Req

[Anonymous No.8209856]

Req is done. There is no fucking bottom. See you at 1 fucking cent within this week

[THEORY TIME No.8209882]

>>8209856
so many REQ FUD threads out of a sudden,gee I wonder why :)

[Anonymous No.8209914]

>>8209882
Maybe because it’s been going sideways and then dropping into nothingness regardless of news

[Anonymous No.8209917]

I have a bunch of REQ but now that they're outsourcing to India I am very, very, very skeptical about the project.
Will likely set a sell for somewhere on the rebound line and get out to tech that isn't developed by third world outsourced developers.

[Anonymous No.8209975]

>>8209917
proof for this shit
is there an update tomorrow btw?

[Anonymous No.8210002]

>>8209975
I believe they said in their last update that the next update could come at any time.

[Anonymous No.8210011]

>>8209856
1ct would be lovely, I would so buy the whole market.

Please sell, OP.

[Anonymous No.8210014]

>>8209856

thanks just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.8210025]

>>8209856
>mainnet coming out this month
>fud threads
Too fucking obvious

[Anonymous No.8210141]

>>8209975
this is verbatim FUD that gets posted all the time. I literally don't know why people pay to post this shit on 4chan, like it has some dramatic impact on the market. It's pathetic

[Anonymous No.8210206]

>>8210025
Mainnet release means a huge dump in this bear market. Hodlers are expecting a pump to get out and they will all sell at the same time. Below 10 cents EOM for sure.Not even fudding. Hodling 67k Reqs since ICO

[Anonymous No.8210208]

>>8209856
The market sucks, and this coin is taking a shit, there is no whale. We're going to suffer for months as long as we hold. I'm sure in a year this coin will be top contender but without tech it's nothing. Just ride it out or buy back when everyone fomos in a year

[Anonymous No.8210212]

>>8210141
pajeets posting this shit for 5 rupees an hour. how big of a subhuman has someone to be, to bash his own kind and himself? its almost as bad as being a chainlink shill

[Anonymous No.8210241]

>>8210212
Req sucks. Market sell Nao.
Buy chainlink. Much riches sirs.

(5 rupees have been added to this poster)

[Anonymous No.8210250]

>>8210206
500k req here, im gonna dump on you so hard faggot

[Anonymous No.8210261]

>>8209856

As I've been saying. .05 by summer. It'll go back up in a week or so, but it will only be dragging out the inevitable.

.01 by SEPT 29 2018.

[Anonymous No.8210271]

>>8210241
ill would gib every chainlink shitposter double the rupees for a week just to stfu and keep my board clean

[Anonymous No.8210286]

kek why you invest in scam anon?

[Anonymous No.8210338]

>>8210261
This

[Anonymous No.8210439]

>>8210261
>.01 by SEPT 29 2018.
.001 is more likely after theyre forced to pay for their copyright infringement

[Anonymous No.8210494]

>>8210439
It gets worse the longer I think about req

[Anonymous No.8210568]

I wonder what's the point of posting those over-the-top FUD posts really is. It should be pretty clear that no one in their right minds believes in $0.01.

If anything, it creates a Streisand-effect. So, why?

[Anonymous No.8210642]

>>8210568
The reason is anger

[Anonymous No.8210673]

>>8210439
>>8210494
Right, the FUD gets worse. You guys are not even trying anymore...

[Anonymous No.8210700]

>>8210439
If you wanted a shit FUD Photoshopped up you only had to ask; I'd have done a better job of it than the 14 year-old kid with a copy of MS Paint who you obviously used.

[Anonymous No.8210710]

>>8210673
how is this fud

[Anonymous No.8210727]

People think a mainnet launch in a bear market will save this shitcoin?

[Anonymous No.8210760]

>>8209914
This for two fucking months. Even fucking link has had one or two pumps

[Anonymous No.8210789]

>>8210206
>$0.005 EOW
>holding 59million REQ btw guise
kys fucking nigger

[Anonymous No.8210829]

>>8210710
It’s fake and was posted for months.

[Anonymous No.8210900]

Why this coin is a thing is still beyond me. The big feature is notification that says 'pls send ___'. Am I missing something?

