Nick Szabo Retweeted LINK

[Anonymous No.6965348]

Nick Szabo, the person who created the idea of Smart Contracts two decades ago, retweeted about LINK.

168k followers.

[Anonymous No.6965377]

OH SHIT ITS TRUE

[Anonymous No.6965710]

>>6965377
Yeah, if anyone wants to go confirm:

https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4

[Anonymous No.6966076]

>>6965348
The guy who is often rumored to be Satoshi retweets about LINK and nobody is replying?

[Anonymous No.6966210]

>>6966076

You are now realizing that thr coordinated link fud/fomo combined with silence on the major happenings is not an organic coincidence. It is a concerted effort to confuse investors and shake out weak hands. The last thing a link investor wants is a positive public image and widely dissseminated first hand sources containing valuable, authentic information.

Link holders will be legends. The writing has been on the wall, only the wise will have enough courage to heed it.

[Anonymous No.6966249]

>>6966210
fucking hell we get it

[Anonymous No.6966407]

>>6966210

I bought 100k linkies in December. I promised myself I would hold for a year.

1. Because I 100% believe this is a winner and Sergey and team will deliver big this year.

2. For tax purposes.

I'm going to be rich.

[Anonymous No.6966485]

>>6966210
Fake. Not the real Nick Szabo twitter

[Anonymous No.6966629]

>>6966485
low tier FUD, I already linked to it for everyone to confirm.

https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4

[Anonymous No.6966777]

>>6965348
BigMac if poo

[Anonymous No.6966784]

The chainlink subreddit has 3k users online
What's up with that

[Anonymous No.6966914]

>>6966629
>Chink puts Apple sticker in Skateboard and takes selfie to fake a partnership
>same chink breaks into a Google office to take a selfie under the logo for the same purposes and is taken out of the premises by the security guards

The coin moons.

>Link is known to be working with Swift and at least 5 major banks.
>first mover advantage in its field
>probably will be endorsed by Nick Szabo if push comes to shove.

Chainlink crash and burns.

Like Pottery.

For link
No news= bad news
Bad news =extremely painful bad news
Good news= bad news
Idk why is that. Unless the fud conspiracy is real

[Anonymous No.6966958]

>>6966914
One day the normies will wake up and that day will be glorious. Probably when mainnet is lauched and with it, a whole backlog of partnerships is announced. Will be too massive to ignore.

[Anonymous No.6967002]

>>6966958
Anon, we don’t need the normies. The big fish will be the ones buying your bags unless you’re planning on running a node

[Anonymous No.6967062]

>>6965348
I think us link holders have been used to FUDing LINK for so long we forgot how to take good news. Right now I think most of us are trying to think of a way to FUD this.

[Anonymous No.6967086]

>>6966958
I highly doubt it. I have a 50k linkies stack. Link over 20 bucks will make me a millionaire. The universe won't allow it
I'm happy with $5 link.

[Anonymous No.6967148]

>>6967002
Normies, big fish, whoever. Mainnet is coming and Rory and Sergey both stated their partnerships will only be announced after that.

It's a perfect storm.
Very few people selling, most of the weak hands are out by now, very few people that even have it (~17k wallets) and we're going to get a huge dump of news all at once. We're gonna be seeing 50-100%+ increases multiple days in a row. The price singularity will be real.

[Anonymous No.6967215]

Delete this

[Anonymous No.6967266]

>>6967148
Imagine them having a backlog of like 20 partnerships they announce all at once when mainnet launches? My god.
They most certainly have them lined up, there's no way they don't after all the connections Sergey has, how many conferences he's been at, the fact SWIFT endorses them, etc, etc, they MUST have a lot of partners in their back pockets. Sergey even stated they are supporting large companies but not of these have been announced. It's all gonna be one big rush to $10+ in a week.

[Anonymous No.6967291]

>>6967215
Why is Frank Garrett taking shit from that cock sugger?

[Anonymous No.6967305]

>>6967266
Don’t forget about the Facebook connection.

