Serious Link thread

[Anonymous No.7929736]

Link is developing pretty nicely and ICO’s are actually willing to use chainlink to base their project around. Also sergey is speaking again in a couple weeks. When should we shill it outside of biz?

[Anonymous No.7929824]

>>7929736

A few days before SXSW on whatever reddit subs makes sense is probably a good idea. If you have Twitter spam it there the days leading up to it and as much as possible on the day of (crypto coverage sucks, so be a "journalist" so there's at least some information available).

Actually... fuck. Someone who has Twitter should organize a Thunderclap to go off the day Sergey speaks. I forgot this thing existed but this is how you get it in front of normies for sure. I don't have Twitter/won't make one for this, but someone more motivated than me should run with the idea. Put this board's autism to use to help market the project to normies on game day.

https://www.thunderclap.it/

[Anonymous No.7929852]

>>7929736
i usually spam a copypasta right about now but this thread feel legit. I'll be monitoring it to see what happens

[Anonymous No.7929890]

>>7929736
Once it reaches ATH and the last worthless unbelievers are able to dump their bags the floodgates will open and the outside world will learn what horror has been incubating in the bowels of the internet these past 6 months.
September.

[Anonymous No.7929903]

Serious Link thread
>howaboutno

[Anonymous No.7929917]

>>7929824
Realtalk this is something that should be coordinated with the devs if you are serious. They have a marketing roadmap already

[Anonymous No.7929927]

>>7929903
BUY LINK NOW OR BTFO
(trump confirmed)

[Anonymous No.7929972]

After the SXSW, I think Sergey will make a big announcement.

[Anonymous No.7929976]

>>7929917

True... I'm not in the Slack though. I probably should join so I'm not stuck on /biz/ for LINK misinformation.

Anyone want to pitch the idea in Slack? I've had marginal success with my past shitty startup with Thunderclap, so I'd think for Chainlink with its much larger follower base it could be a good way to hit a lot of eyes while there's fresh news for them to find.

[Anonymous No.7929980]

Has anyone come up with realistic scenarios in which link could possibly not go up in price?
If crypto as we know it disappears because it's outlawed or we are seeing ww3, maybe. But how else could this token not seriously go up in price as we are nearing blockchain adoption?
>inb4 Sergey could explode because he ate too many BigMacs. Genuine concern, but how else could we lose money on this?

[Anonymous No.7929984]

>>7929927
That logo is so perfect

[Anonymous No.7929985]

>>7929927
Allah Akbar. YOU WANT LINKSAUCE?

[Anonymous No.7929988]

>>7929903
>>7929927
There is a PnD group who mainly post here and use bots and their holdings to swing the price of link up to 40% but normally 10% to milk money out of small buyers. They spam the board with shill or fud depending on whether they are pumping or dumping or recycling back in. They use algo step buying, fake buywalls and milk retards on here who think they are part of a special club. The truth is in this post. It's pathetic and ugly but the truth and its been going on since the ico

[Anonymous No.7930025]

>>7929988

[Anonymous No.7930030]

We dont shill it no more. Weve done enough those who bought will be blessed

[Anonymous No.7930062]

>>7929980

Its impossible. Unless main net launches, and literally not a single developer decides to use it, its going up in price. And with the kinds of players we've seen them partnering with, and the fact that zeppelin_os will make it the default kernel level oracle, its p much impossible for no developers to adopt it. Even without the banking partnerships LINK's value will rise by a fuckload once mainnet is officially launched and supported and dApps can go into production using the network.

[Anonymous No.7930070]

>>7929736
> serious thread
> Link
u dun fucked up

[Anonymous No.7930087]

>>7930062
>we've seen them partnering with
dont say swift. Those are rumors

[Anonymous No.7930102]

>>7929980
token economics are weak, code is open sourced. you do the math

[Anonymous No.7930110]

>>7929736
dont oversell it to begn with, have that air of "wow, i was just thinking about how you solve the orcale problem and then this russian guy might just have the answer. thooughts?"

personally, i'm bursting out my pants with joy at CL. its an absolute fukcoing game changer, but not gonna my spaghetti just yet. play it cool

[Anonymous No.7930144]

>>7929736
> linkmarines

[Anonymous No.7930147]

>>7929736
>>7930062
When the fuck is mainnet launching? I'm itching to quit my job

[Anonymous No.7930148]

>>7929980
AFAIK it relies almost totally on network effect, the tech doesn't seem to be unique or proprietary. Certainly within this board the community has been doing fuck all to help. There has only been one thread from an anon setting up a node. Not a good start.

There are a lot of anons still accumulating until SXSW and realistically all the way till mainnet, so any shilling you do will probably be sabotaged from inside before then.

[Anonymous No.7930155]

>>7930087

Rory confirmed bond systems partnership. Its not a partnership for the gpi which many will mislead with, but the bond payment systems have been tested and confirmed successful tests. SWIFT issued warning to member banks they have until Nov this year to update systems for compliance with their DLT projects. And those systems should be switched to by 2020, likely with interim pilots in 2019.

