CHAINLINK HOLDING ON FOR DEAR LIFE !!!

[Anonymous No.7089517]

COINMARKETCAP #100

>The absolute state of it

explain

[Anonymous No.7089586]

>>7089517
LINK fags will rage but the project doesn't have enough substance.
Very small team, no news and vague promises are just not enough anymore.
The only thing keeping it up is its religious cult like following.

[Colonel Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND No.7089598]

>>7089586

[Anonymous No.7089619]

Mid Feb is the very latest this thing shoots up. Stop looking at it until then

[Anonymous No.7089640]

>>7089517
Current price for this coin is irrelevant. The only thing you need to know for now is one thing: its dirt fucking cheap.

[Anonymous No.7089642]

>>7089586

The thing keeping this up is smart money acquiring cheap af LINK.

Wahh, no updates.

Wahh, this tiny team that rubs shoulders with giants.

Wahh, they won't coddle me like mommy.

Shitty FUD, or a nolinkie who's never going to make it.

[Anonymous No.7089792]

When the biggest holder and advocate exited, i dumped it. Put it into ICX. comfy af.

[Anonymous No.7089912]

>>7089642
If the giants would care about this project there wouldn't only be like 2 people working on it.
You don't seriously believe that a small team is a good thing.
And yes, people who invest in something want to know how the project is going.
Your unconditional belief in this project is not based on rationality.
Otherwise you could give me tangible reasons to buy instead of buzz words.
Could LINK succeed? Yes, but being 100% sure that it will succeed is simply a delusion.

[Mountain Dew Boy No.7089946]

>>7089642
Smart money is absolutely not in link
It’s never going to blow up like you guys think it’s not this grown breaking idea.

[Anonymous No.7089974]

>>7089792

Biggest holder??? lmao
You talking about that nigger with that had 70k.
There are at least 100 linkies on /biz/ with more than that you faggot.

[Anonymous No.7089988]

>>7089792
>When the biggest holder and advocate exited,
source/proof?

[Anonymous No.7089998]

>>7089912

I think having a small team and making the progress they have in wheeling enormous partnerships is a good thing. The more the team grows, the better things will get. 2018 is very clearly the year they're transitioning from a small, proof of concept oriented project to a production network with the team to support it. That's already established fact.

Boo hoo, you need to be coddled and told everything will be alright. Meanwhile people who read the whitepaper, understand the tech, and have been in this game longer than the past 8 months can clearly see what this means for crypto and don't need to be constantly reminded its going to be a game changing project.

Maybe if you were less of a whiney bitch you'd have made it already anon. Enjoy chasing PnDs instead of retiring.

[Anonymous No.7090040]

Cause everything else is doing just peachy?

[Anonymous No.7090054]

>>7089974
lmao he is

[Anonymous No.7090120]

>>7089517
Link marines not selling sorry faggo

[Anonymous No.7090130]

No fucking way any human on /biz/ thinks Mobius is a threat to Link... (Streetshitters don't count as human)

Link - Sergey and huge partnerships being kept quiet until mainnet (months away)

OR

Mobius - Pajeets with no fucking clue what they're getting into doing hilariously bad interviews and shilling on reddit "our product is for EVERYONE" lmao... All hype no product.

[Anonymous No.7090203]

#101 ain't bad. i like to picture sergey with rory pretending to hold him back while he lazyily goes "hold me back, let me at em, hold me back"

[Anonymous No.7090222]

>>7090130

Yup. The success of a crypto project is inversely proportional to the amount of baseless FOMO posts on their Twitter.

Which is exactly why LINK will achieve the price singularity. They don't post anything.

[Anonymous No.7091105]

>>7089912

We know there are hired guns coding for LINK, not permanent team members. So that's not true.

[Anonymous No.7091290]

>>7089946
>grown breaking idea
>grown
go home pajeet

[Anonymous No.7091443]

>>7089517
>He thinks I'm going to even sell 1 of my 92K LINK.

[Anonymous No.7091450]

I hardly even see this shitcoin shipped here anymore, is the hype dead? I got 10k to play with after missing dadi ico

[Anonymous No.7091503]

>>7090130
People are so fucking stupid I don't get it but at least it makes it easier to get rich. Mobius is THE train to be on and it's so fucking cheap.

All these morons getting sucked into buying scams every time they pump. You can rest assured that Aeternity and Chainlink will not be around five years from now. Just don't even worry. Fomo'ing will only waste your money.

Mobius is the real deal. No one is shilling it to you because it wasn't pre-mined so there there aren't special interests creating the kind of hype that sucks in lots of morons to shill their $100 bags.

Buy some Bitcoin, it's the original and still going strong and in the lead. There are still massive gains to be made if it maintains it's dominance. But if you still feel like you missed the train that will deliver untold gains, Mobius is it.

When people talk about Chainlink they sometimes call it Ethereum 2.0. these people are being retarded since Chainlink style smart contract oracles can be built as a second layer on Bitcoin and every other coin with Mobius. The Chainlink technology will not be useful never and the current token will be worthless, there is no reason to buy it besides throwing your money away, validating some /biz/tards, and enriching an fatty Sergey.


In fact Mobius is truly Ethereum 2.0. Mobius takes the ideals of Bitcoin, a permissionless electronic money and brings that ideal to reality. Bitcoin proved the concept of a PoW blockchain but without fungibility it cannot be money. Mobius team also has the years of Bitcoin experience to draw on for improvements.

