Last Chance

[Anonymous No.6859160]

FUN February is coming, who's ready?

[Anonymous No.6859259]

Holding 50k FUN, so yeah you could say I'm ready.

[Anonymous No.6859395]

>>6859160
sell me on FUN faggot

[Anonymous No.6859413]

>>6859259
2.5K
We will make it

[Anonymous No.6859562]

8.3k FUNlet reporting in

[Anonymous No.6859597]

provably fair casinos already exist tho

[Anonymous No.6859602]

600k FUN reporting in.

Bought in at 400sat.

We'll go all the way to 1$ this spring.

[Anonymous No.6859660]

>>6859602
You better not be one of the whales manipulating this

[Anonymous No.6859708]

>>6859597
None exist that are as revolutionary as FUN.
Other 'provably fair' casinos are individual casinos that can't be adopted. FUN is for mass adoption and gives casinos complete freedom.
If I have the option for 20 decent casinos using FUN and I can share my tokens between them, or one individual casino, I'm going to the FUN casinos.

[Anonymous No.6859714]

>>6859660

I'm just a bagholder, my friend.

[Anonymous No.6859741]

[Anonymous No.6859740]

>>6859660
I don't care if whales are manipulating. I just want them to make sure it's going up like a week before ICE so we have a strong starting point

[Anonymous No.6859775]

>>6859741

fucking saved

[Anonymous No.6859923]

25k here

Honest question, why do you all expect FUN to moon from the ICE booth?
Even if someone is interested in using it, it shouldn't influence the price all too much, right?
EVEN CONSIDERING that hundreds of people may see the booth, it seems very optimistic to expect anything even resembling a moon.

[Anonymous No.6860018]

>>6859923
ICE has over 15000 participants on average
8500 of those are representatives of gaming and gambling companies
If literally one decent casino puts money in after ICE, this goes 5x instantly. We went from 3c to 19c in the span of just over a week with absolutely no news backing it and it didn't dump (until Korea fud and consecutive market crashes).

Most cryptos rely solely on investors to increase the value of their coin. This one has casinos on top of investors, and a whale isn't going to beat a casino that literally doesn't give a shit about the market cap and just throws 2% of their holdings at it because they want to buy in while it's cheap. Once any investor sees that, there's going to be so much fomo it's retarded

[Anonymous No.6860023]

>>6859708
fair enough, just figured i'd mention as i'm not sure if everyone understands it.

[Anonymous No.6860105]

Not me daddy I need more time to accumulate

[Anonymous No.6860132]

>>6859160
So when will we find out if the license got approved?

[Anonymous No.6860200]

>>6860132
https://secure.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PublicRegister/Search?Search=funfair

[Anonymous No.6860208]

>>6860132
16 weeks or under usually (I think they applied a couple weeks ago), but it's almost definitely in the bag already

[Anonymous No.6860263]

>>6860208
Hopefully the market recovers fully until then

[Anonymous No.6860390]

I got caught holding bags last week so now I'm a fun fag

[Anonymous No.6860473]

Why does everyone think the casinos will have to buy their fun on the open market? FUN has 6 billion coins in holding, isn't this to help seed casinos starting out?

It's not like someone is just gonna put 20 million in crypto and buy out the orderbook on Binance to start a casino it makes no sense.

[Anonymous No.6860617]

>>6860473
That's literally what they will do. Anyone can make a casino, they just need tokens.

The 6 billion is for when developers start getting paid to submit their games when that option is opened up later in the year. FUN might make some contracts with devs and give them FUN in exchange for publicity or something, maybe, and will hand out casinos coins, but that's only under rare circumstances. FUN also plans to do coin burns, so they need to have coins in the first place to do that.

For the most part, going onto Binance or some shit and buying out the orderbook is exactly what casinos will do.

[Anonymous No.6860641]

>>6860473
i wish this didnt make as much sense as it does. not very good news for casinos taking up the circulating supply.

[Anonymous No.6860669]

>>6859259
I got 26k

Thinking of grabbing some more. I think we could be looking at 2.00 by June

[Anonymous No.6860753]

>>6860617
If FUN can put their games on machines in Vegas or Atlantic City, it might huge then. Don't think the beta version is that different from other casino games. They need to have good quality games to draw people in. Like PS4 quality graphics, lots of variety of games with better music than the one on the site.

I feel like I've played these games somewhere else.

[Anonymous No.6860835]

>>6860669
i would cum so hard

100k bagholder here

[Anonymous No.6860851]

>>6860753
lol what the fuck are you even talking about, do you have any idea what FUN is doing.

[Anonymous No.6861042]

>>6860753
I'm pretty sure you don't actually know what the purpose of FUN is

[Anonymous No.6861105]

>>6860835
You and me brother. Blowin
Loads all over this joint

It feels like a no brainer that’s unique in this space.

ALL ABOARD THE FUN ROCKET.

