LINK will crater after the Q1 conference

[Anonymous No.7116259]

I've seen this sort of thing all the time with small cap biotechs with upcoming catalysts. People pump up the price before a conference or an FDA ruling. Then noobs jump buy into the hype and jump in thinking they are geniuses without realizing that the impending news is already factored into the price.

Once the conference / ruling occurs the price either quickly spikes down around 10-20% in the case of the good, but expected news, or gets demolished 50+% by bad news.


I think in the case of LINK we have to prepare for the worst case scenario. The slack and twitter pages have been a graveyard. No news. The price rising up over $1.00 simply due to BTC spiking to $20,000. This is clear if you look at the market as a whole.


If you think there is going to be some massive reveal about partnerships with huge multinational banks you are hopelessly delusional and should seek immediate mental help.


Look at his past history. At the Bitcoin Super Conference he discusses Smartcontract technology outside of get rich quick Token sales. Sergey is notorious for remaining silent on the LINK tokens. He's going to spend the entire time talking about different possibilities smartcontracts have in government and developing countries. He will probably never mention LINK by name outside of the logo and mention of decentralized oracles.

SXSW his audience is rated medium and his photo isn't added to the website. The topic is: Can we replace lawyers? Again, he's going to focus on smartcontracts and the possibilities it has in government, the legal system, and global trade. If you're relatively new to ChainLink, this is what Sergey does. He is way more focused on what the technology can do for the world. Not making his token holders profits.


The whole point of LINK is stay tied to 1 USD just like tether. Its not an investment. Its a fucking token used to pay for a utility. It has no use outside of the smart contract environment. Just read the fucking white paper.

[Anonymous No.7116290]

>>7116259
Sergey Nazarov
Nazarov became a platoon commander in the Dzerz Division of the Russian Federation Ministry of Internal Affairs specalising in cryprography. He was assigned to the 4th Company of 4th Regiment, where among his duties was the protection kremin foreign policy communications in transit. In 2014 he became an informant when he was recruited by the MVD's FSB counterintelligence section and in 2016 he was officially transferred to the Third Chief Directorate of the FSB, Military Counter Intelligence. Later that year, after studying for a year at the Novosibirsk Military Counter Intelligence School, he became an operational officer and served in FSB military counterintelligence where he has worked on seconment from the Russian ebassy in Washington.

Sergey began his cover career building peer-to-peer marketplaces, going on to the investment team at FirstMark Capital. He joined the cryptocurrency revolution in 2011, and believes it has the ability to change the way societies distribute wealth, enforce contracts, and share critical information with their citizens

[Anonymous No.7116348]

>>7116259
Nobody in their right mind expects news to be announced at this conference, and if you can't tell by the price action, no one is buying into the "news" either. There can't be a selloff if everyone has been fucking selling off the whole time.

You legitimately just wrote an essay for fucking nothing. Congrats.

[Anonymous No.7116383]

>>7116259
>The topic is: Can we replace lawyers?

Possibly the best news for humanity since antibiotics. Just bought another 100

[Anonymous No.7116462]

> He is way more focused on what the technology can do for the world. Not making his token holders profits.

That's a point for, not against dipshit. You know who else does that? Money skelly. But no, ETH at sub 70 cents is a terrible buy right?

[Anonymous No.7116473]

>>7116259

Your FUD attempt in the first 90% of the post is actually accurate. Sergey probably WILL be understated about LINK, talking more about the development of the sector in general. Going off his Devcon and SIBOS talks there is absolutely no reason to think he is going to do any shilling, and he already stated in his EOY announcement that ChainLink will not announce partnerships, they will leave it to their partners. So, yup, there will 100% guaranteed be no major event at his talks that will moon the ChainLink price.

And you know what? That's absolutely fine. I love hearing Sergey's views on the potential of smart contracts in general. I love his ambitions for connecting blockchains to the real world. I don't need the token to moon before mainnet launch. I want ADD day traders and impatient newfags to get shaken out and then miss the boat when it eventually launches. I want the LINK price to stay cheap so I can go from 150k to 200k by main net. Your FUD is pretty accurate except for the stupid tether comment, and it's absolutely fine.

[Anonymous No.7116483]

>>7116259
This was the gayest thing I've ever read

[Anonymous No.7116510]

>>7116259
Kys

[Anonymous No.7116540]

>>7116259
Nice FUD, I'll save it for later

[Anonymous No.7116574]

In B4 "buy mobius mister sir, future coin of the future"

[Anonymous No.7116591]

>>7116510
>>7116483
>>7116473
>>7116462
>>7116383
>>7116348
>>7116290
Wow, the shills sure are out in full force tonight. Its like clockwork.


Congratulations on being part of an actual, literal cult.

[Anonymous No.7116658]

>>7116591
I was a part of the ethereum cult as well. Really regret that. Why'd you have to remind me bro

[Anonymous No.7116671]

>>7116591
Congrats on being a brainlet

[Anonymous No.7116730]

>>7116591
Here, got some fresh FUD OC for you.
t. >100k link holder

[Anonymous No.7116769]

>>7116671
Keep dreaming. Crypto is gambling. Gambling is for the poor and stupid. Which one are you?


