/biz/ - Business & Finance

File: 18 KB, 488x152, town-crier-9adccd0afa37616c1c431fd962d6740c918b2974dcc7b6fff56220249f3d19e5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 05:51:58 2018 No.6580769 [Reply] [Original]

Does anyone remember the thread where one of the insiders said that Sergey had fucked up by "hyping" LINK in some way and SWIFT had been unhappy? Who said this? Does anyone have a screencap?

I can't find the thread and don't have a cap, but I know it was recently. Obviously now it seems like that could have been binance listing LINK without permission. If you weren't here then you have to remember how out of the blue that was but also how irrelevant binance was back then. Even if sergey had wanted to get it on an exchange, there was no way of knowing Binance would basically become the no. 1 exchange.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 05:53:50 2018 No.6580837 Yeah bro this one >>5989877

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 05:55:41 2018 No.6580889
File: 330 KB, 1835x711, psd2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Also did anyone find the second document Assblaster was talking about last night?

This one was posted in the original thread but I can't find and haven't seen anyone post the other. I think assblaster either stole the "made man" theory of sergey or we were onto something. I made this image weeks ago.

https://www.swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SIWP-2016-001-Impact-Open-APIs-FINAL.pdf

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 05:57:45 2018 No.6580945 >>6580889 Keep digging

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 05:58:58 2018 No.6580981
File: 91 KB, 1828x455, Screenshot-2018-1-17 biz - THIS IS NOT A DRILL For those who doubt me, look - Business Finance - 4chan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6580837

Thank you. So it was another "insider" in of an assblaster thread who I don't think ever identified himself, or assblaster himself.

I'm trying to be skeptical but last nights thread is basically what I've thought for a while (minus binance I hadn't thought about that), but then we've all also expressed such thoughts here so Assblaster could just be weaving shit together. If so he's really good at it and probably lurks here a lot more than posts.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:01:50 2018 No.6581072 why even make an ICO or introduce it to the public in anyway when you don't want people know about it

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:02:57 2018 No.6581095 >>6580981 There was a thread last night?

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:05:54 2018 No.6581180

>>6581072

you have to remember when the ico happened, let alone when the ICO was planned, there was no frenzy over crypto like there is right now; the ico probably would have happened then it would have faded away. Also had binance not listed it it (as they allegedly wanted not to happen) would have stayed on decentralized exchanges where very few people would touch it, especially had crypto not exploded.

Assblaster talked about it last night, and the document I posted addresses how they wanted to find a balance between decentralization being open to the public and not being truly dangerously decentralized. Like assblaster said too, it's not confidential info; they just wanted it low key. Banks and shit still need the IT people at banks and shit setting up nodes.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:07:02 2018 No.6581211 >>6581095 Yea, and he says he should be back for one today: >>/biz/thread/S6560973#p6571815

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:07:32 2018 No.6581228 >>6581072 Because the ICO had a 50 (500? I don't remember) eth minimum limit and that purged out a lot of small investors. I think the Binance listing really put things out there with it becoming such a large exchange.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:09:58 2018 No.6581290 File: 62 KB, 1357x342, limbo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6581180 That makes no sense. ChainLink along with Kyber Network & District0x had the craziest, most hyped ICOs, and they were shilled here nonstop during those days.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:11:04 2018 No.6581319
File: 203 KB, 1309x924, Screenshot-2018-1-12 Anyone know if LINK is involved in the Europe's PSD2 • r LINKTrader.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

This also makes me wonder if this guy from that reddit post actually knows something too if this is a solution they've been working on and spreading the word about setting up a node network for some time.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:13:12 2018 No.6581359 >>6581211 Wrong trip bro, the real AB is MPenn something

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:14:28 2018 No.6581395 >>6581359 Apparently he was on his phone instead of his laptop, and used a different trip. He said that he would confirm the trip in his thread tomorrow.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:15:01 2018 No.6581411

>>6581290
Here sure, but there was nowhere near the massive influx of normal people that would come over the next few months. Like I said too, when they were planning it even earlier crypto was even less of a huge deal. Do you remember the threads from back then? It wasn't 95% pajeets asking about price predictions. It wasn't half as bad in september. I cringe reading assblaster threads now because every other post is someone asking "how much do I need to make it." or "price prediction"

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:15:38 2018 No.6581431

>>6581290
on /biz/.... but that was before the pajeets and normies arrived and started pumping every piece of shit 10x.
reddit wasn't interested. they thought it was just a 4chan pnd.
no where else on the internet had heard of it. there was only one youtube video about it, a month later, some guy calling it dumb

I still think a lot of this rise was caused just by the overall flood of hype putting all shitcoins up. it didn't seem to coincide with.

these guys don't even have a twitter presence.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:15:39 2018 No.6581432 >>6581359 >!!MBPenmwX43G This is the real AB's trip code. Stay safe /biz/.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:15:49 2018 No.6581436 >>6581095 There was not, anon. Assblaster has been dark since that one 10 days ago.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:17:40 2018 No.6581487 >>6581180 >nodes Doesn't make sense. That's what 350m tokens are for: incentivizing enterprise.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:19:33 2018 No.6581540 >>6581411 >>6581431 Okay, I understand what you're saying now and share the same sentiments.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:23:34 2018 No.6581634 >>6581432 >>6581211 This Assblaster has too many spelling mistakes/bad grammar. The real Assblaster write impeccably.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:23:50 2018 No.6581645