[Anonymous No.7930158]

all you need to know is aBunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.7930177]

>>7930147

Sometime in Q2. I suspect toward the end or potentially even early Q3, but they've been ahead of the schedule I expected so far so who knows.

Also don't quite your job at mainnet. Wait until 2019 or 2020. The value will be an order of magnitude larger.

[Anonymous No.7930188]

>>7929980
if sir gay dies tomorrow someone would just step into his asics patriot 8's. LINK is bigger than one man, even a man as big as sir gay

[Anonymous No.7930193]

>>7930158
How do I report this shit? It's literally the same one dude spamming every thread trying to force a lame pasta

[Anonymous No.7930202]

>>7930177
wait i second i thought it was q1. Now its getting pushed back to Q2

[Anonymous No.7930207]

>>7929988
wheres this pnd group

[Anonymous No.7930215]

>>7930193
embrace the fud, it's a bump. newfag

[Anonymous No.7930233]

>>7930202

No the code release is Q1, which already happened alongside the alpha mainnet. We'll have a while of community feedback, which has already been going quite well with a lot of work being done on the code by the community, and then we'll see the official mainnet launch that will support production dApps.

Still a ways to go, but the signs are all quite positive so far.

[Anonymous No.7930237]

>>7930193
you have to go back

[SherlockLink !GfWlEQyDyE No.7930238]

Final post is delayed, I don't want to put a timeline to it.

Expect a guest post by Sergey himself on a website called artificiallaywer. - This blog post will come out before SXSW

Who is seal software and how are they connected to chainlink

SmartContract will be listed as Hyperledger and Accord Project members before SXSW.

[Anonymous No.7930244]

>>7930102
>token economics are weak
>open sourced
>mfw
>>7929980
Short of the Sergey, Rory, Thomas and all the devs literally switching projects and doing another ICO, pretty much no.
No other project could have got this in stealth mode. FUD spam is getting stronger. Previous nolinkers unironically buying LINK. Price is STILL up from conference.
>>7930188
Checked
And exactly. Pandora's box has been opened, and the community will now be providing the rocket fuel for the network to be launched. Once its established in just one particular vertical, its multiple reinforcing networking effects will continue to expand it into adjacent markets, and propel it to andromeda
Feels good to be a linkie, lads

[BearShaman !!L8t332Waibq No.7930262]

>>7929736
>Link is developing pretty nicely and ICO’s are actually willing to use chainlink to base their project around.
why would they base their project around an erc20 token?

[Anonymous No.7930305]

>>7930238

What... is this?

All of this almost sounds legit. It lines up too perfectly. Its too good...

Who are you? Why should I believe this?

[Anonymous No.7930308]

>>7930238
k

[Anonymous No.7930310]

>>7930262

[thenightman !!AOnsBuqo6YP No.7930321]

>>7930262
>>7930238
since everyone is tripping now i will too.

[Anonymous No.7930327]

>>7930238
kill yourself none of this requires a trip nor wasn't anything anybody didn't already find earlier. Please do not come back.

[Anonymous No.7930366]

>>7930238
ok will keep an eye out and we'll see.
This looks interesting:
https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2018/02/20/accord-project-ieee-partner-for-smart-contract-global-standards/

If docusign gets on board with promoting or potentially using ChainLink, it's not a stretch to see these guys doing it too. The domino effect is going to be fucking glorious

[Anonymous No.7930378]

>>7930238
Oh man, I thought you died last night.
Thank you for the leads and the research, this is amazing.
Godspeed

[Anonymous No.7930380]

>>7930238

can anyone confirm if this is the real sherlocklink

[Anonymous No.7930387]

>>7930238
oh shit mane

[Anonymous No.7930392]

>>7930147
don't count on quitting your job anon. I'm holding 75k of these stinkies and while I expect and hope it will succeed it's still a huge gamble

[Anonymous No.7930431]

>>7930366
>https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2018/02/20/accord-project-ieee-partner-for-smart-contract-global-standards/
>The partnership, which involves the standards sub-group the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA), is both significant and a major step forward. As readers of Artificial Lawyer will know, Accord and its members, especially smart contract pioneers, Clause, have been working hard on a global basis to create rules and standards for the use of smart contracts.

>Their logic is that there is little use creating smart contracts if there are no standards for their use, just as there would be little use in every bank in every town issuing a separate currency for commerce, for example, or every city launching its own system of weights and measures for trade.

>What any system that will be used as part of the global trading infrastructure and our economic fabric will need is a set of standards, rules and protocols that key players buy into and trust.
>>7930380
just check warosu advanced search in future:
>>/biz/

[Anonymous No.7930443]

if I don't get to quit my job in the next few months I'm gonna kms bro, and if can't get that with link then I guess I'm fucking selling

[Anonymous No.7930456]

>>7929736
>Serious
>Link thread
pick

[Anonymous No.7930580]

>>7930443
Jesus fucking Christ, just go ahead and sell, you're obviously gonna dump this shit way too early anyway. You have to be one impatient motherfucker to have that mindset. You're never going to make it.

