Why Chainlink

[Anonymous No.8210318]

Ok /biz/, I've been here for 8 months now, this is the only place where link is talked about. No other place on the internet or planet earth even talks about this.

I realize /biz/ is home to the worlds biggest autists and I've narrowed it down to two options

1. The Autists know something that us semi-normies don't, similar to the people who had bitcoin in 2009 and we all looked at them as conspiracy theory basement dwellers, and then we watched them cry as their prediction came true.

2. Chainlink funneled its strategy into using /biz/ as it's marketing flagship as it's cost effective and the Link threads are just made by the same 10/20 shillers and then the converted shilees.

Why is it, tell me!!

[Anonymous No.8210373]

>>8210318
Option 1

[Anonymous No.8210431]

I shill LINK constantly how do I get paid?

Do you really think that works? Because they suck balls. No one knows about LINK outside biz so the strategy failed

[Anonymous No.8210447]

Don’t fall for this scam OP

[Anonymous No.8210471]

>>8210318
Haha dude can you read? Why not go take a look at whitepaper and then think about potential markets. The thing is most people think small. They like nano and Litecoin but the truth is that shit won't change the world. Ask yourself what projects will change the world anon and you'll know where to place your bets. Good luck in life.

[Anonymous No.8210474]

>>8210318
Buy chainlink sir, $1000 eoy. Repeating digits confirm sir.

[Anonymous No.8210486]

>>8210318

[Anonymous No.8210493]

You should probably let it sink in that it is a meme based on posts with trips and copypasta.

[Anonymous No.8210510]

>>8210318

DYOR

[Anonymous No.8210525]

>>8210318
Read #2 aloud and think about how ridiculous it sounds.

[Anonymous No.8210545]

>>8210471
Honestly I tried so hard and the only think I see is with swift, basically make or break if swift actually use it or not. i really dont understand the whole oracles thing, why do you need it and dont alot of cryptos already have this built in? and lets say it is an important peice of tech, how does that increase the value of link as a currency?

[Anonymous No.8210569]

>>8210545
Just buy it and let the smart people worry about the details, sweetie.

[Anonymous No.8210570]

>>8210545
Sounds like you know what you’re doing. Don’t buy

[Anonymous No.8210573]

>>8210545
Holy shit how uninformed can one person be?

[Anonymous No.8210603]

They are talking about LINK https://www.coindesk.com/swift-announces-successful-proof-of-concept-trial-for-dlt-platform/

[Anonymous No.8210665]

The greatest trick biz ever pulled was convincing the world that link was a meme.

I’ve been fudding since day one and hold 50k since ICO and right after. That said i should’ve swing traded jan better but such is life

[Anonymous No.8210672]

>>8210318
>this is the only place where link is talked about. No other place on the internet or planet earth even talks about this
dumbest fud ive ever heard

[Anonymous No.8210694]

>>8210318
Option 2 doesn't even make sense. They don't give shits about normal buyers. And crypto is the easiest thing to market all you need to do is drop vague hints that something might happen soon and your token pumps. /biz/ is also way to fringe to market to, better off making twitter posts.

[Anonymous No.8210709]

Link marine here. I actively FUD and downvote link threads on Reddit and anywhere else I see Chainlink, so if marketing via biz was the tactic, real bad move there. Biz gets to have this one, and I for one am not letting anyone else in on it until it's too late for them to make it

[Anonymous No.8210762]

>>8210318
because there are a lot of bagholders here, look at the long time price charts

[Anonymous No.8210775]

>>8210709
kek am i wrong for waiting for the floor before buying in?

all the fud against chainlink convinced me to take a look at it. now im all in, atleast if my brainlet understood what its purpose is

[Anonymous No.8210828]

>>8210762
You're fucking retarded...the highest it has been was a little over 1.30....it's sitting at 50 cents...

You know how many shitcoins out there are 90% down from their all time high?

FUD more dumb ass brainlet

[Anonymous No.8210841]

3. old biz was sickened by the onslaught of newfags with the BTC pump in november and devised a plan to fuck them all while they cashed out millions from ETH and ANS

[Anonymous No.8210880]

Ok Bizrealis, I'm starting to like it, basically takes loads of lawyers and middlemen out. and I get it, you talk about it here because you want to accumulate but not necessarily shill it.

