Holding is a lot more comfy at this price than when it was $6 last year

[Anonymous No.58610219]

It's also nice earning $30 bucks a day from staking. I hope they let us increase our stakes to 30k per wallet with the next version. Has there been any word from the team regarding that?

[Anonymous No.58610227]

Last quarterly update they said their next priority was the claims portal for stakers, so that will probably come with a new iteration of staking and maybe a pool expansion, but they haven't been explicit about that.

[Anonymous No.58610284]

Also this:
>https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x028ad05309ecfd82df5a927fcd33b92dc5799b695724913ac2df50e33b94d05c

[Anonymous No.58610364]

>>58610227
>>58610284
>optimism to arbitroon
seems like a pretty big deal cuz don't those L2s individually take days to reach finality with eth? CCIP will enable Defi 2.0 and cryptofags don't even realize it, and sergey doesn't really care because he is focused on getting TradFi shit into production.

[Anonymous No.58610396]

>>58610284
errr... wait, just noticed the name of the token they transferred... heyoo

[Anonymous No.58610728]

>>58610396
1 Amazon token pls sir.

[Anonymous No.58612010]

When can I stake my linkies? It says it’s full now

[Anonymous No.58612201]

Who can decipher it?:

Settlement_AssetTransferToContract,TRANSFER__CS:0-TRF-4201-1,Amazon,GBP,0x34a2b65DBC02eb7a06e95f60637C565b8e8043E4,0xc163b2cb38B28ad7B6ef330A208C8B785497A350,0xf2aeac5ed1f9bb310e29f44c219dd14ae184f16e,1,0xE38e4BA7A0c6B16c9b06EA6a2c1aF7ca8acaE85c,5224473277236331295,0xE4aB69C077896252FAFBD49EFD26B5D171A32410,0xb1D4538B4571d411F07960EF2838Ce337FE1E80E

[Anonymous No.58612233]

>>58610219
Will it still be comfy when link is at $9 in a couple of weeks?

[Anonymous No.58612245]

>>58612201

[Anonymous No.58612401]

>>58612245
I think the TRF-NNNN is just a reference id and not a type code.

Settlement_AssetTransferToContract,TRANSFER__CS:0-TRF-4372-1,SMSN-5.500-31.10.2026,GBP,0x34a2b65DBC02eb7a06e95f60637C565b8e8043E4,0xc163b2cb38B28ad7B6ef330A208C8B785497A350,0xf2aeac5ed1f9bb310e29f44c219dd14ae184f16e,6,0xE38e4BA7A0c6B16c9b06EA6a2c1aF7ca8acaE85c,5224473277236331295,0xE4aB69C077896252FAFBD49EFD26B5D171A32410,0xb1D4538B4571d411F07960EF2838Ce337FE1E80E

[Anonymous No.58612436]

Reminder there is only ~60 million link left to "dump" (in reality most are probably being moved OTC to enterprise but we can only speculate), after that shit gets real. Game theory always dictated the smartest move for big boy long term players was to dump/suppress the price until either full supply was circulating, or staking 1.0 arrived. One of those is happening within the next year. At that point its no longer beneficial to dump/suppress as you can no longer get new linkies into circulation.

[Anonymous No.58612456]

Based LPL chuddie kiddos how you doing kiddos chuddie "based" pools fucking closed anon

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDOS PILLED

SEETHE

[Anonymous No.58612557]

It's literally lower now than what it was during the crab range in sats. You are losing money and you newfags don't even know it. This is the fate of all shitcoiners

[Anonymous No.58612564]

>>58612436
Lying advokike they have 350m more to dump they even admitted they will dump the rest

[Anonymous No.58612575]

>>58610219
It will be 33k per wallet

[Anonymous No.58612587]

>>58612436
How do you arrive at the 60m number?

[Anonymous No.58612627]

>>58612564
That 350 is gonna be for enterprise clients

[Anonymous No.58612630]

>>58612436
>Copium for 7 years

[Anonymous No.58612635]

>>58612627
>Source: My asshole

[Anonymous No.58612655]

>>58612635

[Anonymous No.58612671]

>>58612635
>>58612587
>>58612564
you're either newfags or butthurt oldfags, it makes no difference to me

[Anonymous No.58612786]

>>58612671
Anon we fucking told you buy LPL stay based and chuddie kiddo pilled

Pools fucking closed

LPL HUH

SEETHE

[Anonymous No.58612796]

>>58612671

you're a fucking retard.
You do know most of the tokens dumped so far or at least half have bee for node operators?
they have way more than 60 million tokens of their development portion left to dump. fuck me you cunts are so fucking retarded i cant even believe what i read here anymore

[Anonymous No.58612805]

>>58612796
kek
prove it, its all on chain.