[Anonymous No.7930614]

>>7930443
We're still a few months away from mainnet. Brainlets don't deserve to make it, you should sell.

[Anonymous No.7930618]

>>7930580

Ya that's like being in a rush to sell ETH at $6.

Fuck ADHD is the quick death of a crypto portfolio.

[Anonymous No.7930640]

>>7930158
Fuck you

[Anonymous No.7930661]

NEW TOP 100 WALLETS ALERT! >>7930430

[Anonymous No.7930669]

>>7929890
Sounds hella fuckin epic

[Anonymous No.7930720]

Stop being lazy anons, help dig:
>>7930366
>>7930431
>>7930238
>seal software
>Seal is the leading provider of Contract Discovery and Analytics.

Check here:
https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2018/02/23/guest-post-why-we-need-intelligent-contracts/

>The idea of encoding a contract on a distributed ledger like a blockchain, what with its immutability and unambiguity, is very attractive.

>There have been plenty of examples in the public domain. My current favourite is AXA Insurance’s Fizzy offering which they market as a 100% automated, 100% secure platform for parametric insurance against delayed flights.

...

>Seal is encoding hashes on the chain whilst the data and logic are stored off the chain. The hashes on the chain store the references (pointers) and a small amount of code to verify that the offline data and logic are correct.

>This model handles large volumes of complex data and addresses the stakeholders need to know the complete history of a contract and its descendants and dependent documents. Intelligent Contracts will deliver that visibility without exposing the data.

>In summary, Smart Contracts have limitations when it comes to complex and sizable traditional contracts, and for that, an intelligent approach is required. That solution is Intelligent Contracts or what might be termed Smart Contracts 3.0

[TheNightman !!AOnsBuqo6YP No.7930734]

>>7930720
sherlink pls go

[Anonymous No.7930744]

>>7930431
it's happening, it's actually happening. we're gonna make it. i never thought i'd get to say that.
but we're really doing it. see, i knew we could do it, but i just never thoguth we would...

[Anonymous No.7930784]

>>7930744

I want to believe. I've become so jaded this feeling is foreign.

Could it be... that I'm already rich beyond my wildest dreams and the world just doesn't know it yet?

[Anonymous No.7930812]

>>7930238
Seal Software provided services to Salesforce. Sergey was tweeting to their CEO recently. Seal Software appears to provide contract monitoring/tracking.

[Anonymous No.7930821]

>>7929988
Post some screenshots, i read this constantly in LINK threads and really want to see some proof, not even a huge LINK holder im just pretty certain this is garbage FUD

[Anonymous No.7930848]

>>7930720
This is fine but meh. A random smart contract company makes some general statements about the sector. Maybe they use LINK, maybe the don't. Who knows.
And if Sergey writes an article in Literally Who magazine, I mean, it's about time and also -- so what.

[Anonymous No.7930877]

So when’s the next announcement/event? I’m a linklet but I’ve been making quiet gains swing trading, it’s been oscillating pretty consistently.

[Anonymous No.7930893]

>>7930720
>>7930744
>>7930812
Check their fucking customers and partners page:
https://www.seal-software.com/customers
https://www.seal-software.com/seal-partners

Docusign is there. It's very possible for Sergey to have a foot in the door here somewhere, considering he's talking with the Founder of Docusign at SXSW

I checked the archives. "Seal software" hasn't been discussed here before. Sherlocklink may or may not be a fag, but we're being lazy fucks for not having found this yet

[Anonymous No.7930901]

>>7930238
>seal software
Salesforce is a customer of seal software.
Sergey tweeted the Salesforce CEO, and one of their new devs worked for Loop & Tie which had dealings with Salesforce.

[Anonymous No.7930913]

>>7930102
you know nothing about token economics
ripple which doesn't require their tokens to be held longer than a few seconds had a >100bn MC at some point

Link tokens will be a golden gateway to making money, you can have the best nodes, infrastructure but guess what without LINK tokens you won't be able to bid on any good assignments due to lacking collateral
Compound interest

>open sourced
go fork bitcoin or ethereum then, good luck

>>7930177
this
I expect the mainnet to be finished by the end of summer

>>7930262
around the decentralized oracles network, not the token itself you brainlet. According to your sub80IQ logic every erc20 token is worthless because
>hurr durr it's just an erc20 token he he

[Anonymous No.7930922]

>>7930893

Ya I don't know how to take this information. It all sounds plausible... but it also all sounds too good to be true.