Now the main thing stopping me from buying, is the token. Why does it need a token? who buys the token. Lets say I'm swift, why cant I just use the platform for it's use, do I have to pay in link to use it? Why would link go up? It sounds the same as ripple, the banks use the tech, use their own currency and then the currency is just a meme token used for funding

[Anonymous No.8210905]

>>8210828
you sound emotionally attached, you ok?

anyways OP, it's because chainlink promised the world back in the day and /biz/ fell for it. then they didn't deliver anything and it turns out everyone other blockchain group is solving oracle problems better than that random russian guy so the price has gone to shit

[Anonymous No.8210919]

>>8210603
By not mentioning it? How is that work?

[Anonymous No.8210926]

Folks discuss link on link forums on reddit, telegram etc.

The problem is that most normies in crypto only discuss price and care only about news related to price. There are coins on reddit that are shilled that are literal scams. Walton chain is an obvious example. Sergey does not give two shits about the price of link. He cares about his product. He is not going to make money by selling his link. He will make money by people paying him to make smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.8210945]

>>8210905
He's not even russian. You literally have no clue what you're talking about lmao.

[Anonymous No.8210966]

>>8210545

Trustless access to off-chain data is the only thing holding back Blockchain & smart contracts from completely transforming the way business is conducted in the Information Age.

LINK is the solution to that problem, and it has few, if any legitimate competitors.

[Anonymous No.8210974]

>>8210926
This....spot on man, i've seen it many times with other invesments. Penny stocks too. Companies that try and hype their product don't have shit really.

The ones that go silent in the night without anyone taking notice are the ones you need to look for. Those are the goldmines waiting to explode

[Anonymous No.8211030]

>>8210545

chainlink's partnership with zeppelin_os is a bigger deal than their potential partnership with swift in many ways tbqf

[Anonymous No.8211036]

>>8210966
Yes I see it has a great use case, but that is the tech, not the currency. If I was swift I would love them. But why would I ever buy link as a currency. It seems like it would be better structured as a business with paying customers and dividends. Who exactly buys link? Is there an access fee to the platform or something?

[Anonymous No.8211037]

>>8210905
>Coin has not increased in price
> Thus the tech behind it must be useless, trash, vaporware.

Is that how your brain works?

[Anonymous No.8211058]

>>8210318
ChainLink does no marketing.

Hopefully that narrows down the answer.

[Anonymous No.8211072]

It's a pump and dump and the discord groups try their best to appeal the lowest common denominator. Retards who think meme magic is a thing and retards who fall for Hiveminds and think Hiveminds on 4chan aren't retarded as fuck.

[Anonymous No.8211108]

>>8211037
>buy duh json parser coin XDD
that's you

[Anonymous No.8211127]

>>8211036
i think you are rewarded with link tokens, if you hold your part of the contract and vice versa when you dont, though i'll have to do more research on that.

[Anonymous No.8211246]

> It sounds the same as ripple
> is just a meme token used for funding
> it solves the same problems Hyperledger and Corda solve just without the support of financial institutions

[Anonymous No.8211272]

>>8211036

Since it’s a decentralized oracle network, you need a system in place to be able to incentivize node operators. If I have a dApp running on ethereum, I can either go with a centralized oracle system to retrieve off-chain data or I can go with something decentralized. At that point, why would I build a decentralized app only to introduce a centralized component into the mix? The token is what allows any decentralized project to stay decentralized end-to-end when gathering off-chain data.

[Anonymous No.8211290]

Ok I trawled the whitepaper for it:

The ChainLink network utilizes the LINK token** to pay ChainLink Node operators
for the retrieval of data from off-chain data feeds, formatting of data into blockchain
readable formats, off-chain computation, and uptime guarantees they provide as operators.
In order for a smart contract on networks like Ethereum to use a ChainLink
node, they will need to pay their chosen ChainLink Node Operator using LINK tokens,
with prices being set by the node operator based on demand for the off-chain resource
their ChainLink provides, and the supply of other similar resources. The LINK token
is an ERC20 token, with the additional ERC223 “transfer and call” functionality
of transfer(address,uint256,bytes), allowing tokens to be received and processed by
contracts within a single transaction.