[Anonymous No.7091574]

I do know only bag holders would have a sense of urgency about it.

[Anonymous No.7091599]

>>7091503
>No one is shilling it to you
it might be the most shilled coin on biz right now

[Anonymous No.7091639]

>>7091599
WTF are you talking about? It is hardly mentioned around here.

[Anonymous No.7091705]

>>7091450
Maybe...just maybe, that's what we've all been waiting for.
This is like, the 12th time it's been bumped out of the top 100 this last 4 months.
I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT RANKING & POPULARITY CONTESTS FOR FAGGOTS, SOYBOYS, KEKS & FAGGOTS SHILLING ON BERGBOOK!!!!

[Anonymous No.7091714]

>>7091639
there's the thread that's paying (lol) for people to make mobius memes, there was a shill thread earlier today, a shill thread last night that included their interview with that chink lady, and at least 5 other threads yesterday about how mobius was better than link because of the wtc partnership.

[Anonymous No.7091756]

>>7091705
Is now a good entry point? Should I just slap my 7 eth down for it right now?

[Anonymous No.7091807]

>>7091756
>Is now a good entry point?
no.

[Anonymous No.7091824]

>>7091714
>dismissing the implications of the WTC partnership
t. brainlet

[Anonymous No.7091841]

>>7091756
>Is now a good entry point?
yes.

[Anonymous No.7091865]

Link is a scam.

[Anonymous No.7091867]

>>7091756
>>Is now a good entry point?
maybe.

[Anonymous No.7091885]

>>7089517
Rory save us!

[Anonymous No.7091919]

>>7091756
If you want to stay poor then don't.
You're dreaming if you think it's gonna dump to .45c, not gonna happen mate.

[Anonymous No.7091997]

Guys I bought 100 stinky linkies just because that that Nigger Ian sold his. I am a a true degenerate.

[Anonymous No.7092013]

>>7091919
WTF THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I'M SEEING THAT PIC

BRB, ADDING TO MY 20K STACK OF STINKY FUCKING LINKIES HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

ALSO DELETE THIS

[Anonymous No.7092078]

>>7091824
let's see, a partnership with a blockchain company that is responsible for no non-crypto economic transaction value vs. POC runs with Sony, swift, factom

yeah, i guess you're right, mobius is totally the shit

[Anonymous No.7092116]

>>7092078
I find LINK weird technically. The way they provide data to the Blockchain is by accepting calls on a centralized API. So data requests to the Blockchain have to originate off-chain. Its solution is poor compared to what MOBI is planning for their initial implementation IMO. LINK implementation has a lot to be desired in my opinion. I agree with the people who say they're trying to do too much.

To expand on what I said, my personal issue with LINK is their API:
https://www.smartcontract.com/

To buy data and create an Ethereum contract to use it, you need to go a centralized API. In practice, this means that even though the data retrieval is decentralized, the management of that data is completely centralized.

Mobius will be completely different. To request the data, it can originate from on-chain or off-chain. The API for requesting the data is also each individual node, which then propagates that request across the network. So even though Mobius will have a centralized FE which makes it easy for people to use it, it means that the requesting of the data and the management of it all, is completely decentralized.

Also keep in mind that the retrieval of data into Ethereum is just one aspect of Mobius, the aspect included in the initial implementation. There's also BTC/Hyperledger and what MOBI can do there, The BTC/Hyperledger functionality will be completely different to that, and creates a whole new aspect not yet seen in any other Oracle projects at all.

[Anonymous No.7092118]

>>7089517
try harder fag, not selling
sage

[Anonymous No.7092167]

>>7089517
Just bought more LINK

[Anonymous No.7092212]

who was the guy yesterday posting on gitter?
it seemd like he was a new dev and shortly after the comment got deleted

[Anonymous No.7092259]

>>7092116

I dont know all that much about how it works but I assumed chainlink data would have to have multiple primary sources to begin with, at least 3 or 5.

Is it even possible to have decentralised data if it is only provided by one primary source to begin with?

[Anonymous No.7092319]

>>7092259
it's a copypasta, except they reversed MOBI and link.

[Anonymous No.7092324]

>>7092259
You’re starting to get it, Anon. This is the fallacy that all of these LINK bag holders want you to buy.

[Anonymous No.7092333]

>>7089517

I unironically market dumped my stack of LINK yesterday and put it all into Mobius. I'm sorry but the lack of updates, developments, communication and quite frankly the tasteless overshilling of LINK around these parts has ruined my enthusiasm for it. I don't really think Sergey has his heart in Chainlink anymore. Something changed along the way, I can feel his enthusiasm for it waning similarly to how he just up and left NXT like a thief in the night. He probably had a great time raising millions of dollars with the ICO and being a famous celebrity on biz, and I'm happy for him, I really am, but he lost his hunger for success along the way and it got replaced by hunger for Big Macs. The Bitcoin superconference will likely be a total shitshow. I've no doubt the price will dump within minutes of Sergey staggering off stage after another boring regurgitated speech where he doesn't even mention Chainlink. I really enjoyed holding LINK, it was a pretty cool bag to carry for a while, but Mobius is definitely the new wave of oracle tech and has all the momentum now. I can't let it pass me by.

[Anonymous No.7092435]

>>7092333

do you know what the circ supply or marketcap is?

[Anonymous No.7092467]

>>7092333
And when the updates and news come, you will be posting pink wojaks and buying at the ATH like the weakhanded person you are

[Anonymous No.7092476]

>>7092333
>>7092116
$3 today

[Anonymous No.7092506]

>>7092333
weak pasta. sad!