[Anonymous No.7930945]

>>7930877
which indicators and intervals do you use? I have been eyeballing it with 10/26 emas and i'm doing okay but it's nervewracking as all hell

[Anonymous No.7930955]

>>7930893
>BOSCH is a partner
>IOTA partnered with BOSCH
OMG! Its! Nothing. It's fucking nothing.

[Anonymous No.7930987]

>When should we shill it outside of biz?

Never. And all of the memes need to be contained to this board. I'll clarify and say that no shilling will be necessary because they're hiring a marketing director and will have partnerships announced shortly. At that point, the market cap will likely 3-5x and from there growth can be largely organic rather than speculative.


>tfw the marketing director is AssBlaster, that was his "new job")

[Anonymous No.7931000]

>>7929736
I don't think you should shill it at all. I think you should keep it under the radar for as long as possible and then let the price rise naturally so you can ACTUALLY BUY MORE when REQ takes off before LINK does.

[Anonymous No.7931011]

>>7930784
it's not where you've been, it's where you're going that counts.

it's in the air. something is really happening...

[Anonymous No.7931014]

>>7930987

>tfw the marketing director is AssBlaster, that was his "new job

god I hope this is true

[Anonymous No.7931030]

>>7930821
link has extremely low volume most the time, making it a prime target for manipulation.
just look at the chart history and you can see their footprints

[Anonymous No.7931037]

>>7930321
You really must have attention problems anon, i’m sorry for you

[Anonymous No.7931050]

>>7930987
He better give us a hint as to when they're announcing that shit. I would think at the next presentation. It would be logical time. That or just before. Either way I'd be fine with that.

[Anonymous No.7931052]

>>7930893
the threads are joining my friends, the trhreads are joining!

[Anonymous No.7931057]

>>7931030

It is very low volume. Which is another reason why people should either be swinging to accumulate, or squatting it. Once the volume shows up, those order books will get burned through so fast the price will rocket with new money flooding in.

[Anonymous No.7931068]

>>7930955
I don't think it's nothing, because look at seal software.

The industries they deal with are fintech, medical and legal. All 3 areas we know ChainLINK has use cases with.

Looking through seal software's site, they're all about contracts. Even a brainlet knows smart contracts are coming to revolutionise this shit

[Anonymous No.7931189]

>>7930893
>Docusign and Salesforce
no way that's a coincidence

[Anonymous No.7931206]

>>7930893
because it's nothing. Literally every company on earth is somehow 2 or 3 degrees separation from smartcontract.com None of this ever goes anywhere.

[Anonymous No.7931215]

>>7929736
>Link is developing pretty nicely

[Anonymous No.7931218]

I want to believe friends

[Anonymous No.7931238]

>>7930720
>>7930744
>>7930893
Seal is a service that tries to make it easy to audit contracts across multiple document formats and storage solutions. This process can be easily standardized and automated if contracts are stored and settled on the blockchain. No more sifting through pdfs, jpgs, old emails, physical documents in file cabinet dungeons, poor handwriting etc. Companies like seal could offer their service via Chainlink and reduce overhead of all interested parties by ungodly amounts.

[Anonymous No.7931242]

>>7931206
>because it's nothing. Literally every company on earth is somehow 2 or 3 degrees separation from smartcontract.com None of this ever goes anywhere.
Give one fucking example, then. Because this is extremely interesting, too interesting to be a coincidence...

[Anonymous No.7931273]

>>7930155
proof

[Anonymous No.7931279]

>>7931238
This.
This is more than just a coincidence, it makes perfect sense!

[Anonymous No.7931312]

>>7931206
and your mum's only ever one degree away from my dick. now get the fuck off this board you worthless little cnut

[Anonymous No.7931320]

>>7930380
it is

[Anonymous No.7931331]

>>7930262
>Wanting to be a tripfag and at the same time this willfully uninformed.

[Anonymous No.7931343]

Really though, who cares? LINK is 100% price dependent on BTC. As long as BTC keeps crashing so will LINK. It will probably be another year before $1 is the floor.

[Anonymous No.7931348]

>>7930893
>>7931189
>>7931206
Their partners aren't exactly literal-whos, and they've been in the game for a while:

>>7930893
>>7930922
>>7930901
Their partners aren't exactly literal-whos.

They've also been in the game for a while:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/edmundingham/2015/05/01/seal-software-founder-on-quest-to-provide-the-ultimate-in-optimized-contract-visibility-and-insight/#1c6441f76122

>To date, Seal Software has processed more than 19 million contracts through its Contract Discovery and Analytics Platform, across industries ranging from Healthcare, Financial Services, Media and Law, to Banking, Oil and Gas, and M&A. The company has several million-dollar-plus client relationships, and has grown its staff to nearly 100. It’s also partnered with the likes of IBM, Accenture, KPMG, Axiom, Elevate and Apttus.

>Contract discovery and analytics is an essential part of contract lifecycle management; what Seal Software enables companies to do is to locate their contracts within existing systems and gain complete visibility and customizable reviews and analysis through its blend of proprietary technology, machine learning and natural language processing techniques. The solution integrates seamlessly with Salesforce and all the major database management solution providers, including IBM, SAP and Oracle.

