Link xrp

[Anonymous No.59262469]

>He bought the wrong banker coin
Yikes

[Anonymous No.59262544]

>>59262469
I’m an XRP maxi, but I remember when LINK and XRP were at the same price. Since then, LINK went to $50, while XRP stayed under $2 for years. This pump is nothing compared to what LINK holders experienced. I mean, if you had 100k LINK and sold at the top, you basically made it.

[Anonymous No.59262575]

>>59262544
>t.seething link baggie

[Anonymous No.59262607]

>>59262575
>t.seething link baggie
I'm 1000% a schizo OG, but I wish I had bought some LINK at $0.80 before it ran to $50 like my coworker did, kek.

[Anonymous No.59263206]

>>59262469
You XRP bag holders are finally making money which is great, but don't miss out on the XRP movement about to do down on SOL where you can do an easy x100 instead.
>>59262996

[Anonymous No.59263238]

>>59262469
XRP
>widely used by hundreds of banks across the world
>millions of dollars of revenue every day
LINK
>used by nobody, just endless pilots and demos
>daily revenue is 40k compared to 10 billion valuation means it's grossly overvalued

[Anonymous No.59263243]

If anyone knows anything, it should be that when btc starts to correct, link will fly high.

[Anonymous No.59263265]

>>59263238
XRP
>centralized
>no cap on supply
>creators frequently print and dump xrp to make profit
>no smart contracts
>no oracle system
but please regurgitate your propaganda talking points

[Anonymous No.59263349]

>>59263265
>XRP
>centralized
THAT'S COMING FROM LINKIE HAHAHAHAHAH. YOUR CEO LITERALLY HOLDS OVER 50% OF SUPPLY LMAO.

[Anonymous No.59263367]

>>59263349
its only 37% now
try and keep up
watch what happens when all supply is public

[Anonymous No.59263408]

>>59262607
>seething 2018 top bagholder
should have bought XRP 8 years ago lol, then you wouldn't complain about a literal ERC shitcoin pumping a bit

[Anonymous No.59263442]

>>59262607
lmao, you literally hold 3 figure xrp

[Anonymous No.59263522]

>>59263367
>only 37%
Here’s your (you)

[Anonymous No.59263553]

>>59263238
>XRP
>>widely used by hundreds of banks across the world
No, that's Chainlink.

Not a single banks has ever used XRP.

[Anonymous No.59263638]

>>59262469
brootal

[Anonymous No.59263770]

>>59263553
Cope, seethe and dial 8

[Anonymous No.59263775]

>>59263770
Not hating on the price action. We're all trying to get that bread and it's all part of the game.
Just spitting some facts

[Anonymous No.59263854]

>>59263265
This is someone with a big bag who fuds.
Supply is capped, no inflation
You cant print it
Smart contracts are literally coming
Oracle systems are literally coming
There are nodes run by ripple , long term vision is fully decentralised

[Anonymous No.59263867]

>>59263854
>Smart contracts are literally coming
>Oracle systems are literally coming
>stablecoin is coming
>decentralized nodes are coming
You know what isn't coming though for XRP?
Adoption.

[Anonymous No.59263871]

still 60% below the all time high set on Jan 07, 2018
brutal

[Anonymous No.59263983]

>>59263238
>xrp
>widely used by hundreds of banks across the world
did i miss something? can someone please enlighten me in which product xrp is actively beeing used? pls no pilots

[Anonymous No.59264009]

>>59263775
>facts
>linkie
Ayyy lmao

[Anonymous No.59264052]

>>59263265
>>no cap on supply

Retard

>>59263854
I made that image this morning

[Anonymous No.59264092]

>>59263867
Reverse spoonfeed request:
DENIED
Allow me to screen this post for future reference.

>>59263871
link still 70% below ath of 50 set on may 2021 4 years ago, brutal

[Anonymous No.59264123]

>>59263408
>seething 2018 top bagholder
First purchase was below 20 cents back in in 2020
>>59263442
>you literally hold 3 figure
Try top 0.1%

[Anonymous No.59264128]

>>59264092
Ripple still has no adoption at all, but yes the price is doing extremely well.

[Anonymous No.59264147]

>>59264128
Good Guy Gary Gensler has been enforcing injunction against ripple for the last 4 years, keeping the all the partnerships and developments under NDA and allowing me to scoop up lots and lots of xerpies for cheapies
thanks for that

[Anonymous No.59264160]

>>59264147
>all the partnerships and developments
Of which there are none.

[Anonymous No.59264171]

>>59264160
yes, linkie
keep repeating that to yourself, maybe you'll even start to believe it one day

[Anonymous No.59264176]

Standard Custody & Trust Company, recently completed the acquisition of this regulated digital asset custodian. This acquisition adds a limited purpose trust company regulated by the New York Department of Financial Services to Ripple's license portfolio.

Metaco: In May 2023, Ripple acquired Metaco, a leading provider of institutional digital asset custody solutions.
The company now holds:
Nearly 40 money transmitter licenses throughout the U.S.
A Major Payment Institution License from the Monetary Authority of Singapore
A Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registration with the Central Bank of Ireland
A New York BitLicense

This is all from 0 adoption and no use. KEK
Your children will ask why you never bought and you will say ''no adoption'' while the RFID chip in your hand that pays for the goyslop is actually a wallet interacting with the XRPL

[Anonymous No.59264182]

>>59264128
Ripple has 8 office locations worldwide. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and has offices in the following countries:
United States (San Francisco - HQ)
Brazil (São Paulo)
Iceland (Reykjavík)
India (Mumbai)
Japan (Tokyo)
Singapore
United Arab Emirates (Dubai)
United Kingdom (London)

All paid for by retail according to this retard. Meanwhile the ACTUAL company being propped up by retail has 1 office and an army of HR roasties sippin those onions lattes

[Anonymous No.59264187]

Oooooooof

[Anonymous No.59264196]

>>59264182
You hold LINK.
You ain't fooling anyone kid.

[Anonymous No.59264220]

>>59264196
Opportunity Cost
In the quiet corners of my mind,
Where dreams and choices intertwine,
I ponder paths I could have crossed,
Yet here I stand, not counting cost.
Each moment whispers, “What if, what then?”
A dance of chances, again and again.
I feel the weight of roads untaken,
Yet in the heart, no dreams are shaken.
The clock ticks on, a steady beat,
With every choice, a bittersweet retreat.
But in this life of ebb and flow,
I find the strength to let it go.
For every door that stays ajar,
There lies a chance to reach for stars.
Though shadows linger from paths I’ve missed,
I embrace the journey, the joy persists.
So here I stand, not lost in cost,
But grateful for the paths embossed.
In every choice, a lesson learned,
In every turn, a fire burned.
I too suffer from opportunity’s chain,
Yet in its grip, I find my gain.
For life’s a tapestry woven tight,
With threads of loss that spark the light.

[Anonymous No.59264236]

>>59264171
It's the literal objective truth

>>59264176
>This is all from 0 adoption and no use
Literally yes. It's all from paying money. And Ripple has lots of it.

>>59264182
>offices good
kek what?

[Anonymous No.59264245]

>>59262469
Link is a banker coin? I thought it was supposed to be a memecoin about McDonalds?