Makes sense, ok so when will it be used, Is there any timeframe? roadmap etc?

[Anonymous No.8211309]

pretty funny how far one little meme will go

[Anonymous No.8211325]

Option 3: people really want the next 1000x coin and latched on this one.

[Anonymous No.8211338]

>>8210545
>i really dont understand the whole oracles thing
here is your problem

[Anonymous No.8211354]

Its a meme OP. Notice how blockfolio threads never have anyone with more than 5k worth holding LINK. Its a meme that only poorfags from /biz/ fell for.

[Anonymous No.8211526]

>>8211036
Literally every transaction involving data requests to the ChainLink network will require the LINK token. There is no using the ChainLink network without using the LINK token. This does not mean the terms of the smart contracts in question can't trigger a payment in any currency (fiat or crypto) they choose - the actual request for data to the CL network will be paid in LINK.

>So why did they make the token at all? >Cynical money grab?

Imagine if they didn't. For the decentralised oracle network to be a success, they need a lot of unique node operators. Without this it's just another centralised network, with the corresponding security/reliability weaknesses. I'm talking the kind of numbers they're actually working with, and then some (Sergey mentioned close to 20k individuals had expressed intent to run a node in his eoy blog post) .

How do you bring about that amount of engagement with your network? You can't hire or manage 19k nodes by yourself... you need to legitimately engage a massive community of people. You do that with a token sale, and by distributing those tokens far and wide. Then you have a bunch of LINK holders ready to run nodes, incentivised to do so by the promise of earning more LINK in return for their services. What's going to make ChainLink valuable is network effect. Nothing else matters. If this becomes the de facto network to connect smart contracts to the real world then its game over. The network will become entrenched in the sense that it just won't make sense to compete with it, only to join it. Like Amazon. What other online book shops are there? Most smaller online marketplaces have become assimilated by and now trade on Amazon, rather than compete with it. The LINK token is what ultimately provides access to this network. Do you see its value yet?

[Anonymous No.8211563]

>>8210603
>https://www.coindesk.com/swift-announces-successful-proof-of-concept-trial-for-dlt-platform/
That has literally nothing to do with chainlink. If you don't see API there is no chainlink

[Anonymous No.8211579]

>>8210318
Memes dominate reality in this timeline. So it doesn’t matter if it works or not , it will be memed into a working state

[Anonymous No.8211605]

Unironically have thousands of Link, and money I couldn't care if is lost.

I'll hold my Linkies to $0, or see it go to $1000

[Anonymous No.8211644]

read the whitepaper
listen to sergey at sibos
listen to sergey at the last conference.
if you don't understand why chainlink is revolutionary, i don't know what to tell you.

[Anonymous No.8211722]

>>8210974
Same with FUN ICX and XRP which is why Im in em

[Anonymous No.8211729]

LINK hype rides on a big assumption - that companies want to use smart contracts but also need data to come through a decentralized network instead of using an already working product that does the same, just isn't decentralized.

[Anonymous No.8211739]

>>8211526
Why would banks trust a bunch of autists vs a centralized source like IBM? This seems like introducing decentralization just for the sake of decentralization.

[Anonymous No.8211738]

>>8210545
>i really dont understand the whole oracles thing, why do you need it and dont alot of cryptos already have this built in?
brainlet alert.

[Anonymous No.8211742]

>>8211290
You should check this out:
https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/677

Network is currently being tested in alpha with github regularly updated and community giving feedback. This should pave the way for mainnet later this year, although no promise of when to expect it. Once mainnet is live, people will be operating nodes and staking link

[Anonymous No.8211767]

>>8211354
Yea, interesting point actually. I haven't noticed any real portfolios (Plus 50K) with noteworthy amounts of link. Seems to be an entirely poor mans game at this point.
Tell me biz, why are the rich ones not buying?

[Anonymous No.8211797]

>>8211605
Any decent link marine is immunised against fud

[Anonymous No.8211839]

>>8211767

Half of /biz blockfolio posts are LARPs anyway. Take a look at Link’s rich list on etherscan.

t. Over 100k link holder.

