Chainlink vs Ethereum : who will prevail?

[Anonymous No.7282144]

Ethereum : impressive track record, proven working product, great team, charismatic leader

Chainlink: two people team including one literal philosopher, classic pump and dump price fluctuations

Now tell me: why would chainlink implement decentralized oracles before ethereum? Kek.

[Anonymous No.7282187]

>>7282144
Cardano will prevail

The era of those boomer coins is long over

[Anonymous No.7282207]

>>7282144
lel you're pretty stupid aint ya

[Anonymous No.7282233]

>>7282144
>Chainlink vs Ethereum
>fucking erc-20 token vs biggest smart contract Blockchain

[Anonymous No.7282245]

>>7282144
I can tell that you are new fag. This was literally same argument for eth as "btc will implement smart contracts". They didn't nor will vitalik because they he is focused on on fundamental eth infrastructure rather than derivatives. That's why there is chain link, enigma, kyber, omnise go, etc.

[Anonymous No.7282276]

Because putting Oracles in Ethereum directly would be stupid you idiot.

[Anonymous No.7282325]

>>7282144
Why is vitalik standing in that pose?

It looks like he has a massive..

[Anonymous No.7282326]

>>7282144
Why is vitalik standing in that pose?

It looks like he has a massive..

[Anonymous No.7282360]

>>7282144 (OP) #
Why is vitalik standing in that pose?

It looks like he has a massive..

[Anonymous No.7282363]

Vitalick my balls.

[Anonymous No.7282414]

>>7282245
Vitalik can buy Sergey if he wants... Et voila they have someone focused

[Anonymous No.7282435]

>>7282187
This unironically

[Anonymous No.7282453]

>>7282144
>smartest people who ever lived were philosophers
>chainlink is made to solve a real problem
>ethereum was made because a kid was upset that his class got nerfed in wow

[Anonymous No.7282474]

>>7282144
>Israel institute
Fuck that Ethereum kike.

[Anonymous No.7282516]

>>7282453
What you fail to understand is that ethereum and chainlink tackle the same problem, namely making smart contracts a viable option. And ethereum is much more than just Vitalik, who's a recognized genius

[Anonymous No.7282554]

this is a good explanation from vitalik about oracles and why ethereum doesn't have them natively

https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/ethereum-and-oracles/

[Anonymous No.7282625]

>>7282144
>why would chainlink implement decentralized oracles before ethereum? Kek.
Because Vitalik himself said the best Oracle solution would be built on top of Ethereum by a third party.

https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/ethereum-and-oracles/
>the most exciting end-user-centric [oracle] innovation is likely what will be built on top [of Ethereum]
>base-level protocols [like Ethereum] are your servant, not your master

[Anonymous No.7282684]

>>7282516
You have no idea what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.7282735]

>>7282625
why would it be chainlink and not someone competitor company?

[Anonymous No.7282741]

>>7282144
It's more like "how perfect will this team be" rather than "prevailing".
ChainLink will suit as a connector to ETH and will enable ETH broader adoption. The more ETH adoption rises the more ChainLink will be used too. It is more a symbiosis. Price wise ETH will always be more worth. ChainLink will rise in value up to anything in the top 8 crytos but never #1

[Anonymous No.7282772]

>>7282144
stealthy fucker

[Anonymous No.7282780]

>>7282735
That's a completely different question.
Simple answer: there is no competitor yet, not a single oracle solution out there is actually decentralized outside of Chainlink.
Also CL already has years of top-level industry exposure to its name, and an initial product release around the corner.

[Anonymous No.7282802]

>>7282741
>ChainLink will suit as a connector to ETH
And all other blockchains, DLTs, Smart Contract platforms, ...

>Price wise ETH will always be more worth
No.
On many different levels, no.

[Anonymous No.7282821]

>>7282516
fuck you, bitch bastird. oracle is a real problem!

[Anonymous No.7282839]

>>7282821

[Anonymous No.7282841]

>>7282144
> Trucks vs roads, who will prevail?

[Anonymous No.7282857]

>>7282144
Different use cases you daft cunt

[Anonymous No.7282885]

>>7282841

this. anyone who doesn't understand that ethereum and link are complimentary and not competitors is a brainlet

[Anonymous No.7282903]

>>7282144
>comparing eth to an erc-20 token

am i missing something? they the same thing right?

[Anonymous No.7282936]

>>7282903
>am i missing something?
Considering that you apparently don't know the first thing about Chainlink, I'd say so.

[Anonymous No.7282955]

>>7282144

[Anonymous No.7282985]

>>7282936
yeah yeah smart contracts. I get it.

how can anyone expect a token to go up in more value then eth though since its the same shit

[Anonymous No.7283027]

>>7282985
>yeah yeah smart contracts. I get it.
More like "yeah yeah decentralized proprietary network of nodes".

>how can anyone expect a token to go up in more value then eth though since its the same shit
The value of an ETH token is in no way tied or even related to the value of ETH.

[Anonymous No.7283072]

>>7283027
>The value of an ETH token is in no way tied or even related to the value of ETH.

thanks for clearing that up. Im still trying to figure this stuff out

[Anonymous No.7283082]

>>7282985
if it serves different blockchains? unless you believe that ethereum alone will run the whole global economy

[Anonymous No.7283154]

both shitcoins

[Anonymous No.7283472]

>>7282453
Hey! Don't say shit about money skelly!
He's just solving the warlock problem, a'ight?

[Anonymous No.7283539]

>>7282684
Because...?

[Anonymous No.7283579]

>>7283539
Because it's obvious.

[Anonymous No.7283633]

>>7282885
>ethereum and link are complimentary
>complimentary
>brainlet
>complimentary
Top fucking Kek!

[Anonymous No.7283841]

>>7283633
Jesus christ go back to bed kid

[Anonymous No.7284064]

>>7283841
>ethereum and link are complimentary