Serious Question

[Anonymous No.7556973]

Why do so many people on /biz/ hate on LINK?

Yet I see them invest in coins like REQ, KNC, and ZRX just to name a few.

When all of these projects are going to depend on LINK's oracles.

Do these people not read white papers? Do they not understand what LINK is going to do?

[Anonymous No.7557156]

>>7556973
A lot of them DO invest in LINK. They just get off posting LINK hate threads and watching the replies while they play with their little penises. Then there are a few who actually believe the FUD and are too pussy to invest.

[Anonymous No.7557236]

Guys, this is fucked up, but hear me out.
I just spoke with the new marketing director of Chainlink and he had some pretty interesting things to tell.

We all know that Sergey has gotten kind of big lately, but the last months it has sprialed out of control. He is now so morbidly obese that he cannot support his own weight. Apparently he used a large chunk of the ICO money to install a huge aquarium in his house. He, and I kid you not, spends 22 houres a day in it to release the strain on his knees and back. According to the MD of Chainlink, he has switched to eating fish food. He says it has the optimal balance of minerals an positive vibrations. But the most fucked up thing is that he is supposedly mating with a clown fish. I don't know if the fish consent or not, but with Sergeys current size I don't think he have a say in the matter. Also, once a day he is hoisted out of the tank and onto a couch so that he can watch his favorite TV show Dr. Phil.

I don't know what to think anymore /biz/. I'm not a professional investor, but I don't think link is a good investment if all of this is true?

[Anonymous No.7557395]

>>7557156
>>>7556973 (OP)
> while they play with their little penises.

kek

[Anonymous No.7557422]

[Anonymous No.7557450]

It has way too many shills so i distrust it inherently

also /biz/ is (almost) always wrong

[Anonymous No.7557456]

>>7556973
I find LINK weird technically. The way they provide data to the Blockchain is by accepting calls on a centralized API. So data requests to the Blockchain have to originate off-chain. Its solution is poor compared to what MOBI is planning for their initial implementation IMO. LINK implementation has a lot to be desired in my opinion. I agree with the people who say they're trying to do too much.

To expand on what I said, my personal issue with LINK is their API:
https://www.smartcontract.com/

To buy data and create an Ethereum contract to use it, you need to go a centralized API. In practice, this means that even though the data retrieval is decentralized, the management of that data is completely centralized.

Mobius will be completely different. To request the data, it can originate from on-chain or off-chain. The API for requesting the data is also each individual node, which then propagates that request across the network. So even though Mobius will have a centralized FE which makes it easy for people to use it, it means that the requesting of the data and the management of it all, is completely decentralized.

Also keep in mind that the retrieval of data into Ethereum is just one aspect of Mobius, the aspect included in the initial implementation. There's also BTC/Hyperledger and what MOBI can do there, The BTC/Hyperledger functionality will be completely different to that, and creates a whole new aspect not yet seen in any other Oracle projects at all.

[Anonymous No.7557526]

>>7556973

I own LINK and REQ, and ZRX. My money is on ZRX to be honest. I have not been this excited about a project since ETH.

>>7557156

So what if I play with my penis? We all have our kinks anon. Mines watching FUD on LINK.....

[Anonymous No.7557537]

>>7556973
most of the people fuding LINK are LINK holders shit posting to confuse newfags and brainlets
>t. 60k linky fud this piece of shit all the time

[Anonymous No.7557564]

>>7556973
I'm a linky and I hate link. Why? Because it dumped when everything else mooned. However, you have to ask yourself WHY it did that. LINK is heavily traded by bots. You can see it by looking at the trades for even a few minutes. The dumb can only mean accumulation, which is good in the long term. But it's bad for me because it fucked my life.

[Anonymous No.7557629]

>>7556973
Because you spam threads about the fucking thing EVERY. GOD. DAMN. DAY. Yeah, the project has a lot of potential, but there's not much to talk about day-to-day and because of that it's the same gay shitposts every time. Give it a rest for a bit and we'll stop flaming you faggots.
>t. 60% LINK holder

[Anonymous No.7557636]

>>7557526
ZRX is interesting.
I'm gonna read into it, but I'm curious if you happen to know the answer to my initial concern with it.
>Are the trades processed in batches to distribute the cost of gas, or is each trade responsible for the gas cost?

[Anonymous No.7557670]

>>7556973

>ZRX depends on LINK

You absolute fucking brainlet

[Anonymous No.7557714]

>>7557456
At first I thought you were retarded, then I see your point.
Good point on the centralized API call. It is a concern.

[Anonymous No.7557716]

>>7556973
the amount of blatant shilling is insane around this coin, really hurts it

[Anonymous No.7558045]

>>7556973
Repeat after me: "link is a meme" -> "it's true value is 46 cents"