[Anonymous No.8211883]

>>8210545
dude I hope you don't buy, because first of all I'd hate to see some clueless faggot accidentally rich and second you would sell at 2-3$ anyway

[Anonymous No.8211890]

If LINK hits 1000, those guys holding over 100k LINK would be worth 9 figures...I highly doubt this will happen

[Anonymous No.8211902]

>>8211739
That's the whole point of all of this. There is no trust.

[Anonymous No.8211909]

>>8211890
And you literally can't sell that many link for that price.

[Anonymous No.8211936]

>>8211767
More a case of the rich not being tacky enough to need to share their portfolios ;)

[Anonymous No.8211943]

>>8211890
People will sell off at $10/20/30 etc
But yes 1k is quite the stretch
But i guess link has a good $50-100 per token in it
Thats more than enough for most ico holders

[Anonymous No.8211960]

>>8211729
kek this

[P@rick B8man No.8211967]

>>8211909
>literally

[Anonymous No.8211971]

>>8210966
Yeah, so how does that technology translate into money for the holders of the coin?
Say company X says "we will use this technology, and we will pay Link Inc. 1 mill for it". Great. How do you guys get any of that?
Have any of you even considered that?

[Anonymous No.8212036]

>>8211971
>>8210813

[Anonymous No.8212039]

>>8210318
Here's the actual reason.

There used to be a legendary anime poster known as anime-chan, or "Dunois"

She shilled /biz/ a shit of shit coins such as odn, mbrs, dnt that all ended up being massive pump and dumps. She shilled chainlink and practically everyone on the board got a piece of it, either through ICO or during the first week on etherdelta. Then it got added to binance and it promptly went 5x.

Everyone on this board was together for a 5x moon mission. None of the shit about muh sibos or oracles has anything to do with it. Now a large portion of the early holders have stockholm syndrome and are just obsessed with this coin for some reason.

[Anonymous No.8212042]

>>8211971
GTFO you fucking retard, you are such a fucking brainlet, your fucking pretentious entitiled attidtude gives me cancer, you don't know shit and want to be spoonfed,
GTFO of my board

[Anonymous No.8212050]

>>8211971

Supply and demand. If non-link holders want to buy link to run a node but most link holders have their tokens locked up in running profitable nodes, what do you think will happen to the price of the coin?

[Anonymous No.8212083]

>>8210318
penny stock pump and dump.

[Anonymous No.8212089]

>>8211971

really? Are you a sub saharan nigger?

Obviously they can't just pay "link" 1 million USD. They would have to buy link tokens and pay them to the nodes the want to use.

Holy Shit kill yourself if you aren't baiting/fudding

[Anonymous No.8212094]

>>8211290
Nah, that still misses the point of what you were asking - I thought.
What you point out is that node operators will get paid, etc. But how does that translate into profit for holders of existing tokens?

[Anonymous No.8212131]

>>8212094
NOBODY FUCKING TELL HIM
THIS IS AN ORDER FROM THE GENERAL
fuck this brainlet
NO ONE SPOONFEED HIM

[Anonymous No.8212144]

>>8212050
>If non-link holders want to buy link to run a node but most link holders have their tokens locked up in running profitable nodes
Then they don't buy it?

[Anonymous No.8212147]

>>8212131
This.

[Anonymous No.8212152]

>>8212036
Nice larp lol

[Anonymous No.8212167]

>>8212089
Why can't people just pay fiat to access the network?

[Anonymous No.8212188]

>>8210905
He's not wrong. All my shitcoins are down 90% from ATH.

[Anonymous No.8212196]

>>8212050
I see. So you're saying any potential user of a node would need to buy Link tokens to pay the node owner.
Thank you.

[Anonymous No.8212201]

Chainlink addresses a real problem but do they actually have a solution. How can you make oracles trust less. The answer is you cannot. Especially if the community is controlling the info that goes in to the Oracle you still need to trust the community and the community cannot be tested. Example pump and dump groups. People are able to get together in huge numbers to fuck shit up so how would these oracles be trustless?

[Anonymous No.8212207]

>>8211722
You're missing Linda and Obsidian. Easy money!

[Anonymous No.8212213]

>>8212094
"How much LINK is required to be a node operator?

