Chainlink

[Anonymous No.7622213]

Why is nobody talking about Chainlink?? It's mooning

[Anonymous No.7622273]

literally 20 threads, stfu

[Anonymous No.7622305]

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand LINK. Sergey's genius is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of LINK's features will go over a typical poorfag's head. There’s also LINK’s solution to the Oracle problem, which is deftly woven into it's source code - it's mooning trajectory draws heavily from Antshares, for instance. The LINKies understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of this cryptocurrency, to realise that Sergey is not just a genius - that his smart contract solution will change your LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike LINK truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the appeal of LINK’s true creator “Satoshi Nakamoto,” who's name is cryptically referenced to "Sergey Nazarov". I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpleton Arkies scratching their heads in confusion as Nazarov’s genius wit unfolds itself on their computer screens. What fools.. how I pity them.

[Anonymous No.7622349]

>>7622213
I know right? Finally a good coin and almost no threads about it. Smh.

[Anonymous No.7622384]

>>7622213
kys

[Anonymous No.7622429]

[Anonymous No.7622474]

>why is no one talking about chainlink

[Anonymous No.7622519]

>>7622429

[Anonymous No.7622691]

This could be the small pump that ass blaster told us about