CHAINLINK

[Anonymous No.59107357]

It's over for Canton Network.

[Anonymous No.59107361]

>>59107357
now you understand why vitalik hates us
will be rich yes but at a cost
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chainlink-announces-ccip-private-transactions-enabling-financial-institutions-to-compliantly-connect-private-chains-to-the-multi-chain-economy-302282445.html

[Anonymous No.59107363]

>>59107357
One of the primary attacks they've been using against CCIP is the lack of privacy. What are they going to say now? Nothing. It's over.

[Anonymous No.59107365]

[Anonymous No.59107367]

>>59107361
>oracles are not worth 32 quadrillion dollars chud
oh no no no

[Anonymous No.59107368]

they forgot to include the token holder, doing nothing yet making a profit somehow, because arrows point at him. the new hires need to internalize how the company earns their money, by selling tokens

[Anonymous No.59107376]

>>59107367
>>59107368
you can just imagine them making private transactions free while only interaction with public blockchains draws a fee
however, the team do get part of their token in link... but maybe they just convert that to equity in cll or something

[Anonymous No.59107378]

>>59107376
part of their salary in LINK*

[Anonymous No.59107382]

>>59107357
I don’t understand. Canton network is just a blockchain. Chainlink is not a blockchain.

[Anonymous No.59107397]

>>59107382
Canton is a 'network of networks' which consists of many distributed ledgers. They are one of Chainlink's main competitors in the TradFi interoperability space.

[Anonymous No.59107399]

p-r-i-c-e

[Anonymous No.59107401]

>>59107357
great news.. but that doesn't change the $35 top this cycle

[Anonymous No.59107403]

>>59107401
THERE IS NO TOP

[Anonymous No.59107407]

>>59107403
there is no bottom, chud

[Anonymous No.59107464]

>>59107407

[Anonymous No.59107730]

>In addition to the Blockchain Privacy Manager and CCIP Private Transactions, the Chainlink Platform also offers an advanced privacy-preserving data verification system in the form of DECO, which uses zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) and existing web infrastructure to enable financial institutions, enterprises, and web3 developers to verify sensitive information without exposing the underlying data.

>In the very near future, we plan to make the DECO Sandbox publicly accessible, offering pre-configured use cases that showcase DECO’s privacy-preserving capabilities such as identity verification, proof of funds verification, and sanctions screenings verifications, while maintaining the privacy of sensitive data.

>The DECO technology is unique in that it requires no modifications at the data source and can be easily integrated into existing workflows and legacy tech stacks. DECO supports multiple methods of generating attestations about offchain data that can be consumed both onchain and offchain in a privacy-preserving manner. We look forward to sharing more information with the launch of the DECO Sandbox.

[Anonymous No.59107747]

>>59107730
Holy fuck. Imagine verifying that you hold more than 10k link then you can discuss in a quality link thread. Imagine seeing link fud in that thread it would be so funny because the fud is no longer valid with +10k link ahahaahhahahahaha

[Anonymous No.59107809]

>>59107747
In the near future there will be an image board entirely for people that have $500k+ net worth with triple digit IQ. The internet is saved.

[Anonymous No.59107847]

>>59107730
what the FUCK
I thought DECO will be years away and suddenly they drop this
holy shit this year will be face melting

[Anonymous No.59107893]

>>59107847
they showed a live demo last year IIRC, and the patent got approved in the spring of this year

[Anonymous No.59107963]

>>59107747
Hey newfag, this was made back in the day. A few /biz/ anons made their own private board and you needed a certain amount of link to post, I wasn't in there though.

In any case, I will still be fudding with 10k LINK because fuck Sergey that fat cunt.

[Anonymous No.59107994]

Okay but what does this mean for me, a retard that doesn't understand any of this and has a 2k stack? Will I make it? Maybe even this year?

[Anonymous No.59108006]

>>59107994
You will never make it holding 2k link and don't let any of these faggots gaslight you into thinking otherwise.

[Anonymous No.59108009]

>>59108006
>2k x 81k =
thats a lot of fucken money anon he'll make it

[Anonymous No.59108014]

>>59107361
>will be rich yes but at a cost

You're implying the value will trickle down to the token. You should know better now

[Anonymous No.59108072]

>>59108006
How much LINK then, anon? I have the lofty dream of $7M to make it forever; how much do I need for that?

[Anonymous No.59108241]

>>59107809
This is an amazing idea.
>use crypto to get rich
>use crypto to anonymously prove you are rich enough to meet minimum board requirements
>no more brown hands typing, stinking the place up

[Anonymous No.59108378]

>>59107407
You're the bottom.

[Anonymous No.59108591]

Securitize is leaving money on the table since they won't get to transact with private blockchains unless they connect to Chainlink.

>>59107847

They were demoing it back in 2022. Probably wanted to hold off to wait on the Financial institutions to be ready for it but it was never
*that* far away.

[Anonymous No.59108596]

>>59108072
2K link is more than enough. You have a cut out of the new financial system. Flipping the BTC network is EZ PZ.

[Anonymous No.59108932]

>>59107403
why do they keep re-casting the actor known as steve?

[Anonymous No.59108948]

>>59107847
Public DECO sandbox coming very soon. If it works as promised then it's going to be huge. And it's patented.

[Anonymous No.59108971]

>>59107399
n-i-g-g-e-r

[Anonymous No.59108974]

>>59108006
"making it" means not having to be a wage-slave. 2k link is more than twice enough

[Anonymous No.59108980]

>>59108596
Will it truly reach 100k?

[Anonymous No.59109120]

>>59108948
This isn’t fair its blackmail!

[Anonymous No.59109159]

Is this bullish or bearish for my ROSE bags?
t. prolapsed anus chud

[Anonymous No.59109164]

>>59108980
without a doubt