[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 88 KB, 1280x633, 5E46FB85-A996-4EB0-A7BE-A352B9BC9042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58557788 No.58557788 [Reply] [Original]

Link will be $200 this bullrun. You have my word.

>> No.58557793

As if this bullrun hasn't already peaked

>> No.58557796

>yet another chaimlink thread that never gets nuked
>new shitcoin alpha threads instantly janny'd

>> No.58557810

>>58557788
checked, due to inflation I won't sell a single one below $300 unfortunately

>> No.58557834

>>58557788
I have three link, that means I got $72

>> No.58557883
File: 40 KB, 736x823, 1505081943079.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58557883

my hatred for link is palpable

>> No.58557893

>>58557788
checked
also links price should not be influenced by bullruns anymore after the singularity has been activated
we will grow even in 2026,2027 and 2028

>> No.58557937

what "bullrun"

>> No.58557943

>>58557788
Add $800 and multiply it by 81. That's the top.

>> No.58557973

>>58557943
I see this happen often. Where does it actually come from? I will be very happy because I have the link but why exactly 81k?

>> No.58558082

>>58557973
At the first SmartCon after party, Sergey got really drunk and started bellowing "MY CHAIN FUCK TOKEN IS GOING TO HIT EIGHTY ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT AND THAT IS A GODDAMN GUARANTEE"

>> No.58558094

>>58558082
First post in months, you guys are so unoriginal and gay now, this place has definitely been overran by Indians.

>> No.58558099
File: 480 KB, 245x230, 1708785343194699.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58558099

>>58558082

I smiled but because it looks like you're the one who's drunk.

>> No.58558104

>>58557973
A few years back there was a "from the future" larper (i dont remember if it was 42 or not) who posted a screenshot of the supposed LINK price several years in the future (dont remember what year, or if it even showed it). It showed the price right around $81k.

>> No.58558117
File: 100 KB, 500x501, 1708120925935865.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58558117

>>58558104
Is that just it? I thought it was based on clever calculations. Good... thank you.

>> No.58558150

>>58557796
/thread