4chan is more interested in insider theories than even talking about the project, LMAO.
It's like the celebrity gossip of crypto discussion. It's a sign of how literally stupid this board has gotten. No interest in ideas, just "Price prediction. When moon"
Fuck, *I* don't even want most of these cunts on board. I can't imagine how Sergey feels

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:24:30 2018 No.6581664

>>6581432

He has another one he used in his first threads that apparantly got cracked but he said he had to use because of his phone. It was definitely him though, don't be a pedant, anyone with reading comprehension can tell by someone's writing. I posted the thread earlier ITT.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:26:06 2018 No.6581707 >>6581645 The project has been discussed to death, and there's literally no news so there's nothing new to discuss, either.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:29:58 2018 No.6581796 >>6581645 Nigger, LINK has been discussed to death. This is way more fun.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:30:49 2018 No.6581823 >>6581228 Nope there was a max limit of 7 ETH

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:32:32 2018 No.6581869 >>6580769 Sergey has never "hyped" Link, so the story is bullshit. Also, nobody has any idea of Swift's inner dialogue. Stop being so gullible.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:34:45 2018 No.6581932 Link shilling is some next level free mason shit hahaha

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:35:01 2018 No.6581939

>>6581869

Did you read THE API ECONOMY AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN FINANCIAL SERVICES: THE CASE OF OPEN BANKING? It pretty much tells you exactly how swift as an organization thought about projects like LINK and the risks and benefits that they saw of doing something like it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:35:45 2018 No.6581961 >>6580981 That Post is from december. Someone posted that shit back in nov/dec

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:35:55 2018 No.6581963 >>6581211 >>>/biz/thread/S6560973#p6571815 >>6581359 >>6581395 >>6581432 Guess we'll wait for the next thread, the writing style is similar.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:37:14 2018 No.6581987 >>6581939 Swift makes its opinion known through press releases and such. But you will NEVER learn of how they "feel" about people like Sergey from some insider.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:38:41 2018 No.6582027 >>6581987 nobody cares about how they "feel". It's just a series of connected dots that point in a certain direction. It might not be true but if it is, holy shit. It's worth the risk.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:41:11 2018 No.6582082 >>6581211 Okay, let's say this is real. In this thread, AB says that SWIFT wants an "open banking initiative through a community-driven decentralized network." Why in god's name would the jews want that?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:42:20 2018 No.6582120 >>6582082 They save money

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:42:32 2018 No.6582125 >>6582082 >Why in god's name would the jews want that? Apparently someone in charge does. With PSD2, the EU just forced banks to decentralize their internal data by opening up their APIs to third parties.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:44:07 2018 No.6582158

>>6582082
The amount of money chainlink will save banks in costs and at the same time making them MORE money is ridiculous. This is the way to go for the financial sector. Even if they won't use chainlink, they will use a decentralized oracle. Only a moron can not see this.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:44:48 2018 No.6582175 ok lads i did it and bought the dip i now have 10k links when will i be a millionaire?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:45:17 2018 No.6582181 As the document says, its a value add, if they have valuable projects within their ecosystem then users are more likely to stay within it, ie keep using swift

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:46:20 2018 No.6582210 >>6582082 it's not AB He said in a previous thread that chainlink will moon to around 60-70 dollars, then corrects down to 10 and then goes up to 150 in the thread from last night "he" said LINK won't moon and correct at all

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:47:33 2018 No.6582247

>>6582082

read the document. It is basically all about that question https://www.swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SIWP-2016-001-Impact-Open-APIs-FINAL.pdf

plus there is another document out there according to assblaster that he'll post if no one finds it, and I don't think anyone has found it yet.

Also "decentralization" is in a sense just a token concept for this project initially. Sergey is meeting with data providers to set up oracles for the network launch. He says that's what his focus is on in this video. They don't seem focused on getting retail investors setting up nodes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMlpTgxKtAY

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:47:45 2018 No.6582252 True, but he was talking about when the crypto bubble bursts as a whole, so maybe it still stands

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:48:06 2018 No.6582263 >>6582175 too soon, bigger dip coming

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:49:47 2018 No.6582311 File: 132 KB, 419x419, 1509766824660.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582175 Bitcoins not finished yet. silly move.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:50:16 2018 No.6582323

>>6582247
if you all believe this is true, the big players are more likley to just kill chainlink and try it again with something else but this time more discreetly.
You fucking retards are too stupid to even realize the work you are doing compiling this "evidence" would effectively ruin your own fantasy that you have going here.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:50:32 2018 No.6582328 Than what would stop big holders (since they seems to have full control over LINK) from dumping LINKs once it's ~$2 and shadowfork it to ensure you small fuckers not going to get rich as well?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:50:36 2018 No.6582332 >>6582263 Down to 15c?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:52:28 2018 No.6582380 >>6582332 lower