[Anonymous No.7092538]

>>7092476
>t. Brainlet
>t. Using price prediction as an argument against a coin with superior tech
The big boys are talking, isn’t it past your bedtime?

[Anonymous No.7092544]

>>7089517
Rory is so cucked he is trying to buy his competitors tokens so he does not have to live in a box when chainlink crashes.

[Anonymous No.7092578]

>>7092544
>the absolute state of LINK

[Anonymous No.7092584]

>>7089988
He is talking about the nigger

[Anonymous No.7092591]

>>7091919
>You're dreaming if you think it's gonna dump to .45c, not gonna happen mate.

Fuck, only a 2k linklet and my paycheck isn't until march.
fuck my shit up tbqh family.

Though by the looks of that pic if I hold my tiny faggot stack till 2025 I should be good.

[Anonymous No.7092657]

>>7092591
I think if LINK succeeds, it will be sooner than 2025 for you. But either way, I wish you the best man, anyone who understands and believes in ChainLink deserves to make it.

[Anonymous No.7092685]

>>7092116
Nice bait and switch. You're gonna be rich with all those Link you hold

[Anonymous No.7092716]

>>7092657
All-in from December, first coin I've truly had faith in. Only invested what I could afford.

Let hope so lad, are you planning to hold until a certain date or sell off as it goes up?
I wish you the best too mate.

[Anonymous No.7092725]

>>7092685
I market dumped my stack of LINK yesterday and put it all into MOBI. The lack of updates, developments, communication and quite frankly the tasteless overshilling of LINK around these parts has ruined my enthusiasm for it. I don't really think Sergey has his heart in LINK anymore. Something changed along the way, I can feel his enthusiasm for it waning similarly to how he just up and left NXT like a thief in the night.

He probably had a great time raising millions of dollars with the ICO and being a famous celebrity on biz. I'm happy for him, I really am, but he lost his hunger for success along the way. I really enjoyed holding LINK, it was a pretty cool bag to carry for a while, but MOBI is definitely the new wave of oracle tech and has all the momentum now. I won’t let it pass me by.

[Anonymous No.7092730]

>>7091919
delet

[Anonymous No.7092735]

Mobiusfags please go

Secondly, why does anyone think LINK will succeed? The Oracle space is just begging for a competent team to take over and shove link out.

[Anonymous No.7092766]

>>7092735
>Secondly, why does anyone think LINK will succeed?
They don't. Just sold the last of my bags by the way (20k)

[Anonymous No.7092771]

>>7089912
>If the giants would care about this project there wouldn't only be like 2 people working on it

You're right. What the hell can two people in a basement do?

[Anonymous No.7092780]

>>7091919
Balete pleez

[Anonymous No.7092816]

>>7092766
Nice. Just sold 100k for 1k sat, then bought 100k for 10k.

/biz/ would be proud of me

[Anonymous No.7092862]

>>7092771
you're an idiot for not knowing google was funded by CIA/NSA

[Anonymous No.7092891]

>>7092538

[Anonymous No.7092913]

>>7092716
Same here. I'm definitely not going to sell 90% of my stack for at least a year. But I am hoping EOY the price is at least good enough for me not to worry about how 2019/2020 will go.

[Anonymous No.7092928]

>>7092862
as if Link isn't funded by swift?

[Anonymous No.7092936]

>>7089517
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCPVLjrHDTs#t=47.7s

[Anonymous No.7092957]

>>7092862
After it became a yuuuge hit. Initially was not a CIA Psyop.
Unlike Facebook with mastermind Zuck AKA Overlord. Twitter too but not myspace.

[Anonymous No.7093099]

>>7092771
Two PhDs, not two P&Ds.

[Anonymous No.7093107]

>>7092816
>>Has literally never changed his profile picture
Kek, I've been cyberstalking Sergey in a desperate attempt to uncover hidden news about Link, and this is not an exaggeration.

[Anonymous No.7093230]

The only thing keeping this up are memes and a cult like believe that it might succeed.
Even if it succeeds why would the price do a x10, who would use this shit?
What do you think would your payout be? Why would this be better than the passive income from neo or other pos coins?

The delusion in this project is beyond me.
"Muh big investors"
THERE ARE NONE
LOOK AT THE PRICE
THERES ONLY 1000000000 LINK AT 60 FUCKING CENT.
A big invesotr could buy up the entire fucking suplly at once.
I really dont get the delusion with this shitcoin.

If it wasn't for memes and the cult this would be worth 20 cent AT MOST. Its utterly useless and hopeless.

[Anonymous No.7093261]

>>7089640
>Current price for this coin is irrelevant.
This.
Right now the only thing determining the price is a very low volume of retarded speculators.
Main net is when the shit hits the fan.

[Anonymous No.7093284]

>>7093230
If it was as irrelevant as you say, you wouldn't even bother posting about it.

[Anonymous No.7093291]

>>7093230
After checking the supply i have to correct myself.
Theres only 350000000 Link at 60 cents, its a joke.

[Anonymous No.7093302]

>>7093284
It's shitting up the board i like to browse for the past x months now it is annoying as FUCK.
Kys Linkie

[Anonymous No.7093327]

>>7093302
Stay poor ;)

[Anonymous No.7093356]

>>7093327
bet you can fill it up with the shit you post here

[Anonymous No.7093360]

>>7089912
>Otherwise you could give me tangible reasons to buy instead of buzz words.
Nah. Just sell whatever you do have and fuck off.