[Anonymous No.59264259]

>>59264236
how do they get these literal boatloads of money 250m for metaco etc. while in a lawsuit with the SEC ?

[Anonymous No.59264264]

>>59264259
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.59264278]

>>59264236
>paid partnerships
adorable. The linkie has xrp and link mixed up again

[Anonymous No.59264283]

>>59264278
Acquiring a company is quite literally a paid partnership

[Anonymous No.59264290]

>>59264283
No, that's a purchase

[Anonymous No.59264293]

>>59264290
A purchase is when you pay for something.

[Anonymous No.59264295]

>>59264264
it seems you are >>59264283

An acquisition is a transaction where one company purchases most or all of another company's shares to gain control of that company. In contrast, a partnership is a business relationship where two or more entities collaborate while maintaining their separate identities.

You are mental gymnastics anon from last threads. It is a pleasure we meet again.

[Anonymous No.59264300]

>>59264295
>An acquisition is a transaction where one company purchases most or all of another company's shares to gain control of that company. In contrast, a partnership is a business relationship where two or more entities collaborate while maintaining their separate identities.
Yes.

And this: >>59264176
is an acquisition of Metaco.

[Anonymous No.59264302]

>>59264293
yes, and you would know that, if you weren't a shoplifting nog

[Anonymous No.59264305]

>>59262469
Euroclear :)
Swift :)
DTCC :)

[Anonymous No.59264315]

>>59264123
>yes I was extremely late to the party and I missed the entire parabolic 2016-2018 run and now I'm seething because a useless ERC which I also missed pump
kek, seething baggie

[Anonymous No.59264317]

>>59264300
i don't know if you are actually retarded or just obtuse

acquisition and paid partnerships are not the same, I really don't know why you would conflate the two

[Anonymous No.59264318]

>>59264300
No its a paid partnership right?

Ripple, the company behind RippleNet, does not publicly disclose a comprehensive list of all its customers. However, based on the search results, we can get some insights into RippleNet's customer base:
Ripple has over 300 customers using RippleNet, with a presence in more than 45 countries across 6 continents
Some notable customers mentioned include:
MoneyGram
goLance
Viamericas
FlashFX
Interbank Peru
Faysal Bank (Pakistan)
Qatar National Bank
bKash (Bangladesh)
Finastra (UK)
TPBank (Vietnam)
PNC Bank (US)12
Major banks using RippleNet's messaging aspect (without XRP) include Standard Chartered and Santander.
Other financial institutions mentioned as RippleNet members are:
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Kotak Mahindra Bank (India)
Itaú Unibanco (Brazil)
IndusInd (India)
InstaReM (Singapore)
BeeTech (Brazil)
Zip Remit (Canada)
LianLian (China)
RAKBANK (UAE)
IFX (UK)
TransferGo (UK)
Currencies Direct (UK)
Airwallex (Australia)
SEB (Sweden)
SBI Remit (Japan)
Siam Commercial Bank (Thailand)
Krungsri (Thailand)4

[Anonymous No.59264322]

>>59264305
Brazil :)

>>59264317
>>59264318
>buying a company is not a paid partnership
you people lmao

>notable customers
Not one notable name among them.
Moneygram is maybe the biggest, and they dropped ripple a long time ago.

[Anonymous No.59264334]

>>59264322
>buying a nog is the same as partnering up with it
ownership and partnership are different from eachother .

[Anonymous No.59264344]

>>59264334
Ripple bought Metaco though.

>>59264322
>Moneygram is maybe the biggest
And it's not even big to begin with lmao

[Anonymous No.59264348]

>>59264322
Due to lawsuit, that is almost over
they went to the brother, xlm
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ninabambysheva/2021/10/06/moneygram-partners-with-ripple-competitor-stellar-will-settle-transactions-with-usdc-stablecoin/

[Anonymous No.59264351]

>>59264344
Yes, that's really not the point contention here, pls try and follow along

[Anonymous No.59264356]

>>59264348
>Due to lawsuit
No, due to it being "too expensive". See pic.
Also Moneygram is an absolute literal who to begin with.

>>59264351
It is in this discussion that you started here >>59264278

[Anonymous No.59264367]

>>59263238
>LINK
SUPRA will replace this.

[Anonymous No.59264391]

>>59264356
SBI remit
Qatar national bank
Finastra
Not big, again you picked the top of the list. You really have trouble reading everything. Are you dislectic or just lazy?

No, due to it being "too expensive".
They stopped 1 of their products because it was too expensive and no demand for it. one of many products yes. And you use a reference from a product that was discontinued with data from 4 years ago. Thats the definition of nitpicking/strawman kek

[Anonymous No.59264398]

>>59264356
no, it is not

[Anonymous No.59264399]

the linkie does seem to favor the goblins style or arguing

[Anonymous No.59264407]

>>59264305
Based.
>>59264318
Anon, with all due respect let me ask you this?
What's even the point of XRP?
Because in the past it was all about 'replacing Swift' (and no one talks about that now) or 'cross border settlement' or whatever.
But now that it's clear that Swift will go live with CCIP + stablecoins/CDBCs there's actually no reason for a bridge currency such as XRP to exist.
So what's your 'bull thesis' so to speak for XRP?
Do you think it's all about tokenization now?
Or are you bullish because Ripple's new stablecoin (don't you see that as a pivot because of their failure to take over the banking sector as hoped for in 2018 when ripplers were full on Bearable guy LARPs $589 2018 and so on?).
>>59264356
Correct.
It just seems to me like Ripple is losing the battle.
I mean, we have ETH, ETH L2s, Solana, Hedera, AVAX, bank's own private chains that will be used for tokenization.
Ofc banks may also use XRP (as yet another L1) but this is a significant 'goalpost moving' moment considering that Ripplers were talking about 'ALL THE MONEY' non-stop in the past few years.

[Anonymous No.59264418]

>>59262469
> November 2019
> XRP: $0.29
> LINK: $3

> November 2020
> XRP: $0.25
> LINK: $14

> November 2021
> XRP: $1.09
> LINK: $34

> November 2022
> XRP: $0.50
> LINK: $6

> November 2023
> XRP: $0.61
> LINK: $16

> November 2024
> XRP: $1.40
> LINK: $15

Holy cope KEK

[Anonymous No.59264423]

>>59264407
Let me see
It's faster, cheaper, stable and not mention secure
ccip, eth & link is a janky, expensive mess
they are however investing alot of the stinkbaggies liquidity into marketing, they absolutely need to
XRP however is a preoduct that speaks for itself

[Anonymous No.59264470]

Ooooooh no no no no no
OoooooooooooooooooooH

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.59264491]

[Anonymous No.59264512]

>>59264407
forex has money tied up in nostro vostro accounts
tokenization of rwa like stocks bonds , look at sologenics recent uptick. Financial derivatives etc.
issuing cbdcs
issuing stablecoins
all of this is additive, they are expanding product range. stables also allow for on and off ramps into and out of crypto/fiat.
any stable on any chain, as long as its safe and secure is a + for the whole industry.
If ripple is losing the battle id suggest you short it to the ground and make it go to zero.