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:52:58 2018 No.6582395 >>6582328 shieeeeeeeet

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:53:46 2018 No.6582420 File: 23 KB, 550x367, 1516101540816.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582328 >shadowfork wew >>6582380 I hope you're right. Gotta accumulate moar.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:54:43 2018 No.6582437 >>6582247 >They don't seem focused on getting retail investors setting up nodes. Oh bug they do. Check out the gitter or Hodges in the slack.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:56:22 2018 No.6582477 >>6582328 This

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:57:53 2018 No.6582519

>>6582323
The thing is, in the end they do want us retail consumers in it. They just didn't want us in it so early. Without a large amount of people to host the nodes, chainlink becomes worthless because you may as well use any other oracle at that point since the number of nodes is what causes link to be decentralized. How difficult would it be to get us neets back on their side if they were to scrap this project and move onto the next?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:58:17 2018 No.6582525 >>6582328 sergey is a phillospher he wont pull that shit. also >shadowfork w e w l a d e w l a d

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:58:23 2018 No.6582527

>>6582247
>>6582125

Thanks, anons. Missed the news about the PSD2, very interesting.

>>6582323

Our impact is too small. And if it's true they've been working with Sergey for years, they're not going to redo everything just so some autists don't make some millions, which is nothing to them.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:59:06 2018 No.6582544 >>6582323 as i said they don't even need to try "something else" They can fork Chainlink and deploy it under different name SMART move: deploy 120 forks so /biz/ won't find it

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:59:50 2018 No.6582557

>>6582437
What makes you think that's not for the benefit of the big players IT people? Like assblaster said it's just low key not an MI6 operation; they still need the technical people at banks and what not to know what to do plus the development community at large to write external adapters.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 06:59:56 2018 No.6582562 File: 44 KB, 480x480, 1338885424500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582328 >shadowfork

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:01:29 2018 No.6582604 >>6582328 Uh oh. Looks like a FUD meme just got born. Rumour is J Parser and Sergey have already shadowforked LINK and set up a parallel network.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:01:36 2018 No.6582607

>>6582557
>What makes you think that's not for the benefit of the big players IT people?
What makes you think I thought otherwise?

For whatever covert purpose they implemented PSD2, the reality is that it plays right into Chainlink's hand in a big way.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:02:29 2018 No.6582632 >>6581395 That's not how trips work

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:02:39 2018 No.6582641 >>6582420 >>6582525 >>6582562 there is no such word, r-right? oh fuck i mean "take an existing product, make a little refactor and then deploy under different name"

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:03:52 2018 No.6582673 >>6582641 And how would that work with a token like Link?

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:04:20 2018 No.6582683
File: 183 KB, 800x600, 1516010901693.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6582527
>they're not going to redo everything just so some autists don't make some millions
This. The amount of money that is necessary for the average /biz/raeli to "make it" is chump change for them.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:04:36 2018 No.6582695 File: 34 KB, 591x730, 1516163268524.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:04:45 2018 No.6582699 >>6582604 guys link is just shadowforked eth don't buys this crap SELL SELL SELL sorry i'm bad at english so i made up some new shitty word

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:05:45 2018 No.6582730

>>6582328
Why didnt enterprises just shadowfork their own ethereum?

If enterprises just forked their own variations of chainlink which of the entities would decide which is the standard token on the network? That's far too much effort just to stop a handful of autists on a mongolian chat room from making some money and would go against the very. decentralised nature of the project.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:06:10 2018 No.6582736 Can someone tell me if you set up nodes (min amount?) how much do u get paid out ?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:06:14 2018 No.6582738 >>6582673 well like it's working with every existing fork

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:06:58 2018 No.6582754 File: 60 KB, 650x370, 1515855413116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582695 Great work & saved.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:07:36 2018 No.6582771 >>6582730 >Shadowfork So this is a word now ?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:07:41 2018 No.6582774 >>6582730 They don't have a control over ETH, that's why they need LINK which was made under their feet (assuming AB telling truth)

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:08:27 2018 No.6582795 >>6582738 You don't even know what a fork is, do you?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:08:39 2018 No.6582803 >>6582738 Show us an example when such a "shadowfork" happen in the history of crypto currencies.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:09:41 2018 No.6582822 >>6582738 Show us an example when such a "shadowfork" happened in the history of crypto currencies.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:09:55 2018 No.6582828 File: 400 KB, 1131x827, 1516062514446.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582695 Haha noice. Anyone have any of the Stan tributes to sergey? That was a great thread. Link is degenerate af

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:10:08 2018 No.6582835 >>6582736 depends how much external data you provide

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:11:00 2018 No.6582856 File: 114 KB, 645x807, 1516075323157.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582822 Bazingacoin

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:11:03 2018 No.6582859 >>6582822 >>6582803 shows you the example happy?

