BREAKING: Ripple Joins Chainlink's SCALE Program

[Anonymous No.59455650]

>Ripple is thrilled to announce its participation in Chainlink’s SCALE program, a significant step toward enhancing blockchain interoperability and fostering innovation in financial services.
>By joining SCALE, Chainlink will contribute to the Ripple ecosystem, facilitating seamless access to real-time data and off-chain computation for smart contracts.
>Ripple’s recently launched stablecoin, $RLUSD, will also benefit from enhanced oracle connectivity, enabling greater transparency and reliability for its use in payment and settlement solutions within the TradFi ecosystem.

https://chainlinktoday.com/ripple-joins-chainlink-scale-with-all-chainlink-services-live-on-mainnet/

https://x.com/Ripple/status/1869461289273615724

[Anonymous No.59455658]

>>59455650
Reverse Fud or idk who is fudding who now

[Anonymous No.59455659]

>>59455650
Maybe you’ll make it afterall ya fidgets

[Anonymous No.59455662]

>>59455650
Lol what do the link hating schizos say now?

[Anonymous No.59455667]

Btw why do the links not work?

[Anonymous No.59455678]

>>59455650

[Anonymous No.59455717]

>>59455650
Kek

[Anonymous No.59455760]

>>59455650
Links dont work
Big if true, it would mean that chainlink helps enable the value transfer on the xrpl. Imagine being a linkie that has been tirelessly fudding xrp, spamming xsg and getting xrp airdropped as one of the first build rewards.
BUT WHAT IS THE VALUE PROPOSITION OF A STABLECOIN HURDURUDHDRU?

[Anonymous No.59455798]

>>59455760
>WHAT IS THE VALUE PROPOSITION OF A STABLECOIN
well?

[Anonymous No.59455859]

>>59455798
Ask tether and usdc

[Anonymous No.59455870]

>>59455859
That's the point, there are hundreds of stablecoins, literally anyone can make one, and many of them have long been well-established.
And on top of that, the only stablecoins institutions are interested in are CBDCs.

It's not that it's a bad thing to issue a stablecoin, but it's hardly pertinent or even mildly interesting.

[Anonymous No.59455911]

/biz/ really is full of retards, with no sense of humour
good god

[Anonymous No.59455943]

>>59455760
>Links dont work
Link never worked

[Anonymous No.59455964]

>>59455870
hundreds of stablecoins
Yes but not all of them have equal market share or are available on every chain or platform

literally anyone can make one
Depends who issues it and what country they are in , literal retard take
Also the backing has major implications for its use and users


the only stablecoins institutions are interested in are CBDCs.
2 fundamentally different concepts , stables are out now and being used, cbdcs are in development.

At some point 20% of all USDC was minted by ripple, USDC depegged by 7% so they develop their own stable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YMDwY11tRA
1:40

[Anonymous No.59455977]

Top kek

[Anonymous No.59455979]

>>59455650
top kek faggot you got me for a sec there

[Anonymous No.59456018]

>>59455964
I'm not sure about regulatory compliance, isnt it weird that ripple literally owns and aquired the trust charter that had the NYDFS license ie Standard Custody & Trust

[Anonymous No.59456034]

>>59456018
Ah yes, standard business practices are weird now
Beverage companies buy liquor stores to acquire existing liquor licenses
Cannabis companies purchase dispensaries to obtain operating permits
Large pharmaceutical firms buy smaller companies to acquire drug patents and regulatory approvals
Media companies acquire smaller stations to obtain broadcasting licenses

Companies buy smaller operators to gain operating permits in regulated markets

Firms purchase existing businesses to acquire health and food handling permits

[Anonymous No.59456044]

Its time to build riplink.

[Anonymous No.59456061]

>>59455964
>Yes but not all of them have equal market share or are available on every chain or platform
>Depends who issues it and what country they are in , literal retard take
It's like you're not even talking about blockchain anymore.
You're fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.59456082]

>>59456061
Elaborate because nothing what you wrote is an argument its just you not understanding the information and projecting it.

[Anonymous No.59456086]

>>59456082
1) any crypto is available "on every chain or platform" the exact same way ripple's stablecoin is
2) it's a crypto, it's functionally irrelevant who issues it and what country they're in

[Anonymous No.59456090]

Both links nuked? Wtf?

[Anonymous No.59456091]

>>59456086
1. can you get me monero on lets say solana?
2. what are mica regulations? here let me help you:

Stablecoin issuers must obtain approval from relevant member state authorities before offering tokens within the EU.
Fiat-backed stablecoins must maintain a 1:1 liquid reserve ratio.
Holders can redeem tokens at any time at par value in the referenced official currency.
Issuers must publish detailed white papers disclosing token structure, backing assets, and risks.
Strict rules on marketing and sales to prevent misleading practices.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) will supervise stablecoin issuers.