Check em

[Anonymous No.6861563]

>>6859597
>provably fair casinos already exist tho
If you're talking about websites that advertise themselves as provably-fair but don't run their games through smart contracts, they still require trust. Provably-fair RNG does not necessarily mean the gameplay is provably-fair. Provably-fair RNG alone is only verifiable for the player after the fact, meaning that only after each play will the player be able to check if the generated "random" number is legitimate or used properly. Even if a casino is producing a true random number, the way in which that number is implemented (the game logic) in calculating a final outcome may be manipulated, if that number is used at all. Of course if you know how the number should have been used, you'll be able to see that you've been scammed (assuming you bother to verify each result on your own), but this doesn't change the fact that provably-fair RNG doesn't guarantee you won't be scammed in the first place. FunFair uses smart contracts to make it clear that both the RNG and manner in which said number is used is fair before even playing so that there is zero possibility of being scammed. Players know the exact rules for which the randomly generated number will be used and it can't be manipulated.

Other smart contract gambling exists, but they do not have the benefits of FunFair's product (one example from a player's perspective is that FunFair's games are much faster and cheaper to play due to FunFair's implementation of custom state channels).

[Anonymous No.6861902]

>>6859160

20k FUNlet reporting in 3$ at least by eoy I can feel it in my bones

[Anonymous No.6862150]

>>6861902
>$3
I'm trying to find a good entry on another 100k. Stop trying to make me FOMO
t. 150k FUN

[Anonymous No.6862161]

>>6859160
12.7K
not much but, it's what I got

[Anonymous No.6862219]

>>6862150

if i were you i'd stick with it for the long hodl but thats just me, senpai

[Anonymous No.6862265]

3k fun here

[Anonymous No.6862357]

Ive seen estimates of the online gambling industry here (around 60bil by 2020 i think)

We know that how the FUN tokens operate, we can assume that more volume (or turnover) is better for the coin, as the utility give it its value.

Now take into account that if you sit down on a blackjack table with $100, play for an hour (admittedly, thats a long session), you could have potentially turned over thousands of dollars (or FUN) after playing multiple hands and going up and down up and down.

So Ive come to the conclusion that the 60bil dollar figure is inaccurate in trying to determine just how much is in the online gambling industry.

Its much, much more

[Anonymous No.6862407]

77k here. Let this shit hit $1 soon.

[Anonymous No.6862431]

>>6862219
I plan to. I also plan to accumulate more. Like I said, waiting on another dip in FUN or a boom in BTC/ETH so I can increase my stack

[Anonymous No.6862434]

>>6859660
>doesn’t recognize the 600k FUNWhale

Whoever this guy is he’s in it for the long haul, I hope he at least warns us before he dumps

[Anonymous No.6862539]

>>6862357
From what I understand you would trade FUN for casinos' chips and gamble with the chips and then cash out via FUN. Am I wrong?

[Anonymous No.6862551]

Wondering how weiss feels about FUN

[Anonymous No.6862563]

>>6860617
if you think Steve Wynn is going to buy FUN tokens on binance or any other exchange you are full blown retarded

[Anonymous No.6862613]

>>6862434
That's like 5 BTC you retard not even close to whale territory.

[Anonymous No.6862656]

>>6862551
AAA+
Jez was knighted by the Queen of England for fucks sake, and they have former William Hill and Pokerstar directors on board too.

[Anonymous No.6862753]

Funfair
The most fun coin right? Or a pedophile coin?
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/01/22/factory-worker-arrested-for-allegedly-molesting-child-at-funfair/

[Anonymous No.6862815]

>>6862753
shitskin factory worker, no one cares.

[Anonymous No.6862860]

>>6862656
Could you fucking imagine though? I mean, fuck (((weiss))) but them giving the nod to FUN would be monumental imo. If they actually rate coins on tech n devs andn potential, it'd be crazy to brush this one off by them. I think they're only doing top20 though. Thinking of dumping my 15k TRX into ETH before I go to bed just to be safe

[Anonymous No.6863131]

>>6862860
Yeah FunFair is hard to go past, it is honestly AAA+ no matter what (((anyone))) says. But I've also heard it's only top20 so I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

[Anonymous No.6863179]

>>6862539
The ecosystem itself utilises FUN tokens to function. IRT what casinos want to show on the front end, they will most likely choose FIAT

So no, your not wrong

[Anonymous No.6863231]

>>6862539
The prevailing hypothesis is that FUN will be utilized on the backend only. Joe gambler may not even know FUN is being used. He just clicks the fiat amount he wants to gamble, the program translates it to FUN, then back from FUN to fiat when he cashes out.

[Anonymous No.6863488]

>>6862613
Yes, because whale has to refer to 100 BTC sell wall trading bots all the time

Micro whale, nano whale, whale junior, whatever helps you sleep at night m8

[Anonymous No.6863546]

Mmmm get inside me Fun

[Anonymous No.6863584]

>>6859160
last chance before it drops to .01

[Anonymous No.6863674]

>>6862563
If you think he won't just tell of his employees to 'take care of it' if it's guaranteed to fix every single one of the issues gambling has, you're deluded.