[Anonymous No.7931379]

>>7931343

[Anonymous No.7931390]

>>7930443
Sell now you emotional brainlet.

[Anonymous No.7931415]

>>7930144
kekked

[Anonymous No.7931440]

>>7931279
People have been raving about this kind of stuff wrt Factom for over a year. I thought that they might be complimentary to Chainlink but I'm starting to think they are going to be totally drowned by other companies that use Link for the exact same purpose.

[Anonymous No.7931456]

>>7931379
lol literally everybody reads that.

[Anonymous No.7931525]

>>7931456
reads what?

[Anonymous No.7931529]

>>7931379
>>7931456
Let me post this picture for 20th time but this time add a big font size text

[Anonymous No.7931570]

>>7931348

Interesting seeing Deloitte on there. I've suspected for a while that SmartContract and Deloitte either already have a partnership of some kind, or will. Seems like a perfect fit.

[Anonymous No.7931587]

>>7931440
Factom and Seal Software are totally different

[Anonymous No.7931615]

For link to succeed...it is dependent on a smart contract platform that does not implement their own oracles? why wouldnt it be better anyways to have one super dominant smart contract platform?

[Anonymous No.7931644]

>>7931615
>one super dominant smart contract platform?
That is a possibility for Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.7931663]

>>7931615

Because software never adopts one platform. AWS might be the most dominant cloud provider, but Google Cloud Services and Azure still exist. That's just the way the game works.

Variety is better because it can keep things being pushed forward. Platforms steal ideas from one another, and cater to whatever niche makes sense for them to cater to. In the end many will die off and few will remain, but having the options in an industry that's still so young is nothing but a good thing.

[Anonymous No.7931688]

>>7931644
basically what im saying is this, does there not need to be 4-8 major smart contract platform in all different languages for there to be demand for LINK ??

[Anonymous No.7931733]

>>7931242
>Hitler partnered with IBM
>Swift uses IBM software and hardware
>Link

[Anonymous No.7931740]

>>7931688
>basically what im saying is this, does there not need to be 4-8 major smart contract platform in all different languages for there to be demand for LINK ??
there already is

[Anonymous No.7931752]

>>7931663
neo ada eos do nothing more then attempt to be "better" but they are not changing the game just making significant trade-offs that they believe is important. is LINK not dependent on a lot of smart contract platforms being widely used and adopted or will a 3rd gen be able to have oracles + smart contracts and wipe the floor with everything? im trying to figure out my pot odds to equity ratio if you kno what i mean.

[Anonymous No.7931774]

>>7931379
I always chuckle at Hitler in the back.
>Hold my phone I recognize that Nazi Leader

[Anonymous No.7931781]

How many of you have actually interacted with a smart contract? I've interacted with dozens. Is biz truly just Normie's in disguise?

[Anonymous No.7931794]

>>7930238
>Expect a guest post by Sergey himself on a website called artificiallaywer. - This blog post will come out before SXSW

I'm glad you've made a tangible prediction. Now we will know if you're a fucking faggot LARPer who should kys or if you're actually a friendly insider. If he actually makes a post, I'll stop calling you a fag and telling you to kys.

[Anonymous No.7931795]

>>7931752
they exist alredy:

1. lisk = javascript
2. omiseog = go
3. neo = every language out
4. eth = whatever weird langage skelly wrote it in

plus there are others

[Anonymous No.7931804]

>>7931688

No. Even if everything but ETH died tomorrow Chainlink's network still provides for dApp developers something that's tediously difficult to deal with at the moment.

It reminds me a bit of the days you used to have to write AJAX requests in pure JS. Technically you could do it, but it sucked so much dick nobody did so the abilities of websites stayed limited. Then came along jQuery and other libraries and made AJAX ezpz, and now we've entirely shifted software architecture paradigms in a way that wouldn't have been possible if we were still hacking together AJAX requests in pure JS.

That's what Chainlink's network will do for blockchain tech. Now all the things people imagine doing with blockchain will actually be possible, and won't require everyone rolling their own oracle to communicate between contracts/chains/off chain systems. Blockchains will eat the world once dApp developers can tap into Chainlink with or without competing contract platforms. Competing platforms simply add more value for LINK being the standard oracle network given its the only one aiming to be network agnostic afaik.