You just proved my point

[Anonymous No.59456110]

>>59456091
>1. can you get me monero on lets say solana?
RLUSD isn't on Solana.

>2. what are mica regulations?
RLUSD isn't mica approved.

[Anonymous No.59456158]

>>59456110
1. For now no, it launched yesterday but that doesnt mean it wont. Any crypto =/= any stablecoin
2. That is what you wish for. We will see when regulations go in effect end of 2024 if it is listed. Most, if not all requirements in US are very similar to the requirements in EU. They literally aim to become the gold standard regarding stablecoins. I highly doubt the company touting compliance as their number 1 selling point wont be compliant.

[Anonymous No.59456162]

>>59456158
So it's exactly the same for RLUSD as for any other crypto, like I said.
Except for Circle which is already MiCA approved.

Have you been drinking? Or is this level of retardation your baseline?

[Anonymous No.59456174]

>>59455650
thanks time traveler

[Anonymous No.59456184]

>>59455662
>Chainlink will contribute to the Ripple ecosystem
kek, Chainfuck is a janny for Ripple
Clean it up, Sir Gay

[Anonymous No.59456185]

>>59456162
All i see is you flinging shit and spitting venom trying to downplay RlUSD coming out.

Claiming hundreds of stables are out, while by end of this year only 1 will be compliant, by your own post.

Claiming its functionally irrelevant who issues a stable, while it clearly matters who and where it is issued, as per regulations.

Claiming stables are not needed and banks want CBDCs while clearly stables are a stepping stone to CBDCs.

[Anonymous No.59456202]

>>59455667
>Btw why do the links not work?
Because LINK doesn't work.

[Anonymous No.59456260]

>>59455658
the ripple versus link feud was always a fake fuddie talking point
ripple was never a competitor to chainlink, and link will connect everything

the only competitors to link are complete jokes like pyth

[Anonymous No.59456271]

>>59456260
oh baggie

[Anonymous No.59456279]

>>59456271
remind me about where the token demand for ripple is again
remember we have the sec files

[Anonymous No.59456283]

>>59456279
good, maybe you can wipe your ass with them
idc what you have to say
we ARE winning, it IS a zero sum game
and you ARE losing

[Anonymous No.59456295]

>>59456279
You can open coinmarketcap and look at the number 3 coin to see the result of the token demand. You know the documents from the SEC lawsuit are from 3 years ago? You know xrp was ruled not a security?
You know that trump mentioned firing SEC chair gensler and approving a pro crypto chair?

[Anonymous No.59456296]

>>59456185
None of your post is relevant to the value proposition of Ripple's stablecoin.
What a completely inane mess of a post.

[Anonymous No.59456300]

>>59455650
Won i need to hold both so i can fud both of my bags. RIP.

[Anonymous No.59456303]

>>59456283
>>59456295
beautiful insta seethe
gary getting fired still doesnt create tokenomics tho
and again ripple just bended the knee to the fat man so no idea why you are still being arrogant

[Anonymous No.59456318]

>>59455760
>Linkies fudding xrp
No we don’t do this and we don’t go to your gay ass containment thread. If only you cunts had the same level of respect. We’ve known for awhile now that ripplecunts are behind most of the current link fud.

[Anonymous No.59456324]

>>59456318
>Linkies fudding xrp
>No we don’t do this and we don’t go to your gay ass containment thread. If only you cunts had the same level of respect. We’ve known for awhile now that ripplecunts are behind most of the current link fud.
Actually you fuckers do.

[Anonymous No.59456326]

>>59456303
Ripple is literally partners with everyone. Kek
Welcome ripple partner number 1,034,978.

[Anonymous No.59456333]

>>59456326
>Ripple is literally partners with everyone
kek then why is nobody using it?

[Anonymous No.59456348]

>>59456303
i'm very comfy, so i don't have anything to prove
you're the one seething, because you're starting to actually realize we were right all along and you got conned by le fat man

[Anonymous No.59456367]

i don't even have to convince you that i've washed my nuts (i haven't) when you gargle them for the price of a value meal to keep starvation off for another day

[Anonymous No.59456491]

>>59455667

[Anonymous No.59456567]

>>59456296
You just refuse to read.
At some point 20% of all USDC was minted by ripple, USDC depegged by 7% so they develop their own stable.

The value proposition is that use of the stable = income through fees of the stable. Same as how tether and usdc work.