[Anonymous No.7093478]

>>7091824
WTC adds a very specific set of external data to its blockchain: RFID chip data.
Meanwhile Chainlink adds ALL external data to ALL blockchains.

This means that Chainlink not only completely gobbles up WTC's use case, but is also a lot more flexible as it allows users to use their own backend (incl. their own blockchain/DLT).
This is why WTC jumped onto the first glimpse of Link competition: just to try and undermine them.

[Anonymous No.7093589]

>worrying about daily price fluctuation

[Anonymous No.7093591]

>>7092116
>hurrrr Link has to get its data from off-chain
Well yes, that's the whole point. lol

>hurrrr you need centralized API
You have no idea why Chainlink is decentralized. The slowness of your brain is soothing to observe, like fish in a placid aquarium.

[Anonymous No.7093623]

>>7089517
holy shit stinkie linkies doing worse than sharpie in pooper digimarines

Stinkie linkies eternally BTFO

[Anonymous No.7093628]

>>7093591
thanks for eating my pasta :^)

[Anonymous No.7093643]

>>7093628
I just read the rest of that; did you simply swap Chainlink and Mobius in that description?

[Anonymous No.7093655]

>>7092913
>I am hoping EOY the price is at least good enough for me not to worry about how 2019/2020 will go.

so what's the minimum eoy price for you?

Mine would have to be like $500, that's not gonna happen. definitely 2019 EOY.
Just want enough to buy a decent home, avoid a mortgage like the plague.

[Anonymous No.7093661]

>>7093591
>The slowness of your brain is soothing to observe, like fish in a placid aquarium.
also holy fucking virginpost! Your autism level is showing anon

[Anonymous No.7093671]

Bought mine at presale and the rest at 1500 sat, lmao at the ones who bought recently and panic, will 3x my stack.if there is a major dip again

[Anonymous No.7093676]

>>7093661
Cute cats anon. From your sister's folder?

[Anonymous No.7093708]

>>7093661
Are you a roastie or a faggot?

[Anonymous No.7093879]

May I have your attention please?
Will the price of chainlink please go up?
I repeat, will the price of chainlink please go up?
We're going to have a wojack here

Y'all act like you never seen a deluded linkie before
Sats all on the floor like REQ and Ripple just burst in the door
Started dumpin' on their ass worse than before they first got divorced
Laughing at your expenditure

It's the return of the "Oh wait, no way, you're kidding
He didn't just gain what I think he did, did he?"

And Sergey said
Nothing you idiots Sergey's dead, he's locked in my basement (ha ha)

People on /biz/ hate linkies, chicka chicka chicka Stinky Linky I'm sick of them
Look at them, walking around postin their wojack threads
Shilling for invester cred "yeah, but they're so deluded though"

Yea I probably missed a couple of gains I could have used
But no worse than what's going on with other coin's that never cruised

Sometimes I want to get on /biz/ and just let loose, but can't,
But it's cool for Sergey to hold back any good news!

My gains are gonna hit, my gains are gonna hit
And if you're lucky you might just get in before it dips
And that's the message that we deliver to kids on /biz/
And expect them not to know how hopeless chainlink is

Of course they gonna know what a shitcoin is, by the time they hit 4chan,
They got past the normie phase didnt't they?
Deluded linkies took a gamble
The FOMO made them scramble now their folio is all red candles

But if we keep selling them bags with no handles
Then there's no reason why a pump wont get us a lambo
But if you feel like I feel follow my example.
Damsels wave your pantyhose, sing the chorus and it goes

I'm Slim Sergey, yes I'm the real Sergey
All you other Slim Sergey are passively lurking
So won't the price of Chainlink please go up,
Please go up,
Please go up

[Anonymous No.7093968]

>>7092324
No, you don't get it faggot.
The point is that not one single node will be responsible for inserting the data into a smart contract making it impossible to be tampered with during the process.
The API that the nodes will connect to is always assumed to be a legitimate source of data.

[Anonymous No.7094006]

>>7093968
thanks for eating my pasta :^) pic related it’s you

[Anonymous No.7094292]

How many linkies will I need to be a millionaire by the end of 2020?

[Anonymous No.7094311]

>>7094292
10-15

[Anonymous No.7094356]

>>7094292
as many as I currently have

[Anonymous No.7094361]

>>7094292
5000-10000

[Anonymous No.7094390]

>>7089998
I only have 800 linkies but I'm scared to buy more because I bought in at 90 cents and the candles are spooky and they make my teeth hurt please make me feel better. I was hoping to take the gains from the NEO I'm holding and put some of it back into linkies while it is cheap. What stops the big guys from making their own decentralized oracle?

[Anonymous No.7094450]

Post your buying Link soundtracks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvBm3Xyfi74

[Anonymous No.7094580]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER!

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.7094608]

>>7094450
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv-WIjmZlKk

[Anonymous No.7094613]

>>7094608
fuck yeah my man

[Anonymous No.7094623]

I only have one question here... WTF is up with Sergey's right eye?

[Anonymous No.7094732]

>>7093230
>implaying 4chan can move the price of a 300m token

[Anonymous No.7094761]

>>7094450
thanks for this anon, long time no hear

[Anonymous No.7094788]

>>7094761
no worries pal, glad you enjoy.

I'm actually so auts that i've got every VC station on my actual car radio. it's fucking sweet.