No LINK is required in order to be a node operator. However, holding LINK on your node (commonly referred to as staking) helps with ranking your node against others. Your node will also need some LINK in order to bid on smart contracts with the penalty amount. If the node is not selected to perform the job, or the node successfully completes the job, then it can retrieve that paid penalty amount."

https://guides.oraclefinder.com/node-faq

[Anonymous No.8212220]

>>8212042
>your fucking pretentious entitiled attidtude gives me cancer
How so, asshole? Asking a question is 'pretentious'? I guess it might piss you off if it exposed that you really didn't know the answer. Is that it?
No problem. Someone else answered me.

[Anonymous No.8212247]

>>8210665
Láttam a Kaiser Sözét!
Favorite movie, man
You sir, just made my day

[Anonymous No.8212253]

>>8212094
We'll tell you if you put a .357 round through that thick fucking skull of yours.

[Anonymous No.8212256]

>>8212213
So the ones holding a small amount of LINK shouldn't bother operating a node?

[Anonymous No.8212270]

>>8212144
>people just won’t buy it.

No, that’s not what happens when you reduce the circulating supply of something people want.

[Anonymous No.8212273]

peace my children, for we are all in this together.

[Anonymous No.8212283]

>>8212201
This

[Anonymous No.8212289]

>>8210880
For real, do your own research.

[Anonymous No.8212302]

>>8212220
yes you are a fucking entitiled pretentious fuck
>hurrr they won't need the token
>durrr they will just pay with fiat/sea shells/zimbabwe dollars
>hurrr they will buy out the company he he

JUST FUCK OFF

he actually didn't answer you shit but that's better than nothing. I know more about the project and its tokens economics than you ever will. The thing is I don't need pretentious fucks like you to hold this coin. If you had asked politely that would've been a different story. I would happily lay down the economics and price driving facotrs in details, but that's not the case.
DON'T BUY

[Anonymous No.8212342]

>>8212050
What do you mean by 'tokens locked up in running profitable nodes' ?
I was starting think I saw the deal here, but now I'm not so sure. I was thinking the value lay in people needing to buy Link in order to pay for the execution of smart contracts on the nodes. Then the node owners would, I guess sell those for cash - or whatever they needed - and the cycle would begin again. No?

[Anonymous No.8212379]

>>8212213
Thanks!

[Anonymous No.8212397]

>>8212253
Fuck you, asshole.

[Anonymous No.8212414]

>>8212342
You lock the prize of the token so you dont lose the money if the value goes to zero. This is the singularity

[Anonymous No.8212434]

>>8211739
no, it's decentralization for a very specific reason. you're too stupid to understand though.

[Anonymous No.8212446]

>>8212302
I didn't say any of your green text, and actually I did ask politely. Anyway, like i said, others have answered the questions that you couldn't

Thanks!

[Anonymous No.8212449]

>>8211729
I believe the assumption is that ChainLink will provide this service at a fraction of the cost at which it is currently offered

[Anonymous No.8212454]

>>8210318
option one you fucking norman sack of regular sweat.

[Anonymous No.8212480]

I did a lot of research since I first created this post, great project and maybe one of the real use cases that people talk about how blockchain will change the world cutting out expensive lawyeres, appraisers etc.

Also very impressed that people on here are thinking very long term 1-3 years. I thought we were all just chasing the next pump here. Not going to buy any right now, but once it gets closer to the real world use I will be buying some. For now ill stick to buying hype coins and flipping them.
Peace

[Anonymous No.8212542]

>>8212480
Is 1-3 years considered long term in crypto?

[Anonymous No.8212584]

>>8212480
Google: morgan stanley auto executing smart contracts
Don’t wait too long

[Anonymous No.8212586]

>>8212542
absolutely

[Anonymous No.8212621]

>>8212342
It has to do with reputation and collateral.

Read the whitepaper you fucking beggar.

[Anonymous No.8212631]

>>8212480
What other projects do you think are good for long term?

[Anonymous No.8212653]

Any opinions on THETA? Never see it shilled here.

[Anonymous No.8212663]

>>8211767
Maybe future billionaires aren’t looking to advertise it on 4chan of all places?

[Anonymous No.8212683]

How do LINK nodes work? Serious question.

