/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.7287825]

Anyone program in the crypto space?

I've authored a few ETH contracts now, and I've been eyeing Quantum for their contracts as well. Does anyone here have experience with the Quantum VM? I don't really think ETH has a robust system, it feels very clunky and I'm wondering if other implementations are better.

Any contract ideas you guys would like to see implemented in ETH? I'd like to challenge myself a bit.

[Anonymous No.7288492]

Theres literally nothing to implement besides gambling sites and ponzis. What kind of answer are you expecting?

[Anonymous No.7288542]

>>7287825
Something that makes use of external data from APIs.

Right now you can use Oraclize, in the future you'll be using Chainlink

[Anonymous No.7288577]

>>7287825
You'd probably have better luck at >>>/g/

This is a retched hive of scum and villainy.

[Anonymous No.7288759]

>>7288492
Not really. Further, why respond if you think there's nothing more to be added to the space?

>>7288542
Hmmm, seems like there's already several solutions for this already though. Given the nature of the project it also seems like I would need resources to pay for external APIs I am making a bridge for and for infrastructure. I'm not really that well versed in ETH development to risk all of that.

>>7288577
/g/ can really get butthurt about crypto talk

[Anonymous No.7288846]

>>7287825
I'm working on a proof-of-concept contracting system for landownership in the public sector.

I'm not sure why anyone would use tokens or coins to do it though. Unless you want it on a public decentralize network, but no business or institution is going to do block-chain without node control.

[Anonymous No.7288922]

>>7288846
>I'm working on a proof-of-concept contracting system for landownership in the public sector.

What do you mean contracting system? As in, a smart contract to denote Land Ownership? Have you read through the developing ERC721 spec?

Is this your own project or are you being paid/part of a group dev project?

>but no business or institution is going to do block-chain without node control.

I think that depends on the sector and the use case of the token.

[Anonymous No.7288973]

>>7287825
Hey anon, any tips on where to learn how to make an ETH contract?

[Anonymous No.7289063]

>>7288973
The documentation out there is honestly total shit. The ETH docs are an alright starting place, but really it took me just googling shit as I went along. Do you have any prior development experience? I'm a wageslave dev so the transition has been easier than for noobs, I'm certain.

[Anonymous No.7289163]

>>7288922
Today record of ownership is stored in public archives, but it might as well be stored on a public block chain that we run with trusted partners. Basically it works a lot like ERC721, but without the calculations because we control every entry and access point.

You won't see anything that requires miners amount to any real world usage because nobody would be able to defend the cost to the environment politically.

[Anonymous No.7289248]

>>7289163
So you're talking about a proprietary chain, then? I suppose there's the theoretical level where some would argue that it's not decentralized, but for certain use cases I don't think that's necessary.

It also sounds like it's either govt based work or some contract/startup, so either way that sounds like a really cool opportunity anon, I'm jealous.

[Anonymous No.7289261]

It's about time that ownership of precious metals be on the public ledger. A serial number on the bar would not be sufficient due to the ability to file or simply melt. Possibly rfid idk.

[Anonymous No.7289430]

>>7289261
https://steemit.com/gold/@dollarvigilante/can-gold-and-silver-be-put-on-the-blockchain

https://orocrypt.com/

Seems like this might already be done, but I'm uncertain. I'm not certain how RFID would work with that though, would it be attached to the packaging? Interesting concept, nonetheless. I don't have the real world knowledge or contacts to make this sort of project work, unfortunately.

[Anonymous No.7289461]

>>7289063
I have a STEM degree with programming experience, so maybe I will be able to learn it?

[Anonymous No.7289553]

>>7289461
I've had my Electrical Engineering college bro review my code and he was able to get it more or less. He's a big C buff though, so he has a big advantage. I would say look at the ERC20 standard, then read the ERC721 specs for an idea of how these standardized token models are being developed. From there you could look at different examples on github (Decentraland and CryptoKitties are both good resources for looking at complete code) to get a feel for how things are done generally.