[THEORY TIME No.8210936]

>>8210900
yes, DYOR

[Anonymous No.8210948]

>>8209856
>stinky pajeets FUDing REQ
>brainlets fall for it

[Anonymous No.8210954]

>>8209856
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

[Anonymous No.8210962]

>>8209856
But mainnet release in 3 weeks?

[Anonymous No.8210973]

>>8210936
Thats what it says on the website. If you have to deep dive to understand it then I guess thats why consumers wont buy it

[Anonymous No.8211023]

>>8209917
sir, indian programmers are one of the most respected engineers in the world. this move can only benefit req.

[Anonymous No.8211042]

The FUD is intense. $5 EOY.

HODL!

[Anonymous No.8211057]

>>8211023
inb4. my id is brown. i know. haha. poo in loo. haha. very funny. racist

[Anonymous No.8211141]

The angry are the stupid who bought in late. I bought millions at $0.04. You don’t make life changing money selling and dumping sh-tcoins. You become wealthy by getting in at ground zero for huge projects. Compare eth’s early price chart with req’s.

[Anonymous No.8211204]

>>8209856
One can only hope, I'd love to buy more cheap req.

[Anonymous No.8211273]

>>8210700
this is legit and the real reason why the lead dev left and forced them to outsource everything

[Anonymous No.8211298]

>>8211273
Top kek guys

[Anonymous No.8211312]

Once the bullrun starts it will reach $1. Once REQ is universally adopted it's not unreasonable to expect 1 REQ to be worth $100k. The only problem I have is the name. "I'll send you the money on wrek" sounds pretty bad when you say it out loud.

[Anonymous No.8211403]

>>8211273
Thanks for showing that they look nothing alike idiot. Also you can't claim a trademark when your trademark is a letter....you obviously don't know much about law. Not to mention that REQ is based in French and is being "sued" by a Australian company. Lol

Also, developers aren't outsourced, REQ is a PLATFORM similarly to the Ethereum Network. This means that it will be even bigger.

Chill out

[Anonymous No.8211518]

>>8211273
Robinson is from my hometown and there was a short article on this in the newspaper a few weeks ago. I don’t think people care here but it sounded serious

[Anonymous No.8211531]

>>8209856
So you base the value of the coin as the only driving force behind the porject? None of these teams care if the price of their token goes up or down, but that people are infatuated with their tech and potentially using their product in their lives.

That is what will drive crypto to be used.

[Anonymous No.8211566]

>>8211518
Hahahahahaha

you're so bad at this.

Link the source then, idiot. DO ITTTT

[Anonymous No.8212227]

Stay for the prophecy

[Anonymous No.8212390]

>>8211273
This is not even close man, a capital R without the stem is not a ground breaking concept

[Anonymous No.8212618]

>>8211273
>logos look nothing alike
>real estate & a decentralized crypto currency service, the two are so different that it is very unlikely to cause confusion

seriously there is no case

[Anonymous No.8213052]

>>8211141
They're not even close, ETH was worth ten bucks within months of its creation, REQ is barely over its ICO price right now. Fucking Norman.

[Anonymous No.8213163]

So fucking tired of FUD rats. My coin is better than yours. Your coin is shit... buy this coin..your a cock stain for buying this coin. Your coin has seen more nigger cum than Mandy Monroe's clit ring..blah blah. We need to be increasing the marketcap of all coins and in so doing all of us get fucking rich. Paid shill/fud teams I hope your children die horrible painful deaths.

[Anonymous No.8213570]

>>8213163
But how would they accumulate without competition if it werent for FUD?

[Anonymous No.8213743]

>>8213052
>ETH was worth $10 within months of it's creation

What? ETH went below ICO for months, and didn't reach $10 until over 1.5 years from creation.

Fucking Norman McDonald.

[Anonymous No.8214486]

>>8213743
imagine req ever reaching 10$

[Anonymous No.8214505]

>someone is all in on Req

[Anonymous No.8214534]

>>8214505
I relate to this

[Anonymous No.8214595]

the big thing will be when fiat is implemented
Q2 will see the start of this thing's moon mission
or not cause BUTTCORN LAWL

[Anonymous No.8214607]

>>8209856
>1 fucking cent
if it goes that low I'm going all in.