Trillionaires

[Anonymous No.7663653]

why is it that everyone considers Bill Gates or Bezos the richest man in the world while disregarding the rest of the trillionaires in the world? why is the top 100 richest on forbes barely equate to 1 trillion?

what about the other 100 trillion $ of assets?

[Anonymous No.7663809]

>>7663653

bump

[Anonymous No.7664087]

Legit richest person in the world is Putin, hand down closest to being a Trillionaire.

[Anonymous No.7664106]

theyre not allowed to name (((them)))

[Anonymous No.7664126]

IIRC it's because Forbes doesn't include legacy dynasties

[Anonymous No.7664194]

>>7663653
the forbes list would just list rothschilds, but the rothschilds don't own very much personally, its in a trust. when you hear about on of them dying and they X00 million to be taxed, that was the pocket change that they where using. the really rich don't own anything, its all held in a trust for generations.

[Anonymous No.7664209]

>>7663653
Saudis...

[Anonymous No.7664214]

>>7664087
>>7663653
>they don't know about the jews

[Anonymous No.7664215]

>all these bluepilled retards

[Anonymous No.7664260]

>>7663653
I wouldn't want it to be publicly known that I'm a trillionaire.

At that point theirs no need, you could buy every sports team in America without breaking a sweat.

You can buy whatever/whom ever you want. Your beyond the scope of "ultra high" networth banking wise. Everything around you is custom, down to your shoes.

The consequences? You can buy that too

[Anonymous No.7664395]

>>7664215
How does this image refute the point in the first frame?
if anything, it implies that the richest people are even more rich than the guy on the right believes

[Anonymous No.7664437]

>>7664395
Im afraid theres no hope for you anon. we're going to have to put you down.

[Anonymous No.7664531]

>>7664395
Are you braindead?

[Anonymous No.7664577]

>>7664531
>>7664437
explain it then, if you can

[Anonymous No.7664627]

>>7664215
>penance
Holy shit I can only imagine they punish her in some satanic ritual type shit like they regularly hold. Psychos.

[Anonymous No.7664667]

>>7663653
many actually consider Putin or possibly middle eastern royal families to be wealthiest on Earth, but it's hard to know their exact net worth because so much of it was gained illegally or isn't public record.

Forget exact numbers but some estimated Putin was worth $500B+ and some saudi princes are worth $1T+

[SmugLong No.7664704]

>>7664577
It's not meant to refute the point in the first frame
It's supposed to show that the Forbes list is bullshit

Are you dribbling over yourself right now?

[Anonymous No.7664763]

>>7664215
must have been (((them))), huh?

[Anonymous No.7664777]

>>7664704
why introduce a point to refute, pretend to refute it, but then don't?
maybe it would make sense if the second character at the end comes to the realization that the problem is worse than he first thought
but he doesn't

[Anonymous No.7664835]

>>7664577
> "Every response on this board must be disagreeing with me"

[SmugLong No.7664841]

>>7664763
100%. Are you implying it wasn't?
Lmao
YouTube Rothschild confronted and skip to 1:25 in the video
You tell me what that laugh means

[Anonymous No.7664900]

>>7664841
Seek help.

[Anonymous No.7664953]

>>7664900
OY VEY!
Not an argument faggot

[Anonymous No.7665310]

>>7663653
The entire point of any "World's Richest" list is to lie to the plebs and make them think that the people featured in the list really are the "world's richest."

[Anonymous No.7665572]

>>7664835
>point completely destroyed by simple question, resorts to insults and deflection

I smell /pol/fags