The most you refer to is me pointing out that none of your arguments thus far make sense. you are again doing a 180 once you are called out on the fact that you simply dont understand the content.

>>59456303
Do you have proof of ripple ''bending the knee?'' And not the fake satire dead links in OPs post.
You can screech all you want about tokenomics, useage etc. the proof is that its BTC ETH and XRP in the top 3. Let me make it absolutely clear:
Ignoring the truth does not change its existence.
Just because you refuse to see it, doesn't mean it isn't real.
"Reality remains unchanged regardless of personal belief.
Denying facts does not negate their truth.

[Anonymous No.59456583]

>>59456567
It's easy to get your coin in the top 3 when Ripple holds the majority of the circulating supply and manipulates its supply and """"demand"""". Eventually the music will stop

[Anonymous No.59456624]

kek, devilish OP.

[Anonymous No.59456690]

>>59456583
Then make one and do it too you seething fudkek.
Everything regarding escrow is publicly available.

[Anonymous No.59456830]

>>59456567
>Do you have proof of ripple ''bending the knee?'' And not the fake satire dead links in OPs post.
Just cause the link is dead doesn't mean its not true. Hows it feel to be on the other end?

[Anonymous No.59456890]

[Anonymous No.59457182]

>>59456830
Its satire, there are no links and the partnership is not true. IF ripple was included in build rewards it would actually be bullish and at that point linkies have no ammo left, to fud ripple would be to fud their own ecosystem. Dont see how you would want to spin that differently

[Anonymous No.59457238]

>LINKies are now writing fan fiction about teaming up with The Standard
unironically pathetic. not even in a. funny way. what a genuinely embarrassing and pathetic thing to do.
you lost
xrp won
I guess writing fan fiction is literal cope

[Anonymous No.59457275]

>>59457182
>if ripple was included in build rewards
lol you just admit ripple is a startup. Scale and build are 2 separate products. scale is a protocol/company paying chainlink 10-30 million dollars. build is a startup handing over 3-5% of their tokens.

[Anonymous No.59457347]

>>59457275
Oof you got me there mate, a start-up in the top 3 listings. quite the achievement innit?

[Anonymous No.59457356]

>>59457347
>the cryptocurrency market caps with dogcoins at the top are the best way to determine a project's validity or not

[Anonymous No.59457373]

>>59457356
Market cap is an argument to fud it but not to shill it.
The STATE

[Anonymous No.59457488]

This would be hilarious because Ari hates criplets

[Anonymous No.59457525]

>>59456567
>The value proposition is that use of the stable = income through fees of the stable.
Yes, but there are hundreds of stables already.

You claimed what sets ripple's stablecoin apart is being "on every chain or platform" (you even gave the example of Solana) and "mica regulations".
Both of which are flat-out lies.

[Anonymous No.59457528]

>>59457488
Source? Kek. That would be funny.

[Anonymous No.59457595]

>>59457528
Someone asked him about xrp ages ago on his twitter, he got quite angry and explained that they will never anything to do with Tradfi. ive got a screen shot somewhere

[Anonymous No.59457622]

>>59457595
people TOTALLY get mad at things they don't deem a threat
people TOTALLY don't get mad at things they feel threatened by
hahahahhahahahhahahahaha

[Anonymous No.59457666]

>>59457622
He's simply tired of the delusional takes, to be fair we all are.

[Anonymous No.59457704]

>>59457666
Checked, but that's the wrong Ari.

[Anonymous No.59457738]

>>59457704
Nah, thats Ari. 229.3k followers

[Anonymous No.59457746]

>>59457738
he's talking about the ari with the high h index

[Anonymous No.59458257]

>>59456333
Checked and because it's not time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFK_u8pDV3Q
Remember Trump saying he would cap this?
The current system is about to be become far less profitable sir.
You don't stop raking incredible profits before you have to.

[Anonymous No.59458274]

I seriously hope Ripple and Chainlink go full bore into business together and become a massive collective success so the XRP vs LINK threads continue forever but it becomes a historical argument over who carried who.

[Anonymous No.59458277]

>>59458274
sorry linkcel but ripple will not be working with your not needed company/token

[Anonymous No.59458289]

>>59458277
I literally laughed out loud. I was intentionally vague and was wondering if I'd get any response accusing me of being one or the other, but wasn't expecting it to come so quickly or so incorrectly.

I'm a massive XRP bagholder, comfortably into 5 digits in my bag.

[Anonymous No.59458438]

>>59457525
Can you copy the line where he said exactly that ?

[Anonymous No.59458448]

>>59458289
>I got a reply to my comment on the internet!!
>WWWOOWWWZERS!!!!