[Anonymous No.6967331]

>>6967305
whats this??

[Anonymous No.6967334]

>>6967215
>being such a blood sucking kike that you can poke royalty in the chest like your bitch

they really do own us.

[Anonymous No.6967353]

anyone who doesnt own some link at this point deserves to be poor

[Anonymous No.6967382]

>>6967331
Are you new? The fucking director of engineering of Facebook is an advisor for Chainlink

[Anonymous No.6967384]

>>6967305
Yeah, there's so many, I didn't even bother to list. I think we all know them by now.

SWIFT, Project Ubin, Facebook, AXA, Sony, DocuSign, etc, etc. Just one of these confirmed is enough for a moon.

[Anonymous No.6967426]

>>6966076
Yep, just doubled my LINK stack.

[Anonymous No.6967441]

>>6967305

Chief Engineer of FB is a key advisor next to Ari Juels. He is a low level hardware security expert.

Mark Zuckerberg posted a status recently(past few weeks not spoon feeding you this shot) mentioning blockchains and (!)decdentralization.

[Anonymous No.6967549]

>>6967441
Ari Juels is dead, just look at the white paper if you don't believe me. Don't kid yourself, Link has failed.

[Anonymous No.6967564]

https://oraclize.it

Most outside data contracts need is some public APIs which can be formatted into oracles with minimal effort. How big marketshare is LINK realistically gonna grab when most maintained APIs will have an oracle version available natively?

[Anonymous No.6967598]

>>6967086
The universe won't allow it because it will make you sell before LINK moons.

Break the space-time continuum, keep hodling no matter what.

[Anonymous No.6967609]

>>6967564
oraclize.it is centralized, anon, we've been over this.

[Anonymous No.6967624]

>>6965348
Here's how it actually went.
>guy with 100k followers tweets about how Hashcash was founded in 1997
>random girl replies about how smart contracts were also envisioned in 1995
>Stinky linky with LINK in his username retweets picture and @s guy who wrote about article while secretly shilling LINK as well
>Nick retweets because of the picture of his article from 20+ years ago
This has nothing to do with LINK.

[Anonymous No.6967631]

>>6967609
Oh, good. Sorry for my ignorance then

[Anonymous No.6967639]

Why did waltonchain choose Mobius over Chainlink? I thought iy was agreed that Mobius is a fucking pajeet meme

[Anonymous No.6967643]

>Satoshi just retweeted Link

Holy fuck

[Anonymous No.6967660]

>>6967624
Still doesn't change the fact that there's now a chainlink logo and $link on Nick Szabo's twitter for all of his 168k followers to see.

[Anonymous No.6967687]

>>6965348
>literal chainlink shill from /biz/ is retweeted by the father of smart contracts and cryptographic genius widely thought to be Satoshi Nakamoto

The memes are coming to life.

[Anonymous No.6967708]

>>6967631
No prob. I took you as a fudder, seems you just weren't aware. Cheers.

[Anonymous No.6967749]

>>6967564
One word:
Decentralized.

You people still don't understand?

Leave /biz.

[Anonymous No.6967768]

good entry point?

[Anonymous No.6967784]

>>6967768
now

[Anonymous No.6967820]

>>6967660
His followers won't care. They already know that he just retweeted for the picture.

[Anonymous No.6967822]

>>6967768

I'd be buying now IMO. Don't try and time it, just accumulate. At $50 will you care that much if you bought at $0.70 vs $0.65?

[Anonymous No.6967828]

Should I go all in?

[Anonymous No.6967857]

>>6967828
I am with 200k.

[Anonymous No.6967872]

>>6967828
Yep

[Anonymous No.6967879]

>>6967708
Yeah I know LINK has always been riddled with FUDers and I hate being the 10000th faggot asking obvious questions about link. I'm just trying to figure out my stake on it once I cash back in. Problem is I have no fucking idea how the adapters actually connect to the blockchain and what's preventing the API providers from figuring out a way to make their data available directly. Wouldn't need decentralization when the API is already a single point of failure and has to be considered trusted.

