[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 360 KB, 750x1334, 23ECF130-3C3E-4F44-9BC9-152268628BC8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7976216 No.7976216 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.7977020
File: 1.35 MB, 245x220, shit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7977020

>> No.7977048

>>7976216
no

>> No.7977049

>>7977020
Nuff said, close thread.

>> No.7977061

Nope, sorry bro

>> No.7977090

>>how many LINK you holding?

>> No.7977095

oh, it's the vertcoin guy again.
no, you're not.

>> No.7977118

>>7976216
You'll be fine

>> No.7977119

>>7977048
Why?

>> No.7977121

the link will make it, nothing else will

>> No.7977130

>>7976216
let's see

>XRB
coin funded by devs who cry, blame others and throw tantrums every time their code fails

>LINK
biz shill, confirmed scam coin

>REQ
in theory, might work but in it's current state it's a flop

>VTC
Sell half, imo.

>DBET
literally wasted your money here

>> No.7977158

>>7977095
What’s wrong with VTC?

>> No.7977203

>>7977130
I agree on VTC.

>> No.7977217

>>7977130
This. Especially DBET lol get rid of that asap.
Rest is alright, apart from xrb maybe but shit will pump anyway.

>> No.7977226

>>7976216
Very good choices
Imo, either vertcoin at nano are going to be the next LTCs

>> No.7977243

>>7977226
Or*

>> No.7977248

>XRB will not make it, 50$ EoY at most
>LINK will obviously make it
>REQ will not make it, literal pajeetcoin headed for 0.10 again
>VTC you serious?
>DBET what the fuck is that shit? literal pajeetcoin with 1BTC daily volume

>> No.7977262
File: 263 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20180226-205643.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7977262

>>7976216
If you make it I also make it.

>> No.7977265

XRB is definitely worst coin. Possibly ever.

*LTC owner

>> No.7977284

>>7977248
VTC will be on LN, DBET for a moon shot. Same supply as ETH. With mainnet net coming soon.

>> No.7977410

>>7977262
Were gonna make it, wish we could all have an actual discussion instead of stupid FUD.

>> No.7977891

>>7976216
Get rid of DBET and REQ imo, the rest is ok. I would not invest so much in VTC but I don't know the project really well.
I'd get some NEO if you want a safe x10 this year, or ELA if you want a possible x30-50.

>> No.7978034

>>7977158
>be around since 2014
>can't even breach 400m market cap

that's what

>> No.7978106

>>7976216
put it all in btc u fucking retard, ICO's are scams

>> No.7978125

>>7977891
Why REQ?

>> No.7978182

>>7978125
Keep REQ. it’s a solid project with a solid team, backed by a big incubator and a real world use case. Ignore the FUD.

>> No.7978186

>>7977130
>biz shill, confirmed scam coin
source?

>> No.7978431

>>7978186
He is lying.

>> No.7978939

>>7976216
Do not hodl nano. It might work but the debts are shady and the tech has been shown to be unreliable at best. Scalp redditors at every opportunity but always have your stop losses set so you don't get left bag holding. Switch nano with something like ENG.