[Anonymous No.7094808]

I love how stupid linkies are in dismissing a project like Mobius. The thing is, it has a real partnership with WTC, it has a marketing team that actually has a pulse and it just finished a token sale.

Not to mention they are using the Stellar network, which is a product designed to have mass appeal to all kinds of normies.

And you stupid /pol/ linkies just dismiss it because there's a couple pajeets on the team.

> B-BUT MUH SWIFT...
Ya, no proof this is real. Literally 0 actual evidence except for you retards drawing lines between dots that do not exist.

Enjoy your stinkbags.

[Anonymous No.7094850]

>>7094808
Wow you actually can sound dumber than the curryniggers who run your scam

[Anonymous No.7094854]

>>7094808
>you stupid /pol/ linkies
salty shitskin detected

[Anonymous No.7094865]

I'm gonna write jokes and earn fucking money doing nothing with BZC faggot, what are you guys doing? Kek.

[Anonymous No.7094872]

>>7094808
>Doesn't mention the tech whatsoever and babbles on about marketing

Know how I know Mobius is a scam?

[Anonymous No.7094877]

>>7094854
>>7094850
Exactly. Don't address any of the actual points I made, just call me a shitskin and move on.

Typical.

[Anonymous No.7094899]

>>7094808
>partnering with an actual shitcoin
Gongrats on this.
Meanwhile link has partnered with zeppeling_os who will be using it for main oracle network.

[Anonymous No.7094908]

Meme magic will prevail. Just hodl!

[Anonymous No.7094957]

>>7094877
>Don't address any of the actual points I made

why would I listen to a nigger?

Enjoy the Anglo being top of the foodchain for another 100 years haha.

[Anonymous No.7094975]

>>7094872
I guess you haven't been following, but marketing is what drives in new money. It is an important facet to the overall strategy of the success of a business, in crypto or otherwise.

Ok, let's talk tech then. Mobius has libraries for dapps already, including Node.js + React-native (javascript), ruby and python, which make up a huge chunk of popular web development languages today.

Their white paper is quite solid, have a read through it.

What part of it is worse than what chainlink has?

[Anonymous No.7094984]

>>7094899
exactly we on top now mufugguh

[Anonymous No.7095009]

>>7094899
zeppelin_os is a solid project. but that alone is not going to pull chainlink out of the mcdonalds which Sergey works out of.

[Anonymous No.7095032]

>>7094957
alright, if it makes it easier to hold your massive link bags, you're free to justify it however you want

[Anonymous No.7095182]

>>7095009
It shows that the price right now is undervalued. That partership is going to give chainlink some solid baseline support in terms of price. The team has many more potential partnerships lined but they are all speculative right now. All we know is that they are going to hire marketing person and with any communicate in social media they will get noticed. Worst case it is easy 2-3x in following months unless they decide to scam us desu.

[Anonymous No.7095189]

>>7094808
Mobius is centralized though.

[Anonymous No.7095271]

>>7095182
Look, in truth I think the idea is actually pretty good and there's value to it. I hope it takes off.

And I hold a tiny bit of Link myself, actually, in the speculative portion of my cryptofolio for the scenario you point out.

But ya, I was more thinking it was retarded to discount Mobius as a competitor without a real reason besides "pajeets".

>>7095189
You're right, but we've seen that the two can co-exist in this crypto market. Normie money needs to flow in through channels they deem is safe, and that's the part that centralisation can play for now, until the world gets more used to de-centralisation.

[Anonymous No.7095282]

I had to sell some shit and LINK was decent enough to give me a good entry point.

[Anonymous No.7095335]

>>7092735
>The Oracle space is just begging for a competent team to take over and shove link out.
Yes, please someone take over and bring out a skateboard. I need something to stimulate me and get my hyped every minute of every day. I don't care if there is a working product or not I just want to see some empty news.

[Anonymous No.7095368]

>>7095335

[Anonymous No.7095437]

>>7095271
>You're right, but we've seen that the two can co-exist in this crypto market. Normie money needs to flow in through channels they deem is safe, and that's the part that centralisation can play for now, until the world gets more used to de-centralisation.
Well sure.
Mobius is trying to do many things, and it will face stiff competition.
But be aware that the oracle part of it is pretty much tacked on to facilitate its many promises. It is in no way a primary focus, and is not at all in the same league as CL. Its fundamentals are all wrong for it to even think about competing with CL.
The only people who will have a use for Mobius' oracles, are the people trying to utilize one of its many promised uses.

[Anonymous No.7095578]

>>7091443

That gif weirds me out.

[Anonymous No.7095584]

Don't you get it, /biz/?
They shadowforked Sergey himself.
The real one eats at Burger King now.

[Anonymous No.7096189]

>>7094975
That copy pasta going around swaps out chainlink for mobius, but it's Johnny Huxtable's (Linkpool dev's) explannation for why he thinks mobius isn't as good.

[Anonymous No.7096242]

>>7094450
Thank you anon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m3sfVItcGA

[Anonymous No.7096733]

>>7094808
>>7094975
>>7095271
>>7095437
pajeet shills btfo'd

[Anonymous No.7096775]

>>7091503
Pasta

[Anonymous No.7096874]

>>7096733
I don't own any Mobius, nor do I give a shit about Mobius. But what I said is pretty obvious.

>>7095437
Ya, agreed, the oracle angle is pretty flimsy in their plans. I read some post on here a while ago where they speculated the entire Mobius project was just an excuse to add more oracles (anchors) to the Stellar network. I could see the logic there, since Mobius was more about the app store really than the oracle part.