It just seems to me like Ripple is losing the battle
lawsuit almost over
tax cuts for american crypto products
being 2 custody companies
multiple licenses regarding offering financial products.
I think you WANT ripple to lose, like many others. Id say put your money where your mouth is and bet on ripple losing this. Buy all the competitors.

[Anonymous No.59264525]

He absolutely NEEDS ripple to lose

shame innit?

[Anonymous No.59264538]

>>59262469
Most XRP baggies have a long way to break even kek. At least marines are only retarded for holding too long because they are greedy idiots.

[Anonymous No.59264565]

>>59264538
Link All-time high
May 10, 2021 (4 years ago)
€50.75
-70.95%

XRP All-time high
Jan 04, 2018 (7 years ago)
€3.69
-61.89%

KEK

[Anonymous No.59264572]

>>59262469
No comparison. EVM violates Russian sanctions. It is going to be migrated and then stomped.

[Anonymous No.59264580]

>>59264512
>>59264423
>It's faster, cheaper
Faster than what?
I'm out of the loop on L1 wars.
Is XRP faster or cheaper than Hedera for example?
>I think you WANT ripple to lose, like many others. Id say put your money where your mouth is and bet on ripple losing this. Buy all the competitors.
Why would I care about Ripple losing?
I'm not betting in any particular L1.
What I ask is out of curiosity because now that it's clear that XRP won't be needed as a bridge currency, it seems like the only bullish argument is the tokenization POV, but I don't get why banks would use Ripple over ETH, AVAX or even better their own private chains.

[Anonymous No.59264589]

>>59263265
>2013+11
>same exact retard fud already disproved and finally buried under the dirt after rippled 1.6
>he doesn’t know about XRPL oracles
>he doesn’t know about xchain
>>59263553
ODL is the most used crypto product on earth. Why do you niggers think it was kept at top 10 all these years? Do you wheelchair bound helmet wearing retards actually think bagholders kept it there? Kill yourselves.

[Anonymous No.59264606]

>>59264580
Biggest difference is that HBAR has a fixed fee model denominated in dollars to attract businesses.
XRP is paid in droplets of xrp with a different fee calculation based on the load of the network. Both are enterprise aimed xprl is more focussed on lquidity and payments and hbar is more focussed on building business applications on the hashgraph. 1 is a hashgraph the other is a hashtree consesus.

the ''ripple losing the battle'' arguments were valid the past 3 years maybe. You forget that SWIFT and the current monetary system is also used as a weapon with regards to sanctions and geopolitical conflicts. there are countries being excluded from SWIFT so the idea the whole ''cross border payments are solved'' because mainly american and european banks (tradfi now) will use CCIP to message between their banks/their system is void if that system is still permissioned in a way.

[Anonymous No.59264615]

>>59264606
So is XRP faster and cheaper than Hedera or not?
You didn't answer anon.
Also:
>Fudding Swift to FUD LINK
How far we've come.

[Anonymous No.59264616]

>>59264391
>SBI remit
Bought out by Ripple

>Qatar national bank
afaik the Qatar thing is a pilot in Turkey that they just pulled the plug on.

>Finastra
2019, no use

>>59264589
>ODL is the most used crypto product on earth
That's funny nobody uses it.

[Anonymous No.59264619]

>>59264606
>my xrp is neutral!
You’re a retard lmao

[Anonymous No.59264633]

>>59264619
See picrel.
I think these plp come from the 2017-2018 era of XRP when the 'neutral playing field' narrative was spread.

[Anonymous No.59264638]

>>59264580
>muh token not sneeded
that is link, my dearest baggie

XRP is cheap, fast, stable, secure AND it scales
No other token comes even close to fulfilling those criteria.
that is why XRP will be used to bridge assets and for tokenization

[Anonymous No.59264641]

>>59264638
>MY chain is cheap, fast, stable, secure AND it scales
yeah but they all say that

[Anonymous No.59264642]

>>59264638
This. So much this. Trust the plan. Patriots in control.

[Anonymous No.59264652]

>>59264619
not an argument lmao

>>59264615
hbar is cheaper from what i can see

>Fudding Swift to FUD LINK. Are facts seen as fud now by the link cartel?
Additional Banned Entities
Iran
Reason for Ban: Iranian banks were disconnected from SWIFT in 2012 and again in 2018 due to concerns over nuclear proliferation and support for terrorism. The sanctions aimed to restrict Iran's ability to conduct international trade and access financial markets.
North Korea
Reason for Ban: North Korean banks have been cut off from SWIFT as part of international sanctions related to its nuclear weapons program and other military provocations. The aim is to limit the country’s ability to finance its weapons development.
Venezuela
Reason for Ban: Certain Venezuelan financial institutions have been sanctioned due to concerns over human rights abuses, corruption, and the undermining of democratic processes. This includes restrictions on transactions that could support the regime of Nicolás Maduro.
Syria
Reason for Ban: Syrian banks have faced restrictions due to the ongoing civil war and the government's use of violence against civilians. Sanctions were imposed to limit the regime's access to international financial systems.
Cuba
Reason for Ban: Cuban financial institutions have been subjected to sanctions for decades due to concerns over human rights violations and support for terrorism, limiting their access to global payment networks.

[Anonymous No.59264656]

>>59264641
yes, they do
the difference being, with xrp it's true
>>59264642
>seething linkie reverting to schizo nonsense
lmao. the writing is on the wall linkcel

[Anonymous No.59264661]

>>59264656
>the difference being, with MY CHAIN it's true
Again, they all say that.
And most of them have a lot more adoption and use than XRPL

[Anonymous No.59264662]

>>59264652
What's the combined GDP of Iran + North Korea + Venezuela + Syria + Cuba?

[Anonymous No.59264663]

>>59264661
really? name one

[Anonymous No.59264667]

I hold both

[Anonymous No.59264671]

>>59264667
I just don't get it.
If you want the most used L1: ETH wins.
If you want the cheapest L1: Hedera wins.
What's the point of XRP again?

[Anonymous No.59264674]

>>59264662
Dont derail it with the GDP numbers. The SWIFT network in a way is permissioned, this was the point. It can be used as a weapon to destabilize countries and is being used as a weapon. You can also add Russia to that list.

[Anonymous No.59264678]

>>59264663
For starters, XRPL is rank 85 by defi TVL.
So there are at least 84 chains with (a lot) more usage than XRPL.

Oh, and there are pretty much zero institutional users in actual production.

[Anonymous No.59264689]

all the brown people at my work talk about xrp
what else do you need to know its a shitcoin
>t. i dont talk to normies about crypto

[Anonymous No.59264691]

>>59264674
So the argument is that some shithole/communist countries might (no evidence?) use XRP as if it were neutral (it's not).
While the rest of the world uses Swift (i.e. LINK).
And that's bullish for XRP?

[Anonymous No.59264705]

>>59264691
No one uses link
it solves the lambo problem for the DEI hires at chainlink labs by moving value from linkcels to sergey

[Anonymous No.59264706]

>>59264671
Eth is expensive
hbar does not have the partnerships and the work with financial institutions, they are more focussed on companies outside of the financial sphere. I own both and they recently both tokenized money market funds together with arbi. Id also argue xrp is more liquid and available compared to hbar.

[Anonymous No.59264707]

>>59264705
You probably hold the biggest LINK stack ITT.