[Anonymous No.6967893]

>>6965348

>starting dozens of threads about a retweet from Jan 24

Linkshills are so desperate, kek

[Anonymous No.6967908]

>>6967687
i'm basically in line with what >>6966407 is saying, but I only have a tenth of his stack. This project has been meme'd way too hard to fail at this point, but I'm discontent with the growing cult mentality surrounding LINK.

[Anonymous No.6967937]

>>6967820
>Following Szabo
>See mention of Chainlink he retweeted
>Not an endorsement of it but now I'm curious about it
>Research
>Realize it's a game changer
>Buy a bunch of LINK

You're a brainlet if you don't think Chainlink showing up on Szabo's twitter is anything worthwhile. I'm just gonna assume you're fudding to accumulate more because I refuse to believe you're this stupid.

[Anonymous No.6967961]

holy fuck

[Anonymous No.6967994]

>>6967893
>trying to FUD the fact that the creator of Smart Contracts mentioned Chainlink

Nolinks are so desperate, kek

[Anonymous No.6968026]

>>6965348
He didn’t retweet about LINK, he retweeted a tweet about him.

[Anonymous No.6968102]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-work_system

Look who’s created that. IS that muh boi ARI JUELS??

Advisor to Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.6968140]

ALL IN THIS SHIT ALL IN THIS SHIT NOW

[Anonymous No.6968164]

>>6967994

>start 100 threads about a retweet from 2 days ago
>shitlink is still tanking
>at $0.70 already

lmaoooo

I wonder when will linkshills realize that a coin cannot be propped only by memes and retweets fro several months in a row

[Anonymous No.6968186]

>>6968026
And that tweet was by a giant Chainlink shill with the Chainlink logo right by his name for all of Szabo's 168k followers to see...

Let's be real here, there's no way you can FUD this.

[Anonymous No.6968242]

>>6968140
THIS IS NOT A JOKE MOTHERFUCKERS I`M FUCKIN ALL IN MEME COIN

[Anonymous No.6968339]

>>6967857
mirin

[Anonymous No.6968341]

>>6968242
Congrats brother, now just don't sell until at least $25. My sell target is $100.

[Anonymous No.6968387]

>>6968339
It's a weird feeling being in the top 1% of what is going to be the future of how the world exchanges data.

[Anonymous No.6968403]

>>6968387
i have 13k

[Anonymous No.6968477]

>mfw LINK shills talks about muh derivatives they actually mean retweets, which are derivatives of regular tweets

[High Preist Boyo !z49yOvT7qs No.6968594]

Kek bless this thread.

Blessed, are the Linkies. For they are truly tested by the long FUD night. For only they can be granted enlightenment. For only their faith is righteous.

Those who hodl true will be rewarded in this life and the next.

[Anonymous No.6968640]

>>6966958
Long ago, when I was a young boy, I used to believe that the normies will wake up one glorious day; however, I have learnt much since then, and now believe otherwise: there will be no "grand awakening of the normies," for they are lazy... the normies will all go to sleep comfortably at their earliest opportunities.
However....
>we remain woke

[Anonymous No.6968698]

>>6967639

>Why did waltonchain choose Mobius over Chainlink?

The questions you should be asking is why did SWIFT choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did SONY choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did AXA choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did ZeppelinOS choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did the World Economic Forum choose ChainLINK over Mobius?

[Anonymous No.6968745]

>>6967639
cucks getting excited about a memecoin choosing a memecoin.
When real businesses are choosing chainlink
I hope you guys dont actually believe the fud you put out

[Anonymous No.6968757]

>>6968403
You're still gonna have a ton of money when it's $25+. Good luck.