So really it's a net win more for Stellar than for Mobius.

[Anonymous No.7096988]

Anyone who hasn't bought link over the past 24hours doesn't deserve to make. You'll be on suicide watch in a few months when you remember how cheaper it is right now.

>Added 10k to my stack earlier

[Anonymous No.7097044]

>>7093099
got eem

[Anonymous No.7097607]

>>7091919
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

[Anonymous No.7097798]

>>7097607
>>7092780
>>7092730
>>7092591
>>7092013
It gets better. That screen cap is from a book called "the fourth industrial revolution", and the guy who wrote it is Klaus Schwab, founder and current chairman of the WEF.

[Anonymous No.7098134]

>>7094450
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMBp71dCDFk

[Anonymous No.7098293]

>>7094808
I know you're a stinky linkie fudding but I'm taking the bait anyways
SWIFT partnership with Chainlink is real
https://create.smartcontract.com/sibos17

[Anonymous No.7098518]

>>7098293
This doesn't indicate a partnership

[Anonymous No.7098606]

>>7098518
"A partnership is an arrangement where parties, known as partners, agree to cooperate to advance their mutual interests."
It's a kind of partnership.

[Anonymous No.7098771]

>>7098518
>https://create.smartcontract.com/sibos17
>Sponsored by and in collaboration with SWIFT
>not a partnership

[Anonymous No.7098797]

>>7089517

[Anonymous No.7099044]

>>7098771
A (possibly) one-time collaboration is not a partnership, or at least it's not the kind of partnership you can go around shilling

[꧁Anonymous꧂ No.7099045]

>>7091824
GET THE FUCK OUT PAJEET

[Anonymous No.7099346]

>>7095584
Underrated

[Anonymous No.7099598]

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

MoonMan is a nigger. Die from a blood poo, soyboii, sack of blood poo fool

biz_classic biz_private

jarunik best delegate evar

[Anonymous No.7099870]

I want to see my link hit 1 sat

[Anonymous No.7099916]

>>7089912
of course it's not guaranteed. but if you could buy a lottery ticket with a 50% chance of winning you wouldn't do it?

[Anonymous No.7100188]

>>7092116
All the idiots not realizing this is a pasta.
You need to change LINK for MOBI, and MOBI for LINK, to get the original text.

[Anonymous No.7100234]

>>7093230
>who would use this shit?

[Anonymous No.7100309]

>>7098293
That just proves SWIFT will be an oracle. That does not prove they are partners.

The Stellar network's anchors are a similar concept and are not necessarily partners.

[Anonymous No.7100455]

the oracles are not any more as they used to be! MMM MMM no no no! MAINNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!

[Anonymous No.7100645]

>>7089517
Someone is bleeding us to $0.50 before the moon mission of a lifetime.

[Anonymous No.7100934]

>>7100309
>That just proves SWIFT will be an oracle. That does not prove they are partners.
moron, LINK doesn't need "partners". it needs people participating in the network, and SWIFT is one of those participants. this thing is going to be huge.

[Anonymous No.7100964]

Explain to me who needs decentralized oracles linkies?

[Anonymous No.7101017]

>>7093879
kek^n

[Anonymous No.7101077]

>>7100934
>etwork's anchors are a similar concept and are not necessarily partners.
>>>
> Anonymous (ID: C5/pnXmD) 01/30/18(Tue)10:36:53 N
Swift isnt going to buy $100 million worth of link just to run a node. They can pay Sergey's company SmartContracts $15 million to develop that for him. If you watch interviews, he is always careful to say Chainlink is a product of SmartContracts.com

The best we can hope for realistically is an official Swift backing/partnership and go after the insurance/financial markets seperately. They might just hire Sergey as well, but there's a chance they'll use link.

[Anonymous No.7101129]

>>7100964
You think a stinky linky would know anything about that?

[Anonymous No.7101136]

>>7100455
>dubs means it needs to get meme'd into being

[Anonymous No.7101458]

>>7101077
This is assuming LINK even needs SWIFT.

Yes that's a big fish, but LINK can do just fine without it. Think about how massive a decentralized oracle network is. It can be used by THOUSANDS of companies and uses.

Why settle for a $15M paycheck when you could build a billion dollar empire.

Microsoft started with 2 people.
Facebook started with 2 people.
Stripe started with 2 people. (Does $9.2B).
Apple started with 2 people.

It's absolutely possible for ChainLink to succeed. There's just too many pessimists here...always wanting a quick flip. When they don't get it, they assume the project to be trash.


Let's see where the FUDers and nolinkers will be in a year.

[Anonymous No.7101684]

>>7091756

Get in with half that, then spread buys about once a week for the next month, and hodl. You’ll be in great shape by EOY

[Anonymous No.7101786]

>>7093230

If it goes to 20c I’m unironically doubling my stack. I’ve been praying for this dip, and I’m praying Tether crashes the market even more so I can accumulate.

[Anonymous No.7101855]

>tfw /biz/ holds a decent chunk of LINK tokens in circulation
>tfw you guys don’t end up being weak handed faggots and selling and the price skyrockets due to scarcity
>tfw my peep can only get so erect

[Anonymous No.7101861]

>>7089517
>buy mobius

[Anonymous No.7102003]

>>7101855

Biz doesn’t own a significant portion, though. Don’t have the image, but people have looked at all the top wallets and most is held by like 17 huge holders. Only like.... 17k wallets exist. (11k? Someone post those pics if you have them.)