[Anonymous No.7931829]

>>7931688
because the platforms themselves need to get external off-chain, to on-chain. This is a critical attack vector, and needs serious implementation of a decentralized oracle network. If ETH or NEO or any other platform implement their own oracles, they will now have to deal with that critical weakness. It will be easier to use an existing decentralized oracle solution like LINK, and LINK will have a higher opportunity to expose itself to multiple network effects: multiple smart-contract platforms, data-providers, devs who've been involved with LINK from the start etc.
See pic related

[Anonymous No.7931897]

>>7931348
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfH1B85YyFU&feature=youtu.be&t=21m50s
sergey mention esignature , docusing is company that provides electronic signature technology they are in San Francisco just like chainlink

[Anonymous No.7931912]

>>7931733
Kek

[Anonymous No.7931926]

>>7931752

Look at the history of software and get back to me. Clearly you've never spent time with Linux if you think a monopoly could or should emerge this early into the game.

And those attempts to be better are what has pushed software forward to where it is now. There's no reason Ethereum will stay the main contract platform other than network effect. But dApps are inherently a developer focused service, so in the end the platform with the best toolkits and least barriers to entry will win, and OMG and NEO are both aiming to position themselves against ETH quite strongly on that front. Keep in mind most developers still haven't made the leap to working with blockchains, so they haven't committed to one chain or the other yet. Its pure folly to assume some monolithic stasis will occur and Ethereum will remain the only contract chain.

[Anonymous No.7931988]

>>7931781

Yes. 90% of this board is new as of last summer. They have no idea how any of the tech works, they just know how to chase PnDs around hoping for lambos and moons.

[Anonymous No.7932000]

>>7931587
yes they are, but factom is pushing document and contract auditability as one of its main use cases. they are specifically targetting lenders for this purpose

[Anonymous No.7932052]

>>7931794
same

[Anonymous No.7932054]

So Sherlock is legit?

[Anonymous No.7932062]

>>7931897
yes, Sergey's speaking along with the founder of Docusign at SXSW:
https://schedule.sxsw.com/2018/events/PP80326

Obviously it's just speculation, but the fact that Sergey is rubbing shoulders with folks like this, the writing is on the wall that he's getting his foot in the door in that sector

[BUY LINK SIRS VERY GOOD !ot.ZdN7A/6 No.7932086]

>>7930310
excuse me brah?

[Anonymous No.7932089]

I've always wanted to live to see the day lawyers get completely BTFO. I didn't think I'd get the chance to invest in it before anyone knew wtf it was. Goddamn its going to be good knowing that as I get rich, lawyers are getting fired.

[Anonymous No.7932104]

>>7931988
This board is actually pretty smart, or at least has higher concentration of smarter people. When I look at plebbit and I look what people are shilling there and what coins they are legitimately invested (not for PnD or a joke, legit thinking they have a future) it's fucking ridiculous. 90% of invest into total scam shitcoins and they will get burned heavily over the next 3 years. On /biz/ it's probably like 50% but only thanks to ChainLink being shilled so heavily here.

[Anonymous No.7932110]

>>7929736
ICO using chain link https: // ori.network

[Anonymous No.7932141]

>>7929736
Retards, shill whatever you want whenever you want. You don't need permission, you don't understand why you do things, you're chasing an experience and you're worthless.

[Anonymous No.7932142]

>>7932104
And it's so ridiculously easy to invest and get a 100x over the next few years if you're not a total brainlet who at least has an idea what a blockchain is and dyor on whether a token actually has a value.
The only coins I'm invested in are ETH, LINK, OMG and REQ and I'm not even 100% sure on REQ. 99% of coins are scams.

[Anonymous No.7932152]

Guys, when do i buy link? is now a good time?

[Anonymous No.7932177]

>>7932089
All those smug "hard working" faggots who took out hundreds of thousands of dollars of loans so they could "network" and scab off of the efforts and gaps in trust between other people. I'm so excited for them get assblasted while my node does their old job better than them for a fraction of their hourly charge.

[Anonymous No.7932195]

>>7932142
Why not RLC?

[Anonymous No.7932198]

>>7932104

That's because some of us here remember sub $1 BTC when it was only talked about on /g/. Some have a clue where this has come from and where its going.

The number of plebbit tier idiots here has grown a shitload though. Its now saturated with brainlets who just bought in chasing eachother around. Reddit ends up with the spillover from that, with PnDs getting promoted as good buys to brainlets on Reddit by the brainlets here. And the cycle continues again and again.

Makes for easy money if you have patience and can filter the noise.

[Anonymous No.7932227]

>>7932142
>LINK, OMG and REQ

[Anonymous No.7932254]

>>7929736
>When should we shill it outside of biz?
You already tried this and got caught out like the dirty ass pajeets you are.

[Anonymous No.7932256]

>>7932177

Same. I bought a house not long ago. The amount of money those glorified paper shufflers charge to print out some goddamn paper is disgusting.

They've got to go. We've known for years they'd be the first white class job to be automated, and I'm excited that by watching my portfolio grow I'll be watching their job market shrink by just as much. Feels good.

[Anonymous No.7932273]

Yeah, LINK is about as useful as a trike bike. Pic related. Linkies BTFO

[Anonymous No.7932275]

>>7932256

white class = white collar/knowledge worker class. fucked up that wording bad.