[/pol/ migrant No.6968785]

>>6968341
Don't sell until this shit is well above 100k SATs

[Anonymous No.6968810]

>>6966914
>Chink puts Apple sticker in Skateboard and takes selfie to fake a partnership
>same chink breaks into a Google office to take a selfie under the logo for the same purposes and is taken out of the premises by the security guards
Actual retards are still posting on /biz/.. Lmao

Omise has received $30m in funding from the 5th largest banking conglomerate in the world
Has been deep in talks with a central bank
Support from thai government
Already processing 8 to 9 figures USD a DAY

Stay mad stinkylinky

[Anonymous No.6968888]

>>6968785
When I say sell, I mean sell some to buy a house and shit. Never selling all of it, I'm a software engineer and plan of being a node operator.

[Anonymous No.6968908]

>>6968594
Cringe

[Anonymous No.6969115]

Bill Gates was living at the SAME TIME Satoshi Nakamoto AND Sergey lived.

Fucking Microsoft partnership how don't people realize this

[Anonymous No.6969158]

>>6965348
sssssssshhh

[Anonymous No.6969160]

>>6967879
can any anons with some tech background answer this?

[Anonymous No.6969262]

>>6968810
So.... Jun didn't do what I posted earlier?
Also Omise and Omisego are different things.
Just like owning link isn't worth shit regarding Smartcontracts.com

[Anonymous No.6969314]

>>6967937
this sazbos character is old an suffers from glaucoma. dude clicks topics without thinking. he's also a drug addict.

[Anonymous No.6969450]

We finna be rich

[Anonymous No.6969506]

>>6969262
The skateboard photo is older than the ICO. He just likes skateboards and has stickers on it... This is a /biz/ meme and literally no talk about it outside of /biz/. Youre a straight up retard if you believe in memes.

>Also Omise and Omisego are different things.
So retarded lmao. 8 to 9 figures USD minimum will be moving through the omisego network.

[Anonymous No.6969612]

>>6967937
>Research

You fucking brainlet, people who actually research their coins before buying are probably <1% of investors. The only way LINK will pump to legendary prices is if there is MARKETING for normies, which there is none. Have fun holding them bags, I'll FOMO in at around 80ct later and ride it to $3 with profits from other moons.

[Anonymous No.6969666]

>>6969612
>if there is MARKETING for normies
>Implying someone with 168k followers retweeting about it is not marketing

[Anonymous No.6969702]

>>6968698
>Why did waltonchain choose Mobius over Chainlink?
why did SWIFT choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did SONY choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did AXA choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did ZeppelinOS choose ChainLINK over Mobius? Why did the World Economic Forum choose ChainLINK over Mobius?

Simple. There was no competition, now Sergey and his autistic fanboys are going to pay deeply for not taking capitalizing on first mover advantage. You can only blame Sergey for sitting on his hands for these past key months and only blame yourself for getting too attached and emotional about a coin.

[Anonymous No.6969729]

>>6969666
A passing mention that Szabo does for a different coin every day is not marketing, brainlet

[Anonymous No.6969996]

Isn't Sergey supposed to be at that bitcoin conference soon? Do you think he'll announce or market anything big? Will there be a mooning from his presence?

[Anonymous No.6970033]

>>6969996
Bitcoin Superconference in Feb, SXSW in March.

Nobody knows what he'll say but we do know they are not announcing any partnerships until main net. It is possible their partners will announce before then but Sergey and friends themselves will not.

[Anonymous No.6970040]

>>6969996
almost checked em

there will be a slight pump beforehand. when he talks and it's the same presentation he gave at sibos, it will dump

[Anonymous No.6970121]

>>6966914
meanwhile szabo follows omisego and jun on twitter, nothing for sergey or link.

[Anonymous No.6970180]

>>6970033
How long on the mainnet? I saw q1, but is that all we really know after a whole month?

[Anonymous No.6970277]

>>6970180
Q1 is the initial implementation. Q2 or Q3 is likely for the final implementation.

[Anonymous No.6970373]

“Murder at the liar’s...”

What was meant by this?

[Anonymous No.6970396]

Check this out.

http://globalfinancialaccess.com

[Anonymous No.6970420]

>>6970121
Sergey and Chainlink don't use their twitter.