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:11:56 2018 No.6582885
File: 44 KB, 960x536, 1505120822334.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

mfw when people keep saying shadowfork

also congrats on this, seriously.

inb4 this fud will be in every thread on biz
>they can just shadowfork it so /biz/ doesn't get rich

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:12:19 2018 No.6582893

>>6582683
This. If the price of link does what AB says, sure I'll make several million dollars, but that's probably less than some of these bankers make in a year. Also, why are we assuming they're intrinsically evil and want us to be poor. Don't get me wrong, banking is a shady industry, but the whole point of investment is to try to make money.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:12:31 2018 No.6582900

>>6582795
Maybe you don't know what a fork is, anon? You were busy reading all this "crypto 101" books so there is a no time for you to know that's just a program in open source repository everyone can copy?
And assuming (((they))) have a control on majority of nodes right now they may copy LINK, create a new fork with different name, and set up their node to work with new token.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:13:22 2018 No.6582914 >>6582900 Confirmed for having no idea what a fork is. Protip: you can't fork tokens.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:15:21 2018 No.6582962 File: 65 KB, 350x350, 1516037065328.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I think we need a shadowfork update on our chainlink fud pasta.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:15:40 2018 No.6582969

>>6582893

Yes I've gotten the sense that while link isn't neccessary to run a node, high value contract writers will require a huge sum of money staked to the node or to bid on the contracts so as to ensure only highly reputable nodes are being used and Sybil attacks can't be launched because they'd be obscenely cost prohibitive. This would of course require a ton of tokens, making supply and demand push the price up.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:15:48 2018 No.6582972 >>6582900 On the second thought, our influence may be really small so that's won't be needed. We don't know how much /biz/ hold in total so...

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:16:43 2018 No.6582991 >>6582544 Have you even seen weaponised autism in action?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:17:31 2018 No.6583012 >>6582893 How much stinky linkies do u have, dont know if I can make it with 10k

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:17:47 2018 No.6583020 File: 297 KB, 2502x522, Screen Shot 2018-01-17 at 4.16.33 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582210 good point. here's the post

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:17:56 2018 No.6583025 >>6582900 >>6582914 this you're a dumb cunt. lol fork an erc20 token lool hahaha AHAHAAH from the guy who brought you shadowfork, comes an entirely new strain of autism, the erc20 shadowfork. only in cinemas.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:19:51 2018 No.6583085

>>6582972

Exactly, /biz/ may not be the target audience, but link is still really under the radar and the frenzy they probably don't want is the sort of attention ripple has received, and obviously chainlink hasn't been subjected to that level of interest at all, and sergey has done everything possible to ensure that doesn't happen.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:20:22 2018 No.6583102

>>6582900
>And assuming (((they))) have a control on majority of nodes right now they may copy LINK
>le (((stormerecho)))
This joowise stuff has gotten tiresome. The only people who are dumber than the people that think "the jews" control nothing are the ones who think that "the jews" control everything.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:20:22 2018 No.6583103

>>6582914
proprotip: you can fork any kind of software when it's open source, and did you even paid attention to what i said? I'm not talking about "transfering tokens from one currency to other with some magic tricks", i'm saying "sell this dirty link, dump it since they are large holders(SWIFT, banks), fork all the software LINK based on, set up their nodes to work with fork, buy this fork, this time being sneaker than with LINK"

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:20:41 2018 No.6583112 >>6582991 We did get a president elected after all. Let's not diminish the power of 100000 screeching autists with nothing but time and the will to make everyone who has disrespected them suffer.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:21:01 2018 No.6583122 >>6583020 >doesnt moon >doesnt correct >will be hard to get link in future I don't get.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:21:11 2018 No.6583128 File: 67 KB, 1024x578, CIA_guy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] pssst all the fud is to shake out the weak hands, r-right lads?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:21:15 2018 No.6583131 >coinbase lists all erc20 tokens in the top 100 >LINK can be bought for dollars This isn't in the dead serge scrolls. This will be catastrophic.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:22:32 2018 No.6583167 >>6583012 I have 20k but I'm waiting for a few speculative coins to moon to increase my stack. Hopefully I'll have 80-100k before this goes parabolic, but I used 30k for my calculations.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:22:37 2018 No.6583171 >>6582683 They know most of the neets would sell once it gets to 5 bucks.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:22:55 2018 No.6583178 >>6583128 Insightful discussion long time on biz, apart from the 24/24 shilling Conclusion: Link is a shitcoin and will never go above 2 dollars

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:23:18 2018 No.6583186 >>6583122 That is because AB is a bullshitter.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:24:09 2018 No.6583215 >>6583167 Same but with this bear market hard to find coins mooning right now, sigh. I think I'll just have 20k linkies and be done with it till next year

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:24:24 2018 No.6583217 >>6583020 that's not his trip though, isn't it like MBPenww????