We are just little frogs who snuck onto a mission to Andromeda. If Chainlink succeeds, we will unquestionably be the Early/Smart money.

[Anonymous No.7102102]

>>7089640
This

[Anonymous No.7102305]

>>7091714
Mobius is doing more shilling for LINK than LINK is at this point.

[Anonymous No.7102333]

If there were less morons fudding this or shilling $50 eoy I would have sold every all time high and been able to quadruple my holdings. Instead I am just holding the same fucking bag for months and we are down almost 50% from just a few weeks ago. Someone wake me up in fucking 2020 ffs this is so shitty to witness. At this rate a "moon mission" would be 80 fucking cents at bitcoin superconference.

[Anonymous No.7102798]

>>7093661

tfw when austimal /biz/ can detect a femanon instantly

[Anonymous No.7102867]

>>7102003

https://ethplorer.io/address/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#pageSize=100&tab=tab-holders

type chainlink in ethplorer and see top holders. nice fud tho.

[Anonymous No.7102921]

>>7102867
How was that post fud?

[Anonymous No.7102990]

>>7102921
>Don’t have the image, but people have looked at all the top wallets and most is held by like 17 huge holders

Fud or not - this is not correct information

[Anonymous No.7103079]

>>7102990
Instead 75% is held by the 8 top wallets? Wha'ts your point?

[Anonymous No.7103341]

>>7101077
>>7103079
I am just providing a source for correct information since he was clearly lacking one. What is your point?

[Anonymous No.7103466]

>>7103341
You said he was fudding. How is that fud?
His information was pretty accurate. Most tokens ARE held by the top 17 wallets, even if the top 8 are the most significant ones and there are 18k wallets.

[Anonymous No.7103513]

>>7103341
stop splitting hairs you insufferable jew

[Anonymous No.7103605]

>>7101458
>There's just too many pessimists here
this is the god honest truth. too many people here failed and sucked at everything in life, and assume everything is just a scam. they should honestly kys.

[Anonymous No.7103669]

>>7092862
Almost like how LINK is funded by SWIFT? :thinking:

[Anonymous No.7103687]

>>7102333
>t. someone who shouldn't be investing.

[Anonymous No.7103779]

Having a small team is not a bad thing. I work for a broker in a third world country, when we started we were 5 people, in a year we grew to 50, that is still our number and we have the biggest market share, making a shit ton of money every month.

However what worries me is the fact that link people don’t do any marketing at all and they keep quiet.

[Anonymous No.7104012]

>>7103466
What I want to know is, assuming assblaster isn't the greatest larp of all time, which of these wallets are his firm? He said his firm bought 100mm link @ 0.16

[Anonymous No.7104024]

>>7091919
wtf is this legit??

[Anonymous No.7104053]

>>7104024
Uh yes, it's a 2016 book "The Fourth Industrial Revolution", written by some big wig president of WEF mentioned earlier in this thread.

[Anonymous No.7104528]

I was this poster (was at coworking space, now at home): >>7094808

>>7101458
> It's absolutely possible for ChainLink to succeed.

Ya you're right. It's possible, surely, to succeed. But the difference is once in a while we need to question the way they're doing it instead of just "trust in LINK". Lots of businesses also failed with 2 people.

> There's just too many pessimists here...always wanting a quick flip. When they don't get it, they assume the project to be trash.

Again, no argument here. Short sighted retards chasing memecoins for the next 10x but just get dumped on.

The questions people ask about LINK are valid. If you hold their tokens you should be asking them too. Questions like "will their partners even need the network we think they're building" or "how does the rewards for running nodes work" or "what is the true nature of their relationship with SWIFT".

These are not FUD. They are legit questions about the product. Mobius also has shitloads of unknowns...hell they all do.

Look at Bitconnect - I'm not comparing LINK to Bitconnect, before you guys get buttpained. I just want to point out this: that people that bought BCC bought it thinking that it was sound and did not ask the right questions. The result is they were burned. Point being is THINK ABOUT THOSE QUESTIONS.

[Anonymous No.7104706]

>>7104528
>once in a while we need to question the way they're doing it
yes, because a bunch of useless NEETs like you have great ideas about running a business.

[Anonymous No.7104753]

>>7104528
>will their partners even need the network we think they're building
this is called FUD. you are suggesting that LINK is entirely useless and a scam, and these companies will just hire sergey to do something else or whatever. please kys

[Anonymous No.7104812]

>>7104053
>smartcontracts.com
>real website is smartcontract.com

[Anonymous No.7104850]

>>7104812
fucking deluded linkies

[Anonymous No.7104897]

>>7104812
They own both

[Anonymous No.7105377]

>>7104706
even if I was a NEET, it does not matter, NEETs are also capable of logic.

>>7104753
have it your way then, call it FUD. I never said it was a scam, you strawmanned my argument.

I am saying that Sergey and co started LINK with the intention of making it work in good faith. So perhaps they meet with industry people who will be their clients and they find, through simple market validation research that the product they are building is not going to work 100% like that.

Perhaps that's what they're struggling with now, how to resolve their situation.

A scam is a fraudulent business scheme by definition and I don't think they set out to do that.

[Anonymous No.7105932]

I think we see 40c link by mid Feb.

[Anonymous No.7106156]

>>7089517
JUDEN JUDEN JUDEN!