[Anonymous No.59264710]

>>59264705
>No one uses link
Institutions do.

And most of crypto.

[Anonymous No.59264713]

>>59264707
sorry linkcel

[Anonymous No.59264716]

>>59262469
>still down for the year in sats
>He didn't buy btc

[Anonymous No.59264724]

>>59264706
ETH L2s are not expensive.
>hbar does not have the partnerships
Arguable.
Which intitutions are currently using XRP for anything in production BTW?

[Anonymous No.59264725]

>>59264691
The argument is that using something that is used as a weapon for your key economic transactions is a risk not every country wants to take. The ''shitholes'' are rn all at war with israel/ukraine/insert globohomo alliance country here. Its not completely open and not completely permissionles. Add BRICS to the mix and the GDP argument also starts to crumble.

[Anonymous No.59264726]

>>59264710
fuckin kek

[Anonymous No.59264727]

>>59264710
i hope that value transfers from the HR roasties to your stack soon but it aint looking great

[Anonymous No.59264729]

>>59264724
They do have partnerships, they have absolute gigaunits in their governing council, they all are focussed on other things than payments or financial products. More into ''stuff''

[Anonymous No.59264737]

currently XRP is eating LINK's lunch

and linkcels are basically a meme

[Anonymous No.59264740]

>>59264725
>Its not completely open and not completely permissionles
But didn't you say you hold Hedera?
In case you didn't know, IIRC Hedera is permissioned and full on pro-globohomo (not that it's a bad thing if you want to make money).
>Add BRICS to the mix
Yes, but that's just your headcanon.
Brazil is literally going with LINK.
This year's Sibos was in China, etc.
No actual evidence of BRICS using XRP.

[Anonymous No.59264744]

>>59264726
I bet this is blowing your mind.

[Anonymous No.59264760]

>>59263871
Still up over 30000% since 2014

newfags don't remember.

[Anonymous No.59264763]

>>59264744
>feb 2024
wow i bet THIS is going to have a huge impact on the price of chainlink
let me check...

oh no linksisters, it's just not fair...

[Anonymous No.59264768]

>>59264182
Chainlink erc-20 by russian conman has office in drawer in a known tax haven in the caribbeans...

[Anonymous No.59264770]

>>59264740
>Its not completely open and not completely permissionles - this was aimed at the SWIFT argument that fixes all. its nice you are CCIP within your own club, transferring value within your ecosystem yes. but if you keep the ''option'' to exclude based on political motives its not fully trustworthy, thats the argument. Imagine not doing shlomos will and your assets are locked on chains you can no longer access.

Yes im sorry I added BRICS but the whole ''lets disregard the club of countries that have been fucked over by the western axis for decades'' and lets also ignore their talks of a gold backed standard and also lets ignore them trying to trade outside of the current financial system and also lets ignore that parts of them are at war with countries that built the current financial system and lets also ignore that their countries combined make up for around 45% of the global population kind of feels like the BRICS of 20 years ago is no longer the BRICS of today.

[Anonymous No.59264781]

>>59264418
you forgot to mention that XRP was $0,0028 in the years 2014- early 2017

[Anonymous No.59264793]

>>59264770
I'm not disregarding BRICS.
But there's no evidence for them using XRP.
Meanwhile, see picrel.
As for:
>Iran + North Korea + Venezuela + Syria + Cuba
Yes kek I'm disregarding those.
>their talks of a gold backed standard
So, no XRP.
You really think a bunch of dictatorships will use your L1?
If anything, they'll make their own.
Same as the banks are doing.
And if they wanna transact with the rest of the world, guess what they'll use.

[Anonymous No.59264797]

>>59264678
XRP is much more than zoomers average meme trading portal. fucking shit that these fudders are out of touch.

[Anonymous No.59264810]

>>59264797
>XRP is much more than zoomers average meme trading portal
Except it has pretty much zero institutional use in production.
So no crypto adoption, and no institutional adoption.

[Anonymous No.59264820]

>>59264793
>guess what they'll use.
no need to guess

[Anonymous No.59264825]

>>59264810
www.ripple.com/customers

[Anonymous No.59264832]

>>59264820
Basado!

[Anonymous No.59264839]

>>59264825
Virtually all literally whos, and on top of that there's no evidence for any of them using XRPL in production.
Even XRPL's prospects for institutional adoption (pilots etc.) are extremely lackluster.

[Anonymous No.59264852]

>>59264793
https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/brics-and-japan-key-to-xrps-bull-run-despite-u-s-regulatory-pressure/

https://watcher.guru/news/ripple-announces-uae-partnership-as-xrp-looks-to-rebound

https://watcher.guru/news/brics-india-uae-use-xrp-in-trade-to-ditch-the-us-dollar

Cross reference the banks and their locations i pulled up here >>59264318

You can peg a supra national currency to a basket of metals or commodities like a bretton woods 3 argeement.

https://vietnamnews.vn/media-outreach/1665190/exploring-the-structure-and-impact-of-a-potential-brics-currency-insights-from-global-broker-octa.html#:~:text=Recent%20research%20suggests%20that%20a,gold%20and%2060%25%20BRICS%20currencies.

The whole make their own layer argument just doesnt stick when its counterparty risk mitigation and interopability that is needed.

no xrp according to you is just fine. gl with your stack. i just broke 6 figs today while link is one of my worst performers.

[Anonymous No.59264856]

>>59264839
cope, there are literal central banks and lots of major european banks.

[Anonymous No.59264866]

careful linkies, copium should be used in moderation

[Anonymous No.59264869]

>>59264852
>https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/brics-and-japan-key-to-xrps-bull-run-despite-u-s-regulatory-pressure/
baseless fluff piece

>https://watcher.guru/news/ripple-announces-uae-partnership-as-xrp-looks-to-rebound
>https://watcher.guru/news/brics-india-uae-use-xrp-in-trade-to-ditch-the-us-dollar
The "partnership" is with a startup accelerator program.

This is fucking pathetic.

>>59264856
Most of them are insignificant (startup incubators, pilots from years ago, testing alongside other chains, ...)
Zero of them actually use it in production.

[Anonymous No.59264878]

>>59264744
Presented without comment

[Anonymous No.59264883]

>>59264878
kek well yeah. Ripple is one of the posterchildren for how retarded the current market is.
I mean ADA pumped because Charles said he was going to talk to Trump.

[Anonymous No.59264893]

>>59264869
Thats ok, the only real thing that is pathetic here is links price action amd the DARVO tactics used by linkies. If i talk to you, link is the most asymmetric play in all of crypto and yet. Why and when will link actually DO what these posts and articles claim it will do

[Anonymous No.59264903]

>>59264893
>Why and when will link actually DO what these posts and articles claim it will do
Link is actually live with a bunch of institutions right now. Unlike Ripple.
And Swift says they're going live next year.
And then there are the DTCC, Euroclear, Brazil, ...

What's Ripple's biggest current thing? That Colombian CBDC pilot? The one that got shitcanned a few weeks ago?

[Anonymous No.59264916]

>>59264883
ADA also pumped when Charles "endorsed" Armstrong as "Crypto Czar".

Clown market.

[Anonymous No.59264918]

>>59264903
Its live but nothing changed price wise
so next year the green god candle of link will come? You see this is usually a talking point for XSG , yet so many similarities between link and xrp.