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:25:07 2018 No.6583231 >>6583103 You have no idea what a fork is, lmao.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:25:25 2018 No.6583241 Post indicators of AssBlaster's writing The obvious ones: Blank line after quote Refers to link as "ChainLINK" Usually answers questions in one long paragraph Anyone know more subtle ones? What are his usual posting times?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:26:17 2018 No.6583263 >>6583171 This. I bought tons of bitcoin at $200, ether at $2, and waves at ico. Sold all of long ago. I will not make the same mistake with link.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:26:39 2018 No.6583277

>>6583103

A lot of real intended users have probably already bought in. They can't just say to them; you're out of luck sorry. There are people with wallets worth millions of dollars plus that contain millions of dollars of eth and other tokens. I don't really think you could just fuck over all of those people, presumably with some level of power and ability to shout it from the rooftops, without serious consequences and bad PR. It's also such a small amount of money to them and retail investors only have such a small percentage of the billion link they probably don't care.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:26:44 2018 No.6583282

>>6583122

he's just trying to say that the value of link, assuming everything goes according to plan, is going to be of such high value that words like "moon" and "correct" won't really make any contextual sense. a whole landscape of value hasn't been accessed yet and link tokens are like deeds to property within that landscape. link would be way bigger than btc because it'd have a much more significant use case

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:27:50 2018 No.6583316 >>6583217 it's not his trip, but his excuse was that he was traveling and on his phone (didn't have access to laptop). supposedly he's going to do another thread today to prove it was actually him

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:28:33 2018 No.6583338

>>6583241
I'm not text analysis expert (but I am a professional copy editor for what's worth and read a lot of the same writers writing over time) and nothing about the posts last night rang any of my alarm bells but things did make me think it was the same guy. The playful use of the exclamation mark was one of the things that stood out to me as definitely being him.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:29:30 2018 No.6583364 >>6583215 Mine have suffered quite a bit in this dip, but they're all low market cap so they have much more room to grow. It's much easier for a coin to go from 20m to 200m than for a coin like link to go from 200m to 2b.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:30:36 2018 No.6583391 If you sell sub $1. You're gonna have a real bad time. Coinbase board member.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:31:03 2018 No.6583409 >>6583282 Getting a erection at this very moment. Just hoping VEN pulls a 5x before link, so I can go all in. Fuck

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:31:43 2018 No.6583425

>>6583102

It's not all the jews, but jews have been at the core of rewriting how European man views the world, completely rewiring his brain. Jews are fucked up, anon. Controlling the mind/culture is one of the greatest powers possible, that and they also dominate the money supply. They wouldn't have succeeded without faggot traitors who are even worse than them, but jews do deserve all the hate they get.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:32:50 2018 No.6583459 >>6583241 another indicator to me was his fluency in talking about the subject. he was answering questions quickly and with detail

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:33:02 2018 No.6583465 File: 130 KB, 1013x1600, 1513007267467.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6582962 oh fug what if they shadowforked BTC and that's why it's going down as investors slowly move to the new one. HOLY FUCKING SHIT, it was fucking jihan all along

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:33:03 2018 No.6583466 >>6583364 Dont know it was much easier in the Q4 Bullrun but now I think moneyis flowing back into top 50 coins

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:36:50 2018 No.6583571 >>6583409 another way of thinking about it is if it's the year 1750 or something and btc were horses, link would be petroleum. we're not even at a stage where most people can conceptualize link's value in any sort of empirical or rational manner

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:37:39 2018 No.6583593 How do I find Assblaster's threads if i'm not on /biz/ all day?

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:39:35 2018 No.6583644

>>6583593

search the archive for username assblaster

>>6583571

this is true; also it's unprecedented in the sense that most of these tokens have a set number that will only ever exist. You can always build more railroads or oil rigs or linux servers but there will only ever be 1 billion link tokens for example.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:39:40 2018 No.6583645 >>6583571 Great so by the time LINK is worth something, we'll already be dead.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:39:48 2018 No.6583648 >>6583465 I want to chain this bitch up in a basement and ravage her daily.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:40:43 2018 No.6583672 You've convinced me to buy another 1 ETH worth of LINK. I'm thinking of dividing my portfolio up like this: >20% ETH >20% LINK >20% ICX >20% NEO >20% shitcoins

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:40:55 2018 No.6583683 File: 1.53 MB, 1827x4782, 1515776671841.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6583593 >>6560973 AB appears about halfway through the thread. screenshot is from a previous appearance

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:40:57 2018 No.6583685 File: 60 KB, 695x1024, 37f052f030c6f394eb5b050243c3368e9133d88c_hq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6583648 Don't we all friend. Dont we all.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:41:22 2018 No.6583695 >>6583645 Just think about your grandchildren, anon. Oh wait...