[Anonymous No.7106752]

>>7104812
wow you're a moron... type in both addresses and see where they go

[Anonymous No.7107048]

>>7105377
>I am saying that Sergey and co started LINK with the intention of making it work in good faith. So perhaps they meet with industry people who will be their clients and they find, through simple market validation research that the product they are building is not going to work 100% like that.

Why would you think that? The zeppelinos deal means that it is confirmed they will have a working network on a short time scale and that it is good. ZeppelinOs built smart contracts already handle 4.5 billion dollars. Factom is using the network, as are a handful of other dapps that we know about or are considering it (like Req). Bravenewcoin has also committed to investing in starting oracles too. It's more reasonable to assume everything is going as planned than not give the signs of adoption we've already seen.

[Anonymous No.7107140]

>>7102990

You dipshit I wasn’t fudding, I stated my info was wrong and asked for someone to post the accurate #s?

My point, which still stands, was: biz does NOT control a meaningful amount of link, our little buys and sells have a trivial impact on the price.

[Anonymous No.7107240]

>>7093655
For this year, taking into account mainnet release, partnership reveals being expected, and LINK's currently low valuation, $50-$100 would be nice. If it doesn't hit that, then at least mainnet will be functioning and then adoption will increase over time. If the price ever hits $500 I'd be tempted to still hold most of it, because we wouldn't know how high it could really go.

[Anonymous No.7107456]

>>7107240
It's not gonna hit even $50 anytime soon, and I can guarantee there will be a nearly 100% turnover by the time it gets anywhere near that. Anyone who think they'd hold all the way to $500 (again impossible) is delusional (beyond thinking it could get that high).

[Anonymous No.7107585]

>>7098797
And Rory wept

[Anonymous No.7107619]

>>7107456
>Ethereum will never reach 100

t. CC-Expert

[Anonymous No.7107628]

>>7107456

Do you realize some people aren't NEETs and don't have time/desire to trade shitcoins all day? There is literally nothing wrong with holding a big bag of link through ups and downs.

>people won't hold it until it goes up
Yeah most people with large bags actually are holding.

What the fuck are you even trying to say? Reading this put a trench in my brain

[Anonymous No.7107776]

>>7107628
If you have a reasonable stack from the ICO <$20 will make you a millionaire. I sold all my $2 eth at $40 and forgot about it and there are stories like that all over /biz/. Very few people are going to let a million dollars ride for the hopes of getting more.

[Anonymous No.7107863]

>>7107776
>>7107628

it's very easy to say you won't care you'll hold forever but at some point that little voice in your head that says "don't get greedy" gets to 99% of people.

[Anonymous No.7107904]

>>7107776
Went through a divorce, thought it was a good idea to sell my 112 ether for 1k kek

[Anonymous No.7107963]

>>7107240
>partnership reveals being expected

ah. based on the fact that when rory was asked whether partnerships will be announced, he literally replied "i would assume so".

thats the exact same fucking answer i give to my clients when i actually want to laugh in their face and ask them what kind of crack are smoking, but instead i draft these bullet-proof zero-accountability answers that make them shut up for the moment.

funny that you 90 iq idiots do not even understand how to properly read business language.

[Anonymous No.7108018]

>>7107904

exactly. Everyone always asks, where'd the guys holding thousands of eth go you see on the /biz/ archives go? They'd literally have 10s of millions of dollars if they held but the sad truth is most of them sold well, well before $1000. They even knew crypto could get to absurd heights like bitcoin already had in 2013.

[Anonymous No.7108029]

main net release + partnerships announced = $10 minimum mid 2018

[Anonymous No.7108047]

Should I wait to put my ICX (in a profit on even with this dip) into LINK?

[Anonymous No.7108088]

>>7107963
You do realize it's a public network on which we'll be able to see all the node operators and contracts, just like you can now? So of course the initial partners and users will be revealed, it's a stupid question he's probably tired of answering.

[Anonymous No.7108096]

What's an example of a crypto that went from below 80 cents to 100$ in just one year? It seems a bit absurd, that kind of growth.

[Anonymous No.7108173]

>>7108096

the only people that think that are retarded newfags who got in after the december moons and hold less than 10k. $100 in a short time period, let alone $1000, is just a meme to get them to pump our bags.

[Anonymous No.7108241]

>>7089517

N-n-no. I’m never going to make it to NintendoSwitch-land now.

[Anonymous No.7108255]

>>7089517
>Complete lack of updates
>Small team
>Other solutions for the same problem catching up

It's shady as fuck

[Anonymous No.7108279]

>>7108173
I'm thinking by December 24th it will be around 58 dollars

[Anonymous No.7108346]

>>7107963
You do realize I said partnership reveals are "being expected" right? I never said they were a sure thing either.
>muh high iq

[Anonymous No.7108380]

>>7108047

Wait until all the YouTube ecelebs start making videos about the event. I can see ICX hitting $10 Billion in a week or two. Then dump it all into LINK and chill.

[Anonymous No.7108896]

>>7089517
Don't worry Linkies, I'll never sell.
I'll be the bag holder of last resort.
I already made it in the crypto game, I'll do the best I can to secure a future for you guys too.

[Anonymous No.7108901]

>>7094899
> gongrats

[Anonymous No.7109038]

>>7108896
Thank you mommy

[Anonymous No.7109605]

>>7092116
Very nice. Just bought 100k mobius.

[Anonymous No.7109738]

>>7108255
you do realize pajeet mobius is way behind link in development right