[Anonymous No.7932292]

>>7932152
no never

[Anonymous No.7932302]

>>7932273

Oh neat. Some literally who said some presumably funny unrelated thing.

Better sell my stack.

[Anonymous No.7932304]

>>7929736

>When should we shill it outside of biz?

Never, you pathetic fucking newfags. Never. The main net will shill itself. God you faggots are pathetic.

[Anonymous No.7932318]

>>7931926
i am not an expert software historian at this but i am trying to understand. your explanation does make sense and clears some of my questions up. what do you think about this?
>i think oracles are critical for smart contracts to be more than digital accountants, but chainlink itself is a bet against a dominant smart contract platform emerging, because such a platform would itself have its own oracles.
>chainlink can only really shine in the same scenario that would let blockchains like ark or icon shine, where we have 5-10 smart contract platforms, or payment platforms, all with huge adoption and usage, where we require some kind of interconnectivity between them.
>personally i dont think that's the way the market is heading

[Anonymous No.7932377]

>>7932000
how are they different from Quantstamp?

[Anonymous No.7932379]

what is the actual realistic estimate of LINK price by EOY

[Anonymous No.7932404]

>>7932195
It's solid but I don't want to diversify too much. I believe in the 4 projects I have very strongly and have done my research that they have slim or no competition. With RLC it has ton of competition.

[Anonymous No.7932419]

>>7932379
1000 US dollars

[Anonymous No.7932424]

>>7932318
Whoever wrote that a brainlet with just enough education to be able to pretend like they have thoughts. They have somehow managed to research link and figure out what it does and at the same time miss the entire point of it's existence.

[Anonymous No.7932431]

>>7932379
Honestly $1 if we're lucky. If BTC crashes then its over for link.

[Anonymous No.7932439]

>>7929736
/r/cryptocurrency has 600k subs. /r/cryptotechnology has 17k

[Anonymous No.7932472]

>>7932424
>>7932424
>Whoever wrote that a brainlet with just enough education to be able to pretend like they have thoughts. They have somehow managed to research link and figure out what it does and at the same time miss the entire point of it's existence.
could someone expand on this anon's points of why whoever wrote this managed to miss the whole point of LINK?

[Anonymous No.7932477]

>>7932431
cough cough, more eth and fiat pairs, decentralised exchanges. In 1-2 years btc will cease to be the market index.

[Anonymous No.7932497]

>>7932318

Its definitely the way the market is heading. 2017 was just the start of it. 2018 is when we'll start to see more adoption on each platform. 2019 we'll have a better idea of which platforms are here to stay along with some new platforms that aim to solve new problems we discover at scale, and by 2020 every thing is going to be in the process of switching to DLT.

The current state of contract platforms is like a computer running an Intel 286, and we're just now entering the realm of a 386 with network support through LINK. We're still so early into the development of blockchains that I expect nothing to look the same in it in the next 5 years. We're still trying to solve huge problems like scalability and side chain support. Betting on a monopoly in a marketplace predicated on decentralization is a losing bet.

[Anonymous No.7932529]

Link is being listed on poloniex

[Anonymous No.7932542]

>>7932377
Quantstamp are concerned with auditing the code of smart contracts for security flaws. Factom is concerned with document/contract fidelity, storage and auditability. Totally unrelated.

[Anonymous No.7932562]

>>7932404
>xrb
>god tier
didn't you listen to assblaster? XRB is on the same level as tron

[Anonymous No.7932595]

>>7932562
The tech is solid, that alone makes it 1000x better than TRON. The fact that's overhyped and overbought is another thing, but that doesn't change the fact that it's a better buy than 99% of other coins that exist right now.

[Anonymous No.7932615]

>>7930443
Lol you’re gonna end up an hero with that brainlet mindset. Either get your motivation in check or kill kys now and stop wasting the time of people around you

[Anonymous No.7932660]

>>7932595
The tech ain't solid. DAGs are a meme that will never work. They're just unplausible.

[Anonymous No.7932739]

>>7932660
Come on anon, I'm not a brainlet. That sort of FUD doesn't work on me. I don't even hold nano.

[Anonymous No.7932783]

>>7932404
>bitcoin
>stellar
>omisego
>blue chip
More like blue shit

[Really sick of all the new tri(...) !LBCiw43GVk No.7932845]

>>7930310

[Anonymous No.7932855]

>>7932419
I see this happening in 2020.

[Anonymous No.7932923]

>>7932855

Same.

[Anonymous No.7932974]

>>7932855
>>7932923
Delusional. $100 maybe

[Anonymous No.7932989]

>>7931988
Where have all the retards that were here before gone instead?

[Anonymous No.7933049]

>>7930155
Mmmmmmmm dubs confirm

[Bukake !UI.NEsTD1M No.7933139]

>>7932845

[Anonymous No.7933157]

my srs price target is $100 EOY 2019, no point predicting in the interim as it’s just hype cycles

[Anonymous No.7933179]

>>7932477
What we really need is a LINK/BCH pairing.

