[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 91 KB, 1200x800, 1515355950988.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6828008 No.6828008 [Reply] [Original]

If you read this document you buy massive amounts of chainlink.

If you don't read, you are okay with being a nolinker and will struggle far more for your lambo.


https://www.swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SIWP-2016-001-Impact-Open-APIs-FINAL.pdf

>> No.6828164

>>6828008
Should i get in? Only 13k pfolio here....is 1k of this shitcoin enough to make It?

>> No.6828183

ok so I just read the whole thing and it's nothing

>> No.6828185

Reading that document will give zero insight to how LINK has anything to do with this. Next time give a little background of how they're related.

>> No.6828223

>>6828164
10k minimum

>> No.6828232

they using the shadowfork of LINK
i knew it, thats why they dont mentioned Chainlink anywere

>> No.6828247

>>6828183
>>6828185
you guys aren't gonna make it at this rate

>> No.6828398

“more specifically in payments – and the use of access and network technologies have created various opportunities for new entrants such as FinTechs and challenger banks to claim some market share, but also for established banks to reconsider their market position and rethink their value proposition to their customers. In this context, banking institutions can choose either to embrace change through the opportunities that technology offers by interacting with the greater ecosystem of market participants and other service providers, or to defend their position by focusing their efforts on developing competitive solutions for all customer and product segments and limiting access to their systems. The recent announcement of the newer version of the payment systems directive (PSD2) to be implemented in 2018 across Europe, as well as the open banking initiative in the UK (OBWG) push towards the creation of an open-banking environment through the introduction of open application programming interfaces (APIs) but the question still remains: what will the banks’ response be to this regulatory change?”
Shots fired

>> No.6828417

>>6828008
Hey look. this shit again.

>> No.6828741

>>6828247
nice meme pal

>> No.6828819

4chan makes the normie pages

https://fynestuff.com/chainlink-story-analysis/

>> No.6828940

>>6828223
fuck.

>> No.6828967

>>6828008
>Strg+F: Chain Link
>0 results

>> No.6829010

>>6828223
l would sa 50.000$ per 1 LINK.

>> No.6829084

So everybody's gonna ignore the likelihood of swift developing their own solution with sergeys help?

>> No.6829111

>>6828008
I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet.

>> No.6829182

>>6829010
You meant $50,000 dollars subhuman.

>> No.6829219

>>6829182
>50'000 dollars dollars

>> No.6829253

>>6828398

Yup. LINK's banking relationships are going to pay dividends far sooner than a lot of people expect. People are focused solely on SWIFT, which likely won't be operational until 2019/2020, but come mainnet partnerships that haven't been priced in will be announced that kick off the price singularity.

>> No.6829264

>>6829219
But that is how it is in my language sir!

>> No.6829276

>>6829084
So you're gonna ignore the likelihood of Sergey developing his own Swift with Swift's help?

>> No.6829288

>>6829084

They probably will if they havent already when they realize most link holders are neonazis and white supremacists

>> No.6829301

>>6828223
10k min what? 10k min buy in? Or that its going to at least 10k

>> No.6829331

>>6828185
How fucking dense can you be

>> No.6829348

This document was only revealed the night assblaster came back, though by a random anon (possibly assblaster idk; and i follow link developments pretty closely and hadn't turned it up for found it myself which is dumb because it was pretty obvious where to look). He promised another document. Did anyone find it?

>> No.6829505

>>6829288
Realistically how much LINK is in the hands of /biz/ though? Can't be that much

>> No.6829512

>>6829111
Checked and nice diary entry, random anonymous internet dweller. Just sold 100k.

>> No.6829555

>>6829348

Wondering this myself.

>> No.6829598

>>6829288

Oh yeah I'm sure SWIFT gives a fuck

>THIS JUST IN: US dollar canceled because some people who own dollar are racist.

>AND LATER: Apple cancels all stocks because some racist folks own stock in the company

lol