I have all my money in a NASDAQ 3X ETF.

[Anonymous No.7116838]

>>7116591

Grats on being a brainlet. Anyone who's been in this space for longer than 8 months knows where things are heading and how Chainlink plays a role in that. Sit back and watch the real players win little man.

[Anonymous No.7116869]

The conference will reveal to the world the stuttering potheads that run this scam. The largest panic in history will ensue.

[Anonymous No.7116921]

>>7116769
Most alts are shit, but if you can't recognize the potential LINK has to impact this space then that's your problem. Enjoy your mutual funds

[Anonymous No.7116925]

>>7116259
Good, so I'll buy before the run up and sell before the dump. Where's the catch?

[Anonymous No.7116950]

>>7116473

How does it feel to have 20X the LINK that I will ever have?

[Anonymous No.7117079]

>>7116591

>this post

of all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these: the smooth brains are at it again

[Anonymous No.7117144]

LINK insider here. I'm not going to reveal much but all I can say is, prepare yourselves. If you're a LINK holder, you should be proud that you've invested in this project so early. We have huge things to come, come March.

[Anonymous No.7117182]

>>7117144
check em

[Anonymous No.7117201]

>>7117144

How do we know you're an insider? Tell us something to prove it that won't give away your identity

[Anonymous No.7117212]

>>7117144

I call bullshit... but I tend to agree March is when we see some crazy movement.

[Anonymous No.7117324]

>>7116259
way to type out 2,000 words of gibberish just to say "buy the rumor sell the news" you absolute faggot

[Anonymous No.7117352]

When is mainnet?
I thought Q1

[Anonymous No.7117369]

>>7117352

Code release Q1. Main net likely Q2.

[Anonymous No.7117511]

>>7116769
Lol gtfo /biz/ then.. the state of nolinkers

[Anonymous No.7117530]

>>7116259
>stay tied to 1 dollar
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

>the rest of the text
this has to be bait, nobody is this retarded

[Anonymous No.7117544]

>>7117144
dubs has spoken

[Anonymous No.7117575]

>Op mentions that muh conference won't result in moon
>delusional bag holders go rabid
Lol. Still sore from sibos I see? Really wish I had saved all those $1 before sibos $5 after sibos posts.

[lined No.7117597]

>>7116591
>>7116259

You are stupid if you don't understand how Chainlink token is essential for secure smart contracts. Everytime he talks about secure smart contracts and its implementation he is talking about the token. This is a utility token, not a token that represents somehow the value of a company. Go to forex for that

[Anonymous No.7117627]

>>7116259
Not gonna lie, I like this FUD. It's ALMOST convincing hehe

[Anonymous No.7117637]

>>7117144
>>7117544
buying 100k right fucking now

[Anonymous No.7117652]

Stupid fud. Chainlink is the most promising project for real world adoption of smart contracts. The economic possibilites thereof are worth at least a few trillion. Just going on that understanding, you're borderline retarded not to place a bet that chainlink will do exactly what it's supposed to do. Risk $1000 (assuming chainlink goes to 0 if it's a scam) to make potentially $100k to $1MM in a few years time. Expected value is well in the positive even if you think there's a 10% chance of Link succeeding. The odds are ridiculously stacked for Link.

[lined No.7117660]

>>7117352
Initial mainnet release, aka GoLang testnet, in Q1, most likely March. Mainnet before summer

[Anonymous No.7117727]

http://www.fintech.finance/fintech-tv/sibos-2017-sergey-nazarov-smartcontract/

If you haven't watched this interview I suggest you do. The potential for this project is so great, and listening to Sergey you can tell he is intelligent and driven by this project.

[Anonymous No.7117917]

deluded linkies

[Anonymous No.7118000]

Riddle anon here.

[Anonymous No.7118036]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp95uHbZ89o

CALLING ALL LINKES TO MAKE THIS VID GO VIRAL

[Anonymous No.7118073]

>>7116473
>mainnet launch
that would be when?

[Anonymous No.7118104]

>>7118073
Q2-Q3

[Anonymous No.7118175]

>>7117727
>listening to Sergey you can tell he is intelligent and driven by this project
>implying that has ANY relevance on LINK mooning
brah

[Anonymous No.7118209]

>>7118104
thanks, hopefully I have enough time to accumulate

[Anonymous No.7118277]

>>7116259

Hey LARPer - What biotechs have you invested in? I know that game well - you are halfway right.

[Anonymous No.7118282]

the great thing about LINK is that eventually, the token price won't be influenced by speculation, since it has an actual use case.

[Anonymous No.7118319]

>>7118104
Not true, Rory said Q1 in the Slack

[Anonymous No.7118380]

>>7118036
I like your video.
Well done, seriously.
Please don't shill it like this though, it makes you look silly.
Just keep making quality content you believe in and you'll get there quicker than you think

[Anonymous No.7118442]

>>7118036
dude looks like a fag

[Anonymous No.7118490]

>>7118319
I think that means Q1 for initial implementation. I am not aware we have a specific date for this.

[Anonymous No.7118528]

>>7118380
nah. thats not me in the vid. I just think, this nerd is very well knowledgable. Normies HAVE to believe him!