[Anonymous No.8212684]

>>8212342

In you’re a node runner, you need link in order to “stake” for data-processing jobs. If your data is correct according to consensus, you get paid more link as a reward. If the data is wrong, you get penalized a certain amount. The more link you stake, the more link you’ll earn. This means, as a node operator, it’d be in my best interests to hold a good amount of link to have priority when it comes to processing new tasks. This is what will create scarcity for those wishing to buy link to run a node or for price speculation.

Since Link is divisible, fluctuations in Link tokens fiat price wouldn’t necessarily effect the price to transact on the network for customers using chainlink to execute their smart contracts. Link can be $100 due to scarcity, while the cost for an individual transaction remains under a cent.

[Anonymous No.8212718]

I was at a meetup the other week.

One roastie presented her shitty meme crypto project called raise. It's a indiegogo style fundraising platform however the project gets a percentage of the funds upon each milestones via smart contracts. However how do we know that the milestones where reached? It would still need people to sign off on it creating middlemen. Link can act as an oracle to verify that the milestones was reached. By using link it will be processed by a link node. Which is ran by linkies. The linkies get paid for running the network in link. Therefore it is profitable for them and the more people that need these types of verifications the more link nodes needed and so link becomes scarce and price goes up. I like it

[Anonymous No.8212757]

>>8212256
They can put their stinkies into Linkpool. And nobody with mediocre knowledge of IT should operate Oracle themselves, it would be surely fat tasty target for many hackers

[Anonymous No.8212840]

>>8210545
guys im spoon feeding the brainlet gibs linkies bliz

[Anonymous No.8212863]

>>8212840
do I deserve a medal linkies?

[Anonymous No.8212880]

>>8212840
LARP and speculation, I hope LINK goes to zero

[Anonymous No.8212884]

>>8211309

[Anonymous No.8212915]

>>8212379
>>8212397
>>8212342

[Anonymous No.8212917]

>>8210545
>>8212863
>>8212840
>LINK SOLVES THE LAMBO PROBLEM

am I doing it right linkies?

[Anonymous No.8212937]

>>8212880
yes, don't buy

[Anonymous No.8212955]

>>8212684
Thanks.

[Anonymous No.8212959]

>>8212167

why can't you just use fiat to run smart contracts on Ethereum Network. What can't Dapps just pay FIAT to launch ICOs on NEO. Why can't companies use FIAT to pay for Vechain services? Why can't TX fees for transactions in any crypto be paid in FIAT or any other payment medium?

Because then rather than create demand for your project's token (and bring value to your project and to token holders invested in your project) you create demand for FIAT currency. Why would you want to do that.

Brainlet

[Anonymous No.8212976]

>>8212863

I have been asking this question for a long time with no answer. Is Air Juels dead or off the board wtf is the cross next to his name

[Anonymous No.8213018]

>>8212959
Let's be honest, all these tokens are going to zero

[Anonymous No.8213022]

>>8212955
also ust to add to it, when people will stake their links on masternodes, the total supply of links will be lowered, wich means less links on exchanges....
and you what that means right senpai?

[Anonymous No.8213031]

>>8210318
Sergey is Plus Ultra

[Anonymous No.8213058]

>>8213022
It means LINK is going to zero

[Anonymous No.8213088]

>>8213058
you mean divided by 0

[Anonymous No.8213142]

>>8210493
>trips

[Anonymous No.8213246]

>>8210545
>Honestly I tried so hard and the only think I see is with swift, basically make or break if swift actually use it or not. i really dont understand the whole oracles thing, why do you need it and dont alot of cryptos already have this built in? and lets say it is an important peice of tech, how does that increase the value of link as a currency?
i had to learn about link myself through my own research. i decided to do my own research because the thought went off in my head, what if, for some fucking reason link actually does go 1000x like eth, and this entire time it has been shilled right in front of my face. id want to kill myself right? you will not get anyone to convince you to buy link here only you can convince yourself after doing your own research and hopefully a light bulb will go off on why this is potentially the biggest project ever. this board did not make me invest into link but it did make me take a serious look into it.

[Anonymous No.8213280]

>>8213088
Checked, and Heil Hitler!