And then there are the DTCC, Euroclear, Brazil, ... and price does 0. Xrp is literally pumping on SEC chair leaving in 2 months.

Biggest upcoming thing would be the stablecoin from the top of me head

[Anonymous No.59264930]

>>59264918
>Its live but nothing changed price wise
>DTCC, Euroclear, Brazil, ... and price does 0

Exactly.
Meanwhile ADA pumps when Charles says he's going to talk to Trump, and XRP pumps on zero news.

>Biggest upcoming thing would be the stablecoin
How the fuck is that a big thing?
That's Ripple themselves building something that already exists and is already extremely monopolized (USDT) and saturated (there are HUNDREDS).

[Anonymous No.59264946]

>>59264852
None of your links provide any evidence.
So yeah, no evidence of BRICS using XRP. Just your headcanon.
>i just broke 6 figs today
Anon, I don't wanna be mean to you so don't tent me.
>>59264878
Why don't post the full chart. See picrel fren.
>>59264918
>Biggest upcoming thing would be the stablecoin
This is Ripple's admission of failure.
They are pivoting to stablecoins to stay relevant.
They went from 'ALL THE MONEY' to 'maybe if we make a stablecoin someone will use us'.

[Anonymous No.59264947]

>>59264869
no they aren't stop fudding. did you thought that rome was build in a day? i think you described link

[Anonymous No.59264948]

>>59264930
So is there a trustburger fund in between price and news?

mica makes tether kill in europe. but thats baseless speculation of course.

Its a thing because stablecoins provide income for ripple, the company. Tether has been making bank the past few cycles and ripple wants a piece of the pie.

2 things can happen to a chain or ecosystem launching, either it collapses a la terra luna or it expands dramatically because it offers more financial products/its easier to get into the ecosystem or out of it.

[Anonymous No.59264958]

>>59264948
>So is there a trustburger fund in between price and news?
Who knows.

>stablecoins provide income for ripple, the company
Transactions, smart contracts, ... provide income for all chains.
What the fuck are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.59264978]

>>59264946
Its additive, for the 100th time, not a pivot.
the stable is a stepping stone to cbdcs and similar. this is also described in IMF and BIS documents.

>>59264958
having your chain generate money by adding friction is a shit business model if you are into payments, ask the tradfi payment world.

[Anonymous No.59264984]

>>59264978
Buddy, there are hundreds of stablecoins on all kinds of chains.
There's literally nothing special about some crypto company adding yet another stablecoin.

In case you didn't realize, the hotness is CBDCs. You know, the stablecoins that institutions themselves are making.

[Anonymous No.59265000]

>>59264978
>>59264984
>CBDCs. You know, the stablecoins that institutions themselves are making.

speaking of which

[Anonymous No.59265016]

>>59264984
Yes but only a few big ones that are fully trustworthy and backed.

XRPL can issue CBDCs, mark my words, this will come after the stable.
https://www.dnb.nl/media/jo3h1dlu/working_paper_no-_736.pdf

I quote:
Assuming that cash usage will keep declining and non-backed crypto’s remain a niche product, a great deal will depend on how stablecoins will develop globally. Mass adoption could be within reach when they are issued by large technology platforms benefitting from ‘deep pockets’ and large worldwide consumer networks. If stablecoins become widely used as money, the stability of the payment system may be at risk without adequate regulation and convertibility at par with public money. Finally, to shift the balance in the right direction, public money needs to first undergo a
digital update. Just like cash, issuing CBDC will support the convertibility between private and
public forms of money. At the same time, CBDC should be designed such that it will not
fundamentally change the role of bank deposits. Hence, the key issue is one of technological
adaptation. Central banks may have to adjust again, just like they did in the past by restoring the balance with respect to coins, private banknotes and bank deposits. Without a doubt, there are exciting times in money and payments ahead of us.

[Anonymous No.59265020]

>>59265000
Yeah but thats proof of reserve, its not issuing it itself its semi facilitating it. Colombia, literal who country amirite? What is their GDP?

[Anonymous No.59265022]

>>59265016
>XRPL can issue CBDCs
Any fucking chain can.

>this will come
This is already in production for Chainlink in Colombia. With the Brazilian central bank in the pipeline.

You're living in la la land, holy shit.

[Anonymous No.59265035]

>>59265022
To make stable and to be allowed to make a stable is something different. Can you list me all the financial emoney transmitters/providers that have a license to issue cbdcs?

>>59265022
You're living in la la land, holy shit.

Im def going there if my folio keeps going brrrrt

[Anonymous No.59265039]

>>59265035
>To make stable and to be allowed to make a stable is something different
What the fuck are you talking about.

[Anonymous No.59265050]

>>59265022
but has that any fucking chain the connections to the institutes and governments as ripple does? youre fighting against windmills anon. ripple has already won it has the most connections to the elite unlike all the other university startup basedlatte coins

[Anonymous No.59265051]

>>59264978
Notice how I destroyed all pro Ripple arguments one by one ITT. For example, you just lost the argument for the BRICS thing. Then you just ignore it, like the discussion never happened. Kinda like a jew.

So to recap:

1) XRP went from 'replacing Swift' to 'working with Swift' to [NOTHING]
2) XRP as a bridge currency is no longer needed because Swift is going live with CCIP so T+0 is coming. Banks will use their own chain. There will be thousands of chains. Interlinked.
3) No evidence nor need for banks or institutions using XRP as a bridge currency.
4) Banks may or may not pick XRP as a public L1 for tokenization, but there's no real reason to do so when they can pick ETH (most used, and cheap if using L2), AVAX (subnets, quite useful), or Hedera (cheapest, fastest).
5) Then you tried to FUD Swift to FUD LINK based on Iran + North Korea + Venezuela + Syria + Cuba. The argument is that some shithole/communist countries might (no evidence?) use XRP as if it were neutral (it's not). Just kek.
6) And then you went on the BRICS thing, again with zero evidence. Brazil is literally going with LINK. This year's Sibos was in China. A bunch of dictatorships will NOT use a public L1, they will make their own if anything.
7) Ripple's stablecoin is aditive! In theory you could say that but what's the value prop? There's already hundred of stablecoins and when CBDCs go live they will be used far more than any stablecoin because you just need to trust the CB (not the CB + the issuer of the stablecoin).

>>59265022
>You're living in la la land
Sadly, I think that's the case for these plp yes.

[Anonymous No.59265058]

>>59265050
>has that any fucking chain the connections to the institutes and governments as ripple does?
kek sure.
Certainly ETH, and arguably Avax and Hedera etc.

[Anonymous No.59265061]

>>59265039
That making a stable is easy from a technological perspective. To have the legal go/no go to actually issue one, go through the checklist, have x on balance , get audited, is something else, you should know, one of the requirements is proof of reserve. Your argument from a post ago is literally what i mean. Ripple holds these licenses.

[Anonymous No.59265064]

>>59265061
>To have the legal go/no go to actually issue one, go through the checklist, have x on balance , get audited, is something else
yeah, it truly is a grueling process that only a select elite has ever had the privilege to complete.

