbes-400-than-ever-before/#3b7d9ccd3369

Your conspiracy theory doesn't hold up

[Anonymous No.8436432]

Inheritance tax should be 100%.

If you haven't earned your money you don't deserve it.