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:42:55 2018 No.6583741 >>6583645 no, i'm just illustrating a point. link will be worth something by eoy and likely $1000 or more within five. the information age moves exponentially faster than the pre-industrial age

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:44:49 2018 No.6583803 >>6580769 >Sergey had fucked up by "hyping" LINK sergey wouldnt hype link if the gains would save his mother

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:44:56 2018 No.6583809 >>6583685 who is that?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:45:23 2018 No.6583820 >>6583741 5 years ? Thats a decade in crypto world

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:48:35 2018 No.6583905 >>6583465 >>6583685 Jesus she is made for breeding/raping

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:49:24 2018 No.6583933 >>6583241 He's probably British or studied English in an anglophile environment. Words with alternative US spellings were spelled the Brit way. Also the use of the word `supper'.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:50:42 2018 No.6583964 File: 33 KB, 629x505, 33.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6583905 whats her name?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:51:29 2018 No.6583979 >>6583933 Most Europeans learn British English because it's right there. Doesn't matter that America is big papa, they're more likely to interact with an englishman.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 07:57:34 2018 No.6584129 >>6583685 >>6583465 name name name name name name name name name name name name name name name name

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:01:17 2018 No.6584248 >>6584129 She is (you)

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:01:46 2018 No.6584262 >>6584129 https://www.instagram.com/nicoleeeveedavis/?hl=en

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:03:00 2018 No.6584299 File: 42 KB, 330x330, rage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6584262 MY FUCKING CHAINLINK NOOOO

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:07:39 2018 No.6584426

tech insider from BXL here

the shadowforking of LINK already took palce, shortly after the ICO SWIFT knew they fucked up by hiring Sergey
it became clearer each day that a white overweight autist as CEO immediately attracted a bunch of pseudo intellectuals neets from the cesspool 4chan
so they came up with a new plan
they needed to shadowfork LINK into a project with CEO's so repulsive to /biz/ that you guys wouldn't invest, but still reliable enough for big investors
two pajeets from stanford university were perfect and so mobius was created

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:09:01 2018 No.6584471 File: 227 KB, 662x675, C9ibNFEXgAEYxVd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6584426 >he still hasn't realized that they shadowforked all of 4changs three months ago

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:11:39 2018 No.6584554 >>6584426 just lock your price in on your trezor before the shadowfork. ezpz

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:11:56 2018 No.6584561

>forks
>shadowforks
>new coin

are you people all dense? If what Assbalster was saying is true, they need to keep up their appearances. Doing any of these things would harm the thing they planned for smart contracts. Don't be retarded. I am not saying Assblaster is true, but under the assumption he is link is safe.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:13:15 2018 No.6584602 >>6584471 >tfw you realize hotwheels chin was the shadowfork of 4chins

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:17:02 2018 No.6584686 how do I shadowfork time

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:17:33 2018 No.6584697 File: 7 KB, 201x251, 1516045362726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6584426 nice new fud pasta

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:24:24 2018 No.6584884 File: 52 KB, 671x473, ww.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6584262 >https://www.instagram.com/nicoleeeveedavis/?hl=en TY BRO

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:24:58 2018 No.6584908 >>6581436 Nah, he was supposedly around last night. Will be able to confirm with screenshots and links today. I'll be making a post around 6:00 East Coast US time.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:26:06 2018 No.6584944 >>6584908 How will you confirm?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:28:41 2018 No.6585029 >>6583316 Ah okay, that sounds plausible. thanks anon. haven;t heard form AB since the whole twitter shit went down, glad to learn there's a possibility he's still with us.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:30:39 2018 No.6585088 >>6581963 Yea, it seemed like the same writing to me as well. I could tell from the pixels. In any event, we'll be able to check those wallets for 100 LINK transfer today

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:31:04 2018 No.6585101 File: 58 KB, 600x885, 1516043737963.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6585029 >haven;t heard form AB since the whole twitter shit went down What's the story again? Did he impersonated somebody and got called out for it?

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:50:49 2018 No.6585666
File: 125 KB, 1000x550, 4chan eras.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6582328
>>6582420
>>6582525
>>6582562
>>6582604
>>6582699
>>6582730
>>6582771
>>6582822
>>6582885
>>6582962
>>6583025
>>6583465
>>6584471
>>6584554
>>6584561
>>6584602
>pic related old fag here
OK, I guess I'm an idiot. Right now LINK is an ERC20 token. Once they get their mainnet up, it'll be a different blockchain, right? So why couldn't they just go "OK, only the people on this pre-approved list can trade in their ERC20's for the real LINK. Everyone else, enjoy your shittokens"?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:52:05 2018 No.6585709 >>6585666 >Once they get their mainnet up, it'll be a different blockchain, right? No. The whole point is for Chainlink to be middleware; it'll work with ANY blockchain. The tokens are the fuel for the free marketplace that is the Chainlink network.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:53:41 2018 No.6585752 File: 2.97 MB, 640x480, 1516127545160.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6585666 checked

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:54:27 2018 No.6585772 >>6585709 So Chainlink is still dependent on Ethereum remaining running then? What are they gonna do if NEO, ICX, or something else makes it irrelevant?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:55:53 2018 No.6585830 >>6585772 It'll work with any blockchain, he just told you. It doesn't matter how well ETH is doing.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:56:27 2018 No.6585845 >>6582736 As far as I know there's no information yet but I think it's likely biz will pool our tokens via smart contract and run a node together.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:57:35 2018 No.6585878

>>6585772
Read the white paper, big boi.
>ChainLink will initially be built on Ethereum [16], [35], but we intend for it to support all leading smart contract networks for both off-chain and cross-chain interactions.
https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