See https://coinmarketcap.com/view/stablecoin/

[Anonymous No.59265099]

>>59265051
Also, before leaving the thread, I just wanted to say that I hold no animosity towards you fren.
You hold XRP + LINK. I hold BTC + LINK.
It's fine, good vibes and all that.
Cya.

[Anonymous No.59265104]

>>59262469
I hold both, LINK as always is the better product, but XRP has normie money.
At least 50% of your folio has to be focused on dumping on normies, all price 0 tech.

[Anonymous No.59265107]

>>59265058
Eth is a non profit foundation that offered eth as a security in an ICO , gl with the cbdc kek.

>>59265051
Absolutely destroyed indeed. I salute you for your summary. time wil tell who was right.

1) wait for lawsuit to be over
2) assumption
3) i posted a list of banks using ripplenet, you just disregard the list
4) may or may not, no reason = your opinion, eth is a dumpster fire and the more layers the more vetting and due diligence, future is multichain like you said in 2. They are tokenizing MMF on xrpl and hbar
5) what i stated is factually true, you can not trust SWIFT to not be used as a weapon, see how you dodge the argument , not neutral is again, an opinion.
6) brazil link ok, rest is an opinion where you assume what dictatorships will do, try calling the IMF, BIS and NATO they will like your argumentation on what they will or wont do
7) What is the value prop of tether, USDC etc? when cbdcs go live this will be a result from stablecoin adoption first

[Anonymous No.59265117]

>>59265099
XRP XLM HBAR XDC VELO LINK ONDO FLR AXL QNT APT

[Anonymous No.59265144]

>>59265107
>gl with the cbdc
Wait, weren't we talking about stablecoins, not CBDCs?
You said Ripple's stablecoin was its biggest coming news.

Anyway, there are tons of nations that have been trialing CBDCs on Ethereum, including Australia, Singapore, Norway, ...
Probably most CBDC trials are happening on private chains. Institutions seem to love those.
And every single one will likely go live on multiple chains.

[Anonymous No.59265163]

>>59265107
Shit I had to go but you baited me witht that stupid comment.

Here we go:

1) Lawsuit cope. Swift will not be working with XRP. Stop lying to yourself.
2) It's not an assumption. Swift works with Chainlink. Out of their mouth, you jew.
3) No one in your provided list uses XRP in production. Keep coping.
4) ETH is the standard. Most widely used L1s. This is again, a fact, not an opinion.
5) You don't need to use Swift to use CCIP. CCIP is a low level protocol.
6) "rest is an opinion" same as yours because you did not provide any evidence.
7) I am not defending Tether/USDC. They are shit compared to a real CBDC and so will be Ripple's stablecoin.

[Anonymous No.59265167]

>>59262469
>Trusting Russians
Oh no no no

[Anonymous No.59265175]

>>59265144
end of lawsuit would be biggest, stablecoin is big, price wise ETFs and digital large cap funds, tokenization and smart contracts, exact timeline i dont know, much is coming.

[Anonymous No.59265184]

>>59265175
>end of lawsuit would be biggest
XRP didn't do much worse than most other coins during the lawsuit.
There's not really anything to warrant a pump if the lawsuit ends, because XRP's adoption status hasn't changed.

>much is coming
All cryptos say that.
It's only different when you have Swift itself for instance say "adoption of crypto X is coming".

[Anonymous No.59265191]

>>59265104
Based retard

[Anonymous No.59265205]

>>59265163
1) assumption, nobody really can rn, as pointed out that moneygram ended partnership due to lawsuit. you simply dont know what will happen after this is over.
2) yes link works with swift, the cross border part no longer needed is an assumption
3) If they are connected to ripplenet, they use it. i dont see why you jump through so many hoops.
4) its the standard for smart contracts and its getting mogged from all sides. l2s are needed to make using it bearable. POS would also require banks to take a stake in the network to negate bad actors
5) doesnt change the fact that access to swift can be used as a weapon,
6) we are both opinionated on geopolitical trends and the relation to the /biz aspect
7) you asked the value proposition of a stable, they all have the same proposition and its quite a big cake, is it bad a company goes where the money is?

[Anonymous No.59265225]

>>59265184
1. there is no real legal framework in the US with regards to digital assets , no lingo , after the lawsuit there will be laws and the much repeated 'legal clarity' the end of the lawsuit also means ripple can be used without fear of legal reprecussions. Yes xrp is not a security but the whole digital asset space is not properly regulated. Neither is their annything to warrant a pump after the announcement of gensler resigning, yet we pamp like never before.

[Anonymous No.59265237]

>>59265225
Right. It might clear things up for the entire industry.

There's still not going to be any adoption of XRP. Or even major prospects thereof.
And if there are, it'll be with XRPL being one of many chains involved, like has been happening to ETH in virtually every institutional trial.

[Anonymous No.59265241]

KKKKKKKK EVEN XRP IS PERFORMING BETTER THAN LINK KKKKKKKKKKK

[Anonymous No.59265252]

>>59265237
def check_number(previous, current):
if current > previous:
print("Good! The number has gone up.")
elif current < previous:
print("Panic! The number has gone down.")
else:
print("The number is unchanged.")

[Anonymous No.59265278]

>>59265205
1) If you argument is 'But anything can still happen!!!' I just don't know what to tell you. Any coin can say that. No evidence. Just fluff. Swift is going live with Chainlink Q4 2025. Out of their mouth.
2) XRP being needed as a bridge currency made sense as a narrative back in 2018 when there was nothing like CCIP. Now banks can just connect and transact from Chain A to Chain B in seconds, no bridge currency needed. And they won't need to replace their backends either (build using COBOL since the 60s BTW, would take decades to re-code; not happening!) because Swift is seamlessly bringing them CCIP access.
3) Because my original point was "No evidence nor need for banks or institutions using XRP as a bridge currency." and your provided list does not refute this fact whatsoever.
4) Just your opinion. The fact is ETH is the most widely used. And HBAR is the cheapest.
5) Using Swift as a weapon is irrelevant to the point because Swift is not needed to use CCIP. Swift needs CCIP. CCIP does not need Swift. What's so hard to understand?
6) Kek, only point I agree with.
7) Sorry, you misunderstood. I did not ask for the value prop of a stable in general. I asked for the value prop of stablecoins as a whole. CBDCs will eat their pie.

[Anonymous No.59265279]

If xrp had news as insane as Link, it would pump straight to $500 without stopping

[Anonymous No.59265283]

>>59265058
ETH is russian, avax is turkish roach coin and hedera is american all of them combined are light years behind xrp and its connections.

[Anonymous No.59265301]

>>59265283
>all of them combined are light years behind xrp and its connections
A lot of institutional initiatives mention Avax and Hedera as candidates.
A heck of a lot more than XRP.

[Anonymous No.59265323]

>two shitcoins that will never break their previous ATH’s, let alone recover their sats value
You only had to buy BTC, at any time in the past, present, or future to not end up being a retard defending your heavy bag of shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.59265326]

>>59265323
XRP already outperformed BTC in like a week lmao

[Anonymous No.59265333]

>>59265326
>not even a 3x from lows
>btc already at a 6x
Brown hands typed this post.