Oh, and the development environment, debugging, etc, is a fucking nightmare. I thought ETH was doomed before I got into the smart contracts and now I am positive it is doomed, long term. It's so hard to deploy contracts that it will eventually lead to centralization.

[Anonymous No.7289753]

>>7289553
I have a similar background to your friend. Good tips, thanks anon!

[Anonymous No.7289827]

>>7289753
Sure thing. Would it be worth it to set up a biz developers discord?

[Anonymous No.7290571]

How can you possibly defend this?

Bittrex have not stated their reasoning for delisting, Jez sans shurgs his shoulders with I dunno cos they never mailed me.... and we now have rumour with ZERO source that bittrex is doing it prep itself for SEC regulation.~

Dont you find it a bit odd that FUN appear so apathetic about it.... in contrast to their excitement when they were listed?

And there are people posting here and on boobtube that its all ok it was going to happen anyway. All normal and nothing to worry about.... and that its was all about ICE a circlejerk that lasts for half a day.

Well fuck me, what a way to lead people on.

[Anonymous No.7290586]

>>7287825

the things I would do to her..

[Anonymous No.7290611]

>>7290571
fuck sake.

for the peace of your thread no, I do backend development .

[Anonymous No.7290676]

>>7290586
who is she

[Anonymous No.7290751]

Op, what do you think about EOS?

t.C++ coder

[Anonymous No.7290784]

>>7290586
>>7290676
Faith Goldy

>>7290611
I'm a backend dev myself.

>>7290751
I've not looked at EOS, got a rundown? I'll go read up now.

>>7290571
what?

[Anonymous No.7290798]

>>7287825
>>7287825
any opportunities for java coder.

[Anonymous No.7290842]

>>7290798
I work with Java a lot, but I don't really see it being applicable to the space. A lot of the ecosystem is moving to dApp methodology, meaning lots of JS and node.

[Anonymous No.7290886]

>>7290842
Fuck JS, its spreading like syphilis.

[Anonymous No.7290920]

>>7290886
I don't disagree.

Ethereum made their own programming language for implementation of Smart Contracts, called Solidity.

[Anonymous No.7290925]

>>7290784
where is the pic from in the op?

[Anonymous No.7290960]

>>7290784
I don't shill it, but I am frustrated by eth fees for running code, of course it's understandable for me as a programmer why it works like this, but I don't think smart contracts can be seriously used with such approach as in eth.

[Anonymous No.7290975]

>>7290925
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYWVT3uMBnw

here's another for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytsUTS5COsc

[Anonymous No.7291012]

>>7290975
Shit, she is only 29 years old but looks like late 30s.

[Anonymous No.7291044]

>>7290960
Well, the important thing to recall is that the purpose of using the chain itself for programming is to allow validation of code across the decentralized network. There's a lot of stuff I feel like would be cool to implement on the chain, but the fees in gas reflect the fact the application would be better suited as a tool on the side.

EOS seems to be...some kind of VM environment for mutliple coins? Their white paper doesn't seem very clear to me.

>>7291012
got those DSL, all I care about.

[Anonymous No.7291082]

>>7291044
Whats DSL? Pretty sure you are not talking about modems?

[Anonymous No.7291103]

>>7291082
Dick Sucking Lips.

[Anonymous No.7291285]

>>7288846
doing the same thing anon. I think it's a good use case.

[Anonymous No.7291460]

Just wait for Tezos to come out and learn to use it. It's the only platform to use formal verification and I would say that will be the biggest meme in smart contracts in future.

[Anonymous No.7291484]

>>7291460
I've been waiting for Tezos, but in the meantime I'm doing what I can. I've been wondering what the next big SC coin will be and I definitely agree that Tezos is one of the most promising in the space.

[Anonymous No.7291486]

>>7287825

We’re doing a token sale for a payments system for freelancers. We need a smart contract dev such as yourself. The percent of tokens we’d give you will make you rich.

[e-mail]

[Anonymous No.7291535]

>>7291486
Let me be clear, I am not a smart contract developer. I now have a small bit of experience doing some smart contracts, yes, but my knowledge in the space does not qualify me for that title. I can definitely send you a message though.