Only thing that'll be tied to ETH is the tokens; and even that can be migrated to any token platform with an air drop if it ever comes to that.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:57:56 2018 No.6585887 >>6585830 I guess I don't understand ERC20 tokens then? Don't they need the Ethereum blockchain/network running to exist?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 08:59:41 2018 No.6585933 >>6585752 excellent webm. Here's your (You)

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:00:43 2018 No.6585968

>>6580889
One of the authors of this paper has twitter. If you look at his "likes" you'll see him liking stuff about bitcoin
https://twitter.com/MarkosZach/likes
I don't know what this means, apart from he has an interest in cryptocurrency.... Still scrolling through his likes, hopefully he lieks something about ChainLINK

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:01:09 2018 No.6585976 >>6585887 How the fuck are NEO or ICX going to erase ETH from existence?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:03:27 2018 No.6586033 >>6584262 cute bitch and all but she is definitely not the one I want to imprison and impregnate fucking liar.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:04:35 2018 No.6586057

>>6580769

In all seriousness looks like price has stabilized after the fall around 0.60, plus or minus a bit. Looks like a good new accumulation point. I'd bet it stays in this range, maybe down to 0.55 some days and up to 0.65 some other days, and we'll trade in this range until the next moon mission.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:05:09 2018 No.6586078 File: 438 KB, 1366x768, swiftguytwitter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6585968 Here's one of his likes, for example. Opinions? He seems to like a lot of stuff that's quite bearish about bitcoin...

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:05:30 2018 No.6586086 >>6585976 >How the fuck would Windows ever overtake Commodore?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:05:50 2018 No.6586103 >>6586057 I hope it stays like this for months stinky linky

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:06:21 2018 No.6586118 >>6586086 read the discussion >>6585830

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:07:06 2018 No.6586138 >>6585878 >air drop So, they'd look at who has LINK on ETH chain and then transfer that to NEO, ICX, etc. or you think they'd just distribute it to all current holders of those platforms?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:08:05 2018 No.6586166 >>6586057 lol it's already collapsed toward 50

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:08:06 2018 No.6586167

>>6585887
>I guess I don't understand ERC20 tokens then?
You don't, but it's ok, I'm here to help.
I just had three shots of coffee so I'm really excited about explaining this to you, ok?

The tokens are the currency of the Chainlink network, it's simply what is used for paying nodes (and two kinds of staking, but don't worry about this until you get the basics).

>Why do you need to pay nodes?
Because there can be no decentralization without some kind of incentive. Nobody would run a node for free.

>Why not fiat instead of a token?
Same reason you use an airline ticket to board a plane instead of a wad of cash; the token is an internally recognized medium that holds information and is processed much quicker

>Why not ETH or BTC instead of a token?
Because the Chainlink network is a standalone network, which needs a proprietary currency to reflect the network's value and reputation.
If the token loses/gains value, it'll be largely because of the network, and not a billion other factors like with BTC or ETH.

Chainlink nodes are "oracles". They translate external data into blockchain-usable data so you can have smart contracts for literally ANYTHING.
The tokens simply fuel the network so independent parties have a reason to become nodes.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:10:00 2018 No.6586234 >>6586118 That's me. I'm reading the discussion. Either add something valuable outside of >it'll work with everything hurr I'm trying to figure out how. >>6584944 read the thread and figure it out for yourself

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:13:29 2018 No.6586358

https://www.swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/SWIFT-Institute-Sibos-2016-Geneva-Brochure-Final2-LORES.pdf
Is this the other document that AssBlaster alluded to? See page 6, "Keeping Blockchains
Decentralised - The Miner’s Dilemma"
I hope he will send me 100 linkies if I got it right

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:13:53 2018 No.6586376

>>6585887
Oh, and as for the basics behind tokens themselves, there are basically two kinds of cryptocurrency: coins and tokens.

Basically, coins have blockchains. The coins are generated through some form of "mining". Bitcoin for instance has value because full nodes hold the entire history of all transactions ever. This cannot be falsified.
Then you have tokens, which are created out of thin air and are used by separate, independent networks. The token transactions are processed through the underlying blockchain, but their value is pretty much completely independent from that blockchain.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:13:54 2018 No.6586379 >>6586167 Thanks for this anon. I pretty much understood all of that. So my question is, why an ERC token, and if ETH network goes down somehow or is overtaken, what happens then? And when mainnet is launched, there won't be a new token created?

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:15:24 2018 No.6586423

>>6586234
I'm telling you that it doesn't matter how hard ETH will have to compete, it won't magically make the tokens based on it disappear. It's hard to add something of value to a question that's already been answered.

>read the thread and figure it out for yourself
>"Sorry I was larping, won't happen again."
It's okay.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:15:39 2018 No.6586434 >>6586376 Haha, I appreciate your help anon. I'm not quite that new. See >>6586379

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:16:09 2018 No.6586444 >>6586138 >So, they'd look at who has LINK on ETH chain and then transfer that to NEO, ICX, etc. Yes.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:17:08 2018 No.6586480

>>6586379
>why an ERC token
It's the most popular type, which in itself holds some advantages.

>if ETH network goes down somehow or is overtaken, what happens then?
Like I said, Chainlink could simply create new tokens on another platform and automatically distribute those to wherever they need to be.
Smart contracts are good at this.