[Anonymous No.59265340]

>>59265333
The fuck you on about? I bought it around 30 cents so thats like already a 5x, IN ONE WEEK, what took bitcoin YEARS

[Anonymous No.59265348]

>>59265340
>>59265333

I rephrase: it wasnt 30cents a week ago, but the bottom of the bear it was 30 cents, now around $1.50 which is a 5x

but in a week oirsomething it did the 3x

so in a week it outperformed it what took BTC years


and in the last week

[Anonymous No.59265364]

Almost as if it had been artificially suppressed

[Anonymous No.59265366]

>>59265364
because of gary gensler

now hes gonna go

so now xrp is free

its gonna do a 100x or even 1000x in the next few years

BTC will not

[Anonymous No.59265382]

>>59265340
You’ve been holding since 2022, at least, and don’t understand time value of money, because you are brown. You will get dumped on and I’ll be here to laugh at you, like many shitcoiners before.

[Anonymous No.59265401]

>>59265278
1) hard to say you will work with an entity if you are legally not allowed to work with said entity due to a lawsuit. Q4 2025 is a lot of time for opportunity cost
2) from chain to chain. but does it untie capital from nostro vostro accounts?
3) ripplenet is moving funds from a to b cross border. There is a list of banks connected to ripplenet. If you claim a customer list is not proof of customers then i cant help you
4) counterparty risk requirements require banks to make sure the eth network is stable and no bad actors, this would require them to either run nodes or take a massive stake. this is not an opinion. its the result of their choice. hbar does not focus on the same clients as ripple, go post a suggestion on their website they pivot to payments and financial institutions
5) ripple can tap into the ccip then, its not exclusive?
6)
7) Stables are backed by something of value, cbdcs are backed by CDs ''trust me bro i know what im doing''. while stables are a representation of a basket of assets/gold/stocks/currencies and are pegged to it. cbdcs is more like programmable money with a time limit to spend, maximum amount etc. a cbdc can/will be used for control while a stable is backed by ''the market'' and not the trustworthyness of a CB. y

[Anonymous No.59265434]

>>59262469
You should know that the flippening is happening.

Just letting you know (Not advertising, jannies) that FLIPXRP on Solana seems like an interesting coin to throw some lunch money at. At the very least a 10x. Just sayin'

[Anonymous No.59265545]

>>59264852
You got absolutely rekt this entire thread KEK, and over half of your support comes from link holders fudding their bags.

You were given a gift and you still probably won’t sell. I’m telling you, you’re going to deeply regret it.

[Anonymous No.59265552]

>>59265401
1) There will be thousands of chains. Your world view of a single 'winning chain' (in this case XRP) is obsolete. Swift recognized this fact years ago, that's why they are going live with CCIP.
2) Nostro Vostro? Kek, not needed when using CCIP. Also, you did not respond to the COBOL thingie. Banks are not replacing their whole backends. They are integrating with CCIP via Swift.
3) Show me any notable financial institution using XRP in production. As already discussed ITT Moneygram was the only big one but the abandoned XRP. In case you don't know, Swift IS the banks, 11k of them, all coming to CCIP. Whatever tech Swift picks, becomes the standard.
4) As I already stated, "Banks may or may not pick XRP as a public L1 for tokenization", so yeah, good luck winning the L1 war. Your opinion is that your L1 is the best. Guess what? mETH heads think the same, and so do the AVAX plp, HBARbarians and so on. Reality is you don't know which L1 will win. And neither do I.
5) Yes, XRP will be just one of the many chains interlinked via CCIP. Glad to see you're starting to get it.
6) Schizo argument. You may not trust CBs but all banks do. They will use CBDCs.

[Anonymous No.59265605]

>>59265545
It's like these plp live in an alternate reality. Wild.
Swift is literally telling them that they are going with LINK and they still can't believe it.

[Anonymous No.59265606]

>>59265366
Hold till 5 dollars bro

[Anonymous No.59265619]

>>59265545
ty for caring for my financial welbeing, i think i will manage. The gift as we speak keeps on giving, i think i will hold on to it for another year or so.

>>59265552
1) yes many chains, point still stands, cant work with entities that are under SEC investigation
2) can you show me docs where they state nostro vostro is no longer needed and it frees up this capital? COBOL and the old infra costs a lot to maintain, dont know if they will or will not replace the backend. imagine having the chance to throw that all out.
3) moneygram was the smallest from the list but you remember the name. they work with xlm now.
4) not knowing is not an argument against.
5) so this means link is additive and all these banks will be able to transact and interact with whatever is build on the xrpl, so we are not competing, you linkies are enhancing and enabling the ledger to succeed. can you tell the fella above me his bags are actually helping me?
6) the reason all our bags will pump is because CBs are fundamentally not trustworthy hence the money supply since we went off the gold standard. of course they want cbdcs, they can shrink and expand the money supply at will and program your cash to disappear if not spent, its a techocratic commies wildest dream to control the plebs to the level of their day to day spending. schizo arguments is all i have. i hold xerps after all

[Anonymous No.59265644]

>>59265605
Not sure if you tapped into their generals but it has been a sight to see. They truly do live in an alternate clown reality, and they’re not considering leaving for an obvious winning ticket.

And thanks for dismantling the king fidget. He is the one doing most of the “spoon feeding” and manipulating noobs with wishful thinking touted as fact.

[Anonymous No.59265673]

>>59265644
XSG and link generals are extremely similar in their reasoning and cult-like properties.

King fidget, i like the name. I will wear it like a badge.

[Anonymous No.59265679]

>>59265673
>XSG and link generals are extremely similar in their reasoning and cult-like properties.
Absolutely not.
You xerpies can (and do) only dream of having crumbs about shit like Swift, Brazil, etc.
Meanwhile Chainlink has literal confirmation of these things.

[Anonymous No.59265735]

>>59265619
1) No, your point does not stand. Swift needs an interoperability protocol, not yet another L1 for settlement. That's not what banks are looking for. XRP does not even compete with LINK in this regard. Different chains are needed for different assets, jurisdictions, and so on. Watch the SIBOS presentations of 2023 and 2024, they're quite informative.
2) Nostro Vostro is not needed when using CCIP. No, I won't sponfeed you. I did this research a while ago and now you must do the same (if you aim to stay unbiased). "COBOL and the old infra costs a lot to maintain" Nope, quite the contrary, what costs a ton (and would take DECADES to replace) is changing it for new infra. If you had any actual experience working in a bank then you would understand that this is out of the question. This is why you need Swift for adoption. Banks will use CCIP via the good old Swift messaging system that they are used to.
3)
4) I am not arguing AGAINST Ripple in the L1 war! I said that they may very well be used. For me, I'd rather not bet in any particular L1. But I respect you if you wanna bet on XRP winning the L1 war (or a big chunk of it). Just know that you are agains ETH, all L2S, SOL, AVAX, HBAR, and bank's own chains. Personally, I'd rather bet on BTC + LINK as I see them as the only two inevitable things in crypto.
5) Correct. LINK does not compete with XRP. You may describe that as 'aditive' if you will. As I said, XRP will be just one of the many chains interlinked via CCIP.
6) No, anon, the reason 'bags' pump is because more people buy than sell. That's it. When CBDCs are out, banks will use them, rendering a lot of stablecoins obsolete. Also: "program your cash to disappear if not spent" You are talking about RETAIL CBDCs. I am talking about WHOLESALE CBDCs (the ones that banks will be using). They are not the same thing. I respect your schizo points on limited consumption but you need to do some research on the difference between retail vs wholesale CBDCs.