[Anonymous No.7933301]

>>7932783
stellar is niggershit but I do think omisego is going to go on a bull run this year that will make antshares run look tame

[Anonymous No.7933451]

>>7933301
OMG marketcap is already high though.

[Anonymous No.7933507]

>>7930321
sneaky, mean!

[Anonymous No.7933630]

>>7930720
>from seal software's website

[Anonymous No.7933685]

>>7932989
Yachts

[MegaAssBlaster !9MDhSiBklc No.7933718]

Hello my boyos, this is assblasters dad, assblaster cannot come out and larp because his mom just penisblasted him "kek".

[Kekblaster No.7933915]

>>7933718
nice just bought 100kek

[Anonymous No.7934035]

>>7931781
Normie in disguise here. Can confirm.

[Anonymous No.7934083]

>>7931804
Doing AJAX in pure JS isn't that bad desu.

[Anonymous No.7934105]

>>7931781
I just lost 6 ether on etheroll

[Anonymous No.7934126]

>>7934083
thank you I thought I was going crazy misremembering what it was like, what was this nigga on about

[Anonymous No.7934145]

>>7933630
Why did they bother to underline those two customers?

[TheNightman !!AOnsBuqo6YP No.7934150]

>>7933718

[Anonymous No.7934332]

>>7934150
begone tripcoder

[Anonymous No.7934398]

>>7934083

I found it gnarly. I just in general find XML gnarly so my memories of pre-library AJAX may be tainted by that, but dealing with XHR objects natively was way grosser than the simple callback approach that's usually used now. With the simplicity of handling those requests with less verbosity/familiarity with the underlying tech required of developers, we've completely shifted paradigms to treat JS/sites as full blown apps now.

Ultimately a bad analogy I spose since LINK is going to be a way bigger deal than jQuery/moo/whatever JS library and don't really have much to do with eachother other than the fact that LINK will enable a paradigm shift for dApps.

[TheNightman !!AOnsBuqo6YP No.7934414]

>>7934332
>his brain is to small to understand what im trying to do.

I wish i had one of those wojak pics so i could respond correctly to you

[Anonymous No.7934423]

>>7934398
Well I fucking hate XML, I'll agree with you on that.

[Anonymous No.7934480]

>>7934398
>Mfw I read Gnarly and I'm getting flashbacks of Tubular. Fuck that shit.

[Anonymous No.7934571]

>>7931379
Anyone drinking at the Opera Bar is a faggot

[Anonymous No.7934753]

>>7932142
is ICX really a shitcoin. we are going to need some type of interconnect ability no?

[Anonymous No.7935047]

>>7934571
It's nice for one drink for the view but the people are horrible, the food is terrible and the drinks are way overpriced.

[Anonymous No.7935233]

>>7931829
>your pic related
what about mobius?

[Anonymous No.7935254]

>>7935233
actually chek that doesn't LINK have a patent? maybe a dreamed that

[Anonymous No.7935315]

>>7934414
Here's one just for you

[Anonymous No.7935984]

According to SherlockLink, a guest article by Sergey will appear on artificiallawyer.com sometime this month.
https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2016/07/22/al-interview-smart-contracts-could-help-reduce-corruption/
Notable article on AL by the CMO of Seal Software:
https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2018/02/23/guest-post-why-we-need-intelligent-contracts/

>There have been plenty of examples in the public domain. My current favourite is AXA Insurance’s Fizzy offering which they market as a 100% automated, 100% secure platform for parametric insurance against delayed flights.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJZulZ_-CMI
now, What do you think Fizzy needs to operate? A way of transferring real life data about plane locations, times, etc. into the insurance smart contract.

Seal is a service that tries to make it easy to audit contracts across multiple document formats and storage solutions. This process can be easily standardized and automated if contracts are stored and settled on the blockchain. No more sifting through pdfs, jpgs, old emails, physical documents in file cabinet dungeons, poor handwriting etc. Companies like seal could offer their service via Chainlink and reduce overhead of all interested parties by ungodly amounts. Seal customers? Docusign and Salesforce among others.

Sergey's first tweet in over a year was regarding a quote from Marc Benioff, the CEO of salesforce. Salesforce gave a $250k startup grant to a company called Loop & Tie. One of Chainlink's software engineers is Dmitri Roche, who worked for L&T.
Sergey is also presenting alongside Docusign this month at SXSW.

[Anonymous No.7936328]

>>7929736
make sure you show everyone this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzWjpjnRf-s

[Anonymous No.7936612]

>>7930901
Missed this earlier ... but the latest version of Seal Software 3.0 has a patent from 1997 .... Under IBM ... just sayin ..

[Anonymous No.7936647]

>>7936612
what does this mean?

[Anonymous No.7936771]

>>7936647
Eh ... bad info ... looks like a different platform under IBM ..