[Anonymous No.6970502]

>>6967624
cope

[Anonymous No.6970676]

>>6965348
I can't stand linkies buy I must admit this is big.

[Anonymous No.6970752]

[Anonymous No.6970817]

[Anonymous No.6970849]

>>6970396
thanks just lost 100k due to the keylogger from clicking that link

[Anonymous No.6970852]

>>6966076
Its being suppressed by the Globalists!

[Anonymous No.6970888]

>>6970852
ebic reddit meme ya filthy kike

[Anonymous No.6970889]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.6970971]

>>6965348
hahaha nolink fud incoming in 3, 2, 1... we get it, you didn't read the whitepaper when we all told you to, and now you think it's too late. Well guess what? It's not. LINK is literally the biggest thing to hit crypto since ethereum, and might actually overtake ETH in a couple of years.

[Anonymous No.6971085]

>>6970852
>Name the Jew, BLAME the Jew, and when you’re online then blame the Jew.

[Anonymous No.6971109]

>>6969702

>Mobius testnet 6 months away
>ChainLINK mainnet live this quarter

You really haven't been paying attention at all, have you?

https://medium.com/@CryptoTakeoff/link-1-3-status-update-c479c657d736

[Anonymous No.6971190]

>>6966958
This. This day will be something unimaginable. /biz/ will make it to mainstream news just for being the early backer of the biggest blockchain project of the decade. People will cry wolf and bitch and moan, but we won't hear them. And the reason we won't hear them is because we'll be having our annual LINK-millionaire meeting in southern France.

[Anonymous No.6971268]

LAST THING AT NIGHT AND FIRST THING IN THE MORNING YOU MUST REPEAT THESE AFFERMATIONS FOR AS LONG AS YOU CAN
I AM RICH
I AM WEALTHY
I AM LUCKY
I AM A MILLIONAIRE
LINK HAS MADE ME RICH

[Anonymous No.6971298]

>>6970420
sergey used to until you retards gave him money.

[꧁Anonymous꧂ No.6971414]

God damn wat a glorious post.

>have a bump of cocaine

[Anonymous No.6971454]

How much LINK to make it by 2030 ($3m+)? Serious replies only please. Currently have 2k

[Anonymous No.6971460]

>>6971298
He used it in equal amounts before and after the ICO. Which is very little.

[Anonymous No.6971503]

>>6971454
200k

[꧁Anonymous꧂ No.6971508]

>>6971454
you'll definitely make it on 2k by 2021 anon but dont fool yourself.
you need at least 10k to be super comfy.

[Anonymous No.6971520]

>>6968102
AAAAAHHHHHHHHHH

[꧁Anonymous꧂ No.6971529]

>>6971508
i mistyped. i meant 100k

[Anonymous No.6971563]

>>6971529
If I had 100k Link today I'd be super comfy.
$70k is a life changing amount.

[Anonymous No.6971808]

>>6967822
This. Just picked up 10K more LINK today.

[Anonymous No.6972094]

EVERYTHING IS ENERGY AND VIBRATION
ATTUNE YOUR VIBRATIONS TO MATCH THAT OF MONEY AND IT WILL FLOW TO YOU

MEDITATE DAILY AND VISUALIZE LINK REACHING $1000 IN THE PRESENT MOMENT FROM YOUR HEART CENTER

WE WILL ALL MAKE IT

[Anonymous No.6972175]

>>6971190
And don't forget the big party that we decided will take place in Norther Europe if we make it by the end of the year :)

[Anonymous No.6972236]

>>6968698
Don't forget ceek.

[Anonymous No.6972263]

>>6972094
>EVERYTHING IS SERGEY AND VIBRATION

There I fixed it for you

[Anonymous No.6972324]

>>6970817
kek'd

[꧁Anonymous꧂ No.6972674]

>>6971563
i was joking. LINK will hit $300 by 2020 Q4

[Anonymous No.6973200]

>>6966485
Kek nice pic saved