[Anonymous No.8213407]

>>8213246
Nothing better than DYOR, but there is always a reason a coin gets shilled of FUDed on biz...
but there is nothing comparable to link, when you invest in it and KNOW...you are literally in the comfiest hold of your life

[Anonymous No.8213537]

>>8212201
this thread and the shit 4 brains who posted above are an advanced form of retard fud. It quite brilliant. My rational thoughts are clouded with murderous rage for these brainlets who suggest the decentralized oracle network could be manipulated without recourse by kamikaze PND groups. I commend your evolved retard fud, but I wont hesitate for a moment to pay to have you gassed after the singularity. I'll be screencapping this thread just to pay a computer forensics specialist to track you and then I'll pay a right wing death squad to gas you and any of your brainlet offspring. Your fud was too effective and you only have yourself to blame.

[Anonymous No.8213621]

LINK is the greatest thing in crypto besides Cardano

[Anonymous No.8213699]

>>8213537
Kek, fucking brutal! So this is what the future is going to look like, when ten thousand 4chan Link billionaires run the world? Best timeline.

[Anonymous No.8213709]

>>8213407
Wintnet is a new link alternative actually

[Anonymous No.8213772]

>>8211739
Wow this guy is retarded

[Anonymous No.8213792]

>>8213709
Wintnet is four years behind ChainLink and its team is made up of a bunch of spic liberals.

[Anonymous No.8213851]

Hope no one have this guy any good info. He’s obviously a Norman that hates this place.

[Anonymous No.8213880]

>>8213851
sorry senpai i already spoon fed
>>8213407
>>8213022
>>8212863
>>8212840

[Anonymous No.8214062]

>>8213031
>Whosoever therefore thou art that now desireth to study this science, keep silence and constantly conceal within the secret closets of your Religious breast, so holy a determination;

>for (as Mercury saith) to publish to the knowledge of many a speech thoroughly filled with so great majesty of the Deity, is a sign of an irreligious spirit

[Anonymous No.8214065]

>>8211030
How is Zeppelin a bigger deal than SWIFT?

[Anonymous No.8214212]

>>8213022
You can't stake link
There are no master nodes
this is the level of Brainlet shilling a worthless utility token

[Anonymous No.8214258]

>>8210318
1

[Anonymous No.8214280]

>>8213792
>this kills the Wintnet

[Anonymous No.8214282]

>>8212446
You should DYOR because most of the info that has been provided to you in this thread is inaccurate as fuck

[Anonymous No.8214330]

>>8213709

Almost invested in witnet, ‘till I saw tokens wouldn’t even get distributed until mainnet. They aren’t even launching a test net till 2019, so your investment is frozen at ICO price for over a year. No thanks.

[Anonymous No.8214357]

>>8212446
>biz
>being polite

[Anonymous No.8214366]

The year is 2030, it's been years since you retired off of ChainLink. You have no reason to struggle or worry your way through life anymore. Your head rests in your smokingly beautiful wife's arms while you watch comfy movies in the living room, with the lights low in the light of your lit fireplace. As your wife kisses you goodnight and heads upstairs to bed you decide to take a walk. You reminisce about 4chan, moon missions and long shots, and you realize that everything that starts out comfy has ended comfy. Then with a smile on your face you turn to see the humble little home burn down to the ground. The last thing you remember from The scene is your wife banging on The bedroom window for help. The insurance company gives you a large check the next day which is converted directly into chainlink. You finally bought the dip.

[Anonymous No.8214420]

>>8214065

Zeppelin is basically a standardized suite of tools for smart contract developers. Zeppelin is using Link as the oracle solution in their toolset. Among many other projects, OMG’s smart contracts are built on zeppelin. In other words, the zeppelin partnership is a huge deal in terms of Link adoption.

[Anonymous No.8214466]

>>8214280
this lol

[Anonymous No.8214479]

>>8214420
>Zeppelin is basically a standardized suite of tools for smart contract developers.
Is it being used now or is it still in development? Do they have a competitor? Or is it just a given that everyone will use Zeppelin? Why?

[Anonymous No.8214674]

>>8214366
>Checked

[Anonymous No.8215248]

>>8214366
Heh..