[Anonymous No.59265752]

>>59265644
No, I've never been to a XRP general kek.
It's like my mind automatically filters them out.

[Anonymous No.59265755]

King fidget retard, you’ve been btfo repeatedly. You made your bag look entirely worthless and delusional. And thanks for giving yourself away. I knew it was you popping into other threads with your doggerel kek

[Anonymous No.59265888]

>>59263349
>YOUR CEO LITERALLY HOLDS OVER 50% OF SUPPLY
thats not what (de)centralized refers to in this context
please go shop for a new brain or ask your supervisor for an updated script

[Anonymous No.59265927]

>>59265755
BTW I am not against XRP per se.
I'm just against the notion that XRP L1 somehow competes with LINK.
Nope, it competes agains every other L1.
All will be interlinked.

[Anonymous No.59265949]

>>59265927
you're right about only 1 thing: link is no competitor.
and it's artificial prop up is coming to an end

[Anonymous No.59265971]

XRP is eating Link's lunch

[Anonymous No.59265986]

>>59265927
I’ve tried explaining that to them but it’s all met with smug contempt. Their delusional price targets depend on their chain being exclusively adopted, which is laughably false. Anyway, great input and a fun thread. King fidget needed a kick in the nuts and you delivered.

[Anonymous No.59265994]

>>59265927
>he doesn't know XRPL has its own oracles

[Anonymous No.59266001]

it's ashame that the linkcels copium, which they do have in copious amounts, doesn't translate into price action
real shame

[Anonymous No.59266004]

>>59265994
It's over for LINK.
Ce fini.

[Anonymous No.59266026]

>>59262469

I took a break for five years and I can't comprehend how the shitcoin known as XRP has held out this long. Their team is incompetent and have shown no growth for the coin for five fuck years.

How have none of you retards realized it was a rug that was pulled five years ago when they were on top briefly.

I'm shocked they haven't been delisted yet.

[Anonymous No.59266057]

>>59263349

>Ceo has a massive stake in a project they are apart of
>This is somehow a bad thing

Room temperature IQ.

[Anonymous No.59266061]

>>59266026
Massive twitter engagement. They know they lost, if you watched swell this year you’d see how desperate they’ve become, even putting out an xrp documentary. It’s memecoin hypenomics. Good for any holders who bet on price action following the election, it was a risky gamble. Now they can sell and actually buy something worthwhile and not a meme.

[Anonymous No.59266064]

>>59265619
>the reason all our bags will pump is because CBs are fundamentally not trustworthy hence the money supply since we went off the gold standard
BTW I also found this point quite interesting and I agree to an extend, though you should also consider that equities have been 'pumping' so to speak for literal centuries (see picrel for the history of the stock market).
This cannot just be explained due to the presence/absence of the gold standard.
Personally, I believe that stocks mainly go up based on two components: risk free rate + risk premium.
Ponder on the popular notion that stocks go up more than bonds (in the long term). This is not necessarily true. There are some studies suggesting that before the FED came to existe, bonds were going up more or less the same as stocks (reflecting higher default risk).

[Anonymous No.59266283]

>>59266026
>I can't comprehend how the shitcoin known as XRP has held out this long
Just read the thread.
These people are not human.

[Anonymous No.59266838]

>dietXRP is flipping Link
Linksisters, our response?

[Anonymous No.59266884]

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

XLM JUST FLIPPED CHAINLINK

HAHAHHA

[Anonymous No.59266921]

My LINK position just got back to even after holding it for over a year. I feel like I need to swap it out into anything else.

[Anonymous No.59266996]

>The link team is having a meltdown in their telegram

[Anonymous No.59267048]

>>59266996
link plz

[Anonymous No.59267348]

>>59265735
Phoneposting while on shitter
Ill check the nostro vostro you got my interest. Cobol is more expensive to find people who know how to code in it no? Its an old language.

I bet on multiple chains as i gave you my list of bags. The common denominator is that the theory is that some chains are "chosen" or developed with a specific function in mind in the future system. They all have the same glowies working and starting these projects.

On cbdcs im convinced they will have a slightly different usecase as cbdcs and because of that they are not direct competition. The wholesale retail take in schizo terms is xml is retail and xrp wholesale.

[Anonymous No.59267375]

>>59265755
I forgot what name i gave you last time. You always go ad hominem and twist the words. Verbally shitting in my skull cavity

[Anonymous No.59267422]

>>59266064
Its inflation 101
Increasing supply means hold annything but fiat. When recession cycles near sell and buy lower or buy physical metals. Problem is that they dilute the pm market with their paper versions. Print cycle = QE = risk assets pump short fiat
QT = dump in time buy back
Bonds are backed by governments and thus backed by taxpayers. This perversion of too big to fail Banks and governments has made it a semi haven for when the qt cycle starts. But thats literal retard take, as i am retarded.

[chainlink summer of dreams No.59267473]

>>59264418
yeah, ripple minted like 15 billion XRP tokens back in 2017 which send their price back to $0.17

[Anonymous No.59267486]

>>59267473
XRP cant be minted it has a fixed supply

[Anonymous No.59267688]

>mint XRP
kek
XRP fudders have no clue about XRP
its genuinely funny

[Anonymous No.59267852]

>>59267688
>>59267486
Didn’t they like mint a billion tokens a few months ago?

[Anonymous No.59267881]

>>59267852
That’s right anon. They literally print 1 billion tokens every month.

[Anonymous No.59267884]

>>59267852

[Anonymous No.59267890]

I'm solded my link, but am not xrp señor

[Anonymous No.59267899]

>>59267852
>mint XRP
lol
lmao

[Anonymous No.59268303]

>>59267852
>>59267881
Kek, you need a raise with that amazing fud.

[Anonymous No.59269148]

>>59265679
wow all those confirmations mustve done a lot for the price lemme check
LMFAO

[Anonymous No.59269260]

I'm an unironic Chainlink maximalist who hasn't really looked into any other crypto projects.
Genuine question, what does XRP actually... Do?

As an outsider it looks like a pretty simple smart contract using the token as an intermediary exchange currency. But I don't understand how that actually solves the problem, which usually comes from liquidity at the destination. I also don't see what it does uniquely now that CCIP exists. Can someone give me a QRD on why it's still seen as such a big deal?

[Anonymous No.59269386]

>>59269260

It is literally a better wheel.

[Anonymous No.59269458]

I remember when Cripples and Stinkies were rooting for eachother in good faith. At some point the tone became zero-sum even though both projects should supplement eachothers' functionalities.

[Anonymous No.59269467]

>>59269260
>give me a QRD
no

[Anonymous No.59269477]

>>59269458
>both projects should supplement eachothers' functionalities.
not anymore
XRPL has oracles now
token not needed? no, chainlink labs not needed

[Anonymous No.59269480]

>>59269148
Each 20c increase in the price nets me a bit over $6000.

[Anonymous No.59269487]

>>59269477
I know, and as an XRP maxi I stand to benefit heavily from it, but I miss the camaraderie.