[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 98 KB, 429x329, linkies.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6964818 No.6964818 [Reply] [Original]

do you ever wonder if we’re going to ruin his entire project?

don’t you think we should help advertise chainlink now that pajeet scammers like mobius are using his vision to profit?

>> No.6964888

>>6964818
>advertise a coin
Buddy, if your coin is not good enough to advertise itself you're sitting on a pile of shit.

>> No.6964915

>>6964888
>coin
Leave.

>> No.6964958

>>6964915
>IT'S A TOKEN
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
yeah, whatever, even worse

>> No.6965018

>>6964818
There is no project mate, we’re eternal bagholders that’s the joke

>> No.6965052

Maybe.

Thus, the damage we do is to ourselves.

>> No.6965067

Why advertise? With the current potential partner roster consisting with the likes of SWIFT it would be like fishing for guppis while you are trying to reel in Moby Dick.

>> No.6965155

>>6964818

op, you need to understand that because chainlink is a serious project, unlike most other cryptocurrencies, it isn't going to be as volatile. we've seen steady and significant growth over the past couple months that a startup in any other industry would be thrilled with. yes, chainlink's price has dropped since the beginning of january, but we've seen huge gains since the ico in october ($0.10 to $0.72 now). if you want to chase moon missions with other coins you should do so, but you need to understand that this is a long term hold. you'll see significant growth within a month if not sooner anyways.

>> No.6965262

>>6965155
This coin is going to do noting but bleed out.
No News, no updates, no new partnerships, no working product, two man team, ghost link

>> No.6965577

>>6965155
there was a difference between early LINK and now

you have people capitalizing on “the oracle problem” with vaporware

>> No.6965665

to everybody who fucks with sergey:
im gonna find your grandma, steal her purse and push her over

>> No.6965761

>>6964958
You genuinely think every project should run off its own blockchain? There are plenty of tokens that are far better than "muh coinz"

>> No.6965961

>>6965155
Why would it be volatile unless it’s a pajeet project?

>> No.6965980

>>6965665
>t. Negro

>> No.6966009

Biz, stop torturing yourself and pick some good coins to invest in.
Look at the long term signals on a good TA discord like q9xXVCC and that's it. Research and invest.

>> No.6966028

>>6965961

>because chainlink is a serious project, unlike most other cryptocurrencies, it isn't going to be as volatile

my point is that it's not as volatile

>> No.6966080
File: 53 KB, 602x602, TEL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6966080

>he didn't sell at $1.30
>he didn't sell at $1.20
>he didn't sell at $1.10
>he didn't sell at $1.00
>he didn't sell at $0.9
>he didn't sell at $0.8
>he didn't sell for tellies at $0.7
WE ARE HERE
>he didn't sell at $0.6
>he didn't sell at $0.5
>he didn't sell at $0.2
>he didn't sell at $0.1

>> No.6966098

>>6965577

and this plays into chainlink's hands. no serious contenders are coming forward yet "the oracle problem" increasingly enters the public conversation

>> No.6966240

>>6965262

>working product comes out this quarter
>partnerships were announced last month
>they already hired new developers

>> No.6966315
File: 731 KB, 750x1334, 21-25-56-1516923170122.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6966315

>>6966080
>>he won't sell at $ 200
YOU WILL BE HERE
>he won't sell at $ 100
>he won't sell at $ 50
>he won't sell at $ 10
>he won't sell at $ 5
>he won't sell at $ 2
>he didn't sell at $1.30
>he didn't sell at $1.20
>he didn't sell at $1.10
>he didn't sell at $1.00
>he didn't sell at $0.9
>he didn't sell at $0.8
>he didn't sell for tellies at $0.7
WE ARE HERE
>he didn't sell at $0.6
>he didn't sell at $0.5
>he didn't sell at $0.2
>he didn't sell at $0.1