[Anonymous No.8215515]

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=sVXiM_1520475217

[Anonymous No.8215658]

>>8210775
The floor is always present

[Anonymous No.8215732]

Bitcoin app was money
Then came smart contracts
Then came the oracles

[Anonymous No.8215826]

>>8210318
Their number 2 strategy is pretty fucking bad if it can't get LINK above its ATH of CMC #77
they should've just hired Justin Sun instead

[Anonymous No.8215861]

WHERE
IS
JASON
PARSER

[Anonymous No.8216133]

>>8210545
>>8210573
This should be more your speed

[Anonymous No.8216168]

>>8215732
Basically this

[Anonymous No.8216174]

>>8213022
lewd version of your pic

[Anonymous No.8216565]

>>8210665
I'm the same.
I don't want link to moon to make it.
It's mainly because it's /our/ coin..
I went to bitcointalk and lurked some in *cough* plebbit and Jesus, the retardation level is astounding. They are legit convinced that shit like Verge and Tron will moon 100x.
And clearly r /linktrader is 99% biz.
I was legit convinced we are a shithole but normies are even worse

[Anonymous No.8216607]

I can't wait until we buy 4chan after LINK moons.

Just imagine.

[Anonymous No.8216705]

>>8210318
why do you think 4chan is the only place LINK is talked about? because it's absolute SHIT. PERIOD. i'm sick of coming on this shitty board and seeing this pajeet tier coin on the front page every single fucking day.

[Anonymous No.8216761]

>>8216705
>front page

[Anonymous No.8216847]

>>8216705
plebbitor sighting

[Anonymous No.8216909]

>>8216705
u hav 2 go bak

[Anonymous No.8217126]

>>8212976
good question

[Anonymous No.8217220]

>>8216705
<wtf is this nigger saying?
<whitetext

[Anonymous No.8217281]

>>8210545
Wow that really makes me reconsider. Just sold 50k

[Anonymous No.8217319]

>>8214420
https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/31787/adoption-of-dlt-presents-significant-operational-challenges-for-swift-member-banks

[Anonymous No.8217549]

>>8217319

“It is a strategic priority for Swift to work with new technologies like DLT and incorporate them into key solutions like gpi”, says Stephen Gilderdale, chief platform officer, Swift. “We are already working on new PoCs and will continue our R&D efforts to ensure that Swift customers will be able to leverage their existing Swift infrastructure and connectivity to benefit from blockchain services, whether offered by Swift or by third parties, on a secure and trusted platform.”

[Anonymous No.8217667]

>>8217549
Rock fucking hard

[Anonymous No.8217717]

>>8217667
"whether offered by Swift or by third parties"

Boom

[Anonymous No.8217997]

I'm afraid if we do not made it, what can I do?

[Anonymous No.8218119]

>>8210569
>Just buy it and let the smart people worry about the details, sweetie.

just sold 1,000,000,000 because faggit sweetie poster

[Anonymous No.8218128]

[Anonymous No.8218161]

[Anonymous No.8218202]

>>8218128
>>8218161
Which one can be made by the other?

Can the red one be made from the white one or vice versa?

My vote is the former.

[Anonymous No.8218211]

[Anonymous No.8218235]

>>8218202

[Anonymous No.8218266]

>>8210471

ONE Oracle of many is going to change the world? What the fuck?

[Anonymous No.8218292]

Reminder from the other thread, Antshares was $0.12 a year ago today...and at $87 still has no real world application

[Anonymous No.8218337]

>>8210545

[Anonymous No.8218351]

>>8218266
WhatsApp changed the World and it is nothing more than a messaging app like others that already existed. The important thing is knowing how to be at the right time.

[Anonymous No.8218517]

>>8212039
This is the truth.
It was shilled among Kyber and BlackMoon.

[Anonymous No.8218768]

>>8216133
Checked, and Heil Hitler!

[Anonymous No.8218861]

>>8218292
Tasty

[Anonymous No.8218870]

>>8218517
the fact that two legitimate projects were shilled among trash at one point means literally nothing

[Anonymous No.8218963]

>knows nothing about this Oracle problem and what is solves
>to be honest only know the simple basics of what a blockchain is.
>owns 30k link

Come at me you salty fuckers

[Anonymous No.8218996]

>>8210545
lmao