>And when mainnet is launched, there won't be a new token created?
No.
The future use of the Link tokens as they currently exist is why the tokens have speculative value right now, even though they aren't in use yet by the network.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:19:02 2018 No.6586545

>>6586423
If the ETH network stops running or becomes weak enough to be vulnerable to attack, then those tokens are compromised. Why would they risk that rather than using a coin based on their own network?

>read the thread and figure it out for yourself
>"Sorry I was larping, won't happen again."
Jesus Christ. Read the warosu thread and search for "100 link". You'll be able to figure out how something can be confirmed.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:22:46 2018 No.6586658
File: 779 KB, 1000x1000, Heather Heyer Tinder.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6586480
>>6586444
Thanks for your help anons! I wish I had something to give. Here's some pic related OC
>>6586423
don't even worry about replying anymore you brainlet. You're not as smart as you think you are and you probably got burned in bitconnect >but it's no problem cause it was only 20% of my portifolio. Still ok though, cause I'm HODLing TRX, XRP, and XVG durr

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:22:46 2018 No.6586660

>>6586545
>Why would they risk that rather than using a coin based on their own network?
You'd need a blockchain to process the token transactions.
Chainlink is trying to create an oracle network, which is completely distinct from a mining network.

I suppose Chainlink could eventually develop its own blockchain to process the tokens, but then they would either have to create a new mining network, or somehow integrate the mining into the functionality of the oracle nodes.
Either way it's not really necessary when you can simply create tokens on the (currently) biggest and most popular token blockchain: ETH. Because when it comes to blockchains; the bigger the better.

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:25:48 2018 No.6586766

>>6586545
>If the ETH network stops running or becomes weak enough to be vulnerable to attack, then those tokens are compromised. Why would they risk that rather than using a coin based on their own network?
"Why do ERC20 tokens exist if they could become useless if ETH dies???"
Shit man, I don't know, what were all these programmers and investors thinking?

>Read the warosu thread and search for "100 link". You'll be able to figure out how something can be confirmed.
I was hoping you'd have some actual proof in the works, not something dependent on further action by him. He already said he'd make a thread on laptop today, that'll be as much of a confirmation as someone receiving 100 link. Problem is if he doesn't make a thread, and doesn't send out link we can't be sure it wasn't him, maybe he just found a reason not to.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:28:27 2018 No.6586866 >>6586033 Pretty sure that's not her senpai. Try searching bellaumbrella on Insta

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:30:20 2018 No.6586960

>>6586766
>He already said he'd make a thread on laptop today, that'll be as much of a confirmation as someone receiving 100 link.
Disagree. It'll prove that it's the same potential LARPer. If he sends the link, now he's paying anons to keep LARPing in what could potentially be a large payment.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:31:08 2018 No.6587005 >>6586960 He said he'd make the thread on laptop, i.e with his usual ID.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:31:23 2018 No.6587015 >>6586766 >>6586960 Also, I take it back, you're not as dumb as I thought. You were just being unhelpful.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:32:27 2018 No.6587065 >>6587005 Trip*

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:33:54 2018 No.6587127
File: 359 KB, 409x512, based mexi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6587005
I know that...
That only proves that it's the same person. Sending out 200 LINK would be a weird thing for a LARPer to do. Paying at least $100 to LARP?
Now i take this back: >>6587015

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:35:37 2018 No.6587197 >>6583391 Please, enough with the larps... Coinbase has zero incentive to list a low cap token like link. It's literally only on one exchange, and a Chinese one at that, most likely without permission.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:37:33 2018 No.6587274 >>6587127 My bad, thought you meant "the same potential larper (as yesterday)"

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:39:13 2018 No.6587323 >>6580769 The best FUD is the one based on rumors pulled out of the ass

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:42:44 2018 No.6587491

>>6585101
Basically some of the more auts and aspie laden linkies got together and found out there were some similarities between AB's background and some Flemish banker lad on twitter, I forget his handle, @creatine, something like that. Flemish guy found out that he had tismo's on his tail and that they had something to do with Chainlink. It was our darkest hour.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:45:29 2018 No.6587612 >>6586078 Hmm looks quite interesting

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:47:00 2018 No.6587673

>>6585968
>>6586078

it's a good sign and a good idea, but I wish someone like that would just like chainlink articles.

I had the same idea and checked the guy who Jacob said was his boss's twitter, and he likes a bunch of similar articles but nothing chainlinks specific

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:47:55 2018 No.6587702 >>6582736 On the current network there's no minimum; not sure about the shadowforked one.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:48:37 2018 No.6587730 >>6586167 >Why not fiat instead of a token? also since this is a global network it's probably easier to pay in crypto and let them sort out cashing out. >>6585887

Anonymous Wed Jan 17 09:49:41 2018 No.6587778
File: 23 KB, 489x423, 1515102317825.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6586167
I actually have a question and you seem to know a lot more about link than me.

What exactly is staking? I know it's beneficial but how, also can anyone holding link stake or do you need a huge amount of them?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]