LINK white paper

[Anonymous No.7029722]

What the fuck is this? You guys told me to read the white paper and it's just a bunch of nonsense bullshit?


Does anyone here even understand what this is saying?

[Anonymous No.7029749]

uh if you don't understand that you are literally nigger tier IQ

[Anonymous No.7029752]

>>7029722
its saids that 9/11 was an inside job.

[Anonymous No.7029768]

>>7029722
>maths and algorithms, proof of concept
>no buzzwords and get rich quick bait

buy mobius pajeet

[Anonymous No.7029779]

>whitepaper in LaTeX with equations you dont understand
BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY

[Anonymous No.7029789]

>>7029722
>only had singings and clappings back in school
there, there, anon. Can you swim at least?

[Anonymous No.7029807]

>I cant understand this so therefore its nonsense bullshit

[Anonymous No.7029811]

white stupid shoo mobius not bag am not lie mobius win big try stink link

[Anonymous No.7029844]

>>7029807
that would be really funny, we'ren't it way too fucking true and epidemic.

[Anonymous No.7029846]

>Mathematics is nonsense bullshit

LITERALLY the language of the universe, the language of God.

Brainlets don't deserve this beautiful piece of art from the LINK team

[Anonymous No.7029857]

and then it hit me. Like a diamond bullet to my forhead

[Anonymous No.7029862]

OP here I read the raibocks white paper it's way better and makes way more sense I'm going all in.

[Anonymous No.7029865]

>ITT people pretend they understand it

[Anonymous No.7029867]

They are just trying to trick you, buy mobius. Simple and good whitepaper

[Anonymous No.7029885]

>reading the white paper

[Anonymous No.7029896]

LinkConnect wrote a pretty good LaTeX whitepaper back in 2014.

It’s just unfortunate that they don’t know how to program what they’ve theorized.

You gave academic daydreamers $30mm even though they aren’t old school, elite, tested programmers.

You got owned.

[Anonymous No.7029903]

That's the point, they told that if you don't understand the whitepaper it means that it's a great project.

But the whitepaper is full of random stuff without any sense that no one can understand, so, while they're scamming you, they also let you think that you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.7029910]

>>7029862

Lol ok fag by all means do that

[Anonymous No.7029917]

>>7029867
yes white no good mobius big try india no lie stupid stink link

[Anonymous No.7029941]

>>7029857

Nice

[Anonymous No.7029946]

>>7029722
Did people really fall for this? I have a degree in applied mathematics and working on my phD, and this doesnt account for a lot of things. I finally looked through the white paper and it's as if the person writing it picked up a mathbook and cut and pasted things into this paper. Huge sell signal. Shouldve never listened to you biz

[Anonymous No.7029956]

>>7029722
i understood all of it, and i have to say... big if true

[Anonymous No.7029958]

that equation looks like shit, dc if its latex or not

[Anonymous No.7029963]

>>7029722
It's a logical parameter. If you got a math major, CS major, or like me dabbled in some of it for engineering, then you know what's going on.

[Anonymous No.7029971]

>>7029722
desu that proves link is a scam

[Anonymous No.7030071]

>>7029722
I had this two years ago in my system modeling class. You aren’t a low IQ nigger or are you?

[Anonymous No.7030119]

>>7029946
>scoffs at you in superior genius

[Anonymous No.7030145]

literally learned this shit in high school, were you raised in a village OP?

[Anonymous No.7030237]

>>7029722

[Anonymous No.7030259]

discord.gg
/2Hyz8Nj

[Anonymous No.7030322]

I might ask on a math forum what that means, 100% it's bullshit

[Anonymous No.7030323]

I just translated the equation for you fucking idiots! You're welcome

[Anonymous No.7030359]

In all seriousness, what does that formula mean?

[Anonymous No.7030415]

>>7030322
Please do and post results I'll send you like .05 ETH

[Anonymous No.7030423]

>>7030359
it's the solution to the big mac problem

[Anonymous No.7030426]

>>7029722
Here is a decryption for brainlets

[Colonel Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND No.7030441]

>>7030426

[Anonymous No.7030461]

[Anonymous No.7030504]

>>7030359
it doesn't mean anything at all unless the symbols and functions in it are defined

[Anonymous No.7030572]

>>7030323
Fuck that. The equation would made that car black and LINKblue.
You made a mistake somewhere bro.

[Anonymous No.7030600]

>whole point of a whitepaper is to be understandable
>include arbitrary nonsense equations to look smart

[Anonymous No.7030729]

>>7030572
>You made a mistake somewhere bro.
Nah i applied it to the shadow link token.

[Anonymous No.7030734]

>>7030600
The white paper is peer-reviewed.
Not to mention co-authored by Ari Juels.
Pretty sure it makes sense.

Go cry in the corner.

[Anonymous No.7030917]

>>7030359
You'd think the whitepaper would put some text around such a formula, explaining a bit what it's good for and what it's supposed to do...

[Anonymous No.7031908]

>>7029896
Stay impoverished. I’m coming for you retard.

[Anonymous No.7033002]

>>7030917 is right. Everyone around here acts all smart and smug yet no Linkie scum has been able to provide an explanation on what any of this means. Literally random math-looking mumbo jumbo to make idiots think it's all complex and intellectual. Kind of like those stock images, where someone writes on a whiteboard and when you look closer, none of it means anything.

[Anonymous No.7033064]

>>7029779
very poorly done latex equations

[Anonymous No.7033123]

Doesn't look that complicated. It's just notation, I mean, how am I supposed to know what sigma_att, etc is supposed to mean?

[Anonymous No.7033162]

>>7030917
as if you have even seen the white paper. for all you know the explanation could be cut off.

[Anonymous No.7033195]

>>7033002
The guy you're quoting was being sarcastic you dunce.
Everything in the formula is accounted for in the body of the whitepaper.

[Anonymous No.7033407]

>>7033195
shhh just let him feel important

[Anonymous No.7033786]

>>7029722
Looks like shitty latex skills.