[Anonymous No.58612867]

>>58612805
Nigger you are the one that said "60M" tokens are left. YOU have to prove it.

Get on with it shill. We all know the dumps for years were to pay the extreme gas costs for node operators and keep them in the green.

[Anonymous No.58612893]

>>58612867
>we
if you can prove the 350 was touched I'll post sharpie in pooper

[Anonymous No.58613110]

>>58612867
>>58612893
We fucking told you already anon buy LPL stay based and fucking chuddie kiddos pilled

LPL HUH

LPL

"BASED"

SEETHE

[Anonymous No.58613714]

>>58610219
I kinda want it to go back to $6 so I can buy a bunch more.

[Anonymous No.58613730]

>>58612786
lol, this spastic comes into every thread crying about not getting staked.
Boohoo.

[Anonymous No.58613772]

>>58612805
>prove it

[Anonymous No.58613786]

https://x.com/0xGachoCCIP/status/1800488541824409604

[Anonymous No.58614024]

>dumps 10%, completed retraced that limp consensus pump already despite going all in with swift and dtcc connections, literally none of it mattered priced in
>advocado: so comfy goys

[Anonymous No.58615186]

>>58612627
>350m for "incentivizing node operators"
AKA subsidizing all of defi at a loss by giving nodes free link which they dump on the market.
Pic related btw

[Anonymous No.58615207]

>>58615186
Satoshi is still subsidizing Bitcoin mining at a rate of 90% to this day.

[Anonymous No.58615227]

>>58615207
Bitcoin has perfect game theory and amazing tokenomics. Chainlink is a blazing dumpster fire ran by incompetent midwits

[Anonymous No.58615245]

>>58615227
>Bitcoin has perfect game theory
kek yeah, see pic

>amazing tokenomics
90% subsidization after 15 years is "amazing tokenomics"?

[Anonymous No.58615611]

>>58615245
>needed token vs unneeded token
Apples to oranges. Bitcoin is perfect, scarce digital gold 2.0
Chainlink is a useless crowd fund token. No one on this board has ever spent a single chainlink token for any services

[Anonymous No.58615729]

I've not been able to stake as well, those links are sitting tight in MetaMask, this dip ain't fazing me.
Staking can wait, my coins are safe and sound. plus, Push Protocol is my homie, always on guard with notifications if some gremlins try to snatch my assets.

[Anonymous No.58615743]

>The year is 2028

>BTC has slowly climbed back to the prior cycle high of $110,000

>Chainlink has recently bounced from $5 to $19.75

>Chainlink cult member: Dude stop fudding...we are up vs btc in the last "x" month timeframe!!!

[Anonymous No.58615839]

>>58612010
I've not been able to stake as well, sitting tight in my MetaMask wallet, this dip ain't fazing me. staking can wait, my coins are safe and sound. plus Push Protocol is my homie, always on guard with notifications if some gremlins try to snatch my assets

[Anonymous No.58615900]

>58615839
the fact you still get low effort jeet bot posts in link threads and not other shitcoin shill threads tells you even they know this is where the only organic money on this board exists.

[Anonymous No.58615980]

>>58615900
good point.

[Anonymous No.58616032]

>>58615611
>>needed token
Yeah, it's so needed that miners still need to be 90% subsidized to keep the network going lmao

[Anonymous No.58616670]

>>58616032
Everyone wants bitcoin, nobody wants chainlink hence the vast price discrepancy and performance

[Anonymous No.58617189]

>>58616670
>Everyone wants bitcoin
This has nothing to do with token needfulness.

[Anonymous No.58617630]

>fuddies out in force
i think another link pump is brewing.

[Anonymous No.58617643]

>>58613786
Biggest news on /biz/ and potentially the entire financial industry right now and barely anyone batted an eye to this.

[Anonymous No.58617654]

>>58617643
I’ll care once we break a new ath

[Anonymous No.58617663]

>>58617643
Yea it's truly insane. I did not think it would happen this fast.

