[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 5 KB, 300x471, 335059-REQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6697270 No.6697270 [Reply] [Original]

Is it dead /biz/?, just give it to me straight

>> No.6697316

>>6697270
latest press release does NOT look good. sounds like they are in over their head and overpromised and now are trying to outsource the work on most of their main promises. Anyone with sense is jumping ship

>> No.6697361

>>6697270
>raised 120 million
>pushed backed milestones
>only outsourcing 30 milllion for 90% of work
>trusting pajeets with a reliable payment app
If someone was trying to make a BIG four killer, they wouldn't outsource it for 30 million LMAO.

>> No.6697370

>>6697316
kek ok

>> No.6697375

>>6697270
they are not capable building what the "promised"
searching NOW for people that can.
not dead but overvalued af ye.

>> No.6697789
File: 145 KB, 646x700, 1507997193540.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6697789

>>6697270
Yes they are applying the strategy that NEO used. with their CoZ project. Basically they are trying to create an ecosystem in which it's easy and incentivized for external developers to create as much content for REQ as possible to get as much early adoption as possible by the market.

This is a BULLISH sign anon. But I still recommend you to sell your REQ and buy in 1 week as it will probably bleed out due to brainlets not understanding how good this news actually is

>> No.6698077

>>6697361
Request has a very ambitious roadmap, do you think they have all the staff and expertise to develop all the various apps/features at this time? Of course they wouldn’t, they need to scale. So what’s the fucking difference between hiring an army of devs to hopefully pull it all together vs. outsourcing to existing teams with expertise in the feature they’re looking for? Biztards I swear

>> No.6698157
File: 118 KB, 504x470, IMG_3632.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6698157

>>6697270
No? What if you do your own research?