[Anonymous No.58618025]

>>58617643
explain this to me like i'm retarded

[Anonymous No.58620312]

>>58618025
It appears to show tokenised shares being traded via CCIP, could be related to the new Texas stock exchange being proposed which will likely be a new model stock market.

I think that things are happening behind the scenes of the global financial system that the establishment doesn't want to be made public for obvious reasons.

[Anonymous No.58620716]

>>58618025
you and your cult members donated $3B in the last seven years to a group of scammers working on a "project". In the meantime they have run an experiment and hired 650 people, all funded by you.

[Anonymous No.58620820]

>>58617630
it's hilarious and a little sad because the most persistent fuddies used to hold themselves but grew impatient and sold. Just like JBP said, like the swing linkers, they grew bitter with resentment

[Anonymous No.58620900]

>>58620312
>>58618025
>>58617643
No guarantee that this is institutional, could just be a single dev experimenting
True if big however

[Anonymous No.58620901]

https://chain.link/circulating-supply
587,099,970.45 LINK
Subtracting the 350M that were sold in the beginning that leaves
237,099,970.45 that have been distributed out of the combined 650M (node operator/dev wallets)

412,900,029.55 tokens left in the chamber.

I'm not autistic enough to track wallets and get the distribution % to see how many are left in each pool but there are roughly ~41% left to "utilize"

[Anonymous No.58620943]

>>58620716
It makes you really angry that no-one on biz will sell, doesn't it? How long have you been trying?

[Anonymous No.58621061]

>58620901
sorry not gonna give a (you) but if 350 million of that are earmarked for node operator incentives, that leaves only 62 million more for dumps. the 350 for node operators can also end up on the open market but that's distinctly different from dilution by the team.

[Anonymous No.58621095]

>>58621061
Anon, Sergey's been paying nodes for five years now.

[Anonymous No.58621225]

>>58621061
idk why you assume basic math is fud but >>58621095
is correct

[Anonymous No.58621276]

>>58621061
so wait you thought staking rewards were coming out of the dev wallet??

[Anonymous No.58621835]

>intentionally misses the point
nice samefagging BTW. Sorry, once again I am not going to give you your (you).

[Anonymous No.58621941]

>>58621835
imagine posting this unironically
i m a g i n e

[Anonymous No.58622253]

>>58620943
I stated an objective fact. You not being able to accept it is not my issue. Maybe take it up with your local cult manager?

[Anonymous No.58622260]

staking "rewards" should be renamed "refunds". They're just sending you back 4% of your prior donations

[Anonymous No.58623033]

>>58610219
Do you think $6 was capitulation and depression? I mean, it could have gone much lower. If you think about it $6 isn't even painful. LINK could easily reach 60 cents again and I think that would be a real capitulation. With depression around 42 cents.

[Anonymous No.58623076]

>>58622260
Lol, it's just implying you're getting something extra for your participation, like an incentive.
and to be honest, I like what Nuklai is doing, it's rewarding with Dua token, at least I'm getting something back for locking something up,

[Anonymous No.58624162]

>>58621276
They are you fool.

[Anonymous No.58624319]

>>58612671
>inb4 once the Continued Development fund runs out, Sergey will announce that the Node Ops fund will start to be dumped on the market to stockpile cash to pay node ops for future jobs so that they stay incentivized and not have to worry about the price of LINK.
>here's your cryptoeconomic security bro

[Anonymous No.58624513]

>>58624162
false

[Anonymous No.58624823]

>>58624162
note how they leave one note replies and refuse to post/bump this thread, and instead spam the board with 10+ low effort fud threads today baiting newfags to respond
its kinda funny, kinda sad

[Anonymous No.58624875]

>>58610219
kek the things link baggies say to display confidence

[Anonymous No.58624901]

>>58624823
They do make new threads when they get BTFO and if you keep bumping the thread that they got btfo in then they start going absolutely rabid and spamming nonsense. There was one a couple years ago that would just say paragraphs in the shape of swastikas that said Nigger lmao

[Anonymous No.58624990]

Anyone think the 3g networks being shut down is connected to all this? It's quite a big infrastructure shift for seemingly little reason. But when you scratch deeper you realise the new payment systems etc could all literally switch